How to minimize the next functional using the Pontryagin Maximum Principle?
$begingroup$
Best regards,
I am asked to minimize the next functional
$T(v)=int_{A}^{B}frac{dx}{v(x)}$,
with $vneq 0text{ and } vin V$, where $V={vin C([A,B]):v(A)=v(B)=0}$.
If we assume that there exists $v^*$ that minimizes the functional, then $v^*$ satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation.
Euler-Lagrange Equation: $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0$.
If $L=frac{1}{v},vneq 0$
$y=vRightarrow frac{partial L}{partial y}=-frac{1}{v^2},$
$frac{partial L}{partial y'}=0Rightarrowfrac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0,$
then $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=-frac{1}{v^2}-0=0Rightarrow frac{1}{v^2}=0,$ which is impossible, then must resort to the Principle of Maximum of Pontryagin.
How can I use the Pontryagin maximum principle in this case and I have also been told that the optimal $v$ is reached at point $frac{A+B}{2}$?
calculus-of-variations optimal-control
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Best regards,
I am asked to minimize the next functional
$T(v)=int_{A}^{B}frac{dx}{v(x)}$,
with $vneq 0text{ and } vin V$, where $V={vin C([A,B]):v(A)=v(B)=0}$.
If we assume that there exists $v^*$ that minimizes the functional, then $v^*$ satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation.
Euler-Lagrange Equation: $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0$.
If $L=frac{1}{v},vneq 0$
$y=vRightarrow frac{partial L}{partial y}=-frac{1}{v^2},$
$frac{partial L}{partial y'}=0Rightarrowfrac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0,$
then $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=-frac{1}{v^2}-0=0Rightarrow frac{1}{v^2}=0,$ which is impossible, then must resort to the Principle of Maximum of Pontryagin.
How can I use the Pontryagin maximum principle in this case and I have also been told that the optimal $v$ is reached at point $frac{A+B}{2}$?
calculus-of-variations optimal-control
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your assumption that there is a minimiser (with the constraints you gave) is wrong. It is not difficult to construct a sequence of functions $v_n$ such that $T(v_n)to-infty$. In fact, this is what the Euler-Lagrange result is telling you!
$endgroup$
– bjorne
Jan 14 at 19:35
$begingroup$
@bjrone I very much agree with you. How could you explain this "problem" in a formal way?
$endgroup$
– Alex Pozo
Jan 15 at 17:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Best regards,
I am asked to minimize the next functional
$T(v)=int_{A}^{B}frac{dx}{v(x)}$,
with $vneq 0text{ and } vin V$, where $V={vin C([A,B]):v(A)=v(B)=0}$.
If we assume that there exists $v^*$ that minimizes the functional, then $v^*$ satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation.
Euler-Lagrange Equation: $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0$.
If $L=frac{1}{v},vneq 0$
$y=vRightarrow frac{partial L}{partial y}=-frac{1}{v^2},$
$frac{partial L}{partial y'}=0Rightarrowfrac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0,$
then $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=-frac{1}{v^2}-0=0Rightarrow frac{1}{v^2}=0,$ which is impossible, then must resort to the Principle of Maximum of Pontryagin.
How can I use the Pontryagin maximum principle in this case and I have also been told that the optimal $v$ is reached at point $frac{A+B}{2}$?
calculus-of-variations optimal-control
$endgroup$
Best regards,
I am asked to minimize the next functional
$T(v)=int_{A}^{B}frac{dx}{v(x)}$,
with $vneq 0text{ and } vin V$, where $V={vin C([A,B]):v(A)=v(B)=0}$.
If we assume that there exists $v^*$ that minimizes the functional, then $v^*$ satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation.
Euler-Lagrange Equation: $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0$.
If $L=frac{1}{v},vneq 0$
$y=vRightarrow frac{partial L}{partial y}=-frac{1}{v^2},$
$frac{partial L}{partial y'}=0Rightarrowfrac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=0,$
then $frac{partial L}{partial y}-frac{d}{dx}(frac{partial L}{partial y'})=-frac{1}{v^2}-0=0Rightarrow frac{1}{v^2}=0,$ which is impossible, then must resort to the Principle of Maximum of Pontryagin.
How can I use the Pontryagin maximum principle in this case and I have also been told that the optimal $v$ is reached at point $frac{A+B}{2}$?
calculus-of-variations optimal-control
calculus-of-variations optimal-control
asked Jan 12 at 17:05
Alex PozoAlex Pozo
519214
519214
$begingroup$
Your assumption that there is a minimiser (with the constraints you gave) is wrong. It is not difficult to construct a sequence of functions $v_n$ such that $T(v_n)to-infty$. In fact, this is what the Euler-Lagrange result is telling you!
$endgroup$
– bjorne
Jan 14 at 19:35
$begingroup$
@bjrone I very much agree with you. How could you explain this "problem" in a formal way?
$endgroup$
– Alex Pozo
Jan 15 at 17:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your assumption that there is a minimiser (with the constraints you gave) is wrong. It is not difficult to construct a sequence of functions $v_n$ such that $T(v_n)to-infty$. In fact, this is what the Euler-Lagrange result is telling you!
$endgroup$
– bjorne
Jan 14 at 19:35
$begingroup$
@bjrone I very much agree with you. How could you explain this "problem" in a formal way?
$endgroup$
– Alex Pozo
Jan 15 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Your assumption that there is a minimiser (with the constraints you gave) is wrong. It is not difficult to construct a sequence of functions $v_n$ such that $T(v_n)to-infty$. In fact, this is what the Euler-Lagrange result is telling you!
$endgroup$
– bjorne
Jan 14 at 19:35
$begingroup$
Your assumption that there is a minimiser (with the constraints you gave) is wrong. It is not difficult to construct a sequence of functions $v_n$ such that $T(v_n)to-infty$. In fact, this is what the Euler-Lagrange result is telling you!
$endgroup$
– bjorne
Jan 14 at 19:35
$begingroup$
@bjrone I very much agree with you. How could you explain this "problem" in a formal way?
$endgroup$
– Alex Pozo
Jan 15 at 17:07
$begingroup$
@bjrone I very much agree with you. How could you explain this "problem" in a formal way?
$endgroup$
– Alex Pozo
Jan 15 at 17:07
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071122%2fhow-to-minimize-the-next-functional-using-the-pontryagin-maximum-principle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071122%2fhow-to-minimize-the-next-functional-using-the-pontryagin-maximum-principle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your assumption that there is a minimiser (with the constraints you gave) is wrong. It is not difficult to construct a sequence of functions $v_n$ such that $T(v_n)to-infty$. In fact, this is what the Euler-Lagrange result is telling you!
$endgroup$
– bjorne
Jan 14 at 19:35
$begingroup$
@bjrone I very much agree with you. How could you explain this "problem" in a formal way?
$endgroup$
– Alex Pozo
Jan 15 at 17:07