Reason for Index Fund and Index Disconnect












1















My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.



Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?










share|improve this question



























    1















    My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.



    Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.



      Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?










      share|improve this question














      My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.



      Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?







      stocks index-fund






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22









      The NightmanThe Nightman

      1084




      1084






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.



          Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.



          The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 4





            Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:02













          • He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:08






          • 3





            He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:10






          • 1





            Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:35



















          3














          An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.



          An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.



          A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.



          And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Great answer, welcome!

            – quid
            Dec 27 '18 at 18:41











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "93"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103375%2freason-for-index-fund-and-index-disconnect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.



          Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.



          The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 4





            Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:02













          • He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:08






          • 3





            He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:10






          • 1





            Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
















          7














          From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.



          Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.



          The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 4





            Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:02













          • He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:08






          • 3





            He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:10






          • 1





            Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:35














          7












          7








          7







          From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.



          Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.



          The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.






          share|improve this answer













          From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.



          Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.



          The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58









          Bob BaerkerBob Baerker

          16.2k12149




          16.2k12149








          • 4





            Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:02













          • He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:08






          • 3





            He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:10






          • 1





            Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:35














          • 4





            Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:02













          • He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:08






          • 3





            He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.

            – Ben Voigt
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:10






          • 1





            Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)

            – Bob Baerker
            Dec 27 '18 at 19:35








          4




          4





          Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.

          – Ben Voigt
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:02







          Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.

          – Ben Voigt
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:02















          He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)

          – Bob Baerker
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:08





          He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)

          – Bob Baerker
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:08




          3




          3





          He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.

          – Ben Voigt
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:10





          He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.

          – Ben Voigt
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:10




          1




          1





          Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)

          – Bob Baerker
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:35





          Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)

          – Bob Baerker
          Dec 27 '18 at 19:35













          3














          An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.



          An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.



          A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.



          And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Great answer, welcome!

            – quid
            Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
















          3














          An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.



          An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.



          A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.



          And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Great answer, welcome!

            – quid
            Dec 27 '18 at 18:41














          3












          3








          3







          An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.



          An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.



          A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.



          And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.






          share|improve this answer















          An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.



          An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.



          A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.



          And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 27 '18 at 18:41

























          answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39









          S SpringS Spring

          61213




          61213













          • Great answer, welcome!

            – quid
            Dec 27 '18 at 18:41



















          • Great answer, welcome!

            – quid
            Dec 27 '18 at 18:41

















          Great answer, welcome!

          – quid
          Dec 27 '18 at 18:41





          Great answer, welcome!

          – quid
          Dec 27 '18 at 18:41


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103375%2freason-for-index-fund-and-index-disconnect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna