Limit of measures is the measure of the intersection












1












$begingroup$


Suppose ${E_n}$ are measurable and suppose we have the following lemma:



If in addition, $E_n subseteq E_{n+1}$,



then lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_n)$.



Then, prove:



If $E_n$ measurable, $m(E_1) < + infty$ AND $E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$,



THEN, lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n)$



So, Since the $E_n$ are measurable, we have monotonicity,



i.e.,



$E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$ $Rightarrow$ $m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n)$



but $m(E_1) < + infty$ gives us



$m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n) = k$ ; $forall n in mathbb{Z}^+$ and SOME $k in mathbb{R}$ (this denotes measure of $E_1$).



I get stuck on how to apply the Lemma, am I supposed to use the analogous version of the Lemma?



i.e., replacing $n$ with $n+1$?



and would this give



lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_{n+1})$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_{n+1})$??



or do I rewrite



$m(E_{n+1}$) = $m(E_n$) + $m(E_1)$



I highly doubt this, I never make assumptions in proofs I am not positive about and I never say I get something till it fully makes sense to me, please help, you can see where I am stuck. I apologize in advance if I am missing the obvious. I am merely a noob at measure theory.






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Use Demorgan's law
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:14
















1












$begingroup$


Suppose ${E_n}$ are measurable and suppose we have the following lemma:



If in addition, $E_n subseteq E_{n+1}$,



then lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_n)$.



Then, prove:



If $E_n$ measurable, $m(E_1) < + infty$ AND $E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$,



THEN, lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n)$



So, Since the $E_n$ are measurable, we have monotonicity,



i.e.,



$E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$ $Rightarrow$ $m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n)$



but $m(E_1) < + infty$ gives us



$m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n) = k$ ; $forall n in mathbb{Z}^+$ and SOME $k in mathbb{R}$ (this denotes measure of $E_1$).



I get stuck on how to apply the Lemma, am I supposed to use the analogous version of the Lemma?



i.e., replacing $n$ with $n+1$?



and would this give



lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_{n+1})$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_{n+1})$??



or do I rewrite



$m(E_{n+1}$) = $m(E_n$) + $m(E_1)$



I highly doubt this, I never make assumptions in proofs I am not positive about and I never say I get something till it fully makes sense to me, please help, you can see where I am stuck. I apologize in advance if I am missing the obvious. I am merely a noob at measure theory.






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Use Demorgan's law
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:14














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Suppose ${E_n}$ are measurable and suppose we have the following lemma:



If in addition, $E_n subseteq E_{n+1}$,



then lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_n)$.



Then, prove:



If $E_n$ measurable, $m(E_1) < + infty$ AND $E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$,



THEN, lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n)$



So, Since the $E_n$ are measurable, we have monotonicity,



i.e.,



$E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$ $Rightarrow$ $m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n)$



but $m(E_1) < + infty$ gives us



$m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n) = k$ ; $forall n in mathbb{Z}^+$ and SOME $k in mathbb{R}$ (this denotes measure of $E_1$).



I get stuck on how to apply the Lemma, am I supposed to use the analogous version of the Lemma?



i.e., replacing $n$ with $n+1$?



and would this give



lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_{n+1})$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_{n+1})$??



or do I rewrite



$m(E_{n+1}$) = $m(E_n$) + $m(E_1)$



I highly doubt this, I never make assumptions in proofs I am not positive about and I never say I get something till it fully makes sense to me, please help, you can see where I am stuck. I apologize in advance if I am missing the obvious. I am merely a noob at measure theory.






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose ${E_n}$ are measurable and suppose we have the following lemma:



If in addition, $E_n subseteq E_{n+1}$,



then lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_n)$.



Then, prove:



If $E_n$ measurable, $m(E_1) < + infty$ AND $E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$,



THEN, lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_n)$ = $m(bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n)$



So, Since the $E_n$ are measurable, we have monotonicity,



i.e.,



$E_{n+1} subseteq E_n$ $Rightarrow$ $m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n)$



but $m(E_1) < + infty$ gives us



$m(E_{n+1}) leq m(E_n) = k$ ; $forall n in mathbb{Z}^+$ and SOME $k in mathbb{R}$ (this denotes measure of $E_1$).



I get stuck on how to apply the Lemma, am I supposed to use the analogous version of the Lemma?



i.e., replacing $n$ with $n+1$?



and would this give



lim$_{n rightarrow infty}$ $m(E_{n+1})$ = $m(bigcup_{n=1}^{infty} E_{n+1})$??



or do I rewrite



$m(E_{n+1}$) = $m(E_n$) + $m(E_1)$



I highly doubt this, I never make assumptions in proofs I am not positive about and I never say I get something till it fully makes sense to me, please help, you can see where I am stuck. I apologize in advance if I am missing the obvious. I am merely a noob at measure theory.






real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure




real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 24 '18 at 0:09









Hossien SahebjameHossien Sahebjame

928




928








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Use Demorgan's law
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:14














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Use Demorgan's law
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 24 '18 at 0:14








1




1




$begingroup$
Use Demorgan's law
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Dec 24 '18 at 0:14




$begingroup$
Use Demorgan's law
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Dec 24 '18 at 0:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

$E_1setminus E_n$ increases to $E_1setminus cap_n E_n$, so $m(E_1setminus E_n) to m(E_1setminus cap_n E_n)$. This gives $m(E_1)-m(E_n) to m(E_1)-m(cap_n E_n)$. Cancel $m(E_1)$ to get the result.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by increases to ? as $n$ tends to $infty$? and is this because $m(E_1)$ is finite and by monotonicity $m(E_n)$ is also finite?
    $endgroup$
    – Hossien Sahebjame
    Jan 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    Increases means $E_1setminus E_n subset E_1setminus E_{n+1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 3 at 23:22











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050826%2flimit-of-measures-is-the-measure-of-the-intersection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

$E_1setminus E_n$ increases to $E_1setminus cap_n E_n$, so $m(E_1setminus E_n) to m(E_1setminus cap_n E_n)$. This gives $m(E_1)-m(E_n) to m(E_1)-m(cap_n E_n)$. Cancel $m(E_1)$ to get the result.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by increases to ? as $n$ tends to $infty$? and is this because $m(E_1)$ is finite and by monotonicity $m(E_n)$ is also finite?
    $endgroup$
    – Hossien Sahebjame
    Jan 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    Increases means $E_1setminus E_n subset E_1setminus E_{n+1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 3 at 23:22
















2












$begingroup$

$E_1setminus E_n$ increases to $E_1setminus cap_n E_n$, so $m(E_1setminus E_n) to m(E_1setminus cap_n E_n)$. This gives $m(E_1)-m(E_n) to m(E_1)-m(cap_n E_n)$. Cancel $m(E_1)$ to get the result.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by increases to ? as $n$ tends to $infty$? and is this because $m(E_1)$ is finite and by monotonicity $m(E_n)$ is also finite?
    $endgroup$
    – Hossien Sahebjame
    Jan 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    Increases means $E_1setminus E_n subset E_1setminus E_{n+1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 3 at 23:22














2












2








2





$begingroup$

$E_1setminus E_n$ increases to $E_1setminus cap_n E_n$, so $m(E_1setminus E_n) to m(E_1setminus cap_n E_n)$. This gives $m(E_1)-m(E_n) to m(E_1)-m(cap_n E_n)$. Cancel $m(E_1)$ to get the result.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$E_1setminus E_n$ increases to $E_1setminus cap_n E_n$, so $m(E_1setminus E_n) to m(E_1setminus cap_n E_n)$. This gives $m(E_1)-m(E_n) to m(E_1)-m(cap_n E_n)$. Cancel $m(E_1)$ to get the result.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 24 '18 at 0:14









Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

58.6k42161




58.6k42161












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by increases to ? as $n$ tends to $infty$? and is this because $m(E_1)$ is finite and by monotonicity $m(E_n)$ is also finite?
    $endgroup$
    – Hossien Sahebjame
    Jan 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    Increases means $E_1setminus E_n subset E_1setminus E_{n+1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 3 at 23:22


















  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by increases to ? as $n$ tends to $infty$? and is this because $m(E_1)$ is finite and by monotonicity $m(E_n)$ is also finite?
    $endgroup$
    – Hossien Sahebjame
    Jan 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    Increases means $E_1setminus E_n subset E_1setminus E_{n+1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 3 at 23:22
















$begingroup$
what do you mean by increases to ? as $n$ tends to $infty$? and is this because $m(E_1)$ is finite and by monotonicity $m(E_n)$ is also finite?
$endgroup$
– Hossien Sahebjame
Jan 3 at 21:23






$begingroup$
what do you mean by increases to ? as $n$ tends to $infty$? and is this because $m(E_1)$ is finite and by monotonicity $m(E_n)$ is also finite?
$endgroup$
– Hossien Sahebjame
Jan 3 at 21:23














$begingroup$
Increases means $E_1setminus E_n subset E_1setminus E_{n+1}$.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 23:22




$begingroup$
Increases means $E_1setminus E_n subset E_1setminus E_{n+1}$.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 3 at 23:22


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050826%2flimit-of-measures-is-the-measure-of-the-intersection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Image
.mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
Read more

Cabo Verde

Image
  Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º)
Read more

Gyllenstierna

Image
.mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
Read more