interpreting sound curves as sinogramms












0












$begingroup$


What's the difference between a spectrogram--spectrum over time (${F}_f(t)$?)-- and a, whatsitcalled, soundwave plot--velocity over time $V(t)$--as often encountered in Music production? Are those in principle the same but with different parameters?



I'm reasoning thus:



For the spectrogram, intervals of length $Delta t$ are taken from a signal and Fourier transformed individually with any crude trick, to get a spectrum for each interval in the spectrogram (also called a sinogram?). The resulting spectra are plotted over time to give a spectrogram [time-axis, frequency axis, and coordinates colored by velocity(f,t)]. Since we can't hear below 20 Hz, we could still get a decent resolution without severely limiting the bandwidth, for some interpretation of decent. If the intervals are too short, low frequencies will be missed.



For the V(t)-graph, normally the current attenuation of the speaker is plotted over time. Instead of plotting attenuation as distance perpendicular to the time axis, we could also choose to shade points on the time axis proportionally.



Now I'm thinking, with very short intervals for the spectrogram, low frequencies will not be filtered out, but appear somehow as aliasing effects in higher frequencies, varying over time. Can we get an infinitesimal slice to get a spectrum at a single point, and doing so for every point instead of taking intervals, can this be plotted to look like the V(t) plot? I mean, that's like taking a single sin(t) and scaling that with some f(t).



I guess the real insight for me would be to learn the various computational methods of transformation. So, I get this is a poor question. The basic question really is, how to get from the 2D picture to a 3D heat-map. I would need to do more work on that.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you make the spectrogram interval infinitesimally short, all frequencies are low frequencies. So you will not resolve any of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:14












  • $begingroup$
    I imagine something like, if you have an infinitely high frequency, the graph looks like a solid plane (or a solid, in case of a speaker membrane). Somewhat like superposition of all states. In another view, a signal existing at only one point in time is an impulse. I think the interesting question is what does the aliasing look like after various methods of taking the transform. I'll leave that for later.
    $endgroup$
    – vectory
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:36
















0












$begingroup$


What's the difference between a spectrogram--spectrum over time (${F}_f(t)$?)-- and a, whatsitcalled, soundwave plot--velocity over time $V(t)$--as often encountered in Music production? Are those in principle the same but with different parameters?



I'm reasoning thus:



For the spectrogram, intervals of length $Delta t$ are taken from a signal and Fourier transformed individually with any crude trick, to get a spectrum for each interval in the spectrogram (also called a sinogram?). The resulting spectra are plotted over time to give a spectrogram [time-axis, frequency axis, and coordinates colored by velocity(f,t)]. Since we can't hear below 20 Hz, we could still get a decent resolution without severely limiting the bandwidth, for some interpretation of decent. If the intervals are too short, low frequencies will be missed.



For the V(t)-graph, normally the current attenuation of the speaker is plotted over time. Instead of plotting attenuation as distance perpendicular to the time axis, we could also choose to shade points on the time axis proportionally.



Now I'm thinking, with very short intervals for the spectrogram, low frequencies will not be filtered out, but appear somehow as aliasing effects in higher frequencies, varying over time. Can we get an infinitesimal slice to get a spectrum at a single point, and doing so for every point instead of taking intervals, can this be plotted to look like the V(t) plot? I mean, that's like taking a single sin(t) and scaling that with some f(t).



I guess the real insight for me would be to learn the various computational methods of transformation. So, I get this is a poor question. The basic question really is, how to get from the 2D picture to a 3D heat-map. I would need to do more work on that.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you make the spectrogram interval infinitesimally short, all frequencies are low frequencies. So you will not resolve any of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:14












  • $begingroup$
    I imagine something like, if you have an infinitely high frequency, the graph looks like a solid plane (or a solid, in case of a speaker membrane). Somewhat like superposition of all states. In another view, a signal existing at only one point in time is an impulse. I think the interesting question is what does the aliasing look like after various methods of taking the transform. I'll leave that for later.
    $endgroup$
    – vectory
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:36














0












0








0





$begingroup$


What's the difference between a spectrogram--spectrum over time (${F}_f(t)$?)-- and a, whatsitcalled, soundwave plot--velocity over time $V(t)$--as often encountered in Music production? Are those in principle the same but with different parameters?



I'm reasoning thus:



For the spectrogram, intervals of length $Delta t$ are taken from a signal and Fourier transformed individually with any crude trick, to get a spectrum for each interval in the spectrogram (also called a sinogram?). The resulting spectra are plotted over time to give a spectrogram [time-axis, frequency axis, and coordinates colored by velocity(f,t)]. Since we can't hear below 20 Hz, we could still get a decent resolution without severely limiting the bandwidth, for some interpretation of decent. If the intervals are too short, low frequencies will be missed.



For the V(t)-graph, normally the current attenuation of the speaker is plotted over time. Instead of plotting attenuation as distance perpendicular to the time axis, we could also choose to shade points on the time axis proportionally.



Now I'm thinking, with very short intervals for the spectrogram, low frequencies will not be filtered out, but appear somehow as aliasing effects in higher frequencies, varying over time. Can we get an infinitesimal slice to get a spectrum at a single point, and doing so for every point instead of taking intervals, can this be plotted to look like the V(t) plot? I mean, that's like taking a single sin(t) and scaling that with some f(t).



I guess the real insight for me would be to learn the various computational methods of transformation. So, I get this is a poor question. The basic question really is, how to get from the 2D picture to a 3D heat-map. I would need to do more work on that.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What's the difference between a spectrogram--spectrum over time (${F}_f(t)$?)-- and a, whatsitcalled, soundwave plot--velocity over time $V(t)$--as often encountered in Music production? Are those in principle the same but with different parameters?



I'm reasoning thus:



For the spectrogram, intervals of length $Delta t$ are taken from a signal and Fourier transformed individually with any crude trick, to get a spectrum for each interval in the spectrogram (also called a sinogram?). The resulting spectra are plotted over time to give a spectrogram [time-axis, frequency axis, and coordinates colored by velocity(f,t)]. Since we can't hear below 20 Hz, we could still get a decent resolution without severely limiting the bandwidth, for some interpretation of decent. If the intervals are too short, low frequencies will be missed.



For the V(t)-graph, normally the current attenuation of the speaker is plotted over time. Instead of plotting attenuation as distance perpendicular to the time axis, we could also choose to shade points on the time axis proportionally.



Now I'm thinking, with very short intervals for the spectrogram, low frequencies will not be filtered out, but appear somehow as aliasing effects in higher frequencies, varying over time. Can we get an infinitesimal slice to get a spectrum at a single point, and doing so for every point instead of taking intervals, can this be plotted to look like the V(t) plot? I mean, that's like taking a single sin(t) and scaling that with some f(t).



I guess the real insight for me would be to learn the various computational methods of transformation. So, I get this is a poor question. The basic question really is, how to get from the 2D picture to a 3D heat-map. I would need to do more work on that.







fourier-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 28 '18 at 4:18







vectory

















asked Dec 28 '18 at 3:44









vectoryvectory

1011




1011












  • $begingroup$
    If you make the spectrogram interval infinitesimally short, all frequencies are low frequencies. So you will not resolve any of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:14












  • $begingroup$
    I imagine something like, if you have an infinitely high frequency, the graph looks like a solid plane (or a solid, in case of a speaker membrane). Somewhat like superposition of all states. In another view, a signal existing at only one point in time is an impulse. I think the interesting question is what does the aliasing look like after various methods of taking the transform. I'll leave that for later.
    $endgroup$
    – vectory
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:36


















  • $begingroup$
    If you make the spectrogram interval infinitesimally short, all frequencies are low frequencies. So you will not resolve any of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:14












  • $begingroup$
    I imagine something like, if you have an infinitely high frequency, the graph looks like a solid plane (or a solid, in case of a speaker membrane). Somewhat like superposition of all states. In another view, a signal existing at only one point in time is an impulse. I think the interesting question is what does the aliasing look like after various methods of taking the transform. I'll leave that for later.
    $endgroup$
    – vectory
    Dec 28 '18 at 4:36
















$begingroup$
If you make the spectrogram interval infinitesimally short, all frequencies are low frequencies. So you will not resolve any of them.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Dec 28 '18 at 4:14






$begingroup$
If you make the spectrogram interval infinitesimally short, all frequencies are low frequencies. So you will not resolve any of them.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Dec 28 '18 at 4:14














$begingroup$
I imagine something like, if you have an infinitely high frequency, the graph looks like a solid plane (or a solid, in case of a speaker membrane). Somewhat like superposition of all states. In another view, a signal existing at only one point in time is an impulse. I think the interesting question is what does the aliasing look like after various methods of taking the transform. I'll leave that for later.
$endgroup$
– vectory
Dec 28 '18 at 4:36




$begingroup$
I imagine something like, if you have an infinitely high frequency, the graph looks like a solid plane (or a solid, in case of a speaker membrane). Somewhat like superposition of all states. In another view, a signal existing at only one point in time is an impulse. I think the interesting question is what does the aliasing look like after various methods of taking the transform. I'll leave that for later.
$endgroup$
– vectory
Dec 28 '18 at 4:36










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054554%2finterpreting-sound-curves-as-sinogramms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054554%2finterpreting-sound-curves-as-sinogramms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna