isn't this wikipedia Definite integrals involving rational or irrational expression wrong!?












9












$begingroup$


photo



isn't this wikipedia Definite integrals involving rational or irrational expression wrong!?



According to my calculations:
$sin[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}]$ while in wiki it is
$sin[frac{(m+1)}{n}]$



seems $pi$ missed.



here is result of my work:



$int_0^infty frac{x^m , dx}{({x^n+a^n)}^r}=frac{(-1)^{r-1}pi a^{m+1-nr}Gamma [(m+1)/n]}{nsin[pi (m+1)/n](r-1)!Gamma[(m+1)/n-r+1]} , 0<m+1<nr$



ref:List of definite integrals



Remark:
@icurays1 in your link there is another wrong $Gamma [frac {(m+1)}{(n-p+1)}]$ while it could be $Gamma [(frac {m+1}{n})-p+1]$
photo






integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @icurays1 i check several times it seems to me $pi$ is missed.
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:37






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    What would Jesus Wolfram Alpha say?
    $endgroup$
    – nbubis
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I've deleted my previous comment - @neo you might be correct, I've found this which agrees with you. Someone should verify with a published table though, for instance Gradshteyn-Ryzhik
    $endgroup$
    – icurays1
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, something is wrong on that Wikipedia page. The second expression is a special case of the one you listed above, but the right hand sides do not agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Willie Wong
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @nbubis Most of the time Jesus Wolfram Alpha says "calculation too complicated...give me your money and I will do it!" ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:25
















9












$begingroup$


photo



isn't this wikipedia Definite integrals involving rational or irrational expression wrong!?



According to my calculations:
$sin[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}]$ while in wiki it is
$sin[frac{(m+1)}{n}]$



seems $pi$ missed.



here is result of my work:



$int_0^infty frac{x^m , dx}{({x^n+a^n)}^r}=frac{(-1)^{r-1}pi a^{m+1-nr}Gamma [(m+1)/n]}{nsin[pi (m+1)/n](r-1)!Gamma[(m+1)/n-r+1]} , 0<m+1<nr$



ref:List of definite integrals



Remark:
@icurays1 in your link there is another wrong $Gamma [frac {(m+1)}{(n-p+1)}]$ while it could be $Gamma [(frac {m+1}{n})-p+1]$
photo






integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @icurays1 i check several times it seems to me $pi$ is missed.
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:37






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    What would Jesus Wolfram Alpha say?
    $endgroup$
    – nbubis
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I've deleted my previous comment - @neo you might be correct, I've found this which agrees with you. Someone should verify with a published table though, for instance Gradshteyn-Ryzhik
    $endgroup$
    – icurays1
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, something is wrong on that Wikipedia page. The second expression is a special case of the one you listed above, but the right hand sides do not agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Willie Wong
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @nbubis Most of the time Jesus Wolfram Alpha says "calculation too complicated...give me your money and I will do it!" ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:25














9












9








9


2



$begingroup$


photo



isn't this wikipedia Definite integrals involving rational or irrational expression wrong!?



According to my calculations:
$sin[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}]$ while in wiki it is
$sin[frac{(m+1)}{n}]$



seems $pi$ missed.



here is result of my work:



$int_0^infty frac{x^m , dx}{({x^n+a^n)}^r}=frac{(-1)^{r-1}pi a^{m+1-nr}Gamma [(m+1)/n]}{nsin[pi (m+1)/n](r-1)!Gamma[(m+1)/n-r+1]} , 0<m+1<nr$



ref:List of definite integrals



Remark:
@icurays1 in your link there is another wrong $Gamma [frac {(m+1)}{(n-p+1)}]$ while it could be $Gamma [(frac {m+1}{n})-p+1]$
photo






integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




photo



isn't this wikipedia Definite integrals involving rational or irrational expression wrong!?



According to my calculations:
$sin[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}]$ while in wiki it is
$sin[frac{(m+1)}{n}]$



seems $pi$ missed.



here is result of my work:



$int_0^infty frac{x^m , dx}{({x^n+a^n)}^r}=frac{(-1)^{r-1}pi a^{m+1-nr}Gamma [(m+1)/n]}{nsin[pi (m+1)/n](r-1)!Gamma[(m+1)/n-r+1]} , 0<m+1<nr$



ref:List of definite integrals



Remark:
@icurays1 in your link there is another wrong $Gamma [frac {(m+1)}{(n-p+1)}]$ while it could be $Gamma [(frac {m+1}{n})-p+1]$
photo






integration




integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 23 '18 at 20:30









Glorfindel

3,41981830




3,41981830










asked Jan 30 '13 at 15:30









NeoNeo

3341213




3341213












  • $begingroup$
    @icurays1 i check several times it seems to me $pi$ is missed.
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:37






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    What would Jesus Wolfram Alpha say?
    $endgroup$
    – nbubis
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I've deleted my previous comment - @neo you might be correct, I've found this which agrees with you. Someone should verify with a published table though, for instance Gradshteyn-Ryzhik
    $endgroup$
    – icurays1
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, something is wrong on that Wikipedia page. The second expression is a special case of the one you listed above, but the right hand sides do not agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Willie Wong
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @nbubis Most of the time Jesus Wolfram Alpha says "calculation too complicated...give me your money and I will do it!" ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:25


















  • $begingroup$
    @icurays1 i check several times it seems to me $pi$ is missed.
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:37






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    What would Jesus Wolfram Alpha say?
    $endgroup$
    – nbubis
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I've deleted my previous comment - @neo you might be correct, I've found this which agrees with you. Someone should verify with a published table though, for instance Gradshteyn-Ryzhik
    $endgroup$
    – icurays1
    Jan 30 '13 at 15:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, something is wrong on that Wikipedia page. The second expression is a special case of the one you listed above, but the right hand sides do not agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Willie Wong
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @nbubis Most of the time Jesus Wolfram Alpha says "calculation too complicated...give me your money and I will do it!" ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – Matemáticos Chibchas
    Jan 30 '13 at 16:25
















$begingroup$
@icurays1 i check several times it seems to me $pi$ is missed.
$endgroup$
– Neo
Jan 30 '13 at 15:37




$begingroup$
@icurays1 i check several times it seems to me $pi$ is missed.
$endgroup$
– Neo
Jan 30 '13 at 15:37




4




4




$begingroup$
What would Jesus Wolfram Alpha say?
$endgroup$
– nbubis
Jan 30 '13 at 15:39




$begingroup$
What would Jesus Wolfram Alpha say?
$endgroup$
– nbubis
Jan 30 '13 at 15:39




1




1




$begingroup$
I've deleted my previous comment - @neo you might be correct, I've found this which agrees with you. Someone should verify with a published table though, for instance Gradshteyn-Ryzhik
$endgroup$
– icurays1
Jan 30 '13 at 15:56






$begingroup$
I've deleted my previous comment - @neo you might be correct, I've found this which agrees with you. Someone should verify with a published table though, for instance Gradshteyn-Ryzhik
$endgroup$
– icurays1
Jan 30 '13 at 15:56






1




1




$begingroup$
Well, something is wrong on that Wikipedia page. The second expression is a special case of the one you listed above, but the right hand sides do not agree.
$endgroup$
– Willie Wong
Jan 30 '13 at 16:10




$begingroup$
Well, something is wrong on that Wikipedia page. The second expression is a special case of the one you listed above, but the right hand sides do not agree.
$endgroup$
– Willie Wong
Jan 30 '13 at 16:10




3




3




$begingroup$
@nbubis Most of the time Jesus Wolfram Alpha says "calculation too complicated...give me your money and I will do it!" ;-)
$endgroup$
– Matemáticos Chibchas
Jan 30 '13 at 16:25




$begingroup$
@nbubis Most of the time Jesus Wolfram Alpha says "calculation too complicated...give me your money and I will do it!" ;-)
$endgroup$
– Matemáticos Chibchas
Jan 30 '13 at 16:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

It is definitely wrong. Take $a=1, m=0, n=2, r=1$. Then it reads
$$int_0^infty frac{1}{x^2+1},dx = frac{pi}{2 sin(1/2)}$$
which is false. The correct value is $pi/2$, which agrees with your proposed $sinleft[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}right]$.



Taking the sine of a rational number is definitely a red flag.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    ok so wikipedia equation must be modified
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 21:11











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f290628%2fisn39t-this-wikipedia-definite-integrals-involving-rational-or-irrational-exp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

It is definitely wrong. Take $a=1, m=0, n=2, r=1$. Then it reads
$$int_0^infty frac{1}{x^2+1},dx = frac{pi}{2 sin(1/2)}$$
which is false. The correct value is $pi/2$, which agrees with your proposed $sinleft[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}right]$.



Taking the sine of a rational number is definitely a red flag.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    ok so wikipedia equation must be modified
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 21:11
















8












$begingroup$

It is definitely wrong. Take $a=1, m=0, n=2, r=1$. Then it reads
$$int_0^infty frac{1}{x^2+1},dx = frac{pi}{2 sin(1/2)}$$
which is false. The correct value is $pi/2$, which agrees with your proposed $sinleft[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}right]$.



Taking the sine of a rational number is definitely a red flag.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    ok so wikipedia equation must be modified
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 21:11














8












8








8





$begingroup$

It is definitely wrong. Take $a=1, m=0, n=2, r=1$. Then it reads
$$int_0^infty frac{1}{x^2+1},dx = frac{pi}{2 sin(1/2)}$$
which is false. The correct value is $pi/2$, which agrees with your proposed $sinleft[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}right]$.



Taking the sine of a rational number is definitely a red flag.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It is definitely wrong. Take $a=1, m=0, n=2, r=1$. Then it reads
$$int_0^infty frac{1}{x^2+1},dx = frac{pi}{2 sin(1/2)}$$
which is false. The correct value is $pi/2$, which agrees with your proposed $sinleft[frac{(m+1)pi}{n}right]$.



Taking the sine of a rational number is definitely a red flag.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 7 '13 at 4:36

























answered Jan 30 '13 at 19:08









Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge

63.1k682171




63.1k682171












  • $begingroup$
    ok so wikipedia equation must be modified
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 21:11


















  • $begingroup$
    ok so wikipedia equation must be modified
    $endgroup$
    – Neo
    Jan 30 '13 at 21:11
















$begingroup$
ok so wikipedia equation must be modified
$endgroup$
– Neo
Jan 30 '13 at 21:11




$begingroup$
ok so wikipedia equation must be modified
$endgroup$
– Neo
Jan 30 '13 at 21:11


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f290628%2fisn39t-this-wikipedia-definite-integrals-involving-rational-or-irrational-exp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Image
.mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
Read more

Cabo Verde

Image
  Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º) ...
Read more

Gyllenstierna

Image
.mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
Read more