Symmetric Boundary Conditions/Eigenvalues (PDEs)
Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian
$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$
$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$
where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors boundary-value-problem laplacian
add a comment |
Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian
$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$
$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$
where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors boundary-value-problem laplacian
I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian
$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$
$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$
where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors boundary-value-problem laplacian
Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian
$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$
$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$
where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors boundary-value-problem laplacian
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors boundary-value-problem laplacian
edited Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
Dylan
12.4k31026
12.4k31026
asked Dec 11 '18 at 21:33
Tim
1
1
I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$
By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!
uselangle
andrangle
for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035856%2fsymmetric-boundary-conditions-eigenvalues-pdes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$
By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!
uselangle
andrangle
for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
add a comment |
Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$
By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!
uselangle
andrangle
for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
add a comment |
Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$
By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!
Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$
By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!
edited Dec 12 '18 at 0:49
answered Dec 12 '18 at 0:44
gdepaul
613
613
uselangle
andrangle
for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
add a comment |
uselangle
andrangle
for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
use
langle
and rangle
for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
use
langle
and rangle
for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035856%2fsymmetric-boundary-conditions-eigenvalues-pdes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54