Show that $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$












7












$begingroup$



Show that $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.




To my knowledge I have to show two things:




  1. $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is path connected for $ngeq 3$.


  2. Every closed curve in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}, ngeq 3$ is null-homotop.



The problem is that I do not know exactly how to show that.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Path-connectedness is easy. For the second part, you can project each closed curve onto the unit sphere (it's not hard to find a homotopy if you explicitly want one). Then if the resulting curve is not surjective, it's easy because $S^{n-1} setminus {p}$ is homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. If the resulting curve is surjective, you can partition it into parts each leaving out one of two opposed caps, and use that partition to find a homotopy with a non-surjective closed path.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you think of a way to deformation retract to a more familiar space, maybe to one with $pi_1=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Allums
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer I suggest you write it as an answer and improve it afterwards if you feel it's necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – Git Gud
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How about this for 1? Your point $p$ lives on a sphere of radius $r>0$ about the origin. This sphere intersects the ray starting at the origin and going through $q$. Take any path along the sphere from $p$ to the intersection point, and then continue along the straightline to $q$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Think about it in spherically, given $x,y$ we know $|x|,|y|>0$ so project $y$ onto the sphere of radius $|x|$ and then move on this sphere to $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:19
















7












$begingroup$



Show that $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.




To my knowledge I have to show two things:




  1. $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is path connected for $ngeq 3$.


  2. Every closed curve in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}, ngeq 3$ is null-homotop.



The problem is that I do not know exactly how to show that.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Path-connectedness is easy. For the second part, you can project each closed curve onto the unit sphere (it's not hard to find a homotopy if you explicitly want one). Then if the resulting curve is not surjective, it's easy because $S^{n-1} setminus {p}$ is homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. If the resulting curve is surjective, you can partition it into parts each leaving out one of two opposed caps, and use that partition to find a homotopy with a non-surjective closed path.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you think of a way to deformation retract to a more familiar space, maybe to one with $pi_1=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Allums
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer I suggest you write it as an answer and improve it afterwards if you feel it's necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – Git Gud
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How about this for 1? Your point $p$ lives on a sphere of radius $r>0$ about the origin. This sphere intersects the ray starting at the origin and going through $q$. Take any path along the sphere from $p$ to the intersection point, and then continue along the straightline to $q$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Think about it in spherically, given $x,y$ we know $|x|,|y|>0$ so project $y$ onto the sphere of radius $|x|$ and then move on this sphere to $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:19














7












7








7


2



$begingroup$



Show that $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.




To my knowledge I have to show two things:




  1. $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is path connected for $ngeq 3$.


  2. Every closed curve in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}, ngeq 3$ is null-homotop.



The problem is that I do not know exactly how to show that.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Show that $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.




To my knowledge I have to show two things:




  1. $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}$ is path connected for $ngeq 3$.


  2. Every closed curve in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus {0}, ngeq 3$ is null-homotop.



The problem is that I do not know exactly how to show that.







algebraic-topology connectedness






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 6 '13 at 18:12









Thomas

35.5k1056116




35.5k1056116










asked Jul 6 '13 at 17:15









math12math12

1,89411844




1,89411844








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Path-connectedness is easy. For the second part, you can project each closed curve onto the unit sphere (it's not hard to find a homotopy if you explicitly want one). Then if the resulting curve is not surjective, it's easy because $S^{n-1} setminus {p}$ is homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. If the resulting curve is surjective, you can partition it into parts each leaving out one of two opposed caps, and use that partition to find a homotopy with a non-surjective closed path.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you think of a way to deformation retract to a more familiar space, maybe to one with $pi_1=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Allums
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer I suggest you write it as an answer and improve it afterwards if you feel it's necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – Git Gud
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How about this for 1? Your point $p$ lives on a sphere of radius $r>0$ about the origin. This sphere intersects the ray starting at the origin and going through $q$. Take any path along the sphere from $p$ to the intersection point, and then continue along the straightline to $q$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Think about it in spherically, given $x,y$ we know $|x|,|y|>0$ so project $y$ onto the sphere of radius $|x|$ and then move on this sphere to $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:19














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Path-connectedness is easy. For the second part, you can project each closed curve onto the unit sphere (it's not hard to find a homotopy if you explicitly want one). Then if the resulting curve is not surjective, it's easy because $S^{n-1} setminus {p}$ is homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. If the resulting curve is surjective, you can partition it into parts each leaving out one of two opposed caps, and use that partition to find a homotopy with a non-surjective closed path.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you think of a way to deformation retract to a more familiar space, maybe to one with $pi_1=0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Allums
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielFischer I suggest you write it as an answer and improve it afterwards if you feel it's necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – Git Gud
    Jul 6 '13 at 17:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How about this for 1? Your point $p$ lives on a sphere of radius $r>0$ about the origin. This sphere intersects the ray starting at the origin and going through $q$. Take any path along the sphere from $p$ to the intersection point, and then continue along the straightline to $q$.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Think about it in spherically, given $x,y$ we know $|x|,|y|>0$ so project $y$ onto the sphere of radius $|x|$ and then move on this sphere to $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Jul 6 '13 at 18:19








1




1




$begingroup$
Path-connectedness is easy. For the second part, you can project each closed curve onto the unit sphere (it's not hard to find a homotopy if you explicitly want one). Then if the resulting curve is not surjective, it's easy because $S^{n-1} setminus {p}$ is homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. If the resulting curve is surjective, you can partition it into parts each leaving out one of two opposed caps, and use that partition to find a homotopy with a non-surjective closed path.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Jul 6 '13 at 17:20






$begingroup$
Path-connectedness is easy. For the second part, you can project each closed curve onto the unit sphere (it's not hard to find a homotopy if you explicitly want one). Then if the resulting curve is not surjective, it's easy because $S^{n-1} setminus {p}$ is homeomorphic to $mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. If the resulting curve is surjective, you can partition it into parts each leaving out one of two opposed caps, and use that partition to find a homotopy with a non-surjective closed path.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Jul 6 '13 at 17:20






1




1




$begingroup$
Can you think of a way to deformation retract to a more familiar space, maybe to one with $pi_1=0$?
$endgroup$
– Derek Allums
Jul 6 '13 at 17:21




$begingroup$
Can you think of a way to deformation retract to a more familiar space, maybe to one with $pi_1=0$?
$endgroup$
– Derek Allums
Jul 6 '13 at 17:21




1




1




$begingroup$
@DanielFischer I suggest you write it as an answer and improve it afterwards if you feel it's necessary.
$endgroup$
– Git Gud
Jul 6 '13 at 17:22




$begingroup$
@DanielFischer I suggest you write it as an answer and improve it afterwards if you feel it's necessary.
$endgroup$
– Git Gud
Jul 6 '13 at 17:22




1




1




$begingroup$
How about this for 1? Your point $p$ lives on a sphere of radius $r>0$ about the origin. This sphere intersects the ray starting at the origin and going through $q$. Take any path along the sphere from $p$ to the intersection point, and then continue along the straightline to $q$.
$endgroup$
– Matt
Jul 6 '13 at 18:17




$begingroup$
How about this for 1? Your point $p$ lives on a sphere of radius $r>0$ about the origin. This sphere intersects the ray starting at the origin and going through $q$. Take any path along the sphere from $p$ to the intersection point, and then continue along the straightline to $q$.
$endgroup$
– Matt
Jul 6 '13 at 18:17




1




1




$begingroup$
Think about it in spherically, given $x,y$ we know $|x|,|y|>0$ so project $y$ onto the sphere of radius $|x|$ and then move on this sphere to $x$.
$endgroup$
– James
Jul 6 '13 at 18:19




$begingroup$
Think about it in spherically, given $x,y$ we know $|x|,|y|>0$ so project $y$ onto the sphere of radius $|x|$ and then move on this sphere to $x$.
$endgroup$
– James
Jul 6 '13 at 18:19










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

The path connectedness is easy. Given $x,, y in mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$, the straight line segment $t mapsto (1-t)cdot x + tcdot y$ connects $x$ and $y$ in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ unless $y$ is a negative multiple of $x$. If $y = ccdot x$ for a $c < 0$, then you can compose a path of two straight line segments, one going a little away from $x$ to $x + varepsiloncdot e_i$ for a small enough $varepsilon > 0$ and $i$ such that $x$ is not a multiple of $e_i$.



It could also be easily seen from the homeomorphism



$$Fcolon S^{n-1} times (0,,infty) to mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0};quad (xi,,r) mapsto rcdot xi.$$



(A proof that $F$ is indeed a homeomorphism may be required, or that may be considered obvious, depending on what was treated previously.)



Given a closed path $gamma colon t mapsto (xi(t),, r(t))$ in $S^{n-1}times (0,,infty)$, the map $H(s,t) = (xi(t),, r(t)^{1-s})$ provides a homotopy to a closed path in $S^{n-1}$.



If you already know that $S^d$ is simply connected for $d geqslant 2$, you are done now.



Otherwise, to prove that fact, consider a closed path $gammacolon [0,,1] to S^{n-1}$. If $gamma([0,,1]) neq S^{n-1}$, assume without loss of generality that the north pole $N = (0,,ldots,,0,,1)$ is not on the trace of $gamma$. Stereographic projection from the north pole gives a homeomorphism $S^{n-1}setminus {N} to R^{n-1}$ (proof may be required), and that shows that $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}setminus {N}$, hence a fortiori in $S^{n-1}$.



If $gamma$ is surjective, you can partition it into parts that each omit one of two opposing caps of the sphere.



Consider for example the two caps $T = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n geqslant frac23}$, $B = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n leqslant -frac23}$ and the belt $E = {xin S^{n-1}colon lvert x_nrvert leqslant frac13}$.



By uniform continuity of $gamma$, there is a $varepsilon > 0$ such that $gamma(t) in B land lvert s-trvert < varepsilon Rightarrow gamma(s) notin E cup T$, and similar for all other combinations of $B,,E,,T$.



Without loss of generality, suppose that $gamma$ starts (and ends) in the south pole.



Set $t_0 = 0$. While $t_k < 1$, find the next partition point $t_{k+1}$ in the following way:




  • If $gamma(t_k) in B$, let $t_{k+1} = minbigl({s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E} cup {1}bigr)$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in E$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in Tcup B}$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in T$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E}$.


By the uniform continuity mentioned above, $t_m = 1$ for an $m leqslant frac{1}{varepsilon}$.



Let $gamma_k$ be the restriction of $gamma$ to $[t_k,,t_{k+1}]$.



If $gamma(t_{k}) in T$, then the composition $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is a path connecting two points $a,, b in E$ in $S^{n-1}setminus B$. The latter is homeomorphic to an open ball, so $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is homotopic to a path connecting $a$ and $b$ in $E$.



Replacing all the $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ with homotopic paths in $E$, you obtain a path homotopic to $gamma$ whose trace omits $T$, hence by the above, it, and therefore also $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand what the homeomorphism F does...
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:07










  • $begingroup$
    In what sense do you not understand? As a mapping, it maps a direction (given by a point on the sphere) and a radius to the corresponding point in the space. Polar coordinates, pretty much. If you wonder what role it plays here, not a big one, but it exposes $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ as the product of two path-connected spaces, so shows the path-connectedness, and it reduces the homotopy question to homotopies on a sphere.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:17












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, you show that every point in $mathbb{R}^nsetminusleft{0right}$ can be identified with a point on the unit sphere and so two different points can be connected by walking on the unit sphere?
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:26












  • $begingroup$
    Not exactly, $F^{-1}(x) = (x/lVert xrVert,, lVert xrVert)$, so a point in $mathbb{R}^{n-1}setminus{0}$ can be identified with the intersection of the ray (emanating from $0$) through this point, and the distance of the point to $0$. You can then connect any two points by 1) going to the sphere along the ray, 2) walking on the sphere, 3) going from the sphere to the endpoint on the ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:30



















3












$begingroup$

The easy part of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem and which does not require an algebraic context (e.g. groups or groupoids) is that if $X$ is the union of a family $mathcal U$ of path connected and simply connected open sets $U_i$ such that any pairwise intersection $U_i cap U_j$ is path connected, and all containing a "base point" $a in X$, then $X$ is simply connected. The key part of the proof is conveyed by the following diagram



connected



in which $alpha$ is a loop in $X$ at the base point $a$ subdivided so that each part $alpha_i$ lies in a set say $U_i$ of $mathcal U$. The start point $x_i$ of $alpha_i$ shown as $circ$ need not be at the base point. However $x_i$ lies in $U_{i-1} cap U_i$ which is path connected; so there is a path $gamma_i$ in $ U_{i-1} cap U_i $ joining $x_i$ to the base point, and we set $gamma_i$ to be constant for $i=0,n$. Now each path $zeta_i= gamma_i^{-1}alpha_igamma_{i+1} $lies in $U_i$ which is simply connected, and so is homotopic in $U_i$ rel end points to a constant path $beta_i$. Hence $alpha$ is null homotopic, using the "horizontal" composition of these homotopies.



Note that even for this result we need a " horizontal composition of squares", and such an intuition is the start of a $2$-dimensional theory.



This type of argument was generalised by J.F. Adams (in unpublished lecture notes) to prove any map $S^r to S^n$ is null homotopic for $r <n$, see 7.6.1 of Topology and Groupoids.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: Thanks for the comment. I'm busy preparing travel from N. Wales to Strasbourg tomorrow for the Loday Memorial Conference, so I hope to have time to think on it on the train. I know the next stage of deforming a subdivided homotopy does need the 3-fold intersection criterion, but thought we could get away with this argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 2 '13 at 20:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: The point is that the intersection of the sets has to contain the base point! Thanks again.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 3 '13 at 5:43












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, of course. That's a nice proof then.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Sep 3 '13 at 8:39



















1












$begingroup$

You can sledgehammer proof your problem by induction on the number of points that you remove and the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Say $x_1,ldots,x_m$ are the points that you remove. We will induct on $m$. When $m = 1$ this is easy because $Bbb{R}^n$ minus a point is homotopy equivalent to $S^{n-1}$ that is simply connected for $ngeq 3$. For the general case of $x_1,ldots,x_m$ points removed, I claim we can find a hyperplane $H$ that separates the first $x_1,ldots,x_l$ points and last $x_{l+1},ldots,x_m$ points. Let $U$ be the open cube minus contains the first $l$ points and $V$ the open cube minus the rest of the points. Then $Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = U cup V$ and then Seifer-van Kampen says that



$$pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) cong pi_1(U)ast pi_1(V)/operatorname{some subgroup}.$$



We don't care about the subgroup at the moment because by induction $pi_1(U) = pi_1(V) = 0$ and so $pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = 0$. Done.



Edit: For those not convinced $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $n geq 3$ here's a proof: Let $U$ be the upper hemisphere and $V$ the lower hemisphere, choose epsilon fattenings of these if you wish. For $n geq 3$, $U cap V$ is homotopy equivalent to the equator $S^{n-2}$ that is path - connected for $n geq 3$. $U,V$ are homotopy equivalent to $D^{n-1}$ which is simply connected for $n geq 3$. The hypotheses of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem are now satisfied and applying it to $U$ and $V$ shows $pi_1(S^{n-1}) = 0$ for $n geq 3$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notice that the proof of the van Kampen theorem itself involves (a generalization of) the exact same argument given by Daniel in his answer (In fact, that is the easy part of the proof of vK's theorem!). Also, notice that (up to equivalence) the question of the OP is precisely «how to prove $S^n$ is simply connected?» which is, exactly, the one you waved away with an «it is easy» :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:32












  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I added a proof that $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:47










  • $begingroup$
    Ben, in that special case the proof of the vK theorem is exactly that given by Daniel.
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I don't remember the proof of van Kampen very much and I haven't looked at algebraic topology for a while, so that was my shot above :)
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask why there is such a hyperplane H? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Apr 21 '14 at 14:03











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f437596%2fshow-that-mathbbrn-setminus-0-is-simply-connected-for-n-geq-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

The path connectedness is easy. Given $x,, y in mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$, the straight line segment $t mapsto (1-t)cdot x + tcdot y$ connects $x$ and $y$ in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ unless $y$ is a negative multiple of $x$. If $y = ccdot x$ for a $c < 0$, then you can compose a path of two straight line segments, one going a little away from $x$ to $x + varepsiloncdot e_i$ for a small enough $varepsilon > 0$ and $i$ such that $x$ is not a multiple of $e_i$.



It could also be easily seen from the homeomorphism



$$Fcolon S^{n-1} times (0,,infty) to mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0};quad (xi,,r) mapsto rcdot xi.$$



(A proof that $F$ is indeed a homeomorphism may be required, or that may be considered obvious, depending on what was treated previously.)



Given a closed path $gamma colon t mapsto (xi(t),, r(t))$ in $S^{n-1}times (0,,infty)$, the map $H(s,t) = (xi(t),, r(t)^{1-s})$ provides a homotopy to a closed path in $S^{n-1}$.



If you already know that $S^d$ is simply connected for $d geqslant 2$, you are done now.



Otherwise, to prove that fact, consider a closed path $gammacolon [0,,1] to S^{n-1}$. If $gamma([0,,1]) neq S^{n-1}$, assume without loss of generality that the north pole $N = (0,,ldots,,0,,1)$ is not on the trace of $gamma$. Stereographic projection from the north pole gives a homeomorphism $S^{n-1}setminus {N} to R^{n-1}$ (proof may be required), and that shows that $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}setminus {N}$, hence a fortiori in $S^{n-1}$.



If $gamma$ is surjective, you can partition it into parts that each omit one of two opposing caps of the sphere.



Consider for example the two caps $T = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n geqslant frac23}$, $B = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n leqslant -frac23}$ and the belt $E = {xin S^{n-1}colon lvert x_nrvert leqslant frac13}$.



By uniform continuity of $gamma$, there is a $varepsilon > 0$ such that $gamma(t) in B land lvert s-trvert < varepsilon Rightarrow gamma(s) notin E cup T$, and similar for all other combinations of $B,,E,,T$.



Without loss of generality, suppose that $gamma$ starts (and ends) in the south pole.



Set $t_0 = 0$. While $t_k < 1$, find the next partition point $t_{k+1}$ in the following way:




  • If $gamma(t_k) in B$, let $t_{k+1} = minbigl({s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E} cup {1}bigr)$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in E$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in Tcup B}$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in T$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E}$.


By the uniform continuity mentioned above, $t_m = 1$ for an $m leqslant frac{1}{varepsilon}$.



Let $gamma_k$ be the restriction of $gamma$ to $[t_k,,t_{k+1}]$.



If $gamma(t_{k}) in T$, then the composition $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is a path connecting two points $a,, b in E$ in $S^{n-1}setminus B$. The latter is homeomorphic to an open ball, so $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is homotopic to a path connecting $a$ and $b$ in $E$.



Replacing all the $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ with homotopic paths in $E$, you obtain a path homotopic to $gamma$ whose trace omits $T$, hence by the above, it, and therefore also $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand what the homeomorphism F does...
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:07










  • $begingroup$
    In what sense do you not understand? As a mapping, it maps a direction (given by a point on the sphere) and a radius to the corresponding point in the space. Polar coordinates, pretty much. If you wonder what role it plays here, not a big one, but it exposes $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ as the product of two path-connected spaces, so shows the path-connectedness, and it reduces the homotopy question to homotopies on a sphere.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:17












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, you show that every point in $mathbb{R}^nsetminusleft{0right}$ can be identified with a point on the unit sphere and so two different points can be connected by walking on the unit sphere?
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:26












  • $begingroup$
    Not exactly, $F^{-1}(x) = (x/lVert xrVert,, lVert xrVert)$, so a point in $mathbb{R}^{n-1}setminus{0}$ can be identified with the intersection of the ray (emanating from $0$) through this point, and the distance of the point to $0$. You can then connect any two points by 1) going to the sphere along the ray, 2) walking on the sphere, 3) going from the sphere to the endpoint on the ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:30
















7












$begingroup$

The path connectedness is easy. Given $x,, y in mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$, the straight line segment $t mapsto (1-t)cdot x + tcdot y$ connects $x$ and $y$ in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ unless $y$ is a negative multiple of $x$. If $y = ccdot x$ for a $c < 0$, then you can compose a path of two straight line segments, one going a little away from $x$ to $x + varepsiloncdot e_i$ for a small enough $varepsilon > 0$ and $i$ such that $x$ is not a multiple of $e_i$.



It could also be easily seen from the homeomorphism



$$Fcolon S^{n-1} times (0,,infty) to mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0};quad (xi,,r) mapsto rcdot xi.$$



(A proof that $F$ is indeed a homeomorphism may be required, or that may be considered obvious, depending on what was treated previously.)



Given a closed path $gamma colon t mapsto (xi(t),, r(t))$ in $S^{n-1}times (0,,infty)$, the map $H(s,t) = (xi(t),, r(t)^{1-s})$ provides a homotopy to a closed path in $S^{n-1}$.



If you already know that $S^d$ is simply connected for $d geqslant 2$, you are done now.



Otherwise, to prove that fact, consider a closed path $gammacolon [0,,1] to S^{n-1}$. If $gamma([0,,1]) neq S^{n-1}$, assume without loss of generality that the north pole $N = (0,,ldots,,0,,1)$ is not on the trace of $gamma$. Stereographic projection from the north pole gives a homeomorphism $S^{n-1}setminus {N} to R^{n-1}$ (proof may be required), and that shows that $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}setminus {N}$, hence a fortiori in $S^{n-1}$.



If $gamma$ is surjective, you can partition it into parts that each omit one of two opposing caps of the sphere.



Consider for example the two caps $T = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n geqslant frac23}$, $B = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n leqslant -frac23}$ and the belt $E = {xin S^{n-1}colon lvert x_nrvert leqslant frac13}$.



By uniform continuity of $gamma$, there is a $varepsilon > 0$ such that $gamma(t) in B land lvert s-trvert < varepsilon Rightarrow gamma(s) notin E cup T$, and similar for all other combinations of $B,,E,,T$.



Without loss of generality, suppose that $gamma$ starts (and ends) in the south pole.



Set $t_0 = 0$. While $t_k < 1$, find the next partition point $t_{k+1}$ in the following way:




  • If $gamma(t_k) in B$, let $t_{k+1} = minbigl({s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E} cup {1}bigr)$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in E$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in Tcup B}$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in T$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E}$.


By the uniform continuity mentioned above, $t_m = 1$ for an $m leqslant frac{1}{varepsilon}$.



Let $gamma_k$ be the restriction of $gamma$ to $[t_k,,t_{k+1}]$.



If $gamma(t_{k}) in T$, then the composition $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is a path connecting two points $a,, b in E$ in $S^{n-1}setminus B$. The latter is homeomorphic to an open ball, so $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is homotopic to a path connecting $a$ and $b$ in $E$.



Replacing all the $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ with homotopic paths in $E$, you obtain a path homotopic to $gamma$ whose trace omits $T$, hence by the above, it, and therefore also $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand what the homeomorphism F does...
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:07










  • $begingroup$
    In what sense do you not understand? As a mapping, it maps a direction (given by a point on the sphere) and a radius to the corresponding point in the space. Polar coordinates, pretty much. If you wonder what role it plays here, not a big one, but it exposes $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ as the product of two path-connected spaces, so shows the path-connectedness, and it reduces the homotopy question to homotopies on a sphere.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:17












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, you show that every point in $mathbb{R}^nsetminusleft{0right}$ can be identified with a point on the unit sphere and so two different points can be connected by walking on the unit sphere?
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:26












  • $begingroup$
    Not exactly, $F^{-1}(x) = (x/lVert xrVert,, lVert xrVert)$, so a point in $mathbb{R}^{n-1}setminus{0}$ can be identified with the intersection of the ray (emanating from $0$) through this point, and the distance of the point to $0$. You can then connect any two points by 1) going to the sphere along the ray, 2) walking on the sphere, 3) going from the sphere to the endpoint on the ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:30














7












7








7





$begingroup$

The path connectedness is easy. Given $x,, y in mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$, the straight line segment $t mapsto (1-t)cdot x + tcdot y$ connects $x$ and $y$ in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ unless $y$ is a negative multiple of $x$. If $y = ccdot x$ for a $c < 0$, then you can compose a path of two straight line segments, one going a little away from $x$ to $x + varepsiloncdot e_i$ for a small enough $varepsilon > 0$ and $i$ such that $x$ is not a multiple of $e_i$.



It could also be easily seen from the homeomorphism



$$Fcolon S^{n-1} times (0,,infty) to mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0};quad (xi,,r) mapsto rcdot xi.$$



(A proof that $F$ is indeed a homeomorphism may be required, or that may be considered obvious, depending on what was treated previously.)



Given a closed path $gamma colon t mapsto (xi(t),, r(t))$ in $S^{n-1}times (0,,infty)$, the map $H(s,t) = (xi(t),, r(t)^{1-s})$ provides a homotopy to a closed path in $S^{n-1}$.



If you already know that $S^d$ is simply connected for $d geqslant 2$, you are done now.



Otherwise, to prove that fact, consider a closed path $gammacolon [0,,1] to S^{n-1}$. If $gamma([0,,1]) neq S^{n-1}$, assume without loss of generality that the north pole $N = (0,,ldots,,0,,1)$ is not on the trace of $gamma$. Stereographic projection from the north pole gives a homeomorphism $S^{n-1}setminus {N} to R^{n-1}$ (proof may be required), and that shows that $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}setminus {N}$, hence a fortiori in $S^{n-1}$.



If $gamma$ is surjective, you can partition it into parts that each omit one of two opposing caps of the sphere.



Consider for example the two caps $T = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n geqslant frac23}$, $B = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n leqslant -frac23}$ and the belt $E = {xin S^{n-1}colon lvert x_nrvert leqslant frac13}$.



By uniform continuity of $gamma$, there is a $varepsilon > 0$ such that $gamma(t) in B land lvert s-trvert < varepsilon Rightarrow gamma(s) notin E cup T$, and similar for all other combinations of $B,,E,,T$.



Without loss of generality, suppose that $gamma$ starts (and ends) in the south pole.



Set $t_0 = 0$. While $t_k < 1$, find the next partition point $t_{k+1}$ in the following way:




  • If $gamma(t_k) in B$, let $t_{k+1} = minbigl({s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E} cup {1}bigr)$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in E$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in Tcup B}$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in T$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E}$.


By the uniform continuity mentioned above, $t_m = 1$ for an $m leqslant frac{1}{varepsilon}$.



Let $gamma_k$ be the restriction of $gamma$ to $[t_k,,t_{k+1}]$.



If $gamma(t_{k}) in T$, then the composition $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is a path connecting two points $a,, b in E$ in $S^{n-1}setminus B$. The latter is homeomorphic to an open ball, so $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is homotopic to a path connecting $a$ and $b$ in $E$.



Replacing all the $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ with homotopic paths in $E$, you obtain a path homotopic to $gamma$ whose trace omits $T$, hence by the above, it, and therefore also $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The path connectedness is easy. Given $x,, y in mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$, the straight line segment $t mapsto (1-t)cdot x + tcdot y$ connects $x$ and $y$ in $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ unless $y$ is a negative multiple of $x$. If $y = ccdot x$ for a $c < 0$, then you can compose a path of two straight line segments, one going a little away from $x$ to $x + varepsiloncdot e_i$ for a small enough $varepsilon > 0$ and $i$ such that $x$ is not a multiple of $e_i$.



It could also be easily seen from the homeomorphism



$$Fcolon S^{n-1} times (0,,infty) to mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0};quad (xi,,r) mapsto rcdot xi.$$



(A proof that $F$ is indeed a homeomorphism may be required, or that may be considered obvious, depending on what was treated previously.)



Given a closed path $gamma colon t mapsto (xi(t),, r(t))$ in $S^{n-1}times (0,,infty)$, the map $H(s,t) = (xi(t),, r(t)^{1-s})$ provides a homotopy to a closed path in $S^{n-1}$.



If you already know that $S^d$ is simply connected for $d geqslant 2$, you are done now.



Otherwise, to prove that fact, consider a closed path $gammacolon [0,,1] to S^{n-1}$. If $gamma([0,,1]) neq S^{n-1}$, assume without loss of generality that the north pole $N = (0,,ldots,,0,,1)$ is not on the trace of $gamma$. Stereographic projection from the north pole gives a homeomorphism $S^{n-1}setminus {N} to R^{n-1}$ (proof may be required), and that shows that $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}setminus {N}$, hence a fortiori in $S^{n-1}$.



If $gamma$ is surjective, you can partition it into parts that each omit one of two opposing caps of the sphere.



Consider for example the two caps $T = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n geqslant frac23}$, $B = {x in S^{n-1}colon x_n leqslant -frac23}$ and the belt $E = {xin S^{n-1}colon lvert x_nrvert leqslant frac13}$.



By uniform continuity of $gamma$, there is a $varepsilon > 0$ such that $gamma(t) in B land lvert s-trvert < varepsilon Rightarrow gamma(s) notin E cup T$, and similar for all other combinations of $B,,E,,T$.



Without loss of generality, suppose that $gamma$ starts (and ends) in the south pole.



Set $t_0 = 0$. While $t_k < 1$, find the next partition point $t_{k+1}$ in the following way:




  • If $gamma(t_k) in B$, let $t_{k+1} = minbigl({s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E} cup {1}bigr)$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in E$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in Tcup B}$.

  • If $gamma(t_k) in T$, let $t_{k+1} = min {s > t_k colon gamma(s) in E}$.


By the uniform continuity mentioned above, $t_m = 1$ for an $m leqslant frac{1}{varepsilon}$.



Let $gamma_k$ be the restriction of $gamma$ to $[t_k,,t_{k+1}]$.



If $gamma(t_{k}) in T$, then the composition $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is a path connecting two points $a,, b in E$ in $S^{n-1}setminus B$. The latter is homeomorphic to an open ball, so $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ is homotopic to a path connecting $a$ and $b$ in $E$.



Replacing all the $gamma_{k-1}gamma_k$ with homotopic paths in $E$, you obtain a path homotopic to $gamma$ whose trace omits $T$, hence by the above, it, and therefore also $gamma$ is null-homotopic in $S^{n-1}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jul 6 '13 at 18:36









Daniel FischerDaniel Fischer

173k16167286




173k16167286












  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand what the homeomorphism F does...
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:07










  • $begingroup$
    In what sense do you not understand? As a mapping, it maps a direction (given by a point on the sphere) and a radius to the corresponding point in the space. Polar coordinates, pretty much. If you wonder what role it plays here, not a big one, but it exposes $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ as the product of two path-connected spaces, so shows the path-connectedness, and it reduces the homotopy question to homotopies on a sphere.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:17












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, you show that every point in $mathbb{R}^nsetminusleft{0right}$ can be identified with a point on the unit sphere and so two different points can be connected by walking on the unit sphere?
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:26












  • $begingroup$
    Not exactly, $F^{-1}(x) = (x/lVert xrVert,, lVert xrVert)$, so a point in $mathbb{R}^{n-1}setminus{0}$ can be identified with the intersection of the ray (emanating from $0$) through this point, and the distance of the point to $0$. You can then connect any two points by 1) going to the sphere along the ray, 2) walking on the sphere, 3) going from the sphere to the endpoint on the ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:30


















  • $begingroup$
    I do not understand what the homeomorphism F does...
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:07










  • $begingroup$
    In what sense do you not understand? As a mapping, it maps a direction (given by a point on the sphere) and a radius to the corresponding point in the space. Polar coordinates, pretty much. If you wonder what role it plays here, not a big one, but it exposes $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ as the product of two path-connected spaces, so shows the path-connectedness, and it reduces the homotopy question to homotopies on a sphere.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:17












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, you show that every point in $mathbb{R}^nsetminusleft{0right}$ can be identified with a point on the unit sphere and so two different points can be connected by walking on the unit sphere?
    $endgroup$
    – math12
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:26












  • $begingroup$
    Not exactly, $F^{-1}(x) = (x/lVert xrVert,, lVert xrVert)$, so a point in $mathbb{R}^{n-1}setminus{0}$ can be identified with the intersection of the ray (emanating from $0$) through this point, and the distance of the point to $0$. You can then connect any two points by 1) going to the sphere along the ray, 2) walking on the sphere, 3) going from the sphere to the endpoint on the ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:30
















$begingroup$
I do not understand what the homeomorphism F does...
$endgroup$
– math12
Jul 6 '13 at 19:07




$begingroup$
I do not understand what the homeomorphism F does...
$endgroup$
– math12
Jul 6 '13 at 19:07












$begingroup$
In what sense do you not understand? As a mapping, it maps a direction (given by a point on the sphere) and a radius to the corresponding point in the space. Polar coordinates, pretty much. If you wonder what role it plays here, not a big one, but it exposes $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ as the product of two path-connected spaces, so shows the path-connectedness, and it reduces the homotopy question to homotopies on a sphere.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Jul 6 '13 at 19:17






$begingroup$
In what sense do you not understand? As a mapping, it maps a direction (given by a point on the sphere) and a radius to the corresponding point in the space. Polar coordinates, pretty much. If you wonder what role it plays here, not a big one, but it exposes $mathbb{R}^nsetminus{0}$ as the product of two path-connected spaces, so shows the path-connectedness, and it reduces the homotopy question to homotopies on a sphere.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Jul 6 '13 at 19:17














$begingroup$
Ah, you show that every point in $mathbb{R}^nsetminusleft{0right}$ can be identified with a point on the unit sphere and so two different points can be connected by walking on the unit sphere?
$endgroup$
– math12
Jul 6 '13 at 19:26






$begingroup$
Ah, you show that every point in $mathbb{R}^nsetminusleft{0right}$ can be identified with a point on the unit sphere and so two different points can be connected by walking on the unit sphere?
$endgroup$
– math12
Jul 6 '13 at 19:26














$begingroup$
Not exactly, $F^{-1}(x) = (x/lVert xrVert,, lVert xrVert)$, so a point in $mathbb{R}^{n-1}setminus{0}$ can be identified with the intersection of the ray (emanating from $0$) through this point, and the distance of the point to $0$. You can then connect any two points by 1) going to the sphere along the ray, 2) walking on the sphere, 3) going from the sphere to the endpoint on the ray.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Jul 6 '13 at 19:30




$begingroup$
Not exactly, $F^{-1}(x) = (x/lVert xrVert,, lVert xrVert)$, so a point in $mathbb{R}^{n-1}setminus{0}$ can be identified with the intersection of the ray (emanating from $0$) through this point, and the distance of the point to $0$. You can then connect any two points by 1) going to the sphere along the ray, 2) walking on the sphere, 3) going from the sphere to the endpoint on the ray.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Jul 6 '13 at 19:30











3












$begingroup$

The easy part of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem and which does not require an algebraic context (e.g. groups or groupoids) is that if $X$ is the union of a family $mathcal U$ of path connected and simply connected open sets $U_i$ such that any pairwise intersection $U_i cap U_j$ is path connected, and all containing a "base point" $a in X$, then $X$ is simply connected. The key part of the proof is conveyed by the following diagram



connected



in which $alpha$ is a loop in $X$ at the base point $a$ subdivided so that each part $alpha_i$ lies in a set say $U_i$ of $mathcal U$. The start point $x_i$ of $alpha_i$ shown as $circ$ need not be at the base point. However $x_i$ lies in $U_{i-1} cap U_i$ which is path connected; so there is a path $gamma_i$ in $ U_{i-1} cap U_i $ joining $x_i$ to the base point, and we set $gamma_i$ to be constant for $i=0,n$. Now each path $zeta_i= gamma_i^{-1}alpha_igamma_{i+1} $lies in $U_i$ which is simply connected, and so is homotopic in $U_i$ rel end points to a constant path $beta_i$. Hence $alpha$ is null homotopic, using the "horizontal" composition of these homotopies.



Note that even for this result we need a " horizontal composition of squares", and such an intuition is the start of a $2$-dimensional theory.



This type of argument was generalised by J.F. Adams (in unpublished lecture notes) to prove any map $S^r to S^n$ is null homotopic for $r <n$, see 7.6.1 of Topology and Groupoids.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: Thanks for the comment. I'm busy preparing travel from N. Wales to Strasbourg tomorrow for the Loday Memorial Conference, so I hope to have time to think on it on the train. I know the next stage of deforming a subdivided homotopy does need the 3-fold intersection criterion, but thought we could get away with this argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 2 '13 at 20:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: The point is that the intersection of the sets has to contain the base point! Thanks again.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 3 '13 at 5:43












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, of course. That's a nice proof then.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Sep 3 '13 at 8:39
















3












$begingroup$

The easy part of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem and which does not require an algebraic context (e.g. groups or groupoids) is that if $X$ is the union of a family $mathcal U$ of path connected and simply connected open sets $U_i$ such that any pairwise intersection $U_i cap U_j$ is path connected, and all containing a "base point" $a in X$, then $X$ is simply connected. The key part of the proof is conveyed by the following diagram



connected



in which $alpha$ is a loop in $X$ at the base point $a$ subdivided so that each part $alpha_i$ lies in a set say $U_i$ of $mathcal U$. The start point $x_i$ of $alpha_i$ shown as $circ$ need not be at the base point. However $x_i$ lies in $U_{i-1} cap U_i$ which is path connected; so there is a path $gamma_i$ in $ U_{i-1} cap U_i $ joining $x_i$ to the base point, and we set $gamma_i$ to be constant for $i=0,n$. Now each path $zeta_i= gamma_i^{-1}alpha_igamma_{i+1} $lies in $U_i$ which is simply connected, and so is homotopic in $U_i$ rel end points to a constant path $beta_i$. Hence $alpha$ is null homotopic, using the "horizontal" composition of these homotopies.



Note that even for this result we need a " horizontal composition of squares", and such an intuition is the start of a $2$-dimensional theory.



This type of argument was generalised by J.F. Adams (in unpublished lecture notes) to prove any map $S^r to S^n$ is null homotopic for $r <n$, see 7.6.1 of Topology and Groupoids.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: Thanks for the comment. I'm busy preparing travel from N. Wales to Strasbourg tomorrow for the Loday Memorial Conference, so I hope to have time to think on it on the train. I know the next stage of deforming a subdivided homotopy does need the 3-fold intersection criterion, but thought we could get away with this argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 2 '13 at 20:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: The point is that the intersection of the sets has to contain the base point! Thanks again.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 3 '13 at 5:43












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, of course. That's a nice proof then.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Sep 3 '13 at 8:39














3












3








3





$begingroup$

The easy part of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem and which does not require an algebraic context (e.g. groups or groupoids) is that if $X$ is the union of a family $mathcal U$ of path connected and simply connected open sets $U_i$ such that any pairwise intersection $U_i cap U_j$ is path connected, and all containing a "base point" $a in X$, then $X$ is simply connected. The key part of the proof is conveyed by the following diagram



connected



in which $alpha$ is a loop in $X$ at the base point $a$ subdivided so that each part $alpha_i$ lies in a set say $U_i$ of $mathcal U$. The start point $x_i$ of $alpha_i$ shown as $circ$ need not be at the base point. However $x_i$ lies in $U_{i-1} cap U_i$ which is path connected; so there is a path $gamma_i$ in $ U_{i-1} cap U_i $ joining $x_i$ to the base point, and we set $gamma_i$ to be constant for $i=0,n$. Now each path $zeta_i= gamma_i^{-1}alpha_igamma_{i+1} $lies in $U_i$ which is simply connected, and so is homotopic in $U_i$ rel end points to a constant path $beta_i$. Hence $alpha$ is null homotopic, using the "horizontal" composition of these homotopies.



Note that even for this result we need a " horizontal composition of squares", and such an intuition is the start of a $2$-dimensional theory.



This type of argument was generalised by J.F. Adams (in unpublished lecture notes) to prove any map $S^r to S^n$ is null homotopic for $r <n$, see 7.6.1 of Topology and Groupoids.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The easy part of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem and which does not require an algebraic context (e.g. groups or groupoids) is that if $X$ is the union of a family $mathcal U$ of path connected and simply connected open sets $U_i$ such that any pairwise intersection $U_i cap U_j$ is path connected, and all containing a "base point" $a in X$, then $X$ is simply connected. The key part of the proof is conveyed by the following diagram



connected



in which $alpha$ is a loop in $X$ at the base point $a$ subdivided so that each part $alpha_i$ lies in a set say $U_i$ of $mathcal U$. The start point $x_i$ of $alpha_i$ shown as $circ$ need not be at the base point. However $x_i$ lies in $U_{i-1} cap U_i$ which is path connected; so there is a path $gamma_i$ in $ U_{i-1} cap U_i $ joining $x_i$ to the base point, and we set $gamma_i$ to be constant for $i=0,n$. Now each path $zeta_i= gamma_i^{-1}alpha_igamma_{i+1} $lies in $U_i$ which is simply connected, and so is homotopic in $U_i$ rel end points to a constant path $beta_i$. Hence $alpha$ is null homotopic, using the "horizontal" composition of these homotopies.



Note that even for this result we need a " horizontal composition of squares", and such an intuition is the start of a $2$-dimensional theory.



This type of argument was generalised by J.F. Adams (in unpublished lecture notes) to prove any map $S^r to S^n$ is null homotopic for $r <n$, see 7.6.1 of Topology and Groupoids.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 23 '18 at 21:13









Glorfindel

3,41981830




3,41981830










answered Jul 7 '13 at 10:46









Ronnie BrownRonnie Brown

12k12938




12k12938












  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: Thanks for the comment. I'm busy preparing travel from N. Wales to Strasbourg tomorrow for the Loday Memorial Conference, so I hope to have time to think on it on the train. I know the next stage of deforming a subdivided homotopy does need the 3-fold intersection criterion, but thought we could get away with this argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 2 '13 at 20:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: The point is that the intersection of the sets has to contain the base point! Thanks again.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 3 '13 at 5:43












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, of course. That's a nice proof then.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Sep 3 '13 at 8:39


















  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: Thanks for the comment. I'm busy preparing travel from N. Wales to Strasbourg tomorrow for the Loday Memorial Conference, so I hope to have time to think on it on the train. I know the next stage of deforming a subdivided homotopy does need the 3-fold intersection criterion, but thought we could get away with this argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 2 '13 at 20:03










  • $begingroup$
    @Daniel: The point is that the intersection of the sets has to contain the base point! Thanks again.
    $endgroup$
    – Ronnie Brown
    Sep 3 '13 at 5:43












  • $begingroup$
    Ah, of course. That's a nice proof then.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Sep 3 '13 at 8:39
















$begingroup$
@Daniel: Thanks for the comment. I'm busy preparing travel from N. Wales to Strasbourg tomorrow for the Loday Memorial Conference, so I hope to have time to think on it on the train. I know the next stage of deforming a subdivided homotopy does need the 3-fold intersection criterion, but thought we could get away with this argument.
$endgroup$
– Ronnie Brown
Sep 2 '13 at 20:03




$begingroup$
@Daniel: Thanks for the comment. I'm busy preparing travel from N. Wales to Strasbourg tomorrow for the Loday Memorial Conference, so I hope to have time to think on it on the train. I know the next stage of deforming a subdivided homotopy does need the 3-fold intersection criterion, but thought we could get away with this argument.
$endgroup$
– Ronnie Brown
Sep 2 '13 at 20:03












$begingroup$
@Daniel: The point is that the intersection of the sets has to contain the base point! Thanks again.
$endgroup$
– Ronnie Brown
Sep 3 '13 at 5:43






$begingroup$
@Daniel: The point is that the intersection of the sets has to contain the base point! Thanks again.
$endgroup$
– Ronnie Brown
Sep 3 '13 at 5:43














$begingroup$
Ah, of course. That's a nice proof then.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Sep 3 '13 at 8:39




$begingroup$
Ah, of course. That's a nice proof then.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Sep 3 '13 at 8:39











1












$begingroup$

You can sledgehammer proof your problem by induction on the number of points that you remove and the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Say $x_1,ldots,x_m$ are the points that you remove. We will induct on $m$. When $m = 1$ this is easy because $Bbb{R}^n$ minus a point is homotopy equivalent to $S^{n-1}$ that is simply connected for $ngeq 3$. For the general case of $x_1,ldots,x_m$ points removed, I claim we can find a hyperplane $H$ that separates the first $x_1,ldots,x_l$ points and last $x_{l+1},ldots,x_m$ points. Let $U$ be the open cube minus contains the first $l$ points and $V$ the open cube minus the rest of the points. Then $Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = U cup V$ and then Seifer-van Kampen says that



$$pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) cong pi_1(U)ast pi_1(V)/operatorname{some subgroup}.$$



We don't care about the subgroup at the moment because by induction $pi_1(U) = pi_1(V) = 0$ and so $pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = 0$. Done.



Edit: For those not convinced $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $n geq 3$ here's a proof: Let $U$ be the upper hemisphere and $V$ the lower hemisphere, choose epsilon fattenings of these if you wish. For $n geq 3$, $U cap V$ is homotopy equivalent to the equator $S^{n-2}$ that is path - connected for $n geq 3$. $U,V$ are homotopy equivalent to $D^{n-1}$ which is simply connected for $n geq 3$. The hypotheses of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem are now satisfied and applying it to $U$ and $V$ shows $pi_1(S^{n-1}) = 0$ for $n geq 3$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notice that the proof of the van Kampen theorem itself involves (a generalization of) the exact same argument given by Daniel in his answer (In fact, that is the easy part of the proof of vK's theorem!). Also, notice that (up to equivalence) the question of the OP is precisely «how to prove $S^n$ is simply connected?» which is, exactly, the one you waved away with an «it is easy» :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:32












  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I added a proof that $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:47










  • $begingroup$
    Ben, in that special case the proof of the vK theorem is exactly that given by Daniel.
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I don't remember the proof of van Kampen very much and I haven't looked at algebraic topology for a while, so that was my shot above :)
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask why there is such a hyperplane H? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Apr 21 '14 at 14:03
















1












$begingroup$

You can sledgehammer proof your problem by induction on the number of points that you remove and the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Say $x_1,ldots,x_m$ are the points that you remove. We will induct on $m$. When $m = 1$ this is easy because $Bbb{R}^n$ minus a point is homotopy equivalent to $S^{n-1}$ that is simply connected for $ngeq 3$. For the general case of $x_1,ldots,x_m$ points removed, I claim we can find a hyperplane $H$ that separates the first $x_1,ldots,x_l$ points and last $x_{l+1},ldots,x_m$ points. Let $U$ be the open cube minus contains the first $l$ points and $V$ the open cube minus the rest of the points. Then $Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = U cup V$ and then Seifer-van Kampen says that



$$pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) cong pi_1(U)ast pi_1(V)/operatorname{some subgroup}.$$



We don't care about the subgroup at the moment because by induction $pi_1(U) = pi_1(V) = 0$ and so $pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = 0$. Done.



Edit: For those not convinced $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $n geq 3$ here's a proof: Let $U$ be the upper hemisphere and $V$ the lower hemisphere, choose epsilon fattenings of these if you wish. For $n geq 3$, $U cap V$ is homotopy equivalent to the equator $S^{n-2}$ that is path - connected for $n geq 3$. $U,V$ are homotopy equivalent to $D^{n-1}$ which is simply connected for $n geq 3$. The hypotheses of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem are now satisfied and applying it to $U$ and $V$ shows $pi_1(S^{n-1}) = 0$ for $n geq 3$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notice that the proof of the van Kampen theorem itself involves (a generalization of) the exact same argument given by Daniel in his answer (In fact, that is the easy part of the proof of vK's theorem!). Also, notice that (up to equivalence) the question of the OP is precisely «how to prove $S^n$ is simply connected?» which is, exactly, the one you waved away with an «it is easy» :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:32












  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I added a proof that $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:47










  • $begingroup$
    Ben, in that special case the proof of the vK theorem is exactly that given by Daniel.
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I don't remember the proof of van Kampen very much and I haven't looked at algebraic topology for a while, so that was my shot above :)
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask why there is such a hyperplane H? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Apr 21 '14 at 14:03














1












1








1





$begingroup$

You can sledgehammer proof your problem by induction on the number of points that you remove and the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Say $x_1,ldots,x_m$ are the points that you remove. We will induct on $m$. When $m = 1$ this is easy because $Bbb{R}^n$ minus a point is homotopy equivalent to $S^{n-1}$ that is simply connected for $ngeq 3$. For the general case of $x_1,ldots,x_m$ points removed, I claim we can find a hyperplane $H$ that separates the first $x_1,ldots,x_l$ points and last $x_{l+1},ldots,x_m$ points. Let $U$ be the open cube minus contains the first $l$ points and $V$ the open cube minus the rest of the points. Then $Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = U cup V$ and then Seifer-van Kampen says that



$$pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) cong pi_1(U)ast pi_1(V)/operatorname{some subgroup}.$$



We don't care about the subgroup at the moment because by induction $pi_1(U) = pi_1(V) = 0$ and so $pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = 0$. Done.



Edit: For those not convinced $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $n geq 3$ here's a proof: Let $U$ be the upper hemisphere and $V$ the lower hemisphere, choose epsilon fattenings of these if you wish. For $n geq 3$, $U cap V$ is homotopy equivalent to the equator $S^{n-2}$ that is path - connected for $n geq 3$. $U,V$ are homotopy equivalent to $D^{n-1}$ which is simply connected for $n geq 3$. The hypotheses of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem are now satisfied and applying it to $U$ and $V$ shows $pi_1(S^{n-1}) = 0$ for $n geq 3$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



You can sledgehammer proof your problem by induction on the number of points that you remove and the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Say $x_1,ldots,x_m$ are the points that you remove. We will induct on $m$. When $m = 1$ this is easy because $Bbb{R}^n$ minus a point is homotopy equivalent to $S^{n-1}$ that is simply connected for $ngeq 3$. For the general case of $x_1,ldots,x_m$ points removed, I claim we can find a hyperplane $H$ that separates the first $x_1,ldots,x_l$ points and last $x_{l+1},ldots,x_m$ points. Let $U$ be the open cube minus contains the first $l$ points and $V$ the open cube minus the rest of the points. Then $Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = U cup V$ and then Seifer-van Kampen says that



$$pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) cong pi_1(U)ast pi_1(V)/operatorname{some subgroup}.$$



We don't care about the subgroup at the moment because by induction $pi_1(U) = pi_1(V) = 0$ and so $pi_1(Bbb{R}^n - {x_1,ldots,x_m}) = 0$. Done.



Edit: For those not convinced $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $n geq 3$ here's a proof: Let $U$ be the upper hemisphere and $V$ the lower hemisphere, choose epsilon fattenings of these if you wish. For $n geq 3$, $U cap V$ is homotopy equivalent to the equator $S^{n-2}$ that is path - connected for $n geq 3$. $U,V$ are homotopy equivalent to $D^{n-1}$ which is simply connected for $n geq 3$. The hypotheses of the Seifert-van Kampen theorem are now satisfied and applying it to $U$ and $V$ shows $pi_1(S^{n-1}) = 0$ for $n geq 3$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jul 6 '13 at 19:46

























answered Jul 6 '13 at 19:28







user38268















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notice that the proof of the van Kampen theorem itself involves (a generalization of) the exact same argument given by Daniel in his answer (In fact, that is the easy part of the proof of vK's theorem!). Also, notice that (up to equivalence) the question of the OP is precisely «how to prove $S^n$ is simply connected?» which is, exactly, the one you waved away with an «it is easy» :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:32












  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I added a proof that $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:47










  • $begingroup$
    Ben, in that special case the proof of the vK theorem is exactly that given by Daniel.
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I don't remember the proof of van Kampen very much and I haven't looked at algebraic topology for a while, so that was my shot above :)
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask why there is such a hyperplane H? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Apr 21 '14 at 14:03














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notice that the proof of the van Kampen theorem itself involves (a generalization of) the exact same argument given by Daniel in his answer (In fact, that is the easy part of the proof of vK's theorem!). Also, notice that (up to equivalence) the question of the OP is precisely «how to prove $S^n$ is simply connected?» which is, exactly, the one you waved away with an «it is easy» :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:32












  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I added a proof that $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:47










  • $begingroup$
    Ben, in that special case the proof of the vK theorem is exactly that given by Daniel.
    $endgroup$
    – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I don't remember the proof of van Kampen very much and I haven't looked at algebraic topology for a while, so that was my shot above :)
    $endgroup$
    – user38268
    Jul 6 '13 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask why there is such a hyperplane H? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Apr 21 '14 at 14:03








1




1




$begingroup$
Notice that the proof of the van Kampen theorem itself involves (a generalization of) the exact same argument given by Daniel in his answer (In fact, that is the easy part of the proof of vK's theorem!). Also, notice that (up to equivalence) the question of the OP is precisely «how to prove $S^n$ is simply connected?» which is, exactly, the one you waved away with an «it is easy» :-)
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jul 6 '13 at 19:32






$begingroup$
Notice that the proof of the van Kampen theorem itself involves (a generalization of) the exact same argument given by Daniel in his answer (In fact, that is the easy part of the proof of vK's theorem!). Also, notice that (up to equivalence) the question of the OP is precisely «how to prove $S^n$ is simply connected?» which is, exactly, the one you waved away with an «it is easy» :-)
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jul 6 '13 at 19:32














$begingroup$
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I added a proof that $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jul 6 '13 at 19:47




$begingroup$
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I added a proof that $S^{n-1}$ is simply connected for $ngeq 3$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jul 6 '13 at 19:47












$begingroup$
Ben, in that special case the proof of the vK theorem is exactly that given by Daniel.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jul 6 '13 at 19:51




$begingroup$
Ben, in that special case the proof of the vK theorem is exactly that given by Daniel.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jul 6 '13 at 19:51












$begingroup$
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I don't remember the proof of van Kampen very much and I haven't looked at algebraic topology for a while, so that was my shot above :)
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jul 6 '13 at 19:56




$begingroup$
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez I don't remember the proof of van Kampen very much and I haven't looked at algebraic topology for a while, so that was my shot above :)
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jul 6 '13 at 19:56












$begingroup$
May I ask why there is such a hyperplane H? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– awllower
Apr 21 '14 at 14:03




$begingroup$
May I ask why there is such a hyperplane H? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– awllower
Apr 21 '14 at 14:03


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f437596%2fshow-that-mathbbrn-setminus-0-is-simply-connected-for-n-geq-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna