When does a map between CW-complexes give a relative CW-complex?
$begingroup$
Let $X$, $Y$ be (absolute) CW-complexes and $varphi:Xto Y$ a continuous map. I would like to know under which assumptions $(Y,varphi(X))$ is a relative CW-complex.
I got interested in this question in a more specific case, i.e. when $Y=X$ and $varphi$ is homotopic to the identity of $X$. However, I don't have many knowledge on algebraic topology to know related results, so every help would be appreciated.
P.S. I already know that this works if $varphi(X)$ is a subcomplex of $Y$.
algebraic-topology cw-complexes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$, $Y$ be (absolute) CW-complexes and $varphi:Xto Y$ a continuous map. I would like to know under which assumptions $(Y,varphi(X))$ is a relative CW-complex.
I got interested in this question in a more specific case, i.e. when $Y=X$ and $varphi$ is homotopic to the identity of $X$. However, I don't have many knowledge on algebraic topology to know related results, so every help would be appreciated.
P.S. I already know that this works if $varphi(X)$ is a subcomplex of $Y$.
algebraic-topology cw-complexes
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I believe it is irrelevant whether $X$ is CW-complex or not. The answer only depends on $varphi(X)$, and even if $X$ is a CW-complex, you do not know much about $varphi(X)$. See math.stackexchange.com/q/2505862. By the way, I guess you allow that the cells of $(Y, varphi(X))$ are completely different from those of $Y$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
Thank you for the comment. I can understand your belief, but I was hoping to find assumption on X rather than on the nature of $varphi$. Also, you guess right, I have no interest in which possible CW structure we give to $(Y, varphi(X))$.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Lorenzin
Dec 13 '18 at 18:22
1
$begingroup$
A minimal requirement is that the inclusion $varphi(X) hookrightarrow Y$ is a cofibration, and I doubt that this can be assured by assumptions on $X$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
3
$begingroup$
Here is an example. Let $X = D^3$ = three dimensional closed ball in $mathbb{R}^3$. It admits an embedding $varphi : D^3 to mathbb{R}^3$ such that the complement of $A = varphi(D^3)$ is not simply connected. An example is the Alexander horned ball (which is enclosed by the Alexander horned sphere en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_horned_sphere). The quotient $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not simply connected, therefore $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not homotopy equivalent to $mathbb{R}^3$ which would be a consequence if $A hookrightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ would be a cofibration.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$, $Y$ be (absolute) CW-complexes and $varphi:Xto Y$ a continuous map. I would like to know under which assumptions $(Y,varphi(X))$ is a relative CW-complex.
I got interested in this question in a more specific case, i.e. when $Y=X$ and $varphi$ is homotopic to the identity of $X$. However, I don't have many knowledge on algebraic topology to know related results, so every help would be appreciated.
P.S. I already know that this works if $varphi(X)$ is a subcomplex of $Y$.
algebraic-topology cw-complexes
$endgroup$
Let $X$, $Y$ be (absolute) CW-complexes and $varphi:Xto Y$ a continuous map. I would like to know under which assumptions $(Y,varphi(X))$ is a relative CW-complex.
I got interested in this question in a more specific case, i.e. when $Y=X$ and $varphi$ is homotopic to the identity of $X$. However, I don't have many knowledge on algebraic topology to know related results, so every help would be appreciated.
P.S. I already know that this works if $varphi(X)$ is a subcomplex of $Y$.
algebraic-topology cw-complexes
algebraic-topology cw-complexes
edited Dec 13 '18 at 17:21
Antonio Lorenzin
asked Dec 13 '18 at 16:12
Antonio LorenzinAntonio Lorenzin
415
415
2
$begingroup$
I believe it is irrelevant whether $X$ is CW-complex or not. The answer only depends on $varphi(X)$, and even if $X$ is a CW-complex, you do not know much about $varphi(X)$. See math.stackexchange.com/q/2505862. By the way, I guess you allow that the cells of $(Y, varphi(X))$ are completely different from those of $Y$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
Thank you for the comment. I can understand your belief, but I was hoping to find assumption on X rather than on the nature of $varphi$. Also, you guess right, I have no interest in which possible CW structure we give to $(Y, varphi(X))$.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Lorenzin
Dec 13 '18 at 18:22
1
$begingroup$
A minimal requirement is that the inclusion $varphi(X) hookrightarrow Y$ is a cofibration, and I doubt that this can be assured by assumptions on $X$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
3
$begingroup$
Here is an example. Let $X = D^3$ = three dimensional closed ball in $mathbb{R}^3$. It admits an embedding $varphi : D^3 to mathbb{R}^3$ such that the complement of $A = varphi(D^3)$ is not simply connected. An example is the Alexander horned ball (which is enclosed by the Alexander horned sphere en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_horned_sphere). The quotient $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not simply connected, therefore $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not homotopy equivalent to $mathbb{R}^3$ which would be a consequence if $A hookrightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ would be a cofibration.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I believe it is irrelevant whether $X$ is CW-complex or not. The answer only depends on $varphi(X)$, and even if $X$ is a CW-complex, you do not know much about $varphi(X)$. See math.stackexchange.com/q/2505862. By the way, I guess you allow that the cells of $(Y, varphi(X))$ are completely different from those of $Y$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
Thank you for the comment. I can understand your belief, but I was hoping to find assumption on X rather than on the nature of $varphi$. Also, you guess right, I have no interest in which possible CW structure we give to $(Y, varphi(X))$.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Lorenzin
Dec 13 '18 at 18:22
1
$begingroup$
A minimal requirement is that the inclusion $varphi(X) hookrightarrow Y$ is a cofibration, and I doubt that this can be assured by assumptions on $X$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
3
$begingroup$
Here is an example. Let $X = D^3$ = three dimensional closed ball in $mathbb{R}^3$. It admits an embedding $varphi : D^3 to mathbb{R}^3$ such that the complement of $A = varphi(D^3)$ is not simply connected. An example is the Alexander horned ball (which is enclosed by the Alexander horned sphere en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_horned_sphere). The quotient $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not simply connected, therefore $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not homotopy equivalent to $mathbb{R}^3$ which would be a consequence if $A hookrightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ would be a cofibration.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
2
2
$begingroup$
I believe it is irrelevant whether $X$ is CW-complex or not. The answer only depends on $varphi(X)$, and even if $X$ is a CW-complex, you do not know much about $varphi(X)$. See math.stackexchange.com/q/2505862. By the way, I guess you allow that the cells of $(Y, varphi(X))$ are completely different from those of $Y$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
I believe it is irrelevant whether $X$ is CW-complex or not. The answer only depends on $varphi(X)$, and even if $X$ is a CW-complex, you do not know much about $varphi(X)$. See math.stackexchange.com/q/2505862. By the way, I guess you allow that the cells of $(Y, varphi(X))$ are completely different from those of $Y$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
Thank you for the comment. I can understand your belief, but I was hoping to find assumption on X rather than on the nature of $varphi$. Also, you guess right, I have no interest in which possible CW structure we give to $(Y, varphi(X))$.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Lorenzin
Dec 13 '18 at 18:22
$begingroup$
Thank you for the comment. I can understand your belief, but I was hoping to find assumption on X rather than on the nature of $varphi$. Also, you guess right, I have no interest in which possible CW structure we give to $(Y, varphi(X))$.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Lorenzin
Dec 13 '18 at 18:22
1
1
$begingroup$
A minimal requirement is that the inclusion $varphi(X) hookrightarrow Y$ is a cofibration, and I doubt that this can be assured by assumptions on $X$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
A minimal requirement is that the inclusion $varphi(X) hookrightarrow Y$ is a cofibration, and I doubt that this can be assured by assumptions on $X$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
3
3
$begingroup$
Here is an example. Let $X = D^3$ = three dimensional closed ball in $mathbb{R}^3$. It admits an embedding $varphi : D^3 to mathbb{R}^3$ such that the complement of $A = varphi(D^3)$ is not simply connected. An example is the Alexander horned ball (which is enclosed by the Alexander horned sphere en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_horned_sphere). The quotient $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not simply connected, therefore $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not homotopy equivalent to $mathbb{R}^3$ which would be a consequence if $A hookrightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ would be a cofibration.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
$begingroup$
Here is an example. Let $X = D^3$ = three dimensional closed ball in $mathbb{R}^3$. It admits an embedding $varphi : D^3 to mathbb{R}^3$ such that the complement of $A = varphi(D^3)$ is not simply connected. An example is the Alexander horned ball (which is enclosed by the Alexander horned sphere en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_horned_sphere). The quotient $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not simply connected, therefore $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not homotopy equivalent to $mathbb{R}^3$ which would be a consequence if $A hookrightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ would be a cofibration.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038221%2fwhen-does-a-map-between-cw-complexes-give-a-relative-cw-complex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038221%2fwhen-does-a-map-between-cw-complexes-give-a-relative-cw-complex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
I believe it is irrelevant whether $X$ is CW-complex or not. The answer only depends on $varphi(X)$, and even if $X$ is a CW-complex, you do not know much about $varphi(X)$. See math.stackexchange.com/q/2505862. By the way, I guess you allow that the cells of $(Y, varphi(X))$ are completely different from those of $Y$?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
Thank you for the comment. I can understand your belief, but I was hoping to find assumption on X rather than on the nature of $varphi$. Also, you guess right, I have no interest in which possible CW structure we give to $(Y, varphi(X))$.
$endgroup$
– Antonio Lorenzin
Dec 13 '18 at 18:22
1
$begingroup$
A minimal requirement is that the inclusion $varphi(X) hookrightarrow Y$ is a cofibration, and I doubt that this can be assured by assumptions on $X$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
3
$begingroup$
Here is an example. Let $X = D^3$ = three dimensional closed ball in $mathbb{R}^3$. It admits an embedding $varphi : D^3 to mathbb{R}^3$ such that the complement of $A = varphi(D^3)$ is not simply connected. An example is the Alexander horned ball (which is enclosed by the Alexander horned sphere en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_horned_sphere). The quotient $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not simply connected, therefore $mathbb{R}^3/A$ is not homotopy equivalent to $mathbb{R}^3$ which would be a consequence if $A hookrightarrow mathbb{R}^3$ would be a cofibration.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 13 '18 at 18:45