Rudin's functional analysis theorem 3.12












0












$begingroup$



Suppose $E$ is a convex subset of a locally convex space $X$. Then the weak closure $overline{E}_w$ of $E$ is equal to its original closure $overline{E}$.




The proof starts as follows




$overline{E}_w$ is weakly closed, hence originally closed, so that $overline{E} subset overline{E}_w$.




I don't get that inclusion, could anyone expound it please?



The proof also continues for the opposite inclusion, but I don't get that either




To obtain the poosite inclusion, choose $x_0 in X, x_0 notin overline{E}$. Part (b) of the separation theorem 3.4 shows that there exists $Lambda in X^*$ and $gamma in mathbb{R}$ such that, for every $x in overline{E}$
$$
Re ; Lambda x_0 < gamma < Re ; Lambda x
$$
The set $left{ x : Re ; Lambda x < gamma right}$ is therefore a weak neighborhood of $x_0$ that does not intersect $E$, thus $x_0 notin overline{E}_w$. This proves $overline{E}_w subset overline{E}$







functional-analysis proof-explanation topological-vector-spaces weak-topology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Suppose $E$ is a convex subset of a locally convex space $X$. Then the weak closure $overline{E}_w$ of $E$ is equal to its original closure $overline{E}$.




    The proof starts as follows




    $overline{E}_w$ is weakly closed, hence originally closed, so that $overline{E} subset overline{E}_w$.




    I don't get that inclusion, could anyone expound it please?



    The proof also continues for the opposite inclusion, but I don't get that either




    To obtain the poosite inclusion, choose $x_0 in X, x_0 notin overline{E}$. Part (b) of the separation theorem 3.4 shows that there exists $Lambda in X^*$ and $gamma in mathbb{R}$ such that, for every $x in overline{E}$
    $$
    Re ; Lambda x_0 < gamma < Re ; Lambda x
    $$
    The set $left{ x : Re ; Lambda x < gamma right}$ is therefore a weak neighborhood of $x_0$ that does not intersect $E$, thus $x_0 notin overline{E}_w$. This proves $overline{E}_w subset overline{E}$







    functional-analysis proof-explanation topological-vector-spaces weak-topology







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Suppose $E$ is a convex subset of a locally convex space $X$. Then the weak closure $overline{E}_w$ of $E$ is equal to its original closure $overline{E}$.




      The proof starts as follows




      $overline{E}_w$ is weakly closed, hence originally closed, so that $overline{E} subset overline{E}_w$.




      I don't get that inclusion, could anyone expound it please?



      The proof also continues for the opposite inclusion, but I don't get that either




      To obtain the poosite inclusion, choose $x_0 in X, x_0 notin overline{E}$. Part (b) of the separation theorem 3.4 shows that there exists $Lambda in X^*$ and $gamma in mathbb{R}$ such that, for every $x in overline{E}$
      $$
      Re ; Lambda x_0 < gamma < Re ; Lambda x
      $$
      The set $left{ x : Re ; Lambda x < gamma right}$ is therefore a weak neighborhood of $x_0$ that does not intersect $E$, thus $x_0 notin overline{E}_w$. This proves $overline{E}_w subset overline{E}$







      functional-analysis proof-explanation topological-vector-spaces weak-topology







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Suppose $E$ is a convex subset of a locally convex space $X$. Then the weak closure $overline{E}_w$ of $E$ is equal to its original closure $overline{E}$.




      The proof starts as follows




      $overline{E}_w$ is weakly closed, hence originally closed, so that $overline{E} subset overline{E}_w$.




      I don't get that inclusion, could anyone expound it please?



      The proof also continues for the opposite inclusion, but I don't get that either




      To obtain the poosite inclusion, choose $x_0 in X, x_0 notin overline{E}$. Part (b) of the separation theorem 3.4 shows that there exists $Lambda in X^*$ and $gamma in mathbb{R}$ such that, for every $x in overline{E}$
      $$
      Re ; Lambda x_0 < gamma < Re ; Lambda x
      $$
      The set $left{ x : Re ; Lambda x < gamma right}$ is therefore a weak neighborhood of $x_0$ that does not intersect $E$, thus $x_0 notin overline{E}_w$. This proves $overline{E}_w subset overline{E}$







      functional-analysis proof-explanation topological-vector-spaces weak-topology




      functional-analysis proof-explanation topological-vector-spaces weak-topology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 10 at 12:02







      user8469759

















      asked Jan 10 at 11:51









      user8469759user8469759

      1,5681618




      1,5681618






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          First, the weak topology is weaker than the original topology
          (it has fewer open and closed sets).
          This means that every weakly closed set is also a closed set.



          Second, the closure of $E$ is the smallest closed set that contains $E$.
          Since the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$ and is closed, it must include the closure of $E$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I know this might appear silly, but why the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$? For some reason this going back and forth between weak topology and original topology drives me crazy.
            $endgroup$
            – user8469759
            Jan 10 at 12:06










          • $begingroup$
            the weak closure is defined as the smallest weakly closed set that contains $E$. So by definition, it has to contain $E$.
            $endgroup$
            – supinf
            Jan 10 at 12:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            How about the other inclusion?
            $endgroup$
            – user8469759
            Jan 10 at 12:09



















          2












          $begingroup$

          Second part: ${x: Re Lambda x <gamma}$ is the inverse image under $Lambda$ of ${zin mathbb C: Re z <gamma}$ which is open in $mathbb C$. Since each continuous linear functional is continuous for the weak topology this inverse image is an open set in the weak topology. This open set contains $x_0$ but it contains no point of $E$ (because $Re Lambda x >gamma$ for all $x in E$). This implies that it cannot belong to the weak closure of $E$. Hence $x_onotin overline {E}$ implies $x_0$ does not belong to weak closure of $E$. In other words, weak closure of $E$ is a subset of $overline {E}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068538%2frudins-functional-analysis-theorem-3-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            First, the weak topology is weaker than the original topology
            (it has fewer open and closed sets).
            This means that every weakly closed set is also a closed set.



            Second, the closure of $E$ is the smallest closed set that contains $E$.
            Since the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$ and is closed, it must include the closure of $E$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I know this might appear silly, but why the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$? For some reason this going back and forth between weak topology and original topology drives me crazy.
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:06










            • $begingroup$
              the weak closure is defined as the smallest weakly closed set that contains $E$. So by definition, it has to contain $E$.
              $endgroup$
              – supinf
              Jan 10 at 12:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How about the other inclusion?
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:09
















            3












            $begingroup$

            First, the weak topology is weaker than the original topology
            (it has fewer open and closed sets).
            This means that every weakly closed set is also a closed set.



            Second, the closure of $E$ is the smallest closed set that contains $E$.
            Since the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$ and is closed, it must include the closure of $E$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I know this might appear silly, but why the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$? For some reason this going back and forth between weak topology and original topology drives me crazy.
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:06










            • $begingroup$
              the weak closure is defined as the smallest weakly closed set that contains $E$. So by definition, it has to contain $E$.
              $endgroup$
              – supinf
              Jan 10 at 12:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How about the other inclusion?
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:09














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            First, the weak topology is weaker than the original topology
            (it has fewer open and closed sets).
            This means that every weakly closed set is also a closed set.



            Second, the closure of $E$ is the smallest closed set that contains $E$.
            Since the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$ and is closed, it must include the closure of $E$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            First, the weak topology is weaker than the original topology
            (it has fewer open and closed sets).
            This means that every weakly closed set is also a closed set.



            Second, the closure of $E$ is the smallest closed set that contains $E$.
            Since the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$ and is closed, it must include the closure of $E$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 10 at 12:02









            supinfsupinf

            6,7561129




            6,7561129












            • $begingroup$
              I know this might appear silly, but why the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$? For some reason this going back and forth between weak topology and original topology drives me crazy.
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:06










            • $begingroup$
              the weak closure is defined as the smallest weakly closed set that contains $E$. So by definition, it has to contain $E$.
              $endgroup$
              – supinf
              Jan 10 at 12:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How about the other inclusion?
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:09


















            • $begingroup$
              I know this might appear silly, but why the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$? For some reason this going back and forth between weak topology and original topology drives me crazy.
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:06










            • $begingroup$
              the weak closure is defined as the smallest weakly closed set that contains $E$. So by definition, it has to contain $E$.
              $endgroup$
              – supinf
              Jan 10 at 12:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              How about the other inclusion?
              $endgroup$
              – user8469759
              Jan 10 at 12:09
















            $begingroup$
            I know this might appear silly, but why the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$? For some reason this going back and forth between weak topology and original topology drives me crazy.
            $endgroup$
            – user8469759
            Jan 10 at 12:06




            $begingroup$
            I know this might appear silly, but why the weak closure of $E$ contains $E$? For some reason this going back and forth between weak topology and original topology drives me crazy.
            $endgroup$
            – user8469759
            Jan 10 at 12:06












            $begingroup$
            the weak closure is defined as the smallest weakly closed set that contains $E$. So by definition, it has to contain $E$.
            $endgroup$
            – supinf
            Jan 10 at 12:07




            $begingroup$
            the weak closure is defined as the smallest weakly closed set that contains $E$. So by definition, it has to contain $E$.
            $endgroup$
            – supinf
            Jan 10 at 12:07




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            How about the other inclusion?
            $endgroup$
            – user8469759
            Jan 10 at 12:09




            $begingroup$
            How about the other inclusion?
            $endgroup$
            – user8469759
            Jan 10 at 12:09











            2












            $begingroup$

            Second part: ${x: Re Lambda x <gamma}$ is the inverse image under $Lambda$ of ${zin mathbb C: Re z <gamma}$ which is open in $mathbb C$. Since each continuous linear functional is continuous for the weak topology this inverse image is an open set in the weak topology. This open set contains $x_0$ but it contains no point of $E$ (because $Re Lambda x >gamma$ for all $x in E$). This implies that it cannot belong to the weak closure of $E$. Hence $x_onotin overline {E}$ implies $x_0$ does not belong to weak closure of $E$. In other words, weak closure of $E$ is a subset of $overline {E}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Second part: ${x: Re Lambda x <gamma}$ is the inverse image under $Lambda$ of ${zin mathbb C: Re z <gamma}$ which is open in $mathbb C$. Since each continuous linear functional is continuous for the weak topology this inverse image is an open set in the weak topology. This open set contains $x_0$ but it contains no point of $E$ (because $Re Lambda x >gamma$ for all $x in E$). This implies that it cannot belong to the weak closure of $E$. Hence $x_onotin overline {E}$ implies $x_0$ does not belong to weak closure of $E$. In other words, weak closure of $E$ is a subset of $overline {E}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Second part: ${x: Re Lambda x <gamma}$ is the inverse image under $Lambda$ of ${zin mathbb C: Re z <gamma}$ which is open in $mathbb C$. Since each continuous linear functional is continuous for the weak topology this inverse image is an open set in the weak topology. This open set contains $x_0$ but it contains no point of $E$ (because $Re Lambda x >gamma$ for all $x in E$). This implies that it cannot belong to the weak closure of $E$. Hence $x_onotin overline {E}$ implies $x_0$ does not belong to weak closure of $E$. In other words, weak closure of $E$ is a subset of $overline {E}$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Second part: ${x: Re Lambda x <gamma}$ is the inverse image under $Lambda$ of ${zin mathbb C: Re z <gamma}$ which is open in $mathbb C$. Since each continuous linear functional is continuous for the weak topology this inverse image is an open set in the weak topology. This open set contains $x_0$ but it contains no point of $E$ (because $Re Lambda x >gamma$ for all $x in E$). This implies that it cannot belong to the weak closure of $E$. Hence $x_onotin overline {E}$ implies $x_0$ does not belong to weak closure of $E$. In other words, weak closure of $E$ is a subset of $overline {E}$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 10 at 12:31









                Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                72.9k53170




                72.9k53170






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068538%2frudins-functional-analysis-theorem-3-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Image
                    .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
                    Read more

                    Cabo Verde

                    Image
                      Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º)
                    Read more

                    Gyllenstierna

                    Image
                    .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
                    Read more