Every differential form $omega$ of degree 1 in the sphere $S^msubsetmathbb{R}^{m+1}$ that is closed is also...












1












$begingroup$


I am in a series of self-studies on differential forms on $m$-dimensional surfaces in Euclidean space. I'm two days thinking about the exercise below. The book that proposes this exercise gives no hint of how to solve it. And it seems to me that there is nothing in the text of the book that can help.



This exercise is in a chapter preceding the chapter on the Stokes' theorem ($int_{partial M} omega = int_{M} domega $). So I am trying a solution that does not use Stokes' theorem.




Exercise. For every differential form of class $C^k$ in sphere $S^m$ there exists a differential $r$-form $Omega$ of class $C^k$ in $mathbb{R}^{m + 1}-{0}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m} = omega $. If $m>1$, conclude that every closed differential form of degree $1$ in the sphere $S^m$ is the differential of a function $f:S^m to mathbb{R}$. In particular, any closed form of degree $1$ in $S^m$ ($m>1$) must be nullified by at least two points.




My job. Let $omega$ be a differential form of class $C^k$ and degree $r$ in sphere
$$S^m = {(x_1,ldots, x_{m + 1}) in mathbb{R}^{m + 1}: x_1^2 +ldots + x_{m + 1}^2 = 1}.$$
Let us obtain a differential form $ Omega $ of class $ C^k $ and degree $ r $ in $ mathbb{R}^{m + 1}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m}=omega$. Let $ x in mathbb{R}^{m+1}-{0}$ be fixed. Given any other vector $ v in mathbb{R}^m$ there exists a unique vector $P_x(v)$ perpendicular to $x$ such that
$$
v=c_vcdot x + P_x(v)
$$

where $ c_v $ is a constant that depends on $ v $. Note that $P_x(v)in T_xS^m$. Since the projection $ P_x $ is a linear application we can define
$$
Omega(x)(v_1,ldots,v_r)=omega({x}/{|x|})(P_x(v_1),ldots,P_x(v_r)).
$$



I believe that this first part of the exercise I did correctly.Now let's go to the second part of the exercise which is proof that $ omega $ is exact.



For every point $ x $ of the sphere $ S^m $ there exists a parametrization $varphi: overline{U} to tilde{U} $ with $x = varphi (u)$ from which we can obtain the base $left{frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_1},ldots,frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_m} right}$ of $ T_xS ^ m $ and its dual base ${du_1,ldots, du_m}$ of $ (T_xS^m)^ast $. In addition, there are coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}to mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
omega(x)(v) = a_1^{varphi}(u) du_1cdot v+ldots+ a_m^{varphi} du_mcdot v
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $vin T_xS^m$. On the assumption that $ omega $ is closed we have
$$
domega(x)(v_1,v_2) =sum_{i<j} left(frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u) right) du_iwedge duj ( v_1,v_2)=0
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $v_1,v_2in T_xS^m$. This means that for every point $xin S^m$ there is a parametrization $varphi $, as $varphi(u)=x$ for some $u in overline{U} $, which provides coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}tomathbb{R}$ of $ omega $ that satisfies for all $i<j$ in ${1,ldots,m}$
$$
frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u)=0
$$

for all $uin overline{U}$.



I think of using the coordinate functions $a_i^{varphi}$ to define a vector field in $overline{U}$ or $tilde{U}$ and achieve some geometric result with line integrals. But I have no idea how to define this field of vectors. Maybe I have not noticed any geometrical property of the sphere that can be used.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you learned anything about deRham cohomology and how to compute it?
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 8 at 20:19










  • $begingroup$
    @TedShifrin No, the book I'm studying is of introductory character.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Jan 8 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for putting your work in your question and where you got stuck: +1 from me
    $endgroup$
    – Neal
    Jan 8 at 22:56
















1












$begingroup$


I am in a series of self-studies on differential forms on $m$-dimensional surfaces in Euclidean space. I'm two days thinking about the exercise below. The book that proposes this exercise gives no hint of how to solve it. And it seems to me that there is nothing in the text of the book that can help.



This exercise is in a chapter preceding the chapter on the Stokes' theorem ($int_{partial M} omega = int_{M} domega $). So I am trying a solution that does not use Stokes' theorem.




Exercise. For every differential form of class $C^k$ in sphere $S^m$ there exists a differential $r$-form $Omega$ of class $C^k$ in $mathbb{R}^{m + 1}-{0}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m} = omega $. If $m>1$, conclude that every closed differential form of degree $1$ in the sphere $S^m$ is the differential of a function $f:S^m to mathbb{R}$. In particular, any closed form of degree $1$ in $S^m$ ($m>1$) must be nullified by at least two points.




My job. Let $omega$ be a differential form of class $C^k$ and degree $r$ in sphere
$$S^m = {(x_1,ldots, x_{m + 1}) in mathbb{R}^{m + 1}: x_1^2 +ldots + x_{m + 1}^2 = 1}.$$
Let us obtain a differential form $ Omega $ of class $ C^k $ and degree $ r $ in $ mathbb{R}^{m + 1}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m}=omega$. Let $ x in mathbb{R}^{m+1}-{0}$ be fixed. Given any other vector $ v in mathbb{R}^m$ there exists a unique vector $P_x(v)$ perpendicular to $x$ such that
$$
v=c_vcdot x + P_x(v)
$$

where $ c_v $ is a constant that depends on $ v $. Note that $P_x(v)in T_xS^m$. Since the projection $ P_x $ is a linear application we can define
$$
Omega(x)(v_1,ldots,v_r)=omega({x}/{|x|})(P_x(v_1),ldots,P_x(v_r)).
$$



I believe that this first part of the exercise I did correctly.Now let's go to the second part of the exercise which is proof that $ omega $ is exact.



For every point $ x $ of the sphere $ S^m $ there exists a parametrization $varphi: overline{U} to tilde{U} $ with $x = varphi (u)$ from which we can obtain the base $left{frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_1},ldots,frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_m} right}$ of $ T_xS ^ m $ and its dual base ${du_1,ldots, du_m}$ of $ (T_xS^m)^ast $. In addition, there are coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}to mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
omega(x)(v) = a_1^{varphi}(u) du_1cdot v+ldots+ a_m^{varphi} du_mcdot v
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $vin T_xS^m$. On the assumption that $ omega $ is closed we have
$$
domega(x)(v_1,v_2) =sum_{i<j} left(frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u) right) du_iwedge duj ( v_1,v_2)=0
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $v_1,v_2in T_xS^m$. This means that for every point $xin S^m$ there is a parametrization $varphi $, as $varphi(u)=x$ for some $u in overline{U} $, which provides coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}tomathbb{R}$ of $ omega $ that satisfies for all $i<j$ in ${1,ldots,m}$
$$
frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u)=0
$$

for all $uin overline{U}$.



I think of using the coordinate functions $a_i^{varphi}$ to define a vector field in $overline{U}$ or $tilde{U}$ and achieve some geometric result with line integrals. But I have no idea how to define this field of vectors. Maybe I have not noticed any geometrical property of the sphere that can be used.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you learned anything about deRham cohomology and how to compute it?
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 8 at 20:19










  • $begingroup$
    @TedShifrin No, the book I'm studying is of introductory character.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Jan 8 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for putting your work in your question and where you got stuck: +1 from me
    $endgroup$
    – Neal
    Jan 8 at 22:56














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am in a series of self-studies on differential forms on $m$-dimensional surfaces in Euclidean space. I'm two days thinking about the exercise below. The book that proposes this exercise gives no hint of how to solve it. And it seems to me that there is nothing in the text of the book that can help.



This exercise is in a chapter preceding the chapter on the Stokes' theorem ($int_{partial M} omega = int_{M} domega $). So I am trying a solution that does not use Stokes' theorem.




Exercise. For every differential form of class $C^k$ in sphere $S^m$ there exists a differential $r$-form $Omega$ of class $C^k$ in $mathbb{R}^{m + 1}-{0}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m} = omega $. If $m>1$, conclude that every closed differential form of degree $1$ in the sphere $S^m$ is the differential of a function $f:S^m to mathbb{R}$. In particular, any closed form of degree $1$ in $S^m$ ($m>1$) must be nullified by at least two points.




My job. Let $omega$ be a differential form of class $C^k$ and degree $r$ in sphere
$$S^m = {(x_1,ldots, x_{m + 1}) in mathbb{R}^{m + 1}: x_1^2 +ldots + x_{m + 1}^2 = 1}.$$
Let us obtain a differential form $ Omega $ of class $ C^k $ and degree $ r $ in $ mathbb{R}^{m + 1}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m}=omega$. Let $ x in mathbb{R}^{m+1}-{0}$ be fixed. Given any other vector $ v in mathbb{R}^m$ there exists a unique vector $P_x(v)$ perpendicular to $x$ such that
$$
v=c_vcdot x + P_x(v)
$$

where $ c_v $ is a constant that depends on $ v $. Note that $P_x(v)in T_xS^m$. Since the projection $ P_x $ is a linear application we can define
$$
Omega(x)(v_1,ldots,v_r)=omega({x}/{|x|})(P_x(v_1),ldots,P_x(v_r)).
$$



I believe that this first part of the exercise I did correctly.Now let's go to the second part of the exercise which is proof that $ omega $ is exact.



For every point $ x $ of the sphere $ S^m $ there exists a parametrization $varphi: overline{U} to tilde{U} $ with $x = varphi (u)$ from which we can obtain the base $left{frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_1},ldots,frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_m} right}$ of $ T_xS ^ m $ and its dual base ${du_1,ldots, du_m}$ of $ (T_xS^m)^ast $. In addition, there are coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}to mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
omega(x)(v) = a_1^{varphi}(u) du_1cdot v+ldots+ a_m^{varphi} du_mcdot v
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $vin T_xS^m$. On the assumption that $ omega $ is closed we have
$$
domega(x)(v_1,v_2) =sum_{i<j} left(frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u) right) du_iwedge duj ( v_1,v_2)=0
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $v_1,v_2in T_xS^m$. This means that for every point $xin S^m$ there is a parametrization $varphi $, as $varphi(u)=x$ for some $u in overline{U} $, which provides coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}tomathbb{R}$ of $ omega $ that satisfies for all $i<j$ in ${1,ldots,m}$
$$
frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u)=0
$$

for all $uin overline{U}$.



I think of using the coordinate functions $a_i^{varphi}$ to define a vector field in $overline{U}$ or $tilde{U}$ and achieve some geometric result with line integrals. But I have no idea how to define this field of vectors. Maybe I have not noticed any geometrical property of the sphere that can be used.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am in a series of self-studies on differential forms on $m$-dimensional surfaces in Euclidean space. I'm two days thinking about the exercise below. The book that proposes this exercise gives no hint of how to solve it. And it seems to me that there is nothing in the text of the book that can help.



This exercise is in a chapter preceding the chapter on the Stokes' theorem ($int_{partial M} omega = int_{M} domega $). So I am trying a solution that does not use Stokes' theorem.




Exercise. For every differential form of class $C^k$ in sphere $S^m$ there exists a differential $r$-form $Omega$ of class $C^k$ in $mathbb{R}^{m + 1}-{0}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m} = omega $. If $m>1$, conclude that every closed differential form of degree $1$ in the sphere $S^m$ is the differential of a function $f:S^m to mathbb{R}$. In particular, any closed form of degree $1$ in $S^m$ ($m>1$) must be nullified by at least two points.




My job. Let $omega$ be a differential form of class $C^k$ and degree $r$ in sphere
$$S^m = {(x_1,ldots, x_{m + 1}) in mathbb{R}^{m + 1}: x_1^2 +ldots + x_{m + 1}^2 = 1}.$$
Let us obtain a differential form $ Omega $ of class $ C^k $ and degree $ r $ in $ mathbb{R}^{m + 1}$ such that $Omega|_{S^m}=omega$. Let $ x in mathbb{R}^{m+1}-{0}$ be fixed. Given any other vector $ v in mathbb{R}^m$ there exists a unique vector $P_x(v)$ perpendicular to $x$ such that
$$
v=c_vcdot x + P_x(v)
$$

where $ c_v $ is a constant that depends on $ v $. Note that $P_x(v)in T_xS^m$. Since the projection $ P_x $ is a linear application we can define
$$
Omega(x)(v_1,ldots,v_r)=omega({x}/{|x|})(P_x(v_1),ldots,P_x(v_r)).
$$



I believe that this first part of the exercise I did correctly.Now let's go to the second part of the exercise which is proof that $ omega $ is exact.



For every point $ x $ of the sphere $ S^m $ there exists a parametrization $varphi: overline{U} to tilde{U} $ with $x = varphi (u)$ from which we can obtain the base $left{frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_1},ldots,frac{partialvarphi(u)}{partial u_m} right}$ of $ T_xS ^ m $ and its dual base ${du_1,ldots, du_m}$ of $ (T_xS^m)^ast $. In addition, there are coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}to mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
omega(x)(v) = a_1^{varphi}(u) du_1cdot v+ldots+ a_m^{varphi} du_mcdot v
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $vin T_xS^m$. On the assumption that $ omega $ is closed we have
$$
domega(x)(v_1,v_2) =sum_{i<j} left(frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u) right) du_iwedge duj ( v_1,v_2)=0
$$

for all $x=varphi(u)in tilde{U}$ and all $v_1,v_2in T_xS^m$. This means that for every point $xin S^m$ there is a parametrization $varphi $, as $varphi(u)=x$ for some $u in overline{U} $, which provides coordinate functions $a_j^{varphi}:overline{U}tomathbb{R}$ of $ omega $ that satisfies for all $i<j$ in ${1,ldots,m}$
$$
frac{partial a_j^{varphi}}{partial u_i}(u)-frac{partial a_i^{varphi}}{partial u_j}(u)=0
$$

for all $uin overline{U}$.



I think of using the coordinate functions $a_i^{varphi}$ to define a vector field in $overline{U}$ or $tilde{U}$ and achieve some geometric result with line integrals. But I have no idea how to define this field of vectors. Maybe I have not noticed any geometrical property of the sphere that can be used.







differential-geometry differential-topology closed-form differential-forms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 18:39







MathOverview

















asked Jan 7 at 18:32









MathOverviewMathOverview

8,96243164




8,96243164












  • $begingroup$
    Have you learned anything about deRham cohomology and how to compute it?
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 8 at 20:19










  • $begingroup$
    @TedShifrin No, the book I'm studying is of introductory character.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Jan 8 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for putting your work in your question and where you got stuck: +1 from me
    $endgroup$
    – Neal
    Jan 8 at 22:56


















  • $begingroup$
    Have you learned anything about deRham cohomology and how to compute it?
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 8 at 20:19










  • $begingroup$
    @TedShifrin No, the book I'm studying is of introductory character.
    $endgroup$
    – MathOverview
    Jan 8 at 22:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for putting your work in your question and where you got stuck: +1 from me
    $endgroup$
    – Neal
    Jan 8 at 22:56
















$begingroup$
Have you learned anything about deRham cohomology and how to compute it?
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Jan 8 at 20:19




$begingroup$
Have you learned anything about deRham cohomology and how to compute it?
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Jan 8 at 20:19












$begingroup$
@TedShifrin No, the book I'm studying is of introductory character.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Jan 8 at 22:22




$begingroup$
@TedShifrin No, the book I'm studying is of introductory character.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Jan 8 at 22:22












$begingroup$
Thanks for putting your work in your question and where you got stuck: +1 from me
$endgroup$
– Neal
Jan 8 at 22:56




$begingroup$
Thanks for putting your work in your question and where you got stuck: +1 from me
$endgroup$
– Neal
Jan 8 at 22:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Now that I've read your post more carefully, I see that the intent is to prove bare-hands that a closed $1$-form $Omega$ on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$ (assuming $mge 2$) is exact. Even though the region is not star-shaped, you can make a standard calculus argument by defining a potential function $f(x) = int_{x_0}^x Omega$ and checking that the integral is path-independent by virtue of the fact that $Omega$ is closed. (This would be easiest with Stokes's Theorem, but can be reduced to direct checking with rectangles in planes and checking that Green's Theorem holds there.) You can restrict yourself to polygonal paths with edges parallel to the coordinate axes, and then it's easy to check as well that $df = Omega$.



Although the problem didn't tell you that you could assume that $Omega$ is closed, it's easy enough to arrange this by taking $Omega = r^*omega$, with $r(x)=x/|x|$ (and this is smooth on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$) and using the fact that $dOmega = dr^*omega = r^*(domega) = r^*0 = 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065317%2fevery-differential-form-omega-of-degree-1-in-the-sphere-sm-subset-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Now that I've read your post more carefully, I see that the intent is to prove bare-hands that a closed $1$-form $Omega$ on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$ (assuming $mge 2$) is exact. Even though the region is not star-shaped, you can make a standard calculus argument by defining a potential function $f(x) = int_{x_0}^x Omega$ and checking that the integral is path-independent by virtue of the fact that $Omega$ is closed. (This would be easiest with Stokes's Theorem, but can be reduced to direct checking with rectangles in planes and checking that Green's Theorem holds there.) You can restrict yourself to polygonal paths with edges parallel to the coordinate axes, and then it's easy to check as well that $df = Omega$.



    Although the problem didn't tell you that you could assume that $Omega$ is closed, it's easy enough to arrange this by taking $Omega = r^*omega$, with $r(x)=x/|x|$ (and this is smooth on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$) and using the fact that $dOmega = dr^*omega = r^*(domega) = r^*0 = 0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Now that I've read your post more carefully, I see that the intent is to prove bare-hands that a closed $1$-form $Omega$ on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$ (assuming $mge 2$) is exact. Even though the region is not star-shaped, you can make a standard calculus argument by defining a potential function $f(x) = int_{x_0}^x Omega$ and checking that the integral is path-independent by virtue of the fact that $Omega$ is closed. (This would be easiest with Stokes's Theorem, but can be reduced to direct checking with rectangles in planes and checking that Green's Theorem holds there.) You can restrict yourself to polygonal paths with edges parallel to the coordinate axes, and then it's easy to check as well that $df = Omega$.



      Although the problem didn't tell you that you could assume that $Omega$ is closed, it's easy enough to arrange this by taking $Omega = r^*omega$, with $r(x)=x/|x|$ (and this is smooth on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$) and using the fact that $dOmega = dr^*omega = r^*(domega) = r^*0 = 0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Now that I've read your post more carefully, I see that the intent is to prove bare-hands that a closed $1$-form $Omega$ on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$ (assuming $mge 2$) is exact. Even though the region is not star-shaped, you can make a standard calculus argument by defining a potential function $f(x) = int_{x_0}^x Omega$ and checking that the integral is path-independent by virtue of the fact that $Omega$ is closed. (This would be easiest with Stokes's Theorem, but can be reduced to direct checking with rectangles in planes and checking that Green's Theorem holds there.) You can restrict yourself to polygonal paths with edges parallel to the coordinate axes, and then it's easy to check as well that $df = Omega$.



        Although the problem didn't tell you that you could assume that $Omega$ is closed, it's easy enough to arrange this by taking $Omega = r^*omega$, with $r(x)=x/|x|$ (and this is smooth on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$) and using the fact that $dOmega = dr^*omega = r^*(domega) = r^*0 = 0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Now that I've read your post more carefully, I see that the intent is to prove bare-hands that a closed $1$-form $Omega$ on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$ (assuming $mge 2$) is exact. Even though the region is not star-shaped, you can make a standard calculus argument by defining a potential function $f(x) = int_{x_0}^x Omega$ and checking that the integral is path-independent by virtue of the fact that $Omega$ is closed. (This would be easiest with Stokes's Theorem, but can be reduced to direct checking with rectangles in planes and checking that Green's Theorem holds there.) You can restrict yourself to polygonal paths with edges parallel to the coordinate axes, and then it's easy to check as well that $df = Omega$.



        Although the problem didn't tell you that you could assume that $Omega$ is closed, it's easy enough to arrange this by taking $Omega = r^*omega$, with $r(x)=x/|x|$ (and this is smooth on $Bbb R^{m+1}-{0}$) and using the fact that $dOmega = dr^*omega = r^*(domega) = r^*0 = 0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 8 at 22:50









        Ted ShifrinTed Shifrin

        64.6k44692




        64.6k44692






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065317%2fevery-differential-form-omega-of-degree-1-in-the-sphere-sm-subset-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna