Prove, that graph $G$ has at least $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ edges.











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Can anybody give me any hints about how to prove that for any graph $G$ the number of edges in it is at least $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$? $chi(G)$ is the minimal number of colors we need to use to color the graph (it's chromatic index in other words).



I tried induction but I'm stuck at an induction step.



I do the induction on the number of edges.



When $|E(G)|=0$ then obviously we can color the graph using only one color, so the theorem holds.



Now induction step from $n Rightarrow n+1$ edges.



Let's erase any edge $e={v,u}$ from $G$. Then $chi(G-e)$ is either the same, or $chi(G-e)<chi(G)$, because we relaxed the graph an $v$ and $u$ no longer need to have different colors. From the first case the thesis is clear, because $G-e$ has more then $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ edges so with the one we erased it's still more. But from the second case we only know that $G geq chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2$ and $chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2 leq chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ so that gives me nothing...










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Can anybody give me any hints about how to prove that for any graph $G$ the number of edges in it is at least $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$? $chi(G)$ is the minimal number of colors we need to use to color the graph (it's chromatic index in other words).



    I tried induction but I'm stuck at an induction step.



    I do the induction on the number of edges.



    When $|E(G)|=0$ then obviously we can color the graph using only one color, so the theorem holds.



    Now induction step from $n Rightarrow n+1$ edges.



    Let's erase any edge $e={v,u}$ from $G$. Then $chi(G-e)$ is either the same, or $chi(G-e)<chi(G)$, because we relaxed the graph an $v$ and $u$ no longer need to have different colors. From the first case the thesis is clear, because $G-e$ has more then $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ edges so with the one we erased it's still more. But from the second case we only know that $G geq chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2$ and $chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2 leq chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ so that gives me nothing...










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Can anybody give me any hints about how to prove that for any graph $G$ the number of edges in it is at least $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$? $chi(G)$ is the minimal number of colors we need to use to color the graph (it's chromatic index in other words).



      I tried induction but I'm stuck at an induction step.



      I do the induction on the number of edges.



      When $|E(G)|=0$ then obviously we can color the graph using only one color, so the theorem holds.



      Now induction step from $n Rightarrow n+1$ edges.



      Let's erase any edge $e={v,u}$ from $G$. Then $chi(G-e)$ is either the same, or $chi(G-e)<chi(G)$, because we relaxed the graph an $v$ and $u$ no longer need to have different colors. From the first case the thesis is clear, because $G-e$ has more then $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ edges so with the one we erased it's still more. But from the second case we only know that $G geq chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2$ and $chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2 leq chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ so that gives me nothing...










      share|cite|improve this question













      Can anybody give me any hints about how to prove that for any graph $G$ the number of edges in it is at least $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$? $chi(G)$ is the minimal number of colors we need to use to color the graph (it's chromatic index in other words).



      I tried induction but I'm stuck at an induction step.



      I do the induction on the number of edges.



      When $|E(G)|=0$ then obviously we can color the graph using only one color, so the theorem holds.



      Now induction step from $n Rightarrow n+1$ edges.



      Let's erase any edge $e={v,u}$ from $G$. Then $chi(G-e)$ is either the same, or $chi(G-e)<chi(G)$, because we relaxed the graph an $v$ and $u$ no longer need to have different colors. From the first case the thesis is clear, because $G-e$ has more then $chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ edges so with the one we erased it's still more. But from the second case we only know that $G geq chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2$ and $chi'(G)(chi'(G)-1)/2 leq chi(G)(chi(G)-1)/2$ so that gives me nothing...







      graph-theory coloring






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 20 '14 at 19:22









      Arek Krawczyk

      1,10811020




      1,10811020






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          Given a coloring of $G$ with $chi(G)$ colors, there must be an edge between every two color classes, because otherwise we could color them the same color.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you :) Incredibly simple and sweet answer :) Looks like my long inductive proof was not a wise choice :P
            – Arek Krawczyk
            Jan 20 '14 at 19:49













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f645339%2fprove-that-graph-g-has-at-least-chig-chig-1-2-edges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          Given a coloring of $G$ with $chi(G)$ colors, there must be an edge between every two color classes, because otherwise we could color them the same color.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you :) Incredibly simple and sweet answer :) Looks like my long inductive proof was not a wise choice :P
            – Arek Krawczyk
            Jan 20 '14 at 19:49

















          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          Given a coloring of $G$ with $chi(G)$ colors, there must be an edge between every two color classes, because otherwise we could color them the same color.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you :) Incredibly simple and sweet answer :) Looks like my long inductive proof was not a wise choice :P
            – Arek Krawczyk
            Jan 20 '14 at 19:49















          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted






          Given a coloring of $G$ with $chi(G)$ colors, there must be an edge between every two color classes, because otherwise we could color them the same color.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Given a coloring of $G$ with $chi(G)$ colors, there must be an edge between every two color classes, because otherwise we could color them the same color.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 20 '14 at 19:33

























          answered Jan 20 '14 at 19:31









          Zur Luria

          1,115510




          1,115510












          • Thank you :) Incredibly simple and sweet answer :) Looks like my long inductive proof was not a wise choice :P
            – Arek Krawczyk
            Jan 20 '14 at 19:49




















          • Thank you :) Incredibly simple and sweet answer :) Looks like my long inductive proof was not a wise choice :P
            – Arek Krawczyk
            Jan 20 '14 at 19:49


















          Thank you :) Incredibly simple and sweet answer :) Looks like my long inductive proof was not a wise choice :P
          – Arek Krawczyk
          Jan 20 '14 at 19:49






          Thank you :) Incredibly simple and sweet answer :) Looks like my long inductive proof was not a wise choice :P
          – Arek Krawczyk
          Jan 20 '14 at 19:49




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f645339%2fprove-that-graph-g-has-at-least-chig-chig-1-2-edges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna