Space of sequences such thtat $sum_{n=0}^{infty}2^n|a_n|<+infty$
Consider the space of sequences of real numbers ${vec{a_i}}$ where each $vec{a_i}={a_{i_n}}$ is such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty}2^n|a_{i_n}|<+infty$. Then how could we better describe the space? Typically, does the space have countable linear basis,is it complete with respect to the norm $|vec{a_i}|=sum_n2^n|a_{i_n}|$,whether it is finite dimensional?
One example that comes to mind is of the sequence $a_n=frac1{2^{2n}}$. Hence, I think the space is countable. How should I proceed further. Is any representation like Riesz representation work here? Thanks beforehand.
sequences-and-series functional-analysis banach-spaces
|
show 7 more comments
Consider the space of sequences of real numbers ${vec{a_i}}$ where each $vec{a_i}={a_{i_n}}$ is such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty}2^n|a_{i_n}|<+infty$. Then how could we better describe the space? Typically, does the space have countable linear basis,is it complete with respect to the norm $|vec{a_i}|=sum_n2^n|a_{i_n}|$,whether it is finite dimensional?
One example that comes to mind is of the sequence $a_n=frac1{2^{2n}}$. Hence, I think the space is countable. How should I proceed further. Is any representation like Riesz representation work here? Thanks beforehand.
sequences-and-series functional-analysis banach-spaces
1
Is it assumed that $a_n>0$? And if $a_n=1/(2^n)$ don't you get the (divergent) series of all $1$'s?
– coffeemath
Dec 13 '18 at 9:29
1
I don't understand the question. What do you actually want?
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:38
1
Your expression for $||cdot||$ is not a norm...
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
1
@vidyarthi because this expression can be negative whereas a norm can't
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:42
1
Tip: if banach space is infinite-dimensional, it's hamel basis is necessarily uncountable
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
|
show 7 more comments
Consider the space of sequences of real numbers ${vec{a_i}}$ where each $vec{a_i}={a_{i_n}}$ is such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty}2^n|a_{i_n}|<+infty$. Then how could we better describe the space? Typically, does the space have countable linear basis,is it complete with respect to the norm $|vec{a_i}|=sum_n2^n|a_{i_n}|$,whether it is finite dimensional?
One example that comes to mind is of the sequence $a_n=frac1{2^{2n}}$. Hence, I think the space is countable. How should I proceed further. Is any representation like Riesz representation work here? Thanks beforehand.
sequences-and-series functional-analysis banach-spaces
Consider the space of sequences of real numbers ${vec{a_i}}$ where each $vec{a_i}={a_{i_n}}$ is such that $sum_{n=0}^{infty}2^n|a_{i_n}|<+infty$. Then how could we better describe the space? Typically, does the space have countable linear basis,is it complete with respect to the norm $|vec{a_i}|=sum_n2^n|a_{i_n}|$,whether it is finite dimensional?
One example that comes to mind is of the sequence $a_n=frac1{2^{2n}}$. Hence, I think the space is countable. How should I proceed further. Is any representation like Riesz representation work here? Thanks beforehand.
sequences-and-series functional-analysis banach-spaces
sequences-and-series functional-analysis banach-spaces
edited Dec 13 '18 at 9:50
vidyarthi
asked Dec 13 '18 at 9:27
vidyarthividyarthi
2,9341832
2,9341832
1
Is it assumed that $a_n>0$? And if $a_n=1/(2^n)$ don't you get the (divergent) series of all $1$'s?
– coffeemath
Dec 13 '18 at 9:29
1
I don't understand the question. What do you actually want?
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:38
1
Your expression for $||cdot||$ is not a norm...
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
1
@vidyarthi because this expression can be negative whereas a norm can't
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:42
1
Tip: if banach space is infinite-dimensional, it's hamel basis is necessarily uncountable
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
|
show 7 more comments
1
Is it assumed that $a_n>0$? And if $a_n=1/(2^n)$ don't you get the (divergent) series of all $1$'s?
– coffeemath
Dec 13 '18 at 9:29
1
I don't understand the question. What do you actually want?
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:38
1
Your expression for $||cdot||$ is not a norm...
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
1
@vidyarthi because this expression can be negative whereas a norm can't
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:42
1
Tip: if banach space is infinite-dimensional, it's hamel basis is necessarily uncountable
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
1
1
Is it assumed that $a_n>0$? And if $a_n=1/(2^n)$ don't you get the (divergent) series of all $1$'s?
– coffeemath
Dec 13 '18 at 9:29
Is it assumed that $a_n>0$? And if $a_n=1/(2^n)$ don't you get the (divergent) series of all $1$'s?
– coffeemath
Dec 13 '18 at 9:29
1
1
I don't understand the question. What do you actually want?
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:38
I don't understand the question. What do you actually want?
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:38
1
1
Your expression for $||cdot||$ is not a norm...
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
Your expression for $||cdot||$ is not a norm...
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
1
1
@vidyarthi because this expression can be negative whereas a norm can't
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:42
@vidyarthi because this expression can be negative whereas a norm can't
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:42
1
1
Tip: if banach space is infinite-dimensional, it's hamel basis is necessarily uncountable
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
Tip: if banach space is infinite-dimensional, it's hamel basis is necessarily uncountable
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
|
show 7 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
${(a_n):sum 2^{n} |a_n| <infty}$ with $|(a_n)|= {sum 2^{n} |a_n| }$ is separable infinite dimensional Banach space. In fact it just an $L^{1}(mu)$ for a suitable measure $mu$. [ Without absolute value you don't even get a norm as pointed out in the comments]. Define a measure $mu$ on the power set of $mathbb N$ by $mu {n}=2^{n}$. Then $int fdmu =sum 2^{n} f(n)$ for any $f:mathbb N to mathbb R$ whcih is $mu$ integrable. The identification of $f in L^{1}(mu)$ with the sequence $(f(n))$ shows that our space is nothing but $L^{1}(mu)$. Note also that $(L^{1}(mu))^{*}=L^{infty}(mu)=ell ^{infty}$.
so it is an infinite dimensional banach space and has no countable basis, right?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
1
@KaviRamaMurthy Are you sure? It looks more like $L^1(mu)$ with weighted atomic Borel measure to me.
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:51
@BigbearZzz You are right. I have corrected my answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:53
@BigbearZzz could you show what transformation would make it into $L^1(mu)$?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:54
@vidyarthi See the last part of my revised answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037796%2fspace-of-sequences-such-thtat-sum-n-0-infty2na-n-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
${(a_n):sum 2^{n} |a_n| <infty}$ with $|(a_n)|= {sum 2^{n} |a_n| }$ is separable infinite dimensional Banach space. In fact it just an $L^{1}(mu)$ for a suitable measure $mu$. [ Without absolute value you don't even get a norm as pointed out in the comments]. Define a measure $mu$ on the power set of $mathbb N$ by $mu {n}=2^{n}$. Then $int fdmu =sum 2^{n} f(n)$ for any $f:mathbb N to mathbb R$ whcih is $mu$ integrable. The identification of $f in L^{1}(mu)$ with the sequence $(f(n))$ shows that our space is nothing but $L^{1}(mu)$. Note also that $(L^{1}(mu))^{*}=L^{infty}(mu)=ell ^{infty}$.
so it is an infinite dimensional banach space and has no countable basis, right?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
1
@KaviRamaMurthy Are you sure? It looks more like $L^1(mu)$ with weighted atomic Borel measure to me.
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:51
@BigbearZzz You are right. I have corrected my answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:53
@BigbearZzz could you show what transformation would make it into $L^1(mu)$?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:54
@vidyarthi See the last part of my revised answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
${(a_n):sum 2^{n} |a_n| <infty}$ with $|(a_n)|= {sum 2^{n} |a_n| }$ is separable infinite dimensional Banach space. In fact it just an $L^{1}(mu)$ for a suitable measure $mu$. [ Without absolute value you don't even get a norm as pointed out in the comments]. Define a measure $mu$ on the power set of $mathbb N$ by $mu {n}=2^{n}$. Then $int fdmu =sum 2^{n} f(n)$ for any $f:mathbb N to mathbb R$ whcih is $mu$ integrable. The identification of $f in L^{1}(mu)$ with the sequence $(f(n))$ shows that our space is nothing but $L^{1}(mu)$. Note also that $(L^{1}(mu))^{*}=L^{infty}(mu)=ell ^{infty}$.
so it is an infinite dimensional banach space and has no countable basis, right?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
1
@KaviRamaMurthy Are you sure? It looks more like $L^1(mu)$ with weighted atomic Borel measure to me.
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:51
@BigbearZzz You are right. I have corrected my answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:53
@BigbearZzz could you show what transformation would make it into $L^1(mu)$?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:54
@vidyarthi See the last part of my revised answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
${(a_n):sum 2^{n} |a_n| <infty}$ with $|(a_n)|= {sum 2^{n} |a_n| }$ is separable infinite dimensional Banach space. In fact it just an $L^{1}(mu)$ for a suitable measure $mu$. [ Without absolute value you don't even get a norm as pointed out in the comments]. Define a measure $mu$ on the power set of $mathbb N$ by $mu {n}=2^{n}$. Then $int fdmu =sum 2^{n} f(n)$ for any $f:mathbb N to mathbb R$ whcih is $mu$ integrable. The identification of $f in L^{1}(mu)$ with the sequence $(f(n))$ shows that our space is nothing but $L^{1}(mu)$. Note also that $(L^{1}(mu))^{*}=L^{infty}(mu)=ell ^{infty}$.
${(a_n):sum 2^{n} |a_n| <infty}$ with $|(a_n)|= {sum 2^{n} |a_n| }$ is separable infinite dimensional Banach space. In fact it just an $L^{1}(mu)$ for a suitable measure $mu$. [ Without absolute value you don't even get a norm as pointed out in the comments]. Define a measure $mu$ on the power set of $mathbb N$ by $mu {n}=2^{n}$. Then $int fdmu =sum 2^{n} f(n)$ for any $f:mathbb N to mathbb R$ whcih is $mu$ integrable. The identification of $f in L^{1}(mu)$ with the sequence $(f(n))$ shows that our space is nothing but $L^{1}(mu)$. Note also that $(L^{1}(mu))^{*}=L^{infty}(mu)=ell ^{infty}$.
edited Dec 13 '18 at 23:12
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:46
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
52.4k31955
52.4k31955
so it is an infinite dimensional banach space and has no countable basis, right?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
1
@KaviRamaMurthy Are you sure? It looks more like $L^1(mu)$ with weighted atomic Borel measure to me.
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:51
@BigbearZzz You are right. I have corrected my answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:53
@BigbearZzz could you show what transformation would make it into $L^1(mu)$?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:54
@vidyarthi See the last part of my revised answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
so it is an infinite dimensional banach space and has no countable basis, right?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
1
@KaviRamaMurthy Are you sure? It looks more like $L^1(mu)$ with weighted atomic Borel measure to me.
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:51
@BigbearZzz You are right. I have corrected my answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:53
@BigbearZzz could you show what transformation would make it into $L^1(mu)$?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:54
@vidyarthi See the last part of my revised answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:59
so it is an infinite dimensional banach space and has no countable basis, right?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
so it is an infinite dimensional banach space and has no countable basis, right?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47
1
1
@KaviRamaMurthy Are you sure? It looks more like $L^1(mu)$ with weighted atomic Borel measure to me.
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:51
@KaviRamaMurthy Are you sure? It looks more like $L^1(mu)$ with weighted atomic Borel measure to me.
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:51
@BigbearZzz You are right. I have corrected my answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:53
@BigbearZzz You are right. I have corrected my answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:53
@BigbearZzz could you show what transformation would make it into $L^1(mu)$?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:54
@BigbearZzz could you show what transformation would make it into $L^1(mu)$?
– vidyarthi
Dec 13 '18 at 9:54
@vidyarthi See the last part of my revised answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:59
@vidyarthi See the last part of my revised answer.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 9:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037796%2fspace-of-sequences-such-thtat-sum-n-0-infty2na-n-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Is it assumed that $a_n>0$? And if $a_n=1/(2^n)$ don't you get the (divergent) series of all $1$'s?
– coffeemath
Dec 13 '18 at 9:29
1
I don't understand the question. What do you actually want?
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:38
1
Your expression for $||cdot||$ is not a norm...
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 9:41
1
@vidyarthi because this expression can be negative whereas a norm can't
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:42
1
Tip: if banach space is infinite-dimensional, it's hamel basis is necessarily uncountable
– igortsts
Dec 13 '18 at 9:47