Confused by a seemingly too simple solution for inequality word problem












0












$begingroup$



Between a city and a village lie two bike tracks: 35km of paved road, and 20km of dirt road. Because of the thick forest between them, a cyclist can choose to ride only one.



The speed on the paved road is at least 4km/h faster than that on the dirt road, and the time it takes to complete the dirt track is shorter by a half hour than that of the paved road.




  1. In what range of time is it possible to complete the dirt track?

  2. In what range of time would it take for the cyclist to complete both tracks?




I solved the first question, but the second one stumped me:



$$text{Let }v text{ be the speed on the dirt road}\text{Let }x text{ be the added speed on the paved road}$$
$$frac{35}{v+x}=frac{20}{v} + 0.5$$
From here, you can define $x$ in terms of $v$, and use the inequality $x > 4$, to get the correct range of: $$boxed{10km/h < v < 16km/h}$$



I don't know how to definitively solve the second question. The total time it takes to complete both tracks would be:
$$t = frac{35}{v+x} + frac{20}{v}$$



If you substitute $x = 4$ and the range of $v$ from before, you get the correct answer of:
$$boxed{3h < t < 4.5h}$$



...But why is this? This was just a pure guess by my part, as my first intuition was to describe $t$ in terms of $x$ for every speed limit & repeat the same process I did in the first question, but that turns into hell. How do I solve this without making this assumption?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Between a city and a village lie two bike tracks: 35km of paved road, and 20km of dirt road. Because of the thick forest between them, a cyclist can choose to ride only one.



    The speed on the paved road is at least 4km/h faster than that on the dirt road, and the time it takes to complete the dirt track is shorter by a half hour than that of the paved road.




    1. In what range of time is it possible to complete the dirt track?

    2. In what range of time would it take for the cyclist to complete both tracks?




    I solved the first question, but the second one stumped me:



    $$text{Let }v text{ be the speed on the dirt road}\text{Let }x text{ be the added speed on the paved road}$$
    $$frac{35}{v+x}=frac{20}{v} + 0.5$$
    From here, you can define $x$ in terms of $v$, and use the inequality $x > 4$, to get the correct range of: $$boxed{10km/h < v < 16km/h}$$



    I don't know how to definitively solve the second question. The total time it takes to complete both tracks would be:
    $$t = frac{35}{v+x} + frac{20}{v}$$



    If you substitute $x = 4$ and the range of $v$ from before, you get the correct answer of:
    $$boxed{3h < t < 4.5h}$$



    ...But why is this? This was just a pure guess by my part, as my first intuition was to describe $t$ in terms of $x$ for every speed limit & repeat the same process I did in the first question, but that turns into hell. How do I solve this without making this assumption?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Between a city and a village lie two bike tracks: 35km of paved road, and 20km of dirt road. Because of the thick forest between them, a cyclist can choose to ride only one.



      The speed on the paved road is at least 4km/h faster than that on the dirt road, and the time it takes to complete the dirt track is shorter by a half hour than that of the paved road.




      1. In what range of time is it possible to complete the dirt track?

      2. In what range of time would it take for the cyclist to complete both tracks?




      I solved the first question, but the second one stumped me:



      $$text{Let }v text{ be the speed on the dirt road}\text{Let }x text{ be the added speed on the paved road}$$
      $$frac{35}{v+x}=frac{20}{v} + 0.5$$
      From here, you can define $x$ in terms of $v$, and use the inequality $x > 4$, to get the correct range of: $$boxed{10km/h < v < 16km/h}$$



      I don't know how to definitively solve the second question. The total time it takes to complete both tracks would be:
      $$t = frac{35}{v+x} + frac{20}{v}$$



      If you substitute $x = 4$ and the range of $v$ from before, you get the correct answer of:
      $$boxed{3h < t < 4.5h}$$



      ...But why is this? This was just a pure guess by my part, as my first intuition was to describe $t$ in terms of $x$ for every speed limit & repeat the same process I did in the first question, but that turns into hell. How do I solve this without making this assumption?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Between a city and a village lie two bike tracks: 35km of paved road, and 20km of dirt road. Because of the thick forest between them, a cyclist can choose to ride only one.



      The speed on the paved road is at least 4km/h faster than that on the dirt road, and the time it takes to complete the dirt track is shorter by a half hour than that of the paved road.




      1. In what range of time is it possible to complete the dirt track?

      2. In what range of time would it take for the cyclist to complete both tracks?




      I solved the first question, but the second one stumped me:



      $$text{Let }v text{ be the speed on the dirt road}\text{Let }x text{ be the added speed on the paved road}$$
      $$frac{35}{v+x}=frac{20}{v} + 0.5$$
      From here, you can define $x$ in terms of $v$, and use the inequality $x > 4$, to get the correct range of: $$boxed{10km/h < v < 16km/h}$$



      I don't know how to definitively solve the second question. The total time it takes to complete both tracks would be:
      $$t = frac{35}{v+x} + frac{20}{v}$$



      If you substitute $x = 4$ and the range of $v$ from before, you get the correct answer of:
      $$boxed{3h < t < 4.5h}$$



      ...But why is this? This was just a pure guess by my part, as my first intuition was to describe $t$ in terms of $x$ for every speed limit & repeat the same process I did in the first question, but that turns into hell. How do I solve this without making this assumption?







      inequality word-problem






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 4 at 23:18









      daedsidogdaedsidog

      29517




      29517






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          From the first equation, we can solve for $x$:



          $$x=frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}$$



          Plug this into the expression for $t$:



          $$t=frac{35}{v+frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}}+frac{20}{v}$$



          Simplify:



          $$t=frac{40}{v}+frac 1 2$$



          From here, use the fact that $10 < v < 16$ to solve for the possible range of values for $t$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062228%2fconfused-by-a-seemingly-too-simple-solution-for-inequality-word-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            From the first equation, we can solve for $x$:



            $$x=frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}$$



            Plug this into the expression for $t$:



            $$t=frac{35}{v+frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}}+frac{20}{v}$$



            Simplify:



            $$t=frac{40}{v}+frac 1 2$$



            From here, use the fact that $10 < v < 16$ to solve for the possible range of values for $t$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              From the first equation, we can solve for $x$:



              $$x=frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}$$



              Plug this into the expression for $t$:



              $$t=frac{35}{v+frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}}+frac{20}{v}$$



              Simplify:



              $$t=frac{40}{v}+frac 1 2$$



              From here, use the fact that $10 < v < 16$ to solve for the possible range of values for $t$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                From the first equation, we can solve for $x$:



                $$x=frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}$$



                Plug this into the expression for $t$:



                $$t=frac{35}{v+frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}}+frac{20}{v}$$



                Simplify:



                $$t=frac{40}{v}+frac 1 2$$



                From here, use the fact that $10 < v < 16$ to solve for the possible range of values for $t$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                From the first equation, we can solve for $x$:



                $$x=frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}$$



                Plug this into the expression for $t$:



                $$t=frac{35}{v+frac{30v-v^2}{v+40}}+frac{20}{v}$$



                Simplify:



                $$t=frac{40}{v}+frac 1 2$$



                From here, use the fact that $10 < v < 16$ to solve for the possible range of values for $t$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 4 at 23:26









                Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

                15.3k1835




                15.3k1835






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062228%2fconfused-by-a-seemingly-too-simple-solution-for-inequality-word-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna