The probabilistic interpretation of ramanujan's constant $ e^{pisqrt{163}}$
Some of the mathematical constants have interesting probabilistic interpretations. For example,
"$pi$". Suppose two integers are chosen at random. What is the probability that they are comprime, that is, have no common factor exceeding 1? The answer is $largefrac{6}{largepi^2}$
"Apery's constant". Given three random integers, the probability that no factor exceeding 1 divides them all is $largefrac{1}{zeta(3)}$
Does there exist probabilistic interpretation of Ramanujan's constant $large e^{largepilargesqrt{163}}$ ?
probability constants
add a comment |
Some of the mathematical constants have interesting probabilistic interpretations. For example,
"$pi$". Suppose two integers are chosen at random. What is the probability that they are comprime, that is, have no common factor exceeding 1? The answer is $largefrac{6}{largepi^2}$
"Apery's constant". Given three random integers, the probability that no factor exceeding 1 divides them all is $largefrac{1}{zeta(3)}$
Does there exist probabilistic interpretation of Ramanujan's constant $large e^{largepilargesqrt{163}}$ ?
probability constants
There doesn't seem to be anything even for Gelfond's constant $e^pi$, nor in its OEIS entry, so its is doubtful it will be easy to find any probabilistic interpretation for $e^{pisqrt{d}}$.
– Tito Piezas III
Dec 28 '15 at 13:17
add a comment |
Some of the mathematical constants have interesting probabilistic interpretations. For example,
"$pi$". Suppose two integers are chosen at random. What is the probability that they are comprime, that is, have no common factor exceeding 1? The answer is $largefrac{6}{largepi^2}$
"Apery's constant". Given three random integers, the probability that no factor exceeding 1 divides them all is $largefrac{1}{zeta(3)}$
Does there exist probabilistic interpretation of Ramanujan's constant $large e^{largepilargesqrt{163}}$ ?
probability constants
Some of the mathematical constants have interesting probabilistic interpretations. For example,
"$pi$". Suppose two integers are chosen at random. What is the probability that they are comprime, that is, have no common factor exceeding 1? The answer is $largefrac{6}{largepi^2}$
"Apery's constant". Given three random integers, the probability that no factor exceeding 1 divides them all is $largefrac{1}{zeta(3)}$
Does there exist probabilistic interpretation of Ramanujan's constant $large e^{largepilargesqrt{163}}$ ?
probability constants
probability constants
edited Dec 13 '18 at 9:26
Klangen
1,65711334
1,65711334
asked Mar 16 '15 at 19:02
vitovito
1,003816
1,003816
There doesn't seem to be anything even for Gelfond's constant $e^pi$, nor in its OEIS entry, so its is doubtful it will be easy to find any probabilistic interpretation for $e^{pisqrt{d}}$.
– Tito Piezas III
Dec 28 '15 at 13:17
add a comment |
There doesn't seem to be anything even for Gelfond's constant $e^pi$, nor in its OEIS entry, so its is doubtful it will be easy to find any probabilistic interpretation for $e^{pisqrt{d}}$.
– Tito Piezas III
Dec 28 '15 at 13:17
There doesn't seem to be anything even for Gelfond's constant $e^pi$, nor in its OEIS entry, so its is doubtful it will be easy to find any probabilistic interpretation for $e^{pisqrt{d}}$.
– Tito Piezas III
Dec 28 '15 at 13:17
There doesn't seem to be anything even for Gelfond's constant $e^pi$, nor in its OEIS entry, so its is doubtful it will be easy to find any probabilistic interpretation for $e^{pisqrt{d}}$.
– Tito Piezas III
Dec 28 '15 at 13:17
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1192757%2fthe-probabilistic-interpretation-of-ramanujans-constant-e-pi-sqrt163%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1192757%2fthe-probabilistic-interpretation-of-ramanujans-constant-e-pi-sqrt163%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
There doesn't seem to be anything even for Gelfond's constant $e^pi$, nor in its OEIS entry, so its is doubtful it will be easy to find any probabilistic interpretation for $e^{pisqrt{d}}$.
– Tito Piezas III
Dec 28 '15 at 13:17