Primitive polynomial of a Galois field












2












$begingroup$


How can one check that a polynomial is primitive polynomial or not?



I have following polynomial $f(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ and i want to know if i can use it to generate $GF(2^3)$.



The definition i have so far says:



The minimum polynomial of a primitive element is called primitive polynomial. What does it mean to have a minimum polynomial of primitive element?



It can be a very basic question but i can't find out how to control whether a polynomial is primitive or not. Any help would be great.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    How can one check that a polynomial is primitive polynomial or not?



    I have following polynomial $f(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ and i want to know if i can use it to generate $GF(2^3)$.



    The definition i have so far says:



    The minimum polynomial of a primitive element is called primitive polynomial. What does it mean to have a minimum polynomial of primitive element?



    It can be a very basic question but i can't find out how to control whether a polynomial is primitive or not. Any help would be great.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      How can one check that a polynomial is primitive polynomial or not?



      I have following polynomial $f(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ and i want to know if i can use it to generate $GF(2^3)$.



      The definition i have so far says:



      The minimum polynomial of a primitive element is called primitive polynomial. What does it mean to have a minimum polynomial of primitive element?



      It can be a very basic question but i can't find out how to control whether a polynomial is primitive or not. Any help would be great.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      How can one check that a polynomial is primitive polynomial or not?



      I have following polynomial $f(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ and i want to know if i can use it to generate $GF(2^3)$.



      The definition i have so far says:



      The minimum polynomial of a primitive element is called primitive polynomial. What does it mean to have a minimum polynomial of primitive element?



      It can be a very basic question but i can't find out how to control whether a polynomial is primitive or not. Any help would be great.







      polynomials galois-theory finite-fields






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 12 at 16:02









      Khan SaabKhan Saab

      30219




      30219






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          In $GF(2)[x]$ you have:



          $$x^8-x= x(x-1)(x^3+x+1)(x^3+x^2+1)$$



          and $f(x)=x^3+x^2+1$ is irreducible over $GF(2)$. To decide if it is a primitive polynomial, you need to know if it has a root in $GF(2^3)$ that generates the multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$.



          The multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$ is a group of order $7$ which is a prime number. And in a group of order a prime number, the order of all elements except the identity element is the order of the group. As $1$ isn’t a root of $f$, the order in $GF(2^3)$ of a root of $f$ is equal to $7$.



          That proves that $f$ is primitive.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            With



            $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x], tag 1$



            we note that $mu(x)$, being a cubic, is reducible in $GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x]$ if and only if it has a linear factor in $Bbb Z_2$, that is, has a zero in this field; this follows from a simple degree argument: if



            $mu(x) = nu(x) lambda(x), ; nu(x), lambda(x) in GF(2)[x], tag 2$



            then



            $3 = deg mu(x) = deg nu(x) + deg lambda(x); ; deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 1, tag 3$



            from which we see that we cannot have



            $deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 2; tag 4$



            we thus find that one of $nu(x)$, $lambda(x)$ is of degree one, and is a monic linear polynomial $x - a$; taking



            $lambda(x) = x - a, tag 5$



            we have



            $mu(x) = (x - a)nu(x), tag 6$



            as asserted above. It follows that we can check the irreducibility of $mu(x)$ by testing for a root in $GF(2) = Bbb Z_2$; we easily see that neither $0$ nor $1$ satisfy $mu(x)$, hence it is irreducible in $Bbb Z_2[x]$; thus, the principal ideal



            $(mu(x)) subset GF(2)[x] tag 7$



            is maximal, and



            $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) tag 8$



            is a field. It is well known that



            $[GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)):GF(2)] = deg mu(x) = 3, tag 9$



            from which we may infer that



            $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3), tag{10}$



            since, up to isomorphism, $GF(2^3)$ is the only field of order $2^3 = 8$.



            Now the elements of $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ are cosets of the ideal $(mu(x))$ in $GF(2)[x]$; for



            $rho(x) in GF(2)[x] tag{11}$



            we let



            $overline{rho(x)} = rho(x) + (mu(x)); tag{12}$



            then



            $bar 0 = 0 + (mu(x)) = mu(x), ; bar 1 = 1 + (mu(x)),$
            $bar x = x + (mu(x)), ; bar x^2 = x^2 + (mu(x)), ; text{and so forth}, tag{13}$



            and we have



            $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = x^3 + x^2 + 1 + (mu(x)) = mu(x) + (mu(x)) = mu(x) = bar 0 + (mu(x)), tag{14}$



            that is,



            $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = bar 0 tag{15}$



            in $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) = Bbb Z_2[x]/(mu(x))$.



            We show by direct calculation that $bar x$ is a primitive element in the field $GF(2)[x] / (mu(x))$; to do so, we observe that in accord with (10) $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ has $8$ elements, whence the multiplicative group $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$ is of order $7$, hence cyclic. By virtue of (15), we compute the powers of $bar x$, starting with $bar x^0 = bar 1$, they are listed below:



            $bar x^0 = bar 1; tag{16}$



            $bar x^1 = bar x; tag{17}$



            $bar x^2 = (bar x)^2 = bar x bar x; tag{18}$



            from this point on we may invoke (15) to reduce powers of $bar x$ greater than the second:



            $bar x^3 = bar x^2 + bar 1; tag{19}$



            $bar x^4 = bar x bar x^3 = bar x (bar x^2 + 1) = bar x^3 + bar x = bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1; tag{20}$



            $bar x^5 = bar x bar x^4 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar x = bar x + bar 1; tag{21}$



            $bar x^6 = bar x bar x^5 = bar x(bar x + bar 1) = bar x^2 + bar x; tag{22}$



            $bar x^7 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 = bar 1 = bar x^0; tag{23}$



            from (16)-(23) we see that $bar x$ generates each of the seven elements of $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$; thus it is a primitive element of this field. Then the polynomial $x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x]$, being monic and irreducible, must be the minimal polynomial of $bar x$ (this follows from the fact that the minimal polynomial is irreducible and divides any polynomial of which $bar x$ is a root; but we have seen $x^3 + x^2 + 1$ is irreducible, so . . ), and it follows by definition that $mu(x)$ is a primitive polynomial for $GF(2)/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3)$.



            It also is apparent from what we have said that we can use the polynomial $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ to "generate" $GF(2^3)$, we simply form the quotient ring $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ as in (10).



            The preceding discussion shows that $bar x = x + (mu(x))$ is a primitive element more or less by brute force, showing that $vert bar x vert = 7$ by systematically evaluating $bar x^k$, $0 le k le 7$; though the results form an engaging pattern which can help us better understand finite fields and their primitive elements, it is impractical to execute such a method manually except for polynomials of relatively low degree; obviously, high-speed digital computers can vastly extend the feasible range of such computations. Of course, having at one's disposal a lot of nice theorems pertaining to the issue can help a lot, but I my knowledge of such is far from encyclopedic. That being the case, the only way I know to find candidate primitive elements and their corresponding polynomials and just check things out; obviously, observations such as those made by mathcounterexamples.net in his/her answer are helpful in this regard.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071051%2fprimitive-polynomial-of-a-galois-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              In $GF(2)[x]$ you have:



              $$x^8-x= x(x-1)(x^3+x+1)(x^3+x^2+1)$$



              and $f(x)=x^3+x^2+1$ is irreducible over $GF(2)$. To decide if it is a primitive polynomial, you need to know if it has a root in $GF(2^3)$ that generates the multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$.



              The multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$ is a group of order $7$ which is a prime number. And in a group of order a prime number, the order of all elements except the identity element is the order of the group. As $1$ isn’t a root of $f$, the order in $GF(2^3)$ of a root of $f$ is equal to $7$.



              That proves that $f$ is primitive.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                In $GF(2)[x]$ you have:



                $$x^8-x= x(x-1)(x^3+x+1)(x^3+x^2+1)$$



                and $f(x)=x^3+x^2+1$ is irreducible over $GF(2)$. To decide if it is a primitive polynomial, you need to know if it has a root in $GF(2^3)$ that generates the multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$.



                The multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$ is a group of order $7$ which is a prime number. And in a group of order a prime number, the order of all elements except the identity element is the order of the group. As $1$ isn’t a root of $f$, the order in $GF(2^3)$ of a root of $f$ is equal to $7$.



                That proves that $f$ is primitive.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  In $GF(2)[x]$ you have:



                  $$x^8-x= x(x-1)(x^3+x+1)(x^3+x^2+1)$$



                  and $f(x)=x^3+x^2+1$ is irreducible over $GF(2)$. To decide if it is a primitive polynomial, you need to know if it has a root in $GF(2^3)$ that generates the multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$.



                  The multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$ is a group of order $7$ which is a prime number. And in a group of order a prime number, the order of all elements except the identity element is the order of the group. As $1$ isn’t a root of $f$, the order in $GF(2^3)$ of a root of $f$ is equal to $7$.



                  That proves that $f$ is primitive.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  In $GF(2)[x]$ you have:



                  $$x^8-x= x(x-1)(x^3+x+1)(x^3+x^2+1)$$



                  and $f(x)=x^3+x^2+1$ is irreducible over $GF(2)$. To decide if it is a primitive polynomial, you need to know if it has a root in $GF(2^3)$ that generates the multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$.



                  The multiplicative subgroup of $GF(2^3)$ is a group of order $7$ which is a prime number. And in a group of order a prime number, the order of all elements except the identity element is the order of the group. As $1$ isn’t a root of $f$, the order in $GF(2^3)$ of a root of $f$ is equal to $7$.



                  That proves that $f$ is primitive.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 13 at 8:24

























                  answered Jan 12 at 17:42









                  mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net

                  26.9k22158




                  26.9k22158























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      With



                      $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x], tag 1$



                      we note that $mu(x)$, being a cubic, is reducible in $GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x]$ if and only if it has a linear factor in $Bbb Z_2$, that is, has a zero in this field; this follows from a simple degree argument: if



                      $mu(x) = nu(x) lambda(x), ; nu(x), lambda(x) in GF(2)[x], tag 2$



                      then



                      $3 = deg mu(x) = deg nu(x) + deg lambda(x); ; deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 1, tag 3$



                      from which we see that we cannot have



                      $deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 2; tag 4$



                      we thus find that one of $nu(x)$, $lambda(x)$ is of degree one, and is a monic linear polynomial $x - a$; taking



                      $lambda(x) = x - a, tag 5$



                      we have



                      $mu(x) = (x - a)nu(x), tag 6$



                      as asserted above. It follows that we can check the irreducibility of $mu(x)$ by testing for a root in $GF(2) = Bbb Z_2$; we easily see that neither $0$ nor $1$ satisfy $mu(x)$, hence it is irreducible in $Bbb Z_2[x]$; thus, the principal ideal



                      $(mu(x)) subset GF(2)[x] tag 7$



                      is maximal, and



                      $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) tag 8$



                      is a field. It is well known that



                      $[GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)):GF(2)] = deg mu(x) = 3, tag 9$



                      from which we may infer that



                      $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3), tag{10}$



                      since, up to isomorphism, $GF(2^3)$ is the only field of order $2^3 = 8$.



                      Now the elements of $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ are cosets of the ideal $(mu(x))$ in $GF(2)[x]$; for



                      $rho(x) in GF(2)[x] tag{11}$



                      we let



                      $overline{rho(x)} = rho(x) + (mu(x)); tag{12}$



                      then



                      $bar 0 = 0 + (mu(x)) = mu(x), ; bar 1 = 1 + (mu(x)),$
                      $bar x = x + (mu(x)), ; bar x^2 = x^2 + (mu(x)), ; text{and so forth}, tag{13}$



                      and we have



                      $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = x^3 + x^2 + 1 + (mu(x)) = mu(x) + (mu(x)) = mu(x) = bar 0 + (mu(x)), tag{14}$



                      that is,



                      $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = bar 0 tag{15}$



                      in $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) = Bbb Z_2[x]/(mu(x))$.



                      We show by direct calculation that $bar x$ is a primitive element in the field $GF(2)[x] / (mu(x))$; to do so, we observe that in accord with (10) $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ has $8$ elements, whence the multiplicative group $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$ is of order $7$, hence cyclic. By virtue of (15), we compute the powers of $bar x$, starting with $bar x^0 = bar 1$, they are listed below:



                      $bar x^0 = bar 1; tag{16}$



                      $bar x^1 = bar x; tag{17}$



                      $bar x^2 = (bar x)^2 = bar x bar x; tag{18}$



                      from this point on we may invoke (15) to reduce powers of $bar x$ greater than the second:



                      $bar x^3 = bar x^2 + bar 1; tag{19}$



                      $bar x^4 = bar x bar x^3 = bar x (bar x^2 + 1) = bar x^3 + bar x = bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1; tag{20}$



                      $bar x^5 = bar x bar x^4 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar x = bar x + bar 1; tag{21}$



                      $bar x^6 = bar x bar x^5 = bar x(bar x + bar 1) = bar x^2 + bar x; tag{22}$



                      $bar x^7 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 = bar 1 = bar x^0; tag{23}$



                      from (16)-(23) we see that $bar x$ generates each of the seven elements of $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$; thus it is a primitive element of this field. Then the polynomial $x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x]$, being monic and irreducible, must be the minimal polynomial of $bar x$ (this follows from the fact that the minimal polynomial is irreducible and divides any polynomial of which $bar x$ is a root; but we have seen $x^3 + x^2 + 1$ is irreducible, so . . ), and it follows by definition that $mu(x)$ is a primitive polynomial for $GF(2)/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3)$.



                      It also is apparent from what we have said that we can use the polynomial $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ to "generate" $GF(2^3)$, we simply form the quotient ring $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ as in (10).



                      The preceding discussion shows that $bar x = x + (mu(x))$ is a primitive element more or less by brute force, showing that $vert bar x vert = 7$ by systematically evaluating $bar x^k$, $0 le k le 7$; though the results form an engaging pattern which can help us better understand finite fields and their primitive elements, it is impractical to execute such a method manually except for polynomials of relatively low degree; obviously, high-speed digital computers can vastly extend the feasible range of such computations. Of course, having at one's disposal a lot of nice theorems pertaining to the issue can help a lot, but I my knowledge of such is far from encyclopedic. That being the case, the only way I know to find candidate primitive elements and their corresponding polynomials and just check things out; obviously, observations such as those made by mathcounterexamples.net in his/her answer are helpful in this regard.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        With



                        $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x], tag 1$



                        we note that $mu(x)$, being a cubic, is reducible in $GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x]$ if and only if it has a linear factor in $Bbb Z_2$, that is, has a zero in this field; this follows from a simple degree argument: if



                        $mu(x) = nu(x) lambda(x), ; nu(x), lambda(x) in GF(2)[x], tag 2$



                        then



                        $3 = deg mu(x) = deg nu(x) + deg lambda(x); ; deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 1, tag 3$



                        from which we see that we cannot have



                        $deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 2; tag 4$



                        we thus find that one of $nu(x)$, $lambda(x)$ is of degree one, and is a monic linear polynomial $x - a$; taking



                        $lambda(x) = x - a, tag 5$



                        we have



                        $mu(x) = (x - a)nu(x), tag 6$



                        as asserted above. It follows that we can check the irreducibility of $mu(x)$ by testing for a root in $GF(2) = Bbb Z_2$; we easily see that neither $0$ nor $1$ satisfy $mu(x)$, hence it is irreducible in $Bbb Z_2[x]$; thus, the principal ideal



                        $(mu(x)) subset GF(2)[x] tag 7$



                        is maximal, and



                        $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) tag 8$



                        is a field. It is well known that



                        $[GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)):GF(2)] = deg mu(x) = 3, tag 9$



                        from which we may infer that



                        $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3), tag{10}$



                        since, up to isomorphism, $GF(2^3)$ is the only field of order $2^3 = 8$.



                        Now the elements of $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ are cosets of the ideal $(mu(x))$ in $GF(2)[x]$; for



                        $rho(x) in GF(2)[x] tag{11}$



                        we let



                        $overline{rho(x)} = rho(x) + (mu(x)); tag{12}$



                        then



                        $bar 0 = 0 + (mu(x)) = mu(x), ; bar 1 = 1 + (mu(x)),$
                        $bar x = x + (mu(x)), ; bar x^2 = x^2 + (mu(x)), ; text{and so forth}, tag{13}$



                        and we have



                        $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = x^3 + x^2 + 1 + (mu(x)) = mu(x) + (mu(x)) = mu(x) = bar 0 + (mu(x)), tag{14}$



                        that is,



                        $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = bar 0 tag{15}$



                        in $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) = Bbb Z_2[x]/(mu(x))$.



                        We show by direct calculation that $bar x$ is a primitive element in the field $GF(2)[x] / (mu(x))$; to do so, we observe that in accord with (10) $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ has $8$ elements, whence the multiplicative group $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$ is of order $7$, hence cyclic. By virtue of (15), we compute the powers of $bar x$, starting with $bar x^0 = bar 1$, they are listed below:



                        $bar x^0 = bar 1; tag{16}$



                        $bar x^1 = bar x; tag{17}$



                        $bar x^2 = (bar x)^2 = bar x bar x; tag{18}$



                        from this point on we may invoke (15) to reduce powers of $bar x$ greater than the second:



                        $bar x^3 = bar x^2 + bar 1; tag{19}$



                        $bar x^4 = bar x bar x^3 = bar x (bar x^2 + 1) = bar x^3 + bar x = bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1; tag{20}$



                        $bar x^5 = bar x bar x^4 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar x = bar x + bar 1; tag{21}$



                        $bar x^6 = bar x bar x^5 = bar x(bar x + bar 1) = bar x^2 + bar x; tag{22}$



                        $bar x^7 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 = bar 1 = bar x^0; tag{23}$



                        from (16)-(23) we see that $bar x$ generates each of the seven elements of $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$; thus it is a primitive element of this field. Then the polynomial $x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x]$, being monic and irreducible, must be the minimal polynomial of $bar x$ (this follows from the fact that the minimal polynomial is irreducible and divides any polynomial of which $bar x$ is a root; but we have seen $x^3 + x^2 + 1$ is irreducible, so . . ), and it follows by definition that $mu(x)$ is a primitive polynomial for $GF(2)/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3)$.



                        It also is apparent from what we have said that we can use the polynomial $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ to "generate" $GF(2^3)$, we simply form the quotient ring $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ as in (10).



                        The preceding discussion shows that $bar x = x + (mu(x))$ is a primitive element more or less by brute force, showing that $vert bar x vert = 7$ by systematically evaluating $bar x^k$, $0 le k le 7$; though the results form an engaging pattern which can help us better understand finite fields and their primitive elements, it is impractical to execute such a method manually except for polynomials of relatively low degree; obviously, high-speed digital computers can vastly extend the feasible range of such computations. Of course, having at one's disposal a lot of nice theorems pertaining to the issue can help a lot, but I my knowledge of such is far from encyclopedic. That being the case, the only way I know to find candidate primitive elements and their corresponding polynomials and just check things out; obviously, observations such as those made by mathcounterexamples.net in his/her answer are helpful in this regard.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          With



                          $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x], tag 1$



                          we note that $mu(x)$, being a cubic, is reducible in $GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x]$ if and only if it has a linear factor in $Bbb Z_2$, that is, has a zero in this field; this follows from a simple degree argument: if



                          $mu(x) = nu(x) lambda(x), ; nu(x), lambda(x) in GF(2)[x], tag 2$



                          then



                          $3 = deg mu(x) = deg nu(x) + deg lambda(x); ; deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 1, tag 3$



                          from which we see that we cannot have



                          $deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 2; tag 4$



                          we thus find that one of $nu(x)$, $lambda(x)$ is of degree one, and is a monic linear polynomial $x - a$; taking



                          $lambda(x) = x - a, tag 5$



                          we have



                          $mu(x) = (x - a)nu(x), tag 6$



                          as asserted above. It follows that we can check the irreducibility of $mu(x)$ by testing for a root in $GF(2) = Bbb Z_2$; we easily see that neither $0$ nor $1$ satisfy $mu(x)$, hence it is irreducible in $Bbb Z_2[x]$; thus, the principal ideal



                          $(mu(x)) subset GF(2)[x] tag 7$



                          is maximal, and



                          $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) tag 8$



                          is a field. It is well known that



                          $[GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)):GF(2)] = deg mu(x) = 3, tag 9$



                          from which we may infer that



                          $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3), tag{10}$



                          since, up to isomorphism, $GF(2^3)$ is the only field of order $2^3 = 8$.



                          Now the elements of $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ are cosets of the ideal $(mu(x))$ in $GF(2)[x]$; for



                          $rho(x) in GF(2)[x] tag{11}$



                          we let



                          $overline{rho(x)} = rho(x) + (mu(x)); tag{12}$



                          then



                          $bar 0 = 0 + (mu(x)) = mu(x), ; bar 1 = 1 + (mu(x)),$
                          $bar x = x + (mu(x)), ; bar x^2 = x^2 + (mu(x)), ; text{and so forth}, tag{13}$



                          and we have



                          $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = x^3 + x^2 + 1 + (mu(x)) = mu(x) + (mu(x)) = mu(x) = bar 0 + (mu(x)), tag{14}$



                          that is,



                          $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = bar 0 tag{15}$



                          in $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) = Bbb Z_2[x]/(mu(x))$.



                          We show by direct calculation that $bar x$ is a primitive element in the field $GF(2)[x] / (mu(x))$; to do so, we observe that in accord with (10) $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ has $8$ elements, whence the multiplicative group $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$ is of order $7$, hence cyclic. By virtue of (15), we compute the powers of $bar x$, starting with $bar x^0 = bar 1$, they are listed below:



                          $bar x^0 = bar 1; tag{16}$



                          $bar x^1 = bar x; tag{17}$



                          $bar x^2 = (bar x)^2 = bar x bar x; tag{18}$



                          from this point on we may invoke (15) to reduce powers of $bar x$ greater than the second:



                          $bar x^3 = bar x^2 + bar 1; tag{19}$



                          $bar x^4 = bar x bar x^3 = bar x (bar x^2 + 1) = bar x^3 + bar x = bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1; tag{20}$



                          $bar x^5 = bar x bar x^4 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar x = bar x + bar 1; tag{21}$



                          $bar x^6 = bar x bar x^5 = bar x(bar x + bar 1) = bar x^2 + bar x; tag{22}$



                          $bar x^7 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 = bar 1 = bar x^0; tag{23}$



                          from (16)-(23) we see that $bar x$ generates each of the seven elements of $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$; thus it is a primitive element of this field. Then the polynomial $x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x]$, being monic and irreducible, must be the minimal polynomial of $bar x$ (this follows from the fact that the minimal polynomial is irreducible and divides any polynomial of which $bar x$ is a root; but we have seen $x^3 + x^2 + 1$ is irreducible, so . . ), and it follows by definition that $mu(x)$ is a primitive polynomial for $GF(2)/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3)$.



                          It also is apparent from what we have said that we can use the polynomial $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ to "generate" $GF(2^3)$, we simply form the quotient ring $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ as in (10).



                          The preceding discussion shows that $bar x = x + (mu(x))$ is a primitive element more or less by brute force, showing that $vert bar x vert = 7$ by systematically evaluating $bar x^k$, $0 le k le 7$; though the results form an engaging pattern which can help us better understand finite fields and their primitive elements, it is impractical to execute such a method manually except for polynomials of relatively low degree; obviously, high-speed digital computers can vastly extend the feasible range of such computations. Of course, having at one's disposal a lot of nice theorems pertaining to the issue can help a lot, but I my knowledge of such is far from encyclopedic. That being the case, the only way I know to find candidate primitive elements and their corresponding polynomials and just check things out; obviously, observations such as those made by mathcounterexamples.net in his/her answer are helpful in this regard.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          With



                          $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x], tag 1$



                          we note that $mu(x)$, being a cubic, is reducible in $GF(2)[x] = Bbb Z_2[x]$ if and only if it has a linear factor in $Bbb Z_2$, that is, has a zero in this field; this follows from a simple degree argument: if



                          $mu(x) = nu(x) lambda(x), ; nu(x), lambda(x) in GF(2)[x], tag 2$



                          then



                          $3 = deg mu(x) = deg nu(x) + deg lambda(x); ; deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 1, tag 3$



                          from which we see that we cannot have



                          $deg nu(x), deg lambda(x) ge 2; tag 4$



                          we thus find that one of $nu(x)$, $lambda(x)$ is of degree one, and is a monic linear polynomial $x - a$; taking



                          $lambda(x) = x - a, tag 5$



                          we have



                          $mu(x) = (x - a)nu(x), tag 6$



                          as asserted above. It follows that we can check the irreducibility of $mu(x)$ by testing for a root in $GF(2) = Bbb Z_2$; we easily see that neither $0$ nor $1$ satisfy $mu(x)$, hence it is irreducible in $Bbb Z_2[x]$; thus, the principal ideal



                          $(mu(x)) subset GF(2)[x] tag 7$



                          is maximal, and



                          $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) tag 8$



                          is a field. It is well known that



                          $[GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)):GF(2)] = deg mu(x) = 3, tag 9$



                          from which we may infer that



                          $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3), tag{10}$



                          since, up to isomorphism, $GF(2^3)$ is the only field of order $2^3 = 8$.



                          Now the elements of $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ are cosets of the ideal $(mu(x))$ in $GF(2)[x]$; for



                          $rho(x) in GF(2)[x] tag{11}$



                          we let



                          $overline{rho(x)} = rho(x) + (mu(x)); tag{12}$



                          then



                          $bar 0 = 0 + (mu(x)) = mu(x), ; bar 1 = 1 + (mu(x)),$
                          $bar x = x + (mu(x)), ; bar x^2 = x^2 + (mu(x)), ; text{and so forth}, tag{13}$



                          and we have



                          $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = x^3 + x^2 + 1 + (mu(x)) = mu(x) + (mu(x)) = mu(x) = bar 0 + (mu(x)), tag{14}$



                          that is,



                          $bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar 1 = bar 0 tag{15}$



                          in $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)) = Bbb Z_2[x]/(mu(x))$.



                          We show by direct calculation that $bar x$ is a primitive element in the field $GF(2)[x] / (mu(x))$; to do so, we observe that in accord with (10) $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ has $8$ elements, whence the multiplicative group $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$ is of order $7$, hence cyclic. By virtue of (15), we compute the powers of $bar x$, starting with $bar x^0 = bar 1$, they are listed below:



                          $bar x^0 = bar 1; tag{16}$



                          $bar x^1 = bar x; tag{17}$



                          $bar x^2 = (bar x)^2 = bar x bar x; tag{18}$



                          from this point on we may invoke (15) to reduce powers of $bar x$ greater than the second:



                          $bar x^3 = bar x^2 + bar 1; tag{19}$



                          $bar x^4 = bar x bar x^3 = bar x (bar x^2 + 1) = bar x^3 + bar x = bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1; tag{20}$



                          $bar x^5 = bar x bar x^4 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x + bar 1) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 + bar x = bar x + bar 1; tag{21}$



                          $bar x^6 = bar x bar x^5 = bar x(bar x + bar 1) = bar x^2 + bar x; tag{22}$



                          $bar x^7 = bar x(bar x^2 + bar x) = bar x^3 + bar x^2 = bar 1 = bar x^0; tag{23}$



                          from (16)-(23) we see that $bar x$ generates each of the seven elements of $(GF(2)[x]/(mu(x)))^times$; thus it is a primitive element of this field. Then the polynomial $x^3 + x^2 + 1 in GF(2)[x]$, being monic and irreducible, must be the minimal polynomial of $bar x$ (this follows from the fact that the minimal polynomial is irreducible and divides any polynomial of which $bar x$ is a root; but we have seen $x^3 + x^2 + 1$ is irreducible, so . . ), and it follows by definition that $mu(x)$ is a primitive polynomial for $GF(2)/(mu(x)) cong GF(2^3)$.



                          It also is apparent from what we have said that we can use the polynomial $mu(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 1$ to "generate" $GF(2^3)$, we simply form the quotient ring $GF(2)[x]/(mu(x))$ as in (10).



                          The preceding discussion shows that $bar x = x + (mu(x))$ is a primitive element more or less by brute force, showing that $vert bar x vert = 7$ by systematically evaluating $bar x^k$, $0 le k le 7$; though the results form an engaging pattern which can help us better understand finite fields and their primitive elements, it is impractical to execute such a method manually except for polynomials of relatively low degree; obviously, high-speed digital computers can vastly extend the feasible range of such computations. Of course, having at one's disposal a lot of nice theorems pertaining to the issue can help a lot, but I my knowledge of such is far from encyclopedic. That being the case, the only way I know to find candidate primitive elements and their corresponding polynomials and just check things out; obviously, observations such as those made by mathcounterexamples.net in his/her answer are helpful in this regard.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Jan 13 at 0:32

























                          answered Jan 12 at 22:14









                          Robert LewisRobert Lewis

                          49k23168




                          49k23168






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071051%2fprimitive-polynomial-of-a-galois-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Cabo Verde

                              Karlovacs län

                              Gyllenstierna