If $Q_l in ℝ^{mtimes l}$, why does $Q_lQ_l^T in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ have nullity $m-l$?












1












$begingroup$


If $Q_l in ℝ^{mtimes l}$ is a matrix that is the first $l$ columns of $Q in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ where Q is orthogonal, why does $Q_lQ_l^T in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ have nullity $m-l$?



The nullspace of $Q_lQ_l^T$ is {$x: Q_lQ_l^Tx=0$}



Since $Q_lQ_l^T=I$ why is the nullity not $0$?



Also if $A in ℝ^{mtimes n} , mge n$ why is $|Q_l^TA|_2 = |A|_2$ only if $l=m$?



I know that since $Q_lQ_l^T=I implies |Q_l|_2=1$ and so $|Q_l^TA|_2 le |A|_2$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The dimension of the nullspace is also called nullity
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    The nullity of $I$ is $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:23










  • $begingroup$
    Was a typo my bad
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:24
















1












$begingroup$


If $Q_l in ℝ^{mtimes l}$ is a matrix that is the first $l$ columns of $Q in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ where Q is orthogonal, why does $Q_lQ_l^T in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ have nullity $m-l$?



The nullspace of $Q_lQ_l^T$ is {$x: Q_lQ_l^Tx=0$}



Since $Q_lQ_l^T=I$ why is the nullity not $0$?



Also if $A in ℝ^{mtimes n} , mge n$ why is $|Q_l^TA|_2 = |A|_2$ only if $l=m$?



I know that since $Q_lQ_l^T=I implies |Q_l|_2=1$ and so $|Q_l^TA|_2 le |A|_2$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The dimension of the nullspace is also called nullity
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    The nullity of $I$ is $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:23










  • $begingroup$
    Was a typo my bad
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:24














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


If $Q_l in ℝ^{mtimes l}$ is a matrix that is the first $l$ columns of $Q in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ where Q is orthogonal, why does $Q_lQ_l^T in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ have nullity $m-l$?



The nullspace of $Q_lQ_l^T$ is {$x: Q_lQ_l^Tx=0$}



Since $Q_lQ_l^T=I$ why is the nullity not $0$?



Also if $A in ℝ^{mtimes n} , mge n$ why is $|Q_l^TA|_2 = |A|_2$ only if $l=m$?



I know that since $Q_lQ_l^T=I implies |Q_l|_2=1$ and so $|Q_l^TA|_2 le |A|_2$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




If $Q_l in ℝ^{mtimes l}$ is a matrix that is the first $l$ columns of $Q in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ where Q is orthogonal, why does $Q_lQ_l^T in ℝ^{mtimes m}$ have nullity $m-l$?



The nullspace of $Q_lQ_l^T$ is {$x: Q_lQ_l^Tx=0$}



Since $Q_lQ_l^T=I$ why is the nullity not $0$?



Also if $A in ℝ^{mtimes n} , mge n$ why is $|Q_l^TA|_2 = |A|_2$ only if $l=m$?



I know that since $Q_lQ_l^T=I implies |Q_l|_2=1$ and so $|Q_l^TA|_2 le |A|_2$







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 21 '18 at 18:23







pablo_mathscobar

















asked Dec 21 '18 at 18:09









pablo_mathscobarpablo_mathscobar

996




996








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The dimension of the nullspace is also called nullity
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    The nullity of $I$ is $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:23










  • $begingroup$
    Was a typo my bad
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:24














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The dimension of the nullspace is also called nullity
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    The nullity of $I$ is $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:23










  • $begingroup$
    Was a typo my bad
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:24








1




1




$begingroup$
The dimension of the nullspace is also called nullity
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 21 '18 at 18:17




$begingroup$
The dimension of the nullspace is also called nullity
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 21 '18 at 18:17












$begingroup$
The nullity of $I$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 21 '18 at 18:23




$begingroup$
The nullity of $I$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 21 '18 at 18:23












$begingroup$
Was a typo my bad
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 18:24




$begingroup$
Was a typo my bad
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 18:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$Q_lQ_l^Tne I_m$. Observe however that $Q_l^TQ_l=I_l$, using that $Q$ was orthogonal. Thus the rank of $Q_l$ must be at least $l$, however since it is an $mtimes l$ matrix, it has rank at most $l$ at the same time.



Edit:
I mistakenly wrote $Q_l$ has nullity $m-l$. That was wrong. It has rank $l$ and therefore nullity $0$ by rank-nullity. It is $Q_l^T$ that has nullity $m-l$, also by rank-nullity (since matrices and their transposes have the same rank).



Then $Q_lQ_l^T$ has nullity $m-l$ since it is the product of an injective matrix and a matrix with nullity $m-l$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is the last line true?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:54










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar Sorry, I was careless. I've edited to fix.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    Why is $Q_l$ an injective matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:03










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar, because its nullity is 0
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh thanks makes sense
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:11











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048759%2fif-q-l-in-%25e2%2584%259dm-times-l-why-does-q-lq-lt-in-%25e2%2584%259dm-times-m-have-nullity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

$Q_lQ_l^Tne I_m$. Observe however that $Q_l^TQ_l=I_l$, using that $Q$ was orthogonal. Thus the rank of $Q_l$ must be at least $l$, however since it is an $mtimes l$ matrix, it has rank at most $l$ at the same time.



Edit:
I mistakenly wrote $Q_l$ has nullity $m-l$. That was wrong. It has rank $l$ and therefore nullity $0$ by rank-nullity. It is $Q_l^T$ that has nullity $m-l$, also by rank-nullity (since matrices and their transposes have the same rank).



Then $Q_lQ_l^T$ has nullity $m-l$ since it is the product of an injective matrix and a matrix with nullity $m-l$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is the last line true?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:54










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar Sorry, I was careless. I've edited to fix.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    Why is $Q_l$ an injective matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:03










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar, because its nullity is 0
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh thanks makes sense
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:11
















1












$begingroup$

$Q_lQ_l^Tne I_m$. Observe however that $Q_l^TQ_l=I_l$, using that $Q$ was orthogonal. Thus the rank of $Q_l$ must be at least $l$, however since it is an $mtimes l$ matrix, it has rank at most $l$ at the same time.



Edit:
I mistakenly wrote $Q_l$ has nullity $m-l$. That was wrong. It has rank $l$ and therefore nullity $0$ by rank-nullity. It is $Q_l^T$ that has nullity $m-l$, also by rank-nullity (since matrices and their transposes have the same rank).



Then $Q_lQ_l^T$ has nullity $m-l$ since it is the product of an injective matrix and a matrix with nullity $m-l$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is the last line true?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:54










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar Sorry, I was careless. I've edited to fix.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    Why is $Q_l$ an injective matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:03










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar, because its nullity is 0
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh thanks makes sense
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:11














1












1








1





$begingroup$

$Q_lQ_l^Tne I_m$. Observe however that $Q_l^TQ_l=I_l$, using that $Q$ was orthogonal. Thus the rank of $Q_l$ must be at least $l$, however since it is an $mtimes l$ matrix, it has rank at most $l$ at the same time.



Edit:
I mistakenly wrote $Q_l$ has nullity $m-l$. That was wrong. It has rank $l$ and therefore nullity $0$ by rank-nullity. It is $Q_l^T$ that has nullity $m-l$, also by rank-nullity (since matrices and their transposes have the same rank).



Then $Q_lQ_l^T$ has nullity $m-l$ since it is the product of an injective matrix and a matrix with nullity $m-l$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



$Q_lQ_l^Tne I_m$. Observe however that $Q_l^TQ_l=I_l$, using that $Q$ was orthogonal. Thus the rank of $Q_l$ must be at least $l$, however since it is an $mtimes l$ matrix, it has rank at most $l$ at the same time.



Edit:
I mistakenly wrote $Q_l$ has nullity $m-l$. That was wrong. It has rank $l$ and therefore nullity $0$ by rank-nullity. It is $Q_l^T$ that has nullity $m-l$, also by rank-nullity (since matrices and their transposes have the same rank).



Then $Q_lQ_l^T$ has nullity $m-l$ since it is the product of an injective matrix and a matrix with nullity $m-l$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 21 '18 at 18:58

























answered Dec 21 '18 at 18:35









jgonjgon

13.8k22041




13.8k22041












  • $begingroup$
    Why is the last line true?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:54










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar Sorry, I was careless. I've edited to fix.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    Why is $Q_l$ an injective matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:03










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar, because its nullity is 0
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh thanks makes sense
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:11


















  • $begingroup$
    Why is the last line true?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:54










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar Sorry, I was careless. I've edited to fix.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    Why is $Q_l$ an injective matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:03










  • $begingroup$
    @pablo_mathscobar, because its nullity is 0
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh thanks makes sense
    $endgroup$
    – pablo_mathscobar
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:11
















$begingroup$
Why is the last line true?
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 18:54




$begingroup$
Why is the last line true?
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 18:54












$begingroup$
@pablo_mathscobar Sorry, I was careless. I've edited to fix.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 21 '18 at 18:58




$begingroup$
@pablo_mathscobar Sorry, I was careless. I've edited to fix.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 21 '18 at 18:58












$begingroup$
Why is $Q_l$ an injective matrix?
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 19:03




$begingroup$
Why is $Q_l$ an injective matrix?
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 19:03












$begingroup$
@pablo_mathscobar, because its nullity is 0
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 21 '18 at 20:00




$begingroup$
@pablo_mathscobar, because its nullity is 0
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 21 '18 at 20:00












$begingroup$
Oh thanks makes sense
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 20:11




$begingroup$
Oh thanks makes sense
$endgroup$
– pablo_mathscobar
Dec 21 '18 at 20:11


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048759%2fif-q-l-in-%25e2%2584%259dm-times-l-why-does-q-lq-lt-in-%25e2%2584%259dm-times-m-have-nullity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna