Showing that $f$ is a uniformly continuous function on the interval $[0, infty)$












2












$begingroup$


Suppose that $f$: $[0, infty) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is continuous on $[0, infty)$ and differentiable on $(1, infty)$ with bounded derivative. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous. (HINT: split $[0, infty)$ into two pieces, on each of which $f$ is uniformly continuous, then explain why this implies that $f$ is uniformly continuous on the whole $[0, infty)$.)



Question: I have solved the majority of the problem, but wanted a little clarification with regards to the explanation in the second part. Specifically there is the situation where:



$ x in [0, 1)$ and $y > 1$ (or vice versa). In this scenario I still have to show $|x - y| < delta$. Given the conditions that I have can I do the following: $$|x - y| leq |x - 1| + |y - 1| < frac{delta}{2} + frac{delta}{2} = delta$$



And if this is allowed is the reason that I should choose $1$ because the two intervals split at that specific point so it allows me to relate $x,y$ to each other?



Assuming the previous step is true then it follows:



$$ |f(x) - f(y)| leq |f(x) - f(1) + |f(1) - f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = epsilon$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I do ....I picked [0,1] and $(1,infty)$ for that reason
    $endgroup$
    – dc3rd
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The implication was that you can have the intervals overlap and not have to worry about the $x$ and the $y$ being in separate ``domains''; that is, instead of $[0,2]cup[2,infty)$, you could take $[0,2]cup[3/2,infty)$. Now simply enforce $|x-y|<frac12$ and both $x,y$ will be in the same domain.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    However, the $delta$ you are looking for is the minimum of both $delta$s for each domain, where $varepsilon /2$ is given.
    $endgroup$
    – YoungMath
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:13
















2












$begingroup$


Suppose that $f$: $[0, infty) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is continuous on $[0, infty)$ and differentiable on $(1, infty)$ with bounded derivative. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous. (HINT: split $[0, infty)$ into two pieces, on each of which $f$ is uniformly continuous, then explain why this implies that $f$ is uniformly continuous on the whole $[0, infty)$.)



Question: I have solved the majority of the problem, but wanted a little clarification with regards to the explanation in the second part. Specifically there is the situation where:



$ x in [0, 1)$ and $y > 1$ (or vice versa). In this scenario I still have to show $|x - y| < delta$. Given the conditions that I have can I do the following: $$|x - y| leq |x - 1| + |y - 1| < frac{delta}{2} + frac{delta}{2} = delta$$



And if this is allowed is the reason that I should choose $1$ because the two intervals split at that specific point so it allows me to relate $x,y$ to each other?



Assuming the previous step is true then it follows:



$$ |f(x) - f(y)| leq |f(x) - f(1) + |f(1) - f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = epsilon$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I do ....I picked [0,1] and $(1,infty)$ for that reason
    $endgroup$
    – dc3rd
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The implication was that you can have the intervals overlap and not have to worry about the $x$ and the $y$ being in separate ``domains''; that is, instead of $[0,2]cup[2,infty)$, you could take $[0,2]cup[3/2,infty)$. Now simply enforce $|x-y|<frac12$ and both $x,y$ will be in the same domain.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    However, the $delta$ you are looking for is the minimum of both $delta$s for each domain, where $varepsilon /2$ is given.
    $endgroup$
    – YoungMath
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:13














2












2








2


0



$begingroup$


Suppose that $f$: $[0, infty) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is continuous on $[0, infty)$ and differentiable on $(1, infty)$ with bounded derivative. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous. (HINT: split $[0, infty)$ into two pieces, on each of which $f$ is uniformly continuous, then explain why this implies that $f$ is uniformly continuous on the whole $[0, infty)$.)



Question: I have solved the majority of the problem, but wanted a little clarification with regards to the explanation in the second part. Specifically there is the situation where:



$ x in [0, 1)$ and $y > 1$ (or vice versa). In this scenario I still have to show $|x - y| < delta$. Given the conditions that I have can I do the following: $$|x - y| leq |x - 1| + |y - 1| < frac{delta}{2} + frac{delta}{2} = delta$$



And if this is allowed is the reason that I should choose $1$ because the two intervals split at that specific point so it allows me to relate $x,y$ to each other?



Assuming the previous step is true then it follows:



$$ |f(x) - f(y)| leq |f(x) - f(1) + |f(1) - f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = epsilon$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose that $f$: $[0, infty) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is continuous on $[0, infty)$ and differentiable on $(1, infty)$ with bounded derivative. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous. (HINT: split $[0, infty)$ into two pieces, on each of which $f$ is uniformly continuous, then explain why this implies that $f$ is uniformly continuous on the whole $[0, infty)$.)



Question: I have solved the majority of the problem, but wanted a little clarification with regards to the explanation in the second part. Specifically there is the situation where:



$ x in [0, 1)$ and $y > 1$ (or vice versa). In this scenario I still have to show $|x - y| < delta$. Given the conditions that I have can I do the following: $$|x - y| leq |x - 1| + |y - 1| < frac{delta}{2} + frac{delta}{2} = delta$$



And if this is allowed is the reason that I should choose $1$ because the two intervals split at that specific point so it allows me to relate $x,y$ to each other?



Assuming the previous step is true then it follows:



$$ |f(x) - f(y)| leq |f(x) - f(1) + |f(1) - f(y)| < frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = epsilon$$







real-analysis proof-explanation uniform-continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 23 '18 at 22:57









dc3rddc3rd

1,48611137




1,48611137












  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I do ....I picked [0,1] and $(1,infty)$ for that reason
    $endgroup$
    – dc3rd
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The implication was that you can have the intervals overlap and not have to worry about the $x$ and the $y$ being in separate ``domains''; that is, instead of $[0,2]cup[2,infty)$, you could take $[0,2]cup[3/2,infty)$. Now simply enforce $|x-y|<frac12$ and both $x,y$ will be in the same domain.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    However, the $delta$ you are looking for is the minimum of both $delta$s for each domain, where $varepsilon /2$ is given.
    $endgroup$
    – YoungMath
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:13


















  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I do ....I picked [0,1] and $(1,infty)$ for that reason
    $endgroup$
    – dc3rd
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The implication was that you can have the intervals overlap and not have to worry about the $x$ and the $y$ being in separate ``domains''; that is, instead of $[0,2]cup[2,infty)$, you could take $[0,2]cup[3/2,infty)$. Now simply enforce $|x-y|<frac12$ and both $x,y$ will be in the same domain.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    However, the $delta$ you are looking for is the minimum of both $delta$s for each domain, where $varepsilon /2$ is given.
    $endgroup$
    – YoungMath
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:13
















$begingroup$
Yes. I do ....I picked [0,1] and $(1,infty)$ for that reason
$endgroup$
– dc3rd
Dec 23 '18 at 23:37




$begingroup$
Yes. I do ....I picked [0,1] and $(1,infty)$ for that reason
$endgroup$
– dc3rd
Dec 23 '18 at 23:37




1




1




$begingroup$
The implication was that you can have the intervals overlap and not have to worry about the $x$ and the $y$ being in separate ``domains''; that is, instead of $[0,2]cup[2,infty)$, you could take $[0,2]cup[3/2,infty)$. Now simply enforce $|x-y|<frac12$ and both $x,y$ will be in the same domain.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Dec 23 '18 at 23:42




$begingroup$
The implication was that you can have the intervals overlap and not have to worry about the $x$ and the $y$ being in separate ``domains''; that is, instead of $[0,2]cup[2,infty)$, you could take $[0,2]cup[3/2,infty)$. Now simply enforce $|x-y|<frac12$ and both $x,y$ will be in the same domain.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Dec 23 '18 at 23:42




1




1




$begingroup$
However, the $delta$ you are looking for is the minimum of both $delta$s for each domain, where $varepsilon /2$ is given.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 24 '18 at 0:13




$begingroup$
However, the $delta$ you are looking for is the minimum of both $delta$s for each domain, where $varepsilon /2$ is given.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 24 '18 at 0:13










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Use MVT to show $|f(x)-f(y)|le M|x-y|$ on $(1,infty)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,1]$, for any $epsilon>0$ there exists $delta>0$ so that $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$ when $|x-y|<delta$ and $x,yin[0,1]$. If $xle 1le y$, because $f$ is continuous at $1$, there is $eta$ so that if $|x-y|<eta$ implies $|x-1|,|y-1|<eta$ and
$$|f(x)-f(y)|le |f(x)-f(1)|+|f(1)-f(y)|<epsilon $$
Now if $|x-y|<min{epsilon/M,delta,eta}$, we get $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This provides more clarity to my situation. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – dc3rd
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    However, it has to be $frac{varepsilon} {2 M}$ to satisfy the desired inequlity. Apart from that it's perfectly fine and almost the same, though a little bit more complicated imao.
    $endgroup$
    – YoungMath
    Dec 24 '18 at 21:11



















1












$begingroup$

The mean value theorem gives Lipschitz and therefore uniform continuity 
of $f$ in $[1,infty)$ including $1$. That is because you need 
differentiablity only in the interior. Moreover, $f$ is uniformly 
continuous in $[0,1]$ since every continuous function on compact sets 
are automatically uniformly continuous. 



Now, let be $varepsilon > 0$. Then,
there exist $delta_{1/2}$ such that $$ lvert f(x_i) - f(1) rvert < 
frac{varepsilon}{2} $$
for $lvert x_i - 1 rvert < delta_i$ where $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. Of course, $delta_i$ does not depend on $1$ nor $x_i$ due to the uniform continuity; this is important. Hence, 
if we choose $delta = min{ delta_1,delta_2 }$, we obtain $$ lvert 
f(x_1) - f(x_2) rvert leq lvert f(x_1) - f(1) rvert + lvert f(1) - 
f(x_2) rvert < frac{varepsilon}{2} + frac{varepsilon}{2} = 
varepsilon$$
since $$lvert x_i - 1 rvert leq lvert x_1 - x_2 rvert < delta leq delta_i$$
for $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. For arbitrary $x_1,x_2$ both entirely in either $[0,1]$ or $[1,infty)$, we can use the same $delta$ due to the choices of each $delta_i$, which proves the statement.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050776%2fshowing-that-f-is-a-uniformly-continuous-function-on-the-interval-0-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Use MVT to show $|f(x)-f(y)|le M|x-y|$ on $(1,infty)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,1]$, for any $epsilon>0$ there exists $delta>0$ so that $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$ when $|x-y|<delta$ and $x,yin[0,1]$. If $xle 1le y$, because $f$ is continuous at $1$, there is $eta$ so that if $|x-y|<eta$ implies $|x-1|,|y-1|<eta$ and
    $$|f(x)-f(y)|le |f(x)-f(1)|+|f(1)-f(y)|<epsilon $$
    Now if $|x-y|<min{epsilon/M,delta,eta}$, we get $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This provides more clarity to my situation. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – dc3rd
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:12










    • $begingroup$
      However, it has to be $frac{varepsilon} {2 M}$ to satisfy the desired inequlity. Apart from that it's perfectly fine and almost the same, though a little bit more complicated imao.
      $endgroup$
      – YoungMath
      Dec 24 '18 at 21:11
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Use MVT to show $|f(x)-f(y)|le M|x-y|$ on $(1,infty)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,1]$, for any $epsilon>0$ there exists $delta>0$ so that $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$ when $|x-y|<delta$ and $x,yin[0,1]$. If $xle 1le y$, because $f$ is continuous at $1$, there is $eta$ so that if $|x-y|<eta$ implies $|x-1|,|y-1|<eta$ and
    $$|f(x)-f(y)|le |f(x)-f(1)|+|f(1)-f(y)|<epsilon $$
    Now if $|x-y|<min{epsilon/M,delta,eta}$, we get $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This provides more clarity to my situation. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – dc3rd
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:12










    • $begingroup$
      However, it has to be $frac{varepsilon} {2 M}$ to satisfy the desired inequlity. Apart from that it's perfectly fine and almost the same, though a little bit more complicated imao.
      $endgroup$
      – YoungMath
      Dec 24 '18 at 21:11














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Use MVT to show $|f(x)-f(y)|le M|x-y|$ on $(1,infty)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,1]$, for any $epsilon>0$ there exists $delta>0$ so that $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$ when $|x-y|<delta$ and $x,yin[0,1]$. If $xle 1le y$, because $f$ is continuous at $1$, there is $eta$ so that if $|x-y|<eta$ implies $|x-1|,|y-1|<eta$ and
    $$|f(x)-f(y)|le |f(x)-f(1)|+|f(1)-f(y)|<epsilon $$
    Now if $|x-y|<min{epsilon/M,delta,eta}$, we get $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Use MVT to show $|f(x)-f(y)|le M|x-y|$ on $(1,infty)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,1]$, for any $epsilon>0$ there exists $delta>0$ so that $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$ when $|x-y|<delta$ and $x,yin[0,1]$. If $xle 1le y$, because $f$ is continuous at $1$, there is $eta$ so that if $|x-y|<eta$ implies $|x-1|,|y-1|<eta$ and
    $$|f(x)-f(y)|le |f(x)-f(1)|+|f(1)-f(y)|<epsilon $$
    Now if $|x-y|<min{epsilon/M,delta,eta}$, we get $|f(x)-f(y)|<epsilon$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 24 '18 at 1:14

























    answered Dec 23 '18 at 23:46









    Guacho PerezGuacho Perez

    3,92911132




    3,92911132












    • $begingroup$
      This provides more clarity to my situation. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – dc3rd
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:12










    • $begingroup$
      However, it has to be $frac{varepsilon} {2 M}$ to satisfy the desired inequlity. Apart from that it's perfectly fine and almost the same, though a little bit more complicated imao.
      $endgroup$
      – YoungMath
      Dec 24 '18 at 21:11


















    • $begingroup$
      This provides more clarity to my situation. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – dc3rd
      Dec 24 '18 at 20:12










    • $begingroup$
      However, it has to be $frac{varepsilon} {2 M}$ to satisfy the desired inequlity. Apart from that it's perfectly fine and almost the same, though a little bit more complicated imao.
      $endgroup$
      – YoungMath
      Dec 24 '18 at 21:11
















    $begingroup$
    This provides more clarity to my situation. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – dc3rd
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:12




    $begingroup$
    This provides more clarity to my situation. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – dc3rd
    Dec 24 '18 at 20:12












    $begingroup$
    However, it has to be $frac{varepsilon} {2 M}$ to satisfy the desired inequlity. Apart from that it's perfectly fine and almost the same, though a little bit more complicated imao.
    $endgroup$
    – YoungMath
    Dec 24 '18 at 21:11




    $begingroup$
    However, it has to be $frac{varepsilon} {2 M}$ to satisfy the desired inequlity. Apart from that it's perfectly fine and almost the same, though a little bit more complicated imao.
    $endgroup$
    – YoungMath
    Dec 24 '18 at 21:11











    1












    $begingroup$

    The mean value theorem gives Lipschitz and therefore uniform continuity 
    of $f$ in $[1,infty)$ including $1$. That is because you need 
    differentiablity only in the interior. Moreover, $f$ is uniformly 
    continuous in $[0,1]$ since every continuous function on compact sets 
    are automatically uniformly continuous. 



    Now, let be $varepsilon > 0$. Then,
    there exist $delta_{1/2}$ such that $$ lvert f(x_i) - f(1) rvert < 
    frac{varepsilon}{2} $$
    for $lvert x_i - 1 rvert < delta_i$ where $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. Of course, $delta_i$ does not depend on $1$ nor $x_i$ due to the uniform continuity; this is important. Hence, 
    if we choose $delta = min{ delta_1,delta_2 }$, we obtain $$ lvert 
    f(x_1) - f(x_2) rvert leq lvert f(x_1) - f(1) rvert + lvert f(1) - 
    f(x_2) rvert < frac{varepsilon}{2} + frac{varepsilon}{2} = 
    varepsilon$$
    since $$lvert x_i - 1 rvert leq lvert x_1 - x_2 rvert < delta leq delta_i$$
    for $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. For arbitrary $x_1,x_2$ both entirely in either $[0,1]$ or $[1,infty)$, we can use the same $delta$ due to the choices of each $delta_i$, which proves the statement.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The mean value theorem gives Lipschitz and therefore uniform continuity 
      of $f$ in $[1,infty)$ including $1$. That is because you need 
      differentiablity only in the interior. Moreover, $f$ is uniformly 
      continuous in $[0,1]$ since every continuous function on compact sets 
      are automatically uniformly continuous. 



      Now, let be $varepsilon > 0$. Then,
      there exist $delta_{1/2}$ such that $$ lvert f(x_i) - f(1) rvert < 
      frac{varepsilon}{2} $$
      for $lvert x_i - 1 rvert < delta_i$ where $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. Of course, $delta_i$ does not depend on $1$ nor $x_i$ due to the uniform continuity; this is important. Hence, 
      if we choose $delta = min{ delta_1,delta_2 }$, we obtain $$ lvert 
      f(x_1) - f(x_2) rvert leq lvert f(x_1) - f(1) rvert + lvert f(1) - 
      f(x_2) rvert < frac{varepsilon}{2} + frac{varepsilon}{2} = 
      varepsilon$$
      since $$lvert x_i - 1 rvert leq lvert x_1 - x_2 rvert < delta leq delta_i$$
      for $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. For arbitrary $x_1,x_2$ both entirely in either $[0,1]$ or $[1,infty)$, we can use the same $delta$ due to the choices of each $delta_i$, which proves the statement.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The mean value theorem gives Lipschitz and therefore uniform continuity 
        of $f$ in $[1,infty)$ including $1$. That is because you need 
        differentiablity only in the interior. Moreover, $f$ is uniformly 
        continuous in $[0,1]$ since every continuous function on compact sets 
        are automatically uniformly continuous. 



        Now, let be $varepsilon > 0$. Then,
        there exist $delta_{1/2}$ such that $$ lvert f(x_i) - f(1) rvert < 
        frac{varepsilon}{2} $$
        for $lvert x_i - 1 rvert < delta_i$ where $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. Of course, $delta_i$ does not depend on $1$ nor $x_i$ due to the uniform continuity; this is important. Hence, 
        if we choose $delta = min{ delta_1,delta_2 }$, we obtain $$ lvert 
        f(x_1) - f(x_2) rvert leq lvert f(x_1) - f(1) rvert + lvert f(1) - 
        f(x_2) rvert < frac{varepsilon}{2} + frac{varepsilon}{2} = 
        varepsilon$$
        since $$lvert x_i - 1 rvert leq lvert x_1 - x_2 rvert < delta leq delta_i$$
        for $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. For arbitrary $x_1,x_2$ both entirely in either $[0,1]$ or $[1,infty)$, we can use the same $delta$ due to the choices of each $delta_i$, which proves the statement.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The mean value theorem gives Lipschitz and therefore uniform continuity 
        of $f$ in $[1,infty)$ including $1$. That is because you need 
        differentiablity only in the interior. Moreover, $f$ is uniformly 
        continuous in $[0,1]$ since every continuous function on compact sets 
        are automatically uniformly continuous. 



        Now, let be $varepsilon > 0$. Then,
        there exist $delta_{1/2}$ such that $$ lvert f(x_i) - f(1) rvert < 
        frac{varepsilon}{2} $$
        for $lvert x_i - 1 rvert < delta_i$ where $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. Of course, $delta_i$ does not depend on $1$ nor $x_i$ due to the uniform continuity; this is important. Hence, 
        if we choose $delta = min{ delta_1,delta_2 }$, we obtain $$ lvert 
        f(x_1) - f(x_2) rvert leq lvert f(x_1) - f(1) rvert + lvert f(1) - 
        f(x_2) rvert < frac{varepsilon}{2} + frac{varepsilon}{2} = 
        varepsilon$$
        since $$lvert x_i - 1 rvert leq lvert x_1 - x_2 rvert < delta leq delta_i$$
        for $0 leq x_1 leq 1 leq x_2$. For arbitrary $x_1,x_2$ both entirely in either $[0,1]$ or $[1,infty)$, we can use the same $delta$ due to the choices of each $delta_i$, which proves the statement.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 24 '18 at 22:07

























        answered Dec 24 '18 at 16:13









        YoungMathYoungMath

        190110




        190110






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050776%2fshowing-that-f-is-a-uniformly-continuous-function-on-the-interval-0-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna