$mathbb{Z}, mathbb{Z}_2$ and $mathbb{Q}[x]$ - rings











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I'm quite new in the theory of rings and hope some of you can help me in tackling some problems in understanding, which occured when I tried to solve a problem.



The problem is about the rings $mathbb{Z}_{2}, mathbb{Z}_{2}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] = {sum_{j=0}^{n}a_{j} x^{j} ~| ~a_{j} in mathbb{Q}, n in mathbb{N} }$



First I need to find the unities, so i need to find $ {e in R : e |1} $.
In $mathbb{Z}_2$ it is easy: $E[mathbb{Z}_2] = {-1,1}$. I guess $E[mathbb{Z}_2[x]] = {1}$ but I can't justify why (I did calculatios for polynomials up to degree 3, but this of course is no proof) . For the latter case, $E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ I don't have a clue how to proof, that every polynomial with constant coefficient $a_0 = 1$ is a unit (I've found this on the Internet). I really can't imagine how every polynomial with constant $a_0$ should be a unit - at least I wasn't able to find even one pair of unities, which give 1 when multiplied.



Is there an easy way to show this two facts?



Furthermore I have to find out which of the given rings are isomorphic. According to a hint it has to do something with the unities. Does an isomorphism map unities to unities? If yes, non of them can be isomorphic, due to their number is different. Is that true?



Finally I should decide whether $mathbb{Q}[x]$ is a factorial ring. Here again I got a hint; Find $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$.
At these final point I really have no idea how to start, but maybe this might get better, when I understand the previous points?



I would really appreciate if some of you can help me understandig this task.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • You're confusing $mathbb{Q}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$. The former consists of polynomials, the latter power series. In $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ every polynomial with nonzero constant term is a unit, but in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ only the nonzero constant polynomials are units.
    – Slade
    Dec 1 at 16:24












  • Hi Slade! You're right - I'm a little bit confused, because I also thought, that the latter one denotes power series, but the problem description defines it as $mathbb{Q}[[x]] = {sum_{j=0}^{n} a_j x^{j} }$, so something I would call polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • But I guess they mean power series, because I really can't imagine, that finding $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$ is possible for polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I'm quite new in the theory of rings and hope some of you can help me in tackling some problems in understanding, which occured when I tried to solve a problem.



The problem is about the rings $mathbb{Z}_{2}, mathbb{Z}_{2}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] = {sum_{j=0}^{n}a_{j} x^{j} ~| ~a_{j} in mathbb{Q}, n in mathbb{N} }$



First I need to find the unities, so i need to find $ {e in R : e |1} $.
In $mathbb{Z}_2$ it is easy: $E[mathbb{Z}_2] = {-1,1}$. I guess $E[mathbb{Z}_2[x]] = {1}$ but I can't justify why (I did calculatios for polynomials up to degree 3, but this of course is no proof) . For the latter case, $E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ I don't have a clue how to proof, that every polynomial with constant coefficient $a_0 = 1$ is a unit (I've found this on the Internet). I really can't imagine how every polynomial with constant $a_0$ should be a unit - at least I wasn't able to find even one pair of unities, which give 1 when multiplied.



Is there an easy way to show this two facts?



Furthermore I have to find out which of the given rings are isomorphic. According to a hint it has to do something with the unities. Does an isomorphism map unities to unities? If yes, non of them can be isomorphic, due to their number is different. Is that true?



Finally I should decide whether $mathbb{Q}[x]$ is a factorial ring. Here again I got a hint; Find $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$.
At these final point I really have no idea how to start, but maybe this might get better, when I understand the previous points?



I would really appreciate if some of you can help me understandig this task.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • You're confusing $mathbb{Q}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$. The former consists of polynomials, the latter power series. In $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ every polynomial with nonzero constant term is a unit, but in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ only the nonzero constant polynomials are units.
    – Slade
    Dec 1 at 16:24












  • Hi Slade! You're right - I'm a little bit confused, because I also thought, that the latter one denotes power series, but the problem description defines it as $mathbb{Q}[[x]] = {sum_{j=0}^{n} a_j x^{j} }$, so something I would call polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • But I guess they mean power series, because I really can't imagine, that finding $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$ is possible for polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





I'm quite new in the theory of rings and hope some of you can help me in tackling some problems in understanding, which occured when I tried to solve a problem.



The problem is about the rings $mathbb{Z}_{2}, mathbb{Z}_{2}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] = {sum_{j=0}^{n}a_{j} x^{j} ~| ~a_{j} in mathbb{Q}, n in mathbb{N} }$



First I need to find the unities, so i need to find $ {e in R : e |1} $.
In $mathbb{Z}_2$ it is easy: $E[mathbb{Z}_2] = {-1,1}$. I guess $E[mathbb{Z}_2[x]] = {1}$ but I can't justify why (I did calculatios for polynomials up to degree 3, but this of course is no proof) . For the latter case, $E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ I don't have a clue how to proof, that every polynomial with constant coefficient $a_0 = 1$ is a unit (I've found this on the Internet). I really can't imagine how every polynomial with constant $a_0$ should be a unit - at least I wasn't able to find even one pair of unities, which give 1 when multiplied.



Is there an easy way to show this two facts?



Furthermore I have to find out which of the given rings are isomorphic. According to a hint it has to do something with the unities. Does an isomorphism map unities to unities? If yes, non of them can be isomorphic, due to their number is different. Is that true?



Finally I should decide whether $mathbb{Q}[x]$ is a factorial ring. Here again I got a hint; Find $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$.
At these final point I really have no idea how to start, but maybe this might get better, when I understand the previous points?



I would really appreciate if some of you can help me understandig this task.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question













I'm quite new in the theory of rings and hope some of you can help me in tackling some problems in understanding, which occured when I tried to solve a problem.



The problem is about the rings $mathbb{Z}_{2}, mathbb{Z}_{2}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[x] = {sum_{j=0}^{n}a_{j} x^{j} ~| ~a_{j} in mathbb{Q}, n in mathbb{N} }$



First I need to find the unities, so i need to find $ {e in R : e |1} $.
In $mathbb{Z}_2$ it is easy: $E[mathbb{Z}_2] = {-1,1}$. I guess $E[mathbb{Z}_2[x]] = {1}$ but I can't justify why (I did calculatios for polynomials up to degree 3, but this of course is no proof) . For the latter case, $E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ I don't have a clue how to proof, that every polynomial with constant coefficient $a_0 = 1$ is a unit (I've found this on the Internet). I really can't imagine how every polynomial with constant $a_0$ should be a unit - at least I wasn't able to find even one pair of unities, which give 1 when multiplied.



Is there an easy way to show this two facts?



Furthermore I have to find out which of the given rings are isomorphic. According to a hint it has to do something with the unities. Does an isomorphism map unities to unities? If yes, non of them can be isomorphic, due to their number is different. Is that true?



Finally I should decide whether $mathbb{Q}[x]$ is a factorial ring. Here again I got a hint; Find $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$.
At these final point I really have no idea how to start, but maybe this might get better, when I understand the previous points?



I would really appreciate if some of you can help me understandig this task.



Thanks!







abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 1 at 13:30









noNickname

353




353












  • You're confusing $mathbb{Q}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$. The former consists of polynomials, the latter power series. In $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ every polynomial with nonzero constant term is a unit, but in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ only the nonzero constant polynomials are units.
    – Slade
    Dec 1 at 16:24












  • Hi Slade! You're right - I'm a little bit confused, because I also thought, that the latter one denotes power series, but the problem description defines it as $mathbb{Q}[[x]] = {sum_{j=0}^{n} a_j x^{j} }$, so something I would call polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • But I guess they mean power series, because I really can't imagine, that finding $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$ is possible for polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago


















  • You're confusing $mathbb{Q}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$. The former consists of polynomials, the latter power series. In $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ every polynomial with nonzero constant term is a unit, but in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ only the nonzero constant polynomials are units.
    – Slade
    Dec 1 at 16:24












  • Hi Slade! You're right - I'm a little bit confused, because I also thought, that the latter one denotes power series, but the problem description defines it as $mathbb{Q}[[x]] = {sum_{j=0}^{n} a_j x^{j} }$, so something I would call polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • But I guess they mean power series, because I really can't imagine, that finding $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$ is possible for polynomials...
    – noNickname
    2 days ago
















You're confusing $mathbb{Q}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$. The former consists of polynomials, the latter power series. In $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ every polynomial with nonzero constant term is a unit, but in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ only the nonzero constant polynomials are units.
– Slade
Dec 1 at 16:24






You're confusing $mathbb{Q}[x]$ and $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$. The former consists of polynomials, the latter power series. In $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ every polynomial with nonzero constant term is a unit, but in $mathbb{Q}[x]$ only the nonzero constant polynomials are units.
– Slade
Dec 1 at 16:24














Hi Slade! You're right - I'm a little bit confused, because I also thought, that the latter one denotes power series, but the problem description defines it as $mathbb{Q}[[x]] = {sum_{j=0}^{n} a_j x^{j} }$, so something I would call polynomials...
– noNickname
2 days ago




Hi Slade! You're right - I'm a little bit confused, because I also thought, that the latter one denotes power series, but the problem description defines it as $mathbb{Q}[[x]] = {sum_{j=0}^{n} a_j x^{j} }$, so something I would call polynomials...
– noNickname
2 days ago












But I guess they mean power series, because I really can't imagine, that finding $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$ is possible for polynomials...
– noNickname
2 days ago




But I guess they mean power series, because I really can't imagine, that finding $p in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $forall f in mathbb{Q}[x]: f=e p^k$ with $e in E[mathbb{Q}[x]]$ and $k in mathbb{N}$ is possible for polynomials...
– noNickname
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Let $K[x]$ be a polynomial ring over a field $K$.
Then a polynomial $fin K[x]$ is invertible if there is a polynomial $gin K[x]$ such that $fg=1$. Now the degree formula comes in: $${rm deg}(f) + {rm deg}(g) = {rm deg}(fg) = {rm deg}(1) = 0.$$ The first equality comes from the fact that the highest terms of $f$ and $g$ multiply while their degrees add; there is no cancellation of the highest terms since $K$ is a field.
Since the degrees of $f,g$ are non-negative and sum up to 0, both need to be zero and so $f,g$ are elements of $K$.
It follows that the unit group of $K[x]$ is $K^*=Ksetminus{0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Hi Wuestenfux! Thanks for this hint! It's kind of obvious in retrospective, but I really didn't had the degree-law in mind, when I tried to solve this example. Is it possible to draw a conclusion about isomorphies between this three rings, with the knowlege about unities? So does the number of unities has to be the same, if the rings are isomorphic or something like this?
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • Units map to units in a ring isomorphism.
    – Wuestenfux
    2 days ago










  • So non of them can be isomorphic, due to the number of units differ? The unit in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ is only $1$, the units in $mathbb{Z}$ are ${-1,1}$ and the units in $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ are infinitelly many, due the field is $mathbb{Q}$.
    – noNickname
    2 days ago













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021335%2fmathbbz-mathbbz-2-and-mathbbqx-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













Let $K[x]$ be a polynomial ring over a field $K$.
Then a polynomial $fin K[x]$ is invertible if there is a polynomial $gin K[x]$ such that $fg=1$. Now the degree formula comes in: $${rm deg}(f) + {rm deg}(g) = {rm deg}(fg) = {rm deg}(1) = 0.$$ The first equality comes from the fact that the highest terms of $f$ and $g$ multiply while their degrees add; there is no cancellation of the highest terms since $K$ is a field.
Since the degrees of $f,g$ are non-negative and sum up to 0, both need to be zero and so $f,g$ are elements of $K$.
It follows that the unit group of $K[x]$ is $K^*=Ksetminus{0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Hi Wuestenfux! Thanks for this hint! It's kind of obvious in retrospective, but I really didn't had the degree-law in mind, when I tried to solve this example. Is it possible to draw a conclusion about isomorphies between this three rings, with the knowlege about unities? So does the number of unities has to be the same, if the rings are isomorphic or something like this?
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • Units map to units in a ring isomorphism.
    – Wuestenfux
    2 days ago










  • So non of them can be isomorphic, due to the number of units differ? The unit in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ is only $1$, the units in $mathbb{Z}$ are ${-1,1}$ and the units in $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ are infinitelly many, due the field is $mathbb{Q}$.
    – noNickname
    2 days ago

















up vote
1
down vote













Let $K[x]$ be a polynomial ring over a field $K$.
Then a polynomial $fin K[x]$ is invertible if there is a polynomial $gin K[x]$ such that $fg=1$. Now the degree formula comes in: $${rm deg}(f) + {rm deg}(g) = {rm deg}(fg) = {rm deg}(1) = 0.$$ The first equality comes from the fact that the highest terms of $f$ and $g$ multiply while their degrees add; there is no cancellation of the highest terms since $K$ is a field.
Since the degrees of $f,g$ are non-negative and sum up to 0, both need to be zero and so $f,g$ are elements of $K$.
It follows that the unit group of $K[x]$ is $K^*=Ksetminus{0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Hi Wuestenfux! Thanks for this hint! It's kind of obvious in retrospective, but I really didn't had the degree-law in mind, when I tried to solve this example. Is it possible to draw a conclusion about isomorphies between this three rings, with the knowlege about unities? So does the number of unities has to be the same, if the rings are isomorphic or something like this?
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • Units map to units in a ring isomorphism.
    – Wuestenfux
    2 days ago










  • So non of them can be isomorphic, due to the number of units differ? The unit in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ is only $1$, the units in $mathbb{Z}$ are ${-1,1}$ and the units in $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ are infinitelly many, due the field is $mathbb{Q}$.
    – noNickname
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Let $K[x]$ be a polynomial ring over a field $K$.
Then a polynomial $fin K[x]$ is invertible if there is a polynomial $gin K[x]$ such that $fg=1$. Now the degree formula comes in: $${rm deg}(f) + {rm deg}(g) = {rm deg}(fg) = {rm deg}(1) = 0.$$ The first equality comes from the fact that the highest terms of $f$ and $g$ multiply while their degrees add; there is no cancellation of the highest terms since $K$ is a field.
Since the degrees of $f,g$ are non-negative and sum up to 0, both need to be zero and so $f,g$ are elements of $K$.
It follows that the unit group of $K[x]$ is $K^*=Ksetminus{0}$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Let $K[x]$ be a polynomial ring over a field $K$.
Then a polynomial $fin K[x]$ is invertible if there is a polynomial $gin K[x]$ such that $fg=1$. Now the degree formula comes in: $${rm deg}(f) + {rm deg}(g) = {rm deg}(fg) = {rm deg}(1) = 0.$$ The first equality comes from the fact that the highest terms of $f$ and $g$ multiply while their degrees add; there is no cancellation of the highest terms since $K$ is a field.
Since the degrees of $f,g$ are non-negative and sum up to 0, both need to be zero and so $f,g$ are elements of $K$.
It follows that the unit group of $K[x]$ is $K^*=Ksetminus{0}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 1 at 15:14









Wuestenfux

2,6971410




2,6971410












  • Hi Wuestenfux! Thanks for this hint! It's kind of obvious in retrospective, but I really didn't had the degree-law in mind, when I tried to solve this example. Is it possible to draw a conclusion about isomorphies between this three rings, with the knowlege about unities? So does the number of unities has to be the same, if the rings are isomorphic or something like this?
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • Units map to units in a ring isomorphism.
    – Wuestenfux
    2 days ago










  • So non of them can be isomorphic, due to the number of units differ? The unit in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ is only $1$, the units in $mathbb{Z}$ are ${-1,1}$ and the units in $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ are infinitelly many, due the field is $mathbb{Q}$.
    – noNickname
    2 days ago




















  • Hi Wuestenfux! Thanks for this hint! It's kind of obvious in retrospective, but I really didn't had the degree-law in mind, when I tried to solve this example. Is it possible to draw a conclusion about isomorphies between this three rings, with the knowlege about unities? So does the number of unities has to be the same, if the rings are isomorphic or something like this?
    – noNickname
    2 days ago










  • Units map to units in a ring isomorphism.
    – Wuestenfux
    2 days ago










  • So non of them can be isomorphic, due to the number of units differ? The unit in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ is only $1$, the units in $mathbb{Z}$ are ${-1,1}$ and the units in $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ are infinitelly many, due the field is $mathbb{Q}$.
    – noNickname
    2 days ago


















Hi Wuestenfux! Thanks for this hint! It's kind of obvious in retrospective, but I really didn't had the degree-law in mind, when I tried to solve this example. Is it possible to draw a conclusion about isomorphies between this three rings, with the knowlege about unities? So does the number of unities has to be the same, if the rings are isomorphic or something like this?
– noNickname
2 days ago




Hi Wuestenfux! Thanks for this hint! It's kind of obvious in retrospective, but I really didn't had the degree-law in mind, when I tried to solve this example. Is it possible to draw a conclusion about isomorphies between this three rings, with the knowlege about unities? So does the number of unities has to be the same, if the rings are isomorphic or something like this?
– noNickname
2 days ago












Units map to units in a ring isomorphism.
– Wuestenfux
2 days ago




Units map to units in a ring isomorphism.
– Wuestenfux
2 days ago












So non of them can be isomorphic, due to the number of units differ? The unit in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ is only $1$, the units in $mathbb{Z}$ are ${-1,1}$ and the units in $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ are infinitelly many, due the field is $mathbb{Q}$.
– noNickname
2 days ago






So non of them can be isomorphic, due to the number of units differ? The unit in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ is only $1$, the units in $mathbb{Z}$ are ${-1,1}$ and the units in $mathbb{Q}[[x]]$ are infinitelly many, due the field is $mathbb{Q}$.
– noNickname
2 days ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021335%2fmathbbz-mathbbz-2-and-mathbbqx-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna