Graded and Filtered Algebras
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is right out of Kassel's Quantum Groups book which I am self-studying. It is on page 14.
The general set-up is this. Let $A$ be a filtered algebra with filtration $F_0(A) subset F_1(A) subset cdots subset A$, and suppose that $I$ is a two-sided ideal of $A$. The quotient algebra is then filtered with filtration $F_i(A/I) = F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I$. We know that for a filtered algebra, $A$, there exists an associated graded algebra, called $mathrm{gr}(A) = oplus S_i$ where $S_i = F_i(A)/F_{i-1}(A)$.
Define $M(2)$ as the polynomial algebra $k[a,b,c,d]$ and define $SL(2) = M(2)/(ad - bc -1)$.
His first claim is that $mathrm{gr}(A/I) = oplus_{i in mathbb{N}} F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I)$. Following this, he claims that $mathrm{gr}(SL(2)) cong k[a,b,c,d]/(ad-bc)$ (note that the ideal $(ad-bc-1)$ is not generated by homogeneous elements so that $SL(2)$ is not graded).
I am unsure how one gets to these results, and any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated!
abstract-algebra graded-rings quantum-groups filtrations
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is right out of Kassel's Quantum Groups book which I am self-studying. It is on page 14.
The general set-up is this. Let $A$ be a filtered algebra with filtration $F_0(A) subset F_1(A) subset cdots subset A$, and suppose that $I$ is a two-sided ideal of $A$. The quotient algebra is then filtered with filtration $F_i(A/I) = F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I$. We know that for a filtered algebra, $A$, there exists an associated graded algebra, called $mathrm{gr}(A) = oplus S_i$ where $S_i = F_i(A)/F_{i-1}(A)$.
Define $M(2)$ as the polynomial algebra $k[a,b,c,d]$ and define $SL(2) = M(2)/(ad - bc -1)$.
His first claim is that $mathrm{gr}(A/I) = oplus_{i in mathbb{N}} F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I)$. Following this, he claims that $mathrm{gr}(SL(2)) cong k[a,b,c,d]/(ad-bc)$ (note that the ideal $(ad-bc-1)$ is not generated by homogeneous elements so that $SL(2)$ is not graded).
I am unsure how one gets to these results, and any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated!
abstract-algebra graded-rings quantum-groups filtrations
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is right out of Kassel's Quantum Groups book which I am self-studying. It is on page 14.
The general set-up is this. Let $A$ be a filtered algebra with filtration $F_0(A) subset F_1(A) subset cdots subset A$, and suppose that $I$ is a two-sided ideal of $A$. The quotient algebra is then filtered with filtration $F_i(A/I) = F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I$. We know that for a filtered algebra, $A$, there exists an associated graded algebra, called $mathrm{gr}(A) = oplus S_i$ where $S_i = F_i(A)/F_{i-1}(A)$.
Define $M(2)$ as the polynomial algebra $k[a,b,c,d]$ and define $SL(2) = M(2)/(ad - bc -1)$.
His first claim is that $mathrm{gr}(A/I) = oplus_{i in mathbb{N}} F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I)$. Following this, he claims that $mathrm{gr}(SL(2)) cong k[a,b,c,d]/(ad-bc)$ (note that the ideal $(ad-bc-1)$ is not generated by homogeneous elements so that $SL(2)$ is not graded).
I am unsure how one gets to these results, and any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated!
abstract-algebra graded-rings quantum-groups filtrations
This is right out of Kassel's Quantum Groups book which I am self-studying. It is on page 14.
The general set-up is this. Let $A$ be a filtered algebra with filtration $F_0(A) subset F_1(A) subset cdots subset A$, and suppose that $I$ is a two-sided ideal of $A$. The quotient algebra is then filtered with filtration $F_i(A/I) = F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I$. We know that for a filtered algebra, $A$, there exists an associated graded algebra, called $mathrm{gr}(A) = oplus S_i$ where $S_i = F_i(A)/F_{i-1}(A)$.
Define $M(2)$ as the polynomial algebra $k[a,b,c,d]$ and define $SL(2) = M(2)/(ad - bc -1)$.
His first claim is that $mathrm{gr}(A/I) = oplus_{i in mathbb{N}} F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I)$. Following this, he claims that $mathrm{gr}(SL(2)) cong k[a,b,c,d]/(ad-bc)$ (note that the ideal $(ad-bc-1)$ is not generated by homogeneous elements so that $SL(2)$ is not graded).
I am unsure how one gets to these results, and any feedback on this would be greatly appreciated!
abstract-algebra graded-rings quantum-groups filtrations
abstract-algebra graded-rings quantum-groups filtrations
edited Dec 1 at 10:55
user26857
39.2k123882
39.2k123882
asked Mar 21 '12 at 22:12
Elden Elmanto
684315
684315
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We have
$$begin{align*}
text{gr}(A/I) &=& bigoplus F_i(A/I)/F_{i-1}(A/I) \
&cong& bigoplus (F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I)/(F_{i-1}(A)/F_{i-1}(A) cap I) \
&cong& bigoplus F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I) end{align*}$$
which follows from the fact that $F_{i-1}(A) cap I subseteq F_i(A) cap I$ and I suppose the third isomorphism theorem.
With $A = k[a, b, c, d]$ and $I = (ad - bc - 1)$ we have that $F_i(A)$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i$ and that $F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i-1$ together with polynomials of the form $f (ad - bc - 1)$ where $f$ has total degree at most $i-2$. Since $f in F_{i-1}(A)$, instead of adding in terms of the form $f(ad - bc - 1)$ we can add in terms of the form $f(ad - bc)$. Do you see how the result follows from here?
Yup. Thank you very much!
– Elden Elmanto
Mar 21 '12 at 23:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We have
$$begin{align*}
text{gr}(A/I) &=& bigoplus F_i(A/I)/F_{i-1}(A/I) \
&cong& bigoplus (F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I)/(F_{i-1}(A)/F_{i-1}(A) cap I) \
&cong& bigoplus F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I) end{align*}$$
which follows from the fact that $F_{i-1}(A) cap I subseteq F_i(A) cap I$ and I suppose the third isomorphism theorem.
With $A = k[a, b, c, d]$ and $I = (ad - bc - 1)$ we have that $F_i(A)$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i$ and that $F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i-1$ together with polynomials of the form $f (ad - bc - 1)$ where $f$ has total degree at most $i-2$. Since $f in F_{i-1}(A)$, instead of adding in terms of the form $f(ad - bc - 1)$ we can add in terms of the form $f(ad - bc)$. Do you see how the result follows from here?
Yup. Thank you very much!
– Elden Elmanto
Mar 21 '12 at 23:08
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We have
$$begin{align*}
text{gr}(A/I) &=& bigoplus F_i(A/I)/F_{i-1}(A/I) \
&cong& bigoplus (F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I)/(F_{i-1}(A)/F_{i-1}(A) cap I) \
&cong& bigoplus F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I) end{align*}$$
which follows from the fact that $F_{i-1}(A) cap I subseteq F_i(A) cap I$ and I suppose the third isomorphism theorem.
With $A = k[a, b, c, d]$ and $I = (ad - bc - 1)$ we have that $F_i(A)$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i$ and that $F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i-1$ together with polynomials of the form $f (ad - bc - 1)$ where $f$ has total degree at most $i-2$. Since $f in F_{i-1}(A)$, instead of adding in terms of the form $f(ad - bc - 1)$ we can add in terms of the form $f(ad - bc)$. Do you see how the result follows from here?
Yup. Thank you very much!
– Elden Elmanto
Mar 21 '12 at 23:08
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
We have
$$begin{align*}
text{gr}(A/I) &=& bigoplus F_i(A/I)/F_{i-1}(A/I) \
&cong& bigoplus (F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I)/(F_{i-1}(A)/F_{i-1}(A) cap I) \
&cong& bigoplus F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I) end{align*}$$
which follows from the fact that $F_{i-1}(A) cap I subseteq F_i(A) cap I$ and I suppose the third isomorphism theorem.
With $A = k[a, b, c, d]$ and $I = (ad - bc - 1)$ we have that $F_i(A)$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i$ and that $F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i-1$ together with polynomials of the form $f (ad - bc - 1)$ where $f$ has total degree at most $i-2$. Since $f in F_{i-1}(A)$, instead of adding in terms of the form $f(ad - bc - 1)$ we can add in terms of the form $f(ad - bc)$. Do you see how the result follows from here?
We have
$$begin{align*}
text{gr}(A/I) &=& bigoplus F_i(A/I)/F_{i-1}(A/I) \
&cong& bigoplus (F_i(A)/F_i(A) cap I)/(F_{i-1}(A)/F_{i-1}(A) cap I) \
&cong& bigoplus F_i(A)/(F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I) end{align*}$$
which follows from the fact that $F_{i-1}(A) cap I subseteq F_i(A) cap I$ and I suppose the third isomorphism theorem.
With $A = k[a, b, c, d]$ and $I = (ad - bc - 1)$ we have that $F_i(A)$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i$ and that $F_{i-1}(A) + F_i(A) cap I$ consists of polynomials of total degree at most $i-1$ together with polynomials of the form $f (ad - bc - 1)$ where $f$ has total degree at most $i-2$. Since $f in F_{i-1}(A)$, instead of adding in terms of the form $f(ad - bc - 1)$ we can add in terms of the form $f(ad - bc)$. Do you see how the result follows from here?
answered Mar 21 '12 at 22:38
Qiaochu Yuan
275k32578914
275k32578914
Yup. Thank you very much!
– Elden Elmanto
Mar 21 '12 at 23:08
add a comment |
Yup. Thank you very much!
– Elden Elmanto
Mar 21 '12 at 23:08
Yup. Thank you very much!
– Elden Elmanto
Mar 21 '12 at 23:08
Yup. Thank you very much!
– Elden Elmanto
Mar 21 '12 at 23:08
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123069%2fgraded-and-filtered-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown