In commutative ring, flat is equivalent to locally free

Multi tool use
Multi tool use












3












$begingroup$


In wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_module , particularly Case of commutative rings, they say that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally free, i.e. $M_P$ is free for all prime ideals"



In Atiyah anf MacDonald's commutative algebra, they proved that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally flat, i.e. $M_P$ is flat for all prime ideals"



So does it mean "$M_P$ is free iff $M_P$ is flat"? How? $R_P$ is only local while we need it to be also Noetherian for the statement to be true?



Thank you for your help










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also don't know how to remove the Noetherian hypothesis, so I suspect the first statement is false with no Noetherian hypotheses.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 17 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    See mathoverflow.net/questions/33522/flatness-and-local-freeness .
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 13 at 13:14
















3












$begingroup$


In wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_module , particularly Case of commutative rings, they say that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally free, i.e. $M_P$ is free for all prime ideals"



In Atiyah anf MacDonald's commutative algebra, they proved that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally flat, i.e. $M_P$ is flat for all prime ideals"



So does it mean "$M_P$ is free iff $M_P$ is flat"? How? $R_P$ is only local while we need it to be also Noetherian for the statement to be true?



Thank you for your help










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also don't know how to remove the Noetherian hypothesis, so I suspect the first statement is false with no Noetherian hypotheses.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 17 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    See mathoverflow.net/questions/33522/flatness-and-local-freeness .
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 13 at 13:14














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


In wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_module , particularly Case of commutative rings, they say that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally free, i.e. $M_P$ is free for all prime ideals"



In Atiyah anf MacDonald's commutative algebra, they proved that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally flat, i.e. $M_P$ is flat for all prime ideals"



So does it mean "$M_P$ is free iff $M_P$ is flat"? How? $R_P$ is only local while we need it to be also Noetherian for the statement to be true?



Thank you for your help










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




In wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_module , particularly Case of commutative rings, they say that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally free, i.e. $M_P$ is free for all prime ideals"



In Atiyah anf MacDonald's commutative algebra, they proved that



"In a commutative ring, a finitely generated module is flat if and only if it is locally flat, i.e. $M_P$ is flat for all prime ideals"



So does it mean "$M_P$ is free iff $M_P$ is flat"? How? $R_P$ is only local while we need it to be also Noetherian for the statement to be true?



Thank you for your help







commutative-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 17 '18 at 8:08









chí trung châuchí trung châu

1,0801725




1,0801725








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also don't know how to remove the Noetherian hypothesis, so I suspect the first statement is false with no Noetherian hypotheses.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 17 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    See mathoverflow.net/questions/33522/flatness-and-local-freeness .
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 13 at 13:14














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I also don't know how to remove the Noetherian hypothesis, so I suspect the first statement is false with no Noetherian hypotheses.
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jan 17 '18 at 9:11










  • $begingroup$
    See mathoverflow.net/questions/33522/flatness-and-local-freeness .
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 13 at 13:14








1




1




$begingroup$
I also don't know how to remove the Noetherian hypothesis, so I suspect the first statement is false with no Noetherian hypotheses.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 17 '18 at 9:11




$begingroup$
I also don't know how to remove the Noetherian hypothesis, so I suspect the first statement is false with no Noetherian hypotheses.
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jan 17 '18 at 9:11












$begingroup$
See mathoverflow.net/questions/33522/flatness-and-local-freeness .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 13 at 13:14




$begingroup$
See mathoverflow.net/questions/33522/flatness-and-local-freeness .
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 13 at 13:14










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2608804%2fin-commutative-ring-flat-is-equivalent-to-locally-free%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2608804%2fin-commutative-ring-flat-is-equivalent-to-locally-free%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







bBzNWfe5kT,T0 DLlmZkjmUUZuTqw7M,FL32Iri
pewrevc9I64,VqIS JlL2kGvRb7,ED P,8 2v CWiiK NoX,B9Cy8Z6Zg l9W1SIE,j0zLNbXmwe5dPxh02g8uC1CmE g Q70SMnB

Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Gyllenstierna

Cabo Verde