Continuity of an upper envelope












1












$begingroup$


I'm now approaching for the first time to the definition of upper envelope of a family of functions, and I just wonder to know some basic properties.



Suppose $Omega $ is an open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$. Let $A$ a family of index. For each $ain A$ we have two functions $f_a:Omegato mathbb{R}^n$, $l_a:Omegatomathbb{R}$ and a scalar number $c_ain mathbb{R}$.



For each fixed $a$ we consider the real valued function: $$g_a:Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^nto mathbb{R}$$ such that $$g_a(x,z,p):=c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)$$ for all $(x,z,p)in Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$, where $(cdot)$ is the usual scalar product on $mathbb{R}^n$.



We can now consider the upper envelope of the family $(g_a)_{ain A}$, namely $$F(x,z,p):=sup_{ain A}g_a(x,z,p)=sup_{ain A}{c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)}.$$



My question is the following:



What are sufficient conditions to have:



1) $|F(x,z,p)|neq infty$ for every $(x,z,p)$



2) $F$ is continuous on $Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$??



Any suggestions will be really appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Translate: family of index.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    Jan 10 at 11:35










  • $begingroup$
    We can think $A$ as a compact subset of $mathbb{R}^m$.
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 11:41
















1












$begingroup$


I'm now approaching for the first time to the definition of upper envelope of a family of functions, and I just wonder to know some basic properties.



Suppose $Omega $ is an open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$. Let $A$ a family of index. For each $ain A$ we have two functions $f_a:Omegato mathbb{R}^n$, $l_a:Omegatomathbb{R}$ and a scalar number $c_ain mathbb{R}$.



For each fixed $a$ we consider the real valued function: $$g_a:Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^nto mathbb{R}$$ such that $$g_a(x,z,p):=c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)$$ for all $(x,z,p)in Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$, where $(cdot)$ is the usual scalar product on $mathbb{R}^n$.



We can now consider the upper envelope of the family $(g_a)_{ain A}$, namely $$F(x,z,p):=sup_{ain A}g_a(x,z,p)=sup_{ain A}{c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)}.$$



My question is the following:



What are sufficient conditions to have:



1) $|F(x,z,p)|neq infty$ for every $(x,z,p)$



2) $F$ is continuous on $Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$??



Any suggestions will be really appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Translate: family of index.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    Jan 10 at 11:35










  • $begingroup$
    We can think $A$ as a compact subset of $mathbb{R}^m$.
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 11:41














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm now approaching for the first time to the definition of upper envelope of a family of functions, and I just wonder to know some basic properties.



Suppose $Omega $ is an open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$. Let $A$ a family of index. For each $ain A$ we have two functions $f_a:Omegato mathbb{R}^n$, $l_a:Omegatomathbb{R}$ and a scalar number $c_ain mathbb{R}$.



For each fixed $a$ we consider the real valued function: $$g_a:Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^nto mathbb{R}$$ such that $$g_a(x,z,p):=c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)$$ for all $(x,z,p)in Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$, where $(cdot)$ is the usual scalar product on $mathbb{R}^n$.



We can now consider the upper envelope of the family $(g_a)_{ain A}$, namely $$F(x,z,p):=sup_{ain A}g_a(x,z,p)=sup_{ain A}{c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)}.$$



My question is the following:



What are sufficient conditions to have:



1) $|F(x,z,p)|neq infty$ for every $(x,z,p)$



2) $F$ is continuous on $Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$??



Any suggestions will be really appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm now approaching for the first time to the definition of upper envelope of a family of functions, and I just wonder to know some basic properties.



Suppose $Omega $ is an open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$. Let $A$ a family of index. For each $ain A$ we have two functions $f_a:Omegato mathbb{R}^n$, $l_a:Omegatomathbb{R}$ and a scalar number $c_ain mathbb{R}$.



For each fixed $a$ we consider the real valued function: $$g_a:Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^nto mathbb{R}$$ such that $$g_a(x,z,p):=c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)$$ for all $(x,z,p)in Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$, where $(cdot)$ is the usual scalar product on $mathbb{R}^n$.



We can now consider the upper envelope of the family $(g_a)_{ain A}$, namely $$F(x,z,p):=sup_{ain A}g_a(x,z,p)=sup_{ain A}{c_a z+f_a(x)cdot p+l_a(x)}.$$



My question is the following:



What are sufficient conditions to have:



1) $|F(x,z,p)|neq infty$ for every $(x,z,p)$



2) $F$ is continuous on $Omegatimesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^n$??



Any suggestions will be really appreciated.







real-analysis supremum-and-infimum envelope






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 10 at 11:20









eleguitareleguitar

140114




140114












  • $begingroup$
    Translate: family of index.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    Jan 10 at 11:35










  • $begingroup$
    We can think $A$ as a compact subset of $mathbb{R}^m$.
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 11:41


















  • $begingroup$
    Translate: family of index.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    Jan 10 at 11:35










  • $begingroup$
    We can think $A$ as a compact subset of $mathbb{R}^m$.
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 11:41
















$begingroup$
Translate: family of index.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 10 at 11:35




$begingroup$
Translate: family of index.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 10 at 11:35












$begingroup$
We can think $A$ as a compact subset of $mathbb{R}^m$.
$endgroup$
– eleguitar
Jan 10 at 11:41




$begingroup$
We can think $A$ as a compact subset of $mathbb{R}^m$.
$endgroup$
– eleguitar
Jan 10 at 11:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

I would suggest the following conditions:



1) $c_a$ is bounded, and $f_a(x)$ and $l_a(x)$ as well for each $x$.



2) $f_a$ and $l_a$ are locally uniformly bounded, ie for all $x in Omega$, there exists some neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and some $M_U > 0$ such that for every $y in U$, $|f_a(y)| +|l_a(y)| leq M_U$.



3) The $f_a$ and $l_a$ are equicontinuous, ie: for all $x in Omega$ and $epsilon >0$, there exists some neighborhood $U subset Omega$ of $x$ such that for all $a in A$, $y in U$, $|f_a(x)-f_a(y)|+|l_a(x)-l_a(y)| leq epsilon$.



1) ensures that $F$ is well-defined.



2) ensures that each $g_a$ is locally (wrt $x$) Lipschitz-continuous wrt $(p,z)$ and that the constants and neighborhoods can be chosen independently from the index, thus the property goes on to $F$.



3) Gives the same kind of continuity wrt $x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Really helpful. Could you give me some good references to learn more about this kind of functions?
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am sorry, I do not know anything specific. For, say, properties of supremum of functions, you could try and check out viscosity solutions for PDE — but all in all this is fairly standard analysis.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 10 at 16:34












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068518%2fcontinuity-of-an-upper-envelope%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

I would suggest the following conditions:



1) $c_a$ is bounded, and $f_a(x)$ and $l_a(x)$ as well for each $x$.



2) $f_a$ and $l_a$ are locally uniformly bounded, ie for all $x in Omega$, there exists some neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and some $M_U > 0$ such that for every $y in U$, $|f_a(y)| +|l_a(y)| leq M_U$.



3) The $f_a$ and $l_a$ are equicontinuous, ie: for all $x in Omega$ and $epsilon >0$, there exists some neighborhood $U subset Omega$ of $x$ such that for all $a in A$, $y in U$, $|f_a(x)-f_a(y)|+|l_a(x)-l_a(y)| leq epsilon$.



1) ensures that $F$ is well-defined.



2) ensures that each $g_a$ is locally (wrt $x$) Lipschitz-continuous wrt $(p,z)$ and that the constants and neighborhoods can be chosen independently from the index, thus the property goes on to $F$.



3) Gives the same kind of continuity wrt $x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Really helpful. Could you give me some good references to learn more about this kind of functions?
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am sorry, I do not know anything specific. For, say, properties of supremum of functions, you could try and check out viscosity solutions for PDE — but all in all this is fairly standard analysis.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 10 at 16:34
















1












$begingroup$

I would suggest the following conditions:



1) $c_a$ is bounded, and $f_a(x)$ and $l_a(x)$ as well for each $x$.



2) $f_a$ and $l_a$ are locally uniformly bounded, ie for all $x in Omega$, there exists some neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and some $M_U > 0$ such that for every $y in U$, $|f_a(y)| +|l_a(y)| leq M_U$.



3) The $f_a$ and $l_a$ are equicontinuous, ie: for all $x in Omega$ and $epsilon >0$, there exists some neighborhood $U subset Omega$ of $x$ such that for all $a in A$, $y in U$, $|f_a(x)-f_a(y)|+|l_a(x)-l_a(y)| leq epsilon$.



1) ensures that $F$ is well-defined.



2) ensures that each $g_a$ is locally (wrt $x$) Lipschitz-continuous wrt $(p,z)$ and that the constants and neighborhoods can be chosen independently from the index, thus the property goes on to $F$.



3) Gives the same kind of continuity wrt $x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Really helpful. Could you give me some good references to learn more about this kind of functions?
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am sorry, I do not know anything specific. For, say, properties of supremum of functions, you could try and check out viscosity solutions for PDE — but all in all this is fairly standard analysis.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 10 at 16:34














1












1








1





$begingroup$

I would suggest the following conditions:



1) $c_a$ is bounded, and $f_a(x)$ and $l_a(x)$ as well for each $x$.



2) $f_a$ and $l_a$ are locally uniformly bounded, ie for all $x in Omega$, there exists some neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and some $M_U > 0$ such that for every $y in U$, $|f_a(y)| +|l_a(y)| leq M_U$.



3) The $f_a$ and $l_a$ are equicontinuous, ie: for all $x in Omega$ and $epsilon >0$, there exists some neighborhood $U subset Omega$ of $x$ such that for all $a in A$, $y in U$, $|f_a(x)-f_a(y)|+|l_a(x)-l_a(y)| leq epsilon$.



1) ensures that $F$ is well-defined.



2) ensures that each $g_a$ is locally (wrt $x$) Lipschitz-continuous wrt $(p,z)$ and that the constants and neighborhoods can be chosen independently from the index, thus the property goes on to $F$.



3) Gives the same kind of continuity wrt $x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I would suggest the following conditions:



1) $c_a$ is bounded, and $f_a(x)$ and $l_a(x)$ as well for each $x$.



2) $f_a$ and $l_a$ are locally uniformly bounded, ie for all $x in Omega$, there exists some neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and some $M_U > 0$ such that for every $y in U$, $|f_a(y)| +|l_a(y)| leq M_U$.



3) The $f_a$ and $l_a$ are equicontinuous, ie: for all $x in Omega$ and $epsilon >0$, there exists some neighborhood $U subset Omega$ of $x$ such that for all $a in A$, $y in U$, $|f_a(x)-f_a(y)|+|l_a(x)-l_a(y)| leq epsilon$.



1) ensures that $F$ is well-defined.



2) ensures that each $g_a$ is locally (wrt $x$) Lipschitz-continuous wrt $(p,z)$ and that the constants and neighborhoods can be chosen independently from the index, thus the property goes on to $F$.



3) Gives the same kind of continuity wrt $x$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 10 at 11:52









MindlackMindlack

4,900211




4,900211












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Really helpful. Could you give me some good references to learn more about this kind of functions?
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am sorry, I do not know anything specific. For, say, properties of supremum of functions, you could try and check out viscosity solutions for PDE — but all in all this is fairly standard analysis.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 10 at 16:34


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Really helpful. Could you give me some good references to learn more about this kind of functions?
    $endgroup$
    – eleguitar
    Jan 10 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am sorry, I do not know anything specific. For, say, properties of supremum of functions, you could try and check out viscosity solutions for PDE — but all in all this is fairly standard analysis.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 10 at 16:34
















$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Really helpful. Could you give me some good references to learn more about this kind of functions?
$endgroup$
– eleguitar
Jan 10 at 14:51




$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Really helpful. Could you give me some good references to learn more about this kind of functions?
$endgroup$
– eleguitar
Jan 10 at 14:51




1




1




$begingroup$
I am sorry, I do not know anything specific. For, say, properties of supremum of functions, you could try and check out viscosity solutions for PDE — but all in all this is fairly standard analysis.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 10 at 16:34




$begingroup$
I am sorry, I do not know anything specific. For, say, properties of supremum of functions, you could try and check out viscosity solutions for PDE — but all in all this is fairly standard analysis.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 10 at 16:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068518%2fcontinuity-of-an-upper-envelope%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna