What is an Itô integral, what does it represent concretely?
$begingroup$
I'm really in truble to understand Itô integral. I can work with it without any problem, but I really don't understand what is it. And why is it an integral ? How can we interpret $$I=int_0^T f(s,B_s)dB_s ?$$
- Would it be : we consider the brownian motion on $[0,T]$ and a function $f:[0,infty )times mathbb Rto mathbb R$, then the area between $(B_t)_{tin [0,T]}$ and $(f(t,B_t))_{tin [0,T]}$ is a sort of Itô integral $I$ ? (in grey in the following picture)
- Why are we interested to this integral ? I also saw that if $H_s$ is the number of call we have then $int_0^T H_s dB_t$ is the profit we made after $[0,T]$. I so, why the price of a call is a Brownian motion ? This is very weird for me.
stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm really in truble to understand Itô integral. I can work with it without any problem, but I really don't understand what is it. And why is it an integral ? How can we interpret $$I=int_0^T f(s,B_s)dB_s ?$$
- Would it be : we consider the brownian motion on $[0,T]$ and a function $f:[0,infty )times mathbb Rto mathbb R$, then the area between $(B_t)_{tin [0,T]}$ and $(f(t,B_t))_{tin [0,T]}$ is a sort of Itô integral $I$ ? (in grey in the following picture)
- Why are we interested to this integral ? I also saw that if $H_s$ is the number of call we have then $int_0^T H_s dB_t$ is the profit we made after $[0,T]$. I so, why the price of a call is a Brownian motion ? This is very weird for me.
stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The stochastic integral doesn't represent an area as a Riemann integral. The stochastic integral is just a stochastic process that has the same properties than the integral, that's why we use the integral notation.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 29 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
Your first suggestion is bizarre since usual integrals are never this area...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:10
$begingroup$
@Did : I add a picture to be more clear. Maybe something in this spirit ? (probably not exactely that, but is to relate this to an area). I'm trying to make a comparaison with stiljes integral, but maybe such integral can't be related to an area, doest it ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Surb : And for the interpretation ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
But already for $f(B_t,t)=1$, this interpretation fails, as surely you can see...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:19
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm really in truble to understand Itô integral. I can work with it without any problem, but I really don't understand what is it. And why is it an integral ? How can we interpret $$I=int_0^T f(s,B_s)dB_s ?$$
- Would it be : we consider the brownian motion on $[0,T]$ and a function $f:[0,infty )times mathbb Rto mathbb R$, then the area between $(B_t)_{tin [0,T]}$ and $(f(t,B_t))_{tin [0,T]}$ is a sort of Itô integral $I$ ? (in grey in the following picture)
- Why are we interested to this integral ? I also saw that if $H_s$ is the number of call we have then $int_0^T H_s dB_t$ is the profit we made after $[0,T]$. I so, why the price of a call is a Brownian motion ? This is very weird for me.
stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
I'm really in truble to understand Itô integral. I can work with it without any problem, but I really don't understand what is it. And why is it an integral ? How can we interpret $$I=int_0^T f(s,B_s)dB_s ?$$
- Would it be : we consider the brownian motion on $[0,T]$ and a function $f:[0,infty )times mathbb Rto mathbb R$, then the area between $(B_t)_{tin [0,T]}$ and $(f(t,B_t))_{tin [0,T]}$ is a sort of Itô integral $I$ ? (in grey in the following picture)
- Why are we interested to this integral ? I also saw that if $H_s$ is the number of call we have then $int_0^T H_s dB_t$ is the profit we made after $[0,T]$. I so, why the price of a call is a Brownian motion ? This is very weird for me.
stochastic-calculus
stochastic-calculus
edited Dec 29 '18 at 11:16
user623855
asked Dec 29 '18 at 11:05
user623855user623855
1457
1457
$begingroup$
The stochastic integral doesn't represent an area as a Riemann integral. The stochastic integral is just a stochastic process that has the same properties than the integral, that's why we use the integral notation.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 29 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
Your first suggestion is bizarre since usual integrals are never this area...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:10
$begingroup$
@Did : I add a picture to be more clear. Maybe something in this spirit ? (probably not exactely that, but is to relate this to an area). I'm trying to make a comparaison with stiljes integral, but maybe such integral can't be related to an area, doest it ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Surb : And for the interpretation ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
But already for $f(B_t,t)=1$, this interpretation fails, as surely you can see...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:19
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
The stochastic integral doesn't represent an area as a Riemann integral. The stochastic integral is just a stochastic process that has the same properties than the integral, that's why we use the integral notation.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 29 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
Your first suggestion is bizarre since usual integrals are never this area...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:10
$begingroup$
@Did : I add a picture to be more clear. Maybe something in this spirit ? (probably not exactely that, but is to relate this to an area). I'm trying to make a comparaison with stiljes integral, but maybe such integral can't be related to an area, doest it ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Surb : And for the interpretation ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
But already for $f(B_t,t)=1$, this interpretation fails, as surely you can see...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
The stochastic integral doesn't represent an area as a Riemann integral. The stochastic integral is just a stochastic process that has the same properties than the integral, that's why we use the integral notation.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 29 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
The stochastic integral doesn't represent an area as a Riemann integral. The stochastic integral is just a stochastic process that has the same properties than the integral, that's why we use the integral notation.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 29 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
Your first suggestion is bizarre since usual integrals are never this area...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:10
$begingroup$
Your first suggestion is bizarre since usual integrals are never this area...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:10
$begingroup$
@Did : I add a picture to be more clear. Maybe something in this spirit ? (probably not exactely that, but is to relate this to an area). I'm trying to make a comparaison with stiljes integral, but maybe such integral can't be related to an area, doest it ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Did : I add a picture to be more clear. Maybe something in this spirit ? (probably not exactely that, but is to relate this to an area). I'm trying to make a comparaison with stiljes integral, but maybe such integral can't be related to an area, doest it ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Surb : And for the interpretation ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Surb : And for the interpretation ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
But already for $f(B_t,t)=1$, this interpretation fails, as surely you can see...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:19
$begingroup$
But already for $f(B_t,t)=1$, this interpretation fails, as surely you can see...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:19
|
show 4 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055742%2fwhat-is-an-it%25c3%25b4-integral-what-does-it-represent-concretely%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055742%2fwhat-is-an-it%25c3%25b4-integral-what-does-it-represent-concretely%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The stochastic integral doesn't represent an area as a Riemann integral. The stochastic integral is just a stochastic process that has the same properties than the integral, that's why we use the integral notation.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Dec 29 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
Your first suggestion is bizarre since usual integrals are never this area...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:10
$begingroup$
@Did : I add a picture to be more clear. Maybe something in this spirit ? (probably not exactely that, but is to relate this to an area). I'm trying to make a comparaison with stiljes integral, but maybe such integral can't be related to an area, doest it ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
@Surb : And for the interpretation ?
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 29 '18 at 11:18
$begingroup$
But already for $f(B_t,t)=1$, this interpretation fails, as surely you can see...
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 29 '18 at 11:19