Symmetric Boundary Conditions/Eigenvalues (PDEs)












0














Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian



$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$



$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$



where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
















0














Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian



$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$



$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$



where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:54














0












0








0


1





Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian



$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$



$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$



where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.










share|cite|improve this question















Consider the following eigenvalue problem for the Laplacian



$-Delta u = lambda u$ in $U$



$u + a left(frac{partial u}{partial v}right)$ on $partial U$



where $v$ is the outward unit normal to the boundary. Suppose that $a(x) geq 0$ for any $x in partial U$. Show that the boundary condition given in this system is symmetric.







pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors boundary-value-problem laplacian






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '18 at 4:24









Dylan

12.4k31026




12.4k31026










asked Dec 11 '18 at 21:33









Tim

1




1












  • I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:54


















  • I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
















I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54




I can't discern what you boundary condition is. Please write it as an equation.
– DisintegratingByParts
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:



$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$



By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!






share|cite|improve this answer























  • use langle and rangle for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
    – Dylan
    Dec 13 '18 at 4:24











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035856%2fsymmetric-boundary-conditions-eigenvalues-pdes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:



$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$



By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!






share|cite|improve this answer























  • use langle and rangle for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
    – Dylan
    Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
















0














Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:



$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$



By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!






share|cite|improve this answer























  • use langle and rangle for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
    – Dylan
    Dec 13 '18 at 4:24














0












0








0






Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:



$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$



By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!






share|cite|improve this answer














Recall that a symmetric boundary condition is one that satisfies
$$<u, Delta v > = <Delta u, v >$$
where $< cdot, cdot >$ is the $L_2$ inner product. Observe, by applying Green's identity:



$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = int_{U} (v Delta u - u Delta v) dsigma = int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma $$
Now we break up the boundary into cases,
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma + int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma$$



By the round-robin condition, if $$a(x) = 0 implies u = 0 = v implies int_{partial U text{and } a(x)= 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = 0$$
So then consider:
$$int_{partial U} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U text{and } a(x) not = 0} (v frac{partial u}{partial nu} - u frac{partial v}{partial nu} ) dsigma = int_{partial U} frac{-vu}{a} + frac{uv}{a} dsigma = 0$$
Therefore,
$$<u, Delta v> - <Delta u, v> = 0 implies <u, Delta v> = <Delta u, v>$$
Which proves the boundary condition is symmetric!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 12 '18 at 0:49

























answered Dec 12 '18 at 0:44









gdepaul

613




613












  • use langle and rangle for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
    – Dylan
    Dec 13 '18 at 4:24


















  • use langle and rangle for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
    – Dylan
    Dec 13 '18 at 4:24
















use langle and rangle for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24




use langle and rangle for angle brackets: $langle$ $rangle$
– Dylan
Dec 13 '18 at 4:24


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035856%2fsymmetric-boundary-conditions-eigenvalues-pdes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna