If $f circ f = 0 $, show that transformations $f + id_x$ and $f - id_x$ are isomorphisms of $X$












4












$begingroup$


I have a problem with this task:

The linear transformation $f in L(X,X)$ has property $f circ f = 0 $
Show that transformations $f + id_x$ and $f - id_x$ are isomorphisms of $X$ space with itself


If I need to be honest I have no idea how to prove this. I was tryinging something like that:


If $f + id_x$ is isomorphism it must be both injective and surjective.

Ok, but $id_x$ is injective and surjective.

I thought to show that f is surjective but unfortunately sum of two surjectives can give me something what is not surjective...

Maybe the key is in $f circ f = 0 $?
Thanks for your time!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is $X$ finite dimensional?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 4 at 23:19






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    Try to compose them with each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 4 at 23:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As people illustrated, one way to prove something is an isomorphism is to actually find its inverse, quite explicitly! A deeper example is the inverse to $I-A$ where norm of the matrix $A$ is small. The trick is to replace formally the variable $x$ below with $A$ -- quite unsettling I know! $(1-x)^{-1}=frac{1}{1-x} = sum_{i=0}^infty x^i$
    $endgroup$
    – Behnam Esmayli
    Jan 4 at 23:50


















4












$begingroup$


I have a problem with this task:

The linear transformation $f in L(X,X)$ has property $f circ f = 0 $
Show that transformations $f + id_x$ and $f - id_x$ are isomorphisms of $X$ space with itself


If I need to be honest I have no idea how to prove this. I was tryinging something like that:


If $f + id_x$ is isomorphism it must be both injective and surjective.

Ok, but $id_x$ is injective and surjective.

I thought to show that f is surjective but unfortunately sum of two surjectives can give me something what is not surjective...

Maybe the key is in $f circ f = 0 $?
Thanks for your time!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is $X$ finite dimensional?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 4 at 23:19






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    Try to compose them with each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 4 at 23:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As people illustrated, one way to prove something is an isomorphism is to actually find its inverse, quite explicitly! A deeper example is the inverse to $I-A$ where norm of the matrix $A$ is small. The trick is to replace formally the variable $x$ below with $A$ -- quite unsettling I know! $(1-x)^{-1}=frac{1}{1-x} = sum_{i=0}^infty x^i$
    $endgroup$
    – Behnam Esmayli
    Jan 4 at 23:50
















4












4








4





$begingroup$


I have a problem with this task:

The linear transformation $f in L(X,X)$ has property $f circ f = 0 $
Show that transformations $f + id_x$ and $f - id_x$ are isomorphisms of $X$ space with itself


If I need to be honest I have no idea how to prove this. I was tryinging something like that:


If $f + id_x$ is isomorphism it must be both injective and surjective.

Ok, but $id_x$ is injective and surjective.

I thought to show that f is surjective but unfortunately sum of two surjectives can give me something what is not surjective...

Maybe the key is in $f circ f = 0 $?
Thanks for your time!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a problem with this task:

The linear transformation $f in L(X,X)$ has property $f circ f = 0 $
Show that transformations $f + id_x$ and $f - id_x$ are isomorphisms of $X$ space with itself


If I need to be honest I have no idea how to prove this. I was tryinging something like that:


If $f + id_x$ is isomorphism it must be both injective and surjective.

Ok, but $id_x$ is injective and surjective.

I thought to show that f is surjective but unfortunately sum of two surjectives can give me something what is not surjective...

Maybe the key is in $f circ f = 0 $?
Thanks for your time!







linear-algebra proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 4 at 23:17









VirtualUserVirtualUser

1,096117




1,096117








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is $X$ finite dimensional?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 4 at 23:19






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    Try to compose them with each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 4 at 23:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As people illustrated, one way to prove something is an isomorphism is to actually find its inverse, quite explicitly! A deeper example is the inverse to $I-A$ where norm of the matrix $A$ is small. The trick is to replace formally the variable $x$ below with $A$ -- quite unsettling I know! $(1-x)^{-1}=frac{1}{1-x} = sum_{i=0}^infty x^i$
    $endgroup$
    – Behnam Esmayli
    Jan 4 at 23:50
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is $X$ finite dimensional?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 4 at 23:19






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    Try to compose them with each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 4 at 23:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As people illustrated, one way to prove something is an isomorphism is to actually find its inverse, quite explicitly! A deeper example is the inverse to $I-A$ where norm of the matrix $A$ is small. The trick is to replace formally the variable $x$ below with $A$ -- quite unsettling I know! $(1-x)^{-1}=frac{1}{1-x} = sum_{i=0}^infty x^i$
    $endgroup$
    – Behnam Esmayli
    Jan 4 at 23:50










1




1




$begingroup$
Is $X$ finite dimensional?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 4 at 23:19




$begingroup$
Is $X$ finite dimensional?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 4 at 23:19




13




13




$begingroup$
Try to compose them with each other.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Jan 4 at 23:21




$begingroup$
Try to compose them with each other.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Jan 4 at 23:21




2




2




$begingroup$
As people illustrated, one way to prove something is an isomorphism is to actually find its inverse, quite explicitly! A deeper example is the inverse to $I-A$ where norm of the matrix $A$ is small. The trick is to replace formally the variable $x$ below with $A$ -- quite unsettling I know! $(1-x)^{-1}=frac{1}{1-x} = sum_{i=0}^infty x^i$
$endgroup$
– Behnam Esmayli
Jan 4 at 23:50






$begingroup$
As people illustrated, one way to prove something is an isomorphism is to actually find its inverse, quite explicitly! A deeper example is the inverse to $I-A$ where norm of the matrix $A$ is small. The trick is to replace formally the variable $x$ below with $A$ -- quite unsettling I know! $(1-x)^{-1}=frac{1}{1-x} = sum_{i=0}^infty x^i$
$endgroup$
– Behnam Esmayli
Jan 4 at 23:50












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

$f - id_X$ is an isomorphism iff $-(f - id_X) = id_X - f$ is an isomorphism.



We have
$$[(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f)](x) = ((f +id_X)((id_X - f)(x))) = (f +id_X)(x - f(x)) = (f + id_X)(x) - (f + id_X)(f(x)) = f(x) + x -f(f(x)) - f(x) = x,$$
i.e. $(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f) = id_X$. Similarly$(id_X - f) circ (f + id_X = id_X$.



This shows that $f + id_X, id_X - f$ are inverse isomorphisms.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    Since $f in L(X,X)$ and $f circ f = 0 $,
    we have
    $$(id_x + f )circ (id_x-f)= id_x -f + f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$
    and
    $$(id_x - f )circ (id_x + f)= id_x + f - f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$



    So $id_x + f $ and $id_x - f $ are isomorphisms. Since $f-id_x = -(id_x-f)$, we have that $f-id_x$ is an isomorphism. So, we have that $f+id_x$ and $f-id_x$ are isomorphisms.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      2












      $begingroup$

      if $hcirc g=idx$ then, $g$ is injective and $h$ is surjective .



      $fcirc f-idx=idx=(f-idx)circ(f+idx)=(f+idx)circ(cf-idx)$ and this means that:
      -$f+idx$ is injective and $f-idx$ is surjective
      -$f-idx$ is surjective and $f+idx$ is injective



      And finally you got the answer..






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        2












        $begingroup$

        If $X$ is finite-dimensional, it suffices to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is injective, or that its kernel is trivial.



        Assume $0 = (f pm operatorname{id}_X)(x) = f(x)pm x$. Hence $f(x) = mp, x$. Applying $f$ to this yields
        $$0 = f^2(x) = mp, f(x)$$
        so $x = mp, f(x) = 0$.



        Hence $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is an isomorphism.



        If $X$ is not finite-dimensional, we also need to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is surjective. For this, note that for arbitrary $y in X$ we have



        $$(f pm operatorname{id}_X)(pm ,y -f(y)) = pm, f(y)-f^2(y) + y mp,f(y) = y$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          I think it should be $[pm y-f(y)]$
          $endgroup$
          – Shubham Johri
          Jan 5 at 7:46










        • $begingroup$
          @ShubhamJohri True, thanks.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Jan 5 at 13:50



















        0












        $begingroup$

        As all the other answers have amended my comment by actually going through the computation, I just want to add two levels of generalisations of the result which I see:



        i) We only need the abelian group structure on $X$. In other words, with the same proof we get the more general result:




        If $A$ is an abelian group and $f in End(A)$ satisfies $fcirc f =0$, then $pm id_A pm f$ are automorphisms of $A$.




        ii) Now the $End(A)$ in part i is a unital (but not necessarily commutative) ring $R$ with addition as addition and composition as multiplication, $id_A =1_R$. From this perspective, the result is just a special case of




        If $u in R^times$, $n in R$ is nilpotent, and $u$ and $n$ commute with each other, then $u+n in R^times$.




        which is proved by a geometric series argument as suggested in Behnam Esmayli's comment. In our special case $n=pm f$ with $n^2=0$, of course the inverse of $u+n$ is just $u^{-1}(1-n)$. See Units and Nilpotents and its many duplicates for a general discussion.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062226%2fif-f-circ-f-0-show-that-transformations-f-id-x-and-f-id-x-are-iso%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          $f - id_X$ is an isomorphism iff $-(f - id_X) = id_X - f$ is an isomorphism.



          We have
          $$[(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f)](x) = ((f +id_X)((id_X - f)(x))) = (f +id_X)(x - f(x)) = (f + id_X)(x) - (f + id_X)(f(x)) = f(x) + x -f(f(x)) - f(x) = x,$$
          i.e. $(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f) = id_X$. Similarly$(id_X - f) circ (f + id_X = id_X$.



          This shows that $f + id_X, id_X - f$ are inverse isomorphisms.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$


















            3












            $begingroup$

            $f - id_X$ is an isomorphism iff $-(f - id_X) = id_X - f$ is an isomorphism.



            We have
            $$[(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f)](x) = ((f +id_X)((id_X - f)(x))) = (f +id_X)(x - f(x)) = (f + id_X)(x) - (f + id_X)(f(x)) = f(x) + x -f(f(x)) - f(x) = x,$$
            i.e. $(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f) = id_X$. Similarly$(id_X - f) circ (f + id_X = id_X$.



            This shows that $f + id_X, id_X - f$ are inverse isomorphisms.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$
















              3












              3








              3





              $begingroup$

              $f - id_X$ is an isomorphism iff $-(f - id_X) = id_X - f$ is an isomorphism.



              We have
              $$[(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f)](x) = ((f +id_X)((id_X - f)(x))) = (f +id_X)(x - f(x)) = (f + id_X)(x) - (f + id_X)(f(x)) = f(x) + x -f(f(x)) - f(x) = x,$$
              i.e. $(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f) = id_X$. Similarly$(id_X - f) circ (f + id_X = id_X$.



              This shows that $f + id_X, id_X - f$ are inverse isomorphisms.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              $f - id_X$ is an isomorphism iff $-(f - id_X) = id_X - f$ is an isomorphism.



              We have
              $$[(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f)](x) = ((f +id_X)((id_X - f)(x))) = (f +id_X)(x - f(x)) = (f + id_X)(x) - (f + id_X)(f(x)) = f(x) + x -f(f(x)) - f(x) = x,$$
              i.e. $(f + id_X) circ (id_X - f) = id_X$. Similarly$(id_X - f) circ (f + id_X = id_X$.



              This shows that $f + id_X, id_X - f$ are inverse isomorphisms.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jan 5 at 10:30

























              answered Jan 4 at 23:35









              Paul FrostPaul Frost

              11.6k3934




              11.6k3934























                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  Since $f in L(X,X)$ and $f circ f = 0 $,
                  we have
                  $$(id_x + f )circ (id_x-f)= id_x -f + f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$
                  and
                  $$(id_x - f )circ (id_x + f)= id_x + f - f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$



                  So $id_x + f $ and $id_x - f $ are isomorphisms. Since $f-id_x = -(id_x-f)$, we have that $f-id_x$ is an isomorphism. So, we have that $f+id_x$ and $f-id_x$ are isomorphisms.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$


















                    4












                    $begingroup$

                    Since $f in L(X,X)$ and $f circ f = 0 $,
                    we have
                    $$(id_x + f )circ (id_x-f)= id_x -f + f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$
                    and
                    $$(id_x - f )circ (id_x + f)= id_x + f - f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$



                    So $id_x + f $ and $id_x - f $ are isomorphisms. Since $f-id_x = -(id_x-f)$, we have that $f-id_x$ is an isomorphism. So, we have that $f+id_x$ and $f-id_x$ are isomorphisms.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$
















                      4












                      4








                      4





                      $begingroup$

                      Since $f in L(X,X)$ and $f circ f = 0 $,
                      we have
                      $$(id_x + f )circ (id_x-f)= id_x -f + f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$
                      and
                      $$(id_x - f )circ (id_x + f)= id_x + f - f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$



                      So $id_x + f $ and $id_x - f $ are isomorphisms. Since $f-id_x = -(id_x-f)$, we have that $f-id_x$ is an isomorphism. So, we have that $f+id_x$ and $f-id_x$ are isomorphisms.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Since $f in L(X,X)$ and $f circ f = 0 $,
                      we have
                      $$(id_x + f )circ (id_x-f)= id_x -f + f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$
                      and
                      $$(id_x - f )circ (id_x + f)= id_x + f - f - (fcirc f)= id_x$$



                      So $id_x + f $ and $id_x - f $ are isomorphisms. Since $f-id_x = -(id_x-f)$, we have that $f-id_x$ is an isomorphism. So, we have that $f+id_x$ and $f-id_x$ are isomorphisms.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 5 at 15:07

























                      answered Jan 4 at 23:34









                      RamiroRamiro

                      7,22421334




                      7,22421334























                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          if $hcirc g=idx$ then, $g$ is injective and $h$ is surjective .



                          $fcirc f-idx=idx=(f-idx)circ(f+idx)=(f+idx)circ(cf-idx)$ and this means that:
                          -$f+idx$ is injective and $f-idx$ is surjective
                          -$f-idx$ is surjective and $f+idx$ is injective



                          And finally you got the answer..






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            if $hcirc g=idx$ then, $g$ is injective and $h$ is surjective .



                            $fcirc f-idx=idx=(f-idx)circ(f+idx)=(f+idx)circ(cf-idx)$ and this means that:
                            -$f+idx$ is injective and $f-idx$ is surjective
                            -$f-idx$ is surjective and $f+idx$ is injective



                            And finally you got the answer..






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              2












                              2








                              2





                              $begingroup$

                              if $hcirc g=idx$ then, $g$ is injective and $h$ is surjective .



                              $fcirc f-idx=idx=(f-idx)circ(f+idx)=(f+idx)circ(cf-idx)$ and this means that:
                              -$f+idx$ is injective and $f-idx$ is surjective
                              -$f-idx$ is surjective and $f+idx$ is injective



                              And finally you got the answer..






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              if $hcirc g=idx$ then, $g$ is injective and $h$ is surjective .



                              $fcirc f-idx=idx=(f-idx)circ(f+idx)=(f+idx)circ(cf-idx)$ and this means that:
                              -$f+idx$ is injective and $f-idx$ is surjective
                              -$f-idx$ is surjective and $f+idx$ is injective



                              And finally you got the answer..







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Jan 5 at 0:34







                              user376171






























                                  2












                                  $begingroup$

                                  If $X$ is finite-dimensional, it suffices to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is injective, or that its kernel is trivial.



                                  Assume $0 = (f pm operatorname{id}_X)(x) = f(x)pm x$. Hence $f(x) = mp, x$. Applying $f$ to this yields
                                  $$0 = f^2(x) = mp, f(x)$$
                                  so $x = mp, f(x) = 0$.



                                  Hence $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is an isomorphism.



                                  If $X$ is not finite-dimensional, we also need to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is surjective. For this, note that for arbitrary $y in X$ we have



                                  $$(f pm operatorname{id}_X)(pm ,y -f(y)) = pm, f(y)-f^2(y) + y mp,f(y) = y$$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$













                                  • $begingroup$
                                    I think it should be $[pm y-f(y)]$
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Shubham Johri
                                    Jan 5 at 7:46










                                  • $begingroup$
                                    @ShubhamJohri True, thanks.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – mechanodroid
                                    Jan 5 at 13:50
















                                  2












                                  $begingroup$

                                  If $X$ is finite-dimensional, it suffices to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is injective, or that its kernel is trivial.



                                  Assume $0 = (f pm operatorname{id}_X)(x) = f(x)pm x$. Hence $f(x) = mp, x$. Applying $f$ to this yields
                                  $$0 = f^2(x) = mp, f(x)$$
                                  so $x = mp, f(x) = 0$.



                                  Hence $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is an isomorphism.



                                  If $X$ is not finite-dimensional, we also need to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is surjective. For this, note that for arbitrary $y in X$ we have



                                  $$(f pm operatorname{id}_X)(pm ,y -f(y)) = pm, f(y)-f^2(y) + y mp,f(y) = y$$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$













                                  • $begingroup$
                                    I think it should be $[pm y-f(y)]$
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Shubham Johri
                                    Jan 5 at 7:46










                                  • $begingroup$
                                    @ShubhamJohri True, thanks.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – mechanodroid
                                    Jan 5 at 13:50














                                  2












                                  2








                                  2





                                  $begingroup$

                                  If $X$ is finite-dimensional, it suffices to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is injective, or that its kernel is trivial.



                                  Assume $0 = (f pm operatorname{id}_X)(x) = f(x)pm x$. Hence $f(x) = mp, x$. Applying $f$ to this yields
                                  $$0 = f^2(x) = mp, f(x)$$
                                  so $x = mp, f(x) = 0$.



                                  Hence $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is an isomorphism.



                                  If $X$ is not finite-dimensional, we also need to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is surjective. For this, note that for arbitrary $y in X$ we have



                                  $$(f pm operatorname{id}_X)(pm ,y -f(y)) = pm, f(y)-f^2(y) + y mp,f(y) = y$$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$



                                  If $X$ is finite-dimensional, it suffices to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is injective, or that its kernel is trivial.



                                  Assume $0 = (f pm operatorname{id}_X)(x) = f(x)pm x$. Hence $f(x) = mp, x$. Applying $f$ to this yields
                                  $$0 = f^2(x) = mp, f(x)$$
                                  so $x = mp, f(x) = 0$.



                                  Hence $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is an isomorphism.



                                  If $X$ is not finite-dimensional, we also need to show that $f pm operatorname{id}_X$ is surjective. For this, note that for arbitrary $y in X$ we have



                                  $$(f pm operatorname{id}_X)(pm ,y -f(y)) = pm, f(y)-f^2(y) + y mp,f(y) = y$$







                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                  share|cite|improve this answer








                                  edited Jan 5 at 13:49

























                                  answered Jan 4 at 23:48









                                  mechanodroidmechanodroid

                                  28.7k62548




                                  28.7k62548












                                  • $begingroup$
                                    I think it should be $[pm y-f(y)]$
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Shubham Johri
                                    Jan 5 at 7:46










                                  • $begingroup$
                                    @ShubhamJohri True, thanks.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – mechanodroid
                                    Jan 5 at 13:50


















                                  • $begingroup$
                                    I think it should be $[pm y-f(y)]$
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Shubham Johri
                                    Jan 5 at 7:46










                                  • $begingroup$
                                    @ShubhamJohri True, thanks.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – mechanodroid
                                    Jan 5 at 13:50
















                                  $begingroup$
                                  I think it should be $[pm y-f(y)]$
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Shubham Johri
                                  Jan 5 at 7:46




                                  $begingroup$
                                  I think it should be $[pm y-f(y)]$
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Shubham Johri
                                  Jan 5 at 7:46












                                  $begingroup$
                                  @ShubhamJohri True, thanks.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – mechanodroid
                                  Jan 5 at 13:50




                                  $begingroup$
                                  @ShubhamJohri True, thanks.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – mechanodroid
                                  Jan 5 at 13:50











                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  As all the other answers have amended my comment by actually going through the computation, I just want to add two levels of generalisations of the result which I see:



                                  i) We only need the abelian group structure on $X$. In other words, with the same proof we get the more general result:




                                  If $A$ is an abelian group and $f in End(A)$ satisfies $fcirc f =0$, then $pm id_A pm f$ are automorphisms of $A$.




                                  ii) Now the $End(A)$ in part i is a unital (but not necessarily commutative) ring $R$ with addition as addition and composition as multiplication, $id_A =1_R$. From this perspective, the result is just a special case of




                                  If $u in R^times$, $n in R$ is nilpotent, and $u$ and $n$ commute with each other, then $u+n in R^times$.




                                  which is proved by a geometric series argument as suggested in Behnam Esmayli's comment. In our special case $n=pm f$ with $n^2=0$, of course the inverse of $u+n$ is just $u^{-1}(1-n)$. See Units and Nilpotents and its many duplicates for a general discussion.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    As all the other answers have amended my comment by actually going through the computation, I just want to add two levels of generalisations of the result which I see:



                                    i) We only need the abelian group structure on $X$. In other words, with the same proof we get the more general result:




                                    If $A$ is an abelian group and $f in End(A)$ satisfies $fcirc f =0$, then $pm id_A pm f$ are automorphisms of $A$.




                                    ii) Now the $End(A)$ in part i is a unital (but not necessarily commutative) ring $R$ with addition as addition and composition as multiplication, $id_A =1_R$. From this perspective, the result is just a special case of




                                    If $u in R^times$, $n in R$ is nilpotent, and $u$ and $n$ commute with each other, then $u+n in R^times$.




                                    which is proved by a geometric series argument as suggested in Behnam Esmayli's comment. In our special case $n=pm f$ with $n^2=0$, of course the inverse of $u+n$ is just $u^{-1}(1-n)$. See Units and Nilpotents and its many duplicates for a general discussion.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      As all the other answers have amended my comment by actually going through the computation, I just want to add two levels of generalisations of the result which I see:



                                      i) We only need the abelian group structure on $X$. In other words, with the same proof we get the more general result:




                                      If $A$ is an abelian group and $f in End(A)$ satisfies $fcirc f =0$, then $pm id_A pm f$ are automorphisms of $A$.




                                      ii) Now the $End(A)$ in part i is a unital (but not necessarily commutative) ring $R$ with addition as addition and composition as multiplication, $id_A =1_R$. From this perspective, the result is just a special case of




                                      If $u in R^times$, $n in R$ is nilpotent, and $u$ and $n$ commute with each other, then $u+n in R^times$.




                                      which is proved by a geometric series argument as suggested in Behnam Esmayli's comment. In our special case $n=pm f$ with $n^2=0$, of course the inverse of $u+n$ is just $u^{-1}(1-n)$. See Units and Nilpotents and its many duplicates for a general discussion.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      As all the other answers have amended my comment by actually going through the computation, I just want to add two levels of generalisations of the result which I see:



                                      i) We only need the abelian group structure on $X$. In other words, with the same proof we get the more general result:




                                      If $A$ is an abelian group and $f in End(A)$ satisfies $fcirc f =0$, then $pm id_A pm f$ are automorphisms of $A$.




                                      ii) Now the $End(A)$ in part i is a unital (but not necessarily commutative) ring $R$ with addition as addition and composition as multiplication, $id_A =1_R$. From this perspective, the result is just a special case of




                                      If $u in R^times$, $n in R$ is nilpotent, and $u$ and $n$ commute with each other, then $u+n in R^times$.




                                      which is proved by a geometric series argument as suggested in Behnam Esmayli's comment. In our special case $n=pm f$ with $n^2=0$, of course the inverse of $u+n$ is just $u^{-1}(1-n)$. See Units and Nilpotents and its many duplicates for a general discussion.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Jan 5 at 18:31









                                      Torsten SchoenebergTorsten Schoeneberg

                                      4,3212834




                                      4,3212834






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062226%2fif-f-circ-f-0-show-that-transformations-f-id-x-and-f-id-x-are-iso%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Bressuire

                                          Cabo Verde

                                          Gyllenstierna