Example of a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ which is not $sigma$-finite under Lebesgue measure?












0












$begingroup$


We know open and closed sets are $sigma$-finite. What would be the example of a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ which is not $sigma$-finite under Lebesgue measure?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Song If the subset is Lebesgue measurable, then it is $sigma$-finite.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Song are you confusing $sigma$-compact with $sigma$ -finite?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:47












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw For some reason, I've read $sigma$-finite as $sigma$-compact. Thanks for pointing out my error!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:17
















0












$begingroup$


We know open and closed sets are $sigma$-finite. What would be the example of a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ which is not $sigma$-finite under Lebesgue measure?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @Song If the subset is Lebesgue measurable, then it is $sigma$-finite.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Song are you confusing $sigma$-compact with $sigma$ -finite?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:47












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw For some reason, I've read $sigma$-finite as $sigma$-compact. Thanks for pointing out my error!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:17














0












0








0





$begingroup$


We know open and closed sets are $sigma$-finite. What would be the example of a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ which is not $sigma$-finite under Lebesgue measure?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




We know open and closed sets are $sigma$-finite. What would be the example of a subset of $mathbb{R}^2$ which is not $sigma$-finite under Lebesgue measure?







real-analysis analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 12 at 17:16









ershersh

573113




573113












  • $begingroup$
    @Song If the subset is Lebesgue measurable, then it is $sigma$-finite.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Song are you confusing $sigma$-compact with $sigma$ -finite?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:47












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw For some reason, I've read $sigma$-finite as $sigma$-compact. Thanks for pointing out my error!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:17


















  • $begingroup$
    @Song If the subset is Lebesgue measurable, then it is $sigma$-finite.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Song are you confusing $sigma$-compact with $sigma$ -finite?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 12 at 19:47












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw For some reason, I've read $sigma$-finite as $sigma$-compact. Thanks for pointing out my error!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:17
















$begingroup$
@Song If the subset is Lebesgue measurable, then it is $sigma$-finite.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 12 at 19:32




$begingroup$
@Song If the subset is Lebesgue measurable, then it is $sigma$-finite.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 12 at 19:32












$begingroup$
@Song are you confusing $sigma$-compact with $sigma$ -finite?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 12 at 19:47






$begingroup$
@Song are you confusing $sigma$-compact with $sigma$ -finite?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 12 at 19:47














$begingroup$
@zhw For some reason, I've read $sigma$-finite as $sigma$-compact. Thanks for pointing out my error!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 13 at 20:17




$begingroup$
@zhw For some reason, I've read $sigma$-finite as $sigma$-compact. Thanks for pointing out my error!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 13 at 20:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

(Thanks to @zhw pointing out my mistake) If we allow $Esubsetmathbb{R}^2$ to be a non-measurable set, then obviously it cannot be a countable union of measurable sets of a finite measure. We can construct a non-measurable subset of $[0,1]^2$ in a similar way constructing a Vitali set. This can be an example of a non-$sigma$-finite set that you are looking for. However, we cannot find any examples among measurable sets. The reason is as follows. Note that every measurable set $E$ can be expressed as
$$
E=bigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n
$$
where $E_n =Ecap [-n,n]^2$ and that each $E_n$ has a finite measure $m(E_n)le m([-n,n]^2)= 4n^2$. This shows that there are no measurable, non-$sigma$-finite subset of $mathbb{R}^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You deleted your comments that I corrected, didn't answer my question there, then provided an answer with zero acknowledgement. Not really a cool thing to do.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. I'm so sorry about that if it makes you feel bad. At first I did leave a comment appreciating your pointing out my mistake, but after a while I deleted it only because I thought you probably already read it. Again, I apologize for such a misbehavior.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:18










  • $begingroup$
    OK, thanks for your comment here. In the future, at times, you might want to consider not deleting comments of yours even if they're mistaken. Often the resulting discussion can help readers.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw Oh, I think it's a really good point. I'll keep it in my mind. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:31












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071133%2fexample-of-a-subset-of-mathbbr2-which-is-not-sigma-finite-under-lebesgu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

(Thanks to @zhw pointing out my mistake) If we allow $Esubsetmathbb{R}^2$ to be a non-measurable set, then obviously it cannot be a countable union of measurable sets of a finite measure. We can construct a non-measurable subset of $[0,1]^2$ in a similar way constructing a Vitali set. This can be an example of a non-$sigma$-finite set that you are looking for. However, we cannot find any examples among measurable sets. The reason is as follows. Note that every measurable set $E$ can be expressed as
$$
E=bigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n
$$
where $E_n =Ecap [-n,n]^2$ and that each $E_n$ has a finite measure $m(E_n)le m([-n,n]^2)= 4n^2$. This shows that there are no measurable, non-$sigma$-finite subset of $mathbb{R}^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You deleted your comments that I corrected, didn't answer my question there, then provided an answer with zero acknowledgement. Not really a cool thing to do.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. I'm so sorry about that if it makes you feel bad. At first I did leave a comment appreciating your pointing out my mistake, but after a while I deleted it only because I thought you probably already read it. Again, I apologize for such a misbehavior.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:18










  • $begingroup$
    OK, thanks for your comment here. In the future, at times, you might want to consider not deleting comments of yours even if they're mistaken. Often the resulting discussion can help readers.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw Oh, I think it's a really good point. I'll keep it in my mind. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:31
















1












$begingroup$

(Thanks to @zhw pointing out my mistake) If we allow $Esubsetmathbb{R}^2$ to be a non-measurable set, then obviously it cannot be a countable union of measurable sets of a finite measure. We can construct a non-measurable subset of $[0,1]^2$ in a similar way constructing a Vitali set. This can be an example of a non-$sigma$-finite set that you are looking for. However, we cannot find any examples among measurable sets. The reason is as follows. Note that every measurable set $E$ can be expressed as
$$
E=bigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n
$$
where $E_n =Ecap [-n,n]^2$ and that each $E_n$ has a finite measure $m(E_n)le m([-n,n]^2)= 4n^2$. This shows that there are no measurable, non-$sigma$-finite subset of $mathbb{R}^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You deleted your comments that I corrected, didn't answer my question there, then provided an answer with zero acknowledgement. Not really a cool thing to do.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. I'm so sorry about that if it makes you feel bad. At first I did leave a comment appreciating your pointing out my mistake, but after a while I deleted it only because I thought you probably already read it. Again, I apologize for such a misbehavior.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:18










  • $begingroup$
    OK, thanks for your comment here. In the future, at times, you might want to consider not deleting comments of yours even if they're mistaken. Often the resulting discussion can help readers.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw Oh, I think it's a really good point. I'll keep it in my mind. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:31














1












1








1





$begingroup$

(Thanks to @zhw pointing out my mistake) If we allow $Esubsetmathbb{R}^2$ to be a non-measurable set, then obviously it cannot be a countable union of measurable sets of a finite measure. We can construct a non-measurable subset of $[0,1]^2$ in a similar way constructing a Vitali set. This can be an example of a non-$sigma$-finite set that you are looking for. However, we cannot find any examples among measurable sets. The reason is as follows. Note that every measurable set $E$ can be expressed as
$$
E=bigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n
$$
where $E_n =Ecap [-n,n]^2$ and that each $E_n$ has a finite measure $m(E_n)le m([-n,n]^2)= 4n^2$. This shows that there are no measurable, non-$sigma$-finite subset of $mathbb{R}^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



(Thanks to @zhw pointing out my mistake) If we allow $Esubsetmathbb{R}^2$ to be a non-measurable set, then obviously it cannot be a countable union of measurable sets of a finite measure. We can construct a non-measurable subset of $[0,1]^2$ in a similar way constructing a Vitali set. This can be an example of a non-$sigma$-finite set that you are looking for. However, we cannot find any examples among measurable sets. The reason is as follows. Note that every measurable set $E$ can be expressed as
$$
E=bigcup_{n=1}^infty E_n
$$
where $E_n =Ecap [-n,n]^2$ and that each $E_n$ has a finite measure $m(E_n)le m([-n,n]^2)= 4n^2$. This shows that there are no measurable, non-$sigma$-finite subset of $mathbb{R}^2$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 13 at 20:54

























answered Jan 12 at 20:16









SongSong

18.6k21651




18.6k21651












  • $begingroup$
    You deleted your comments that I corrected, didn't answer my question there, then provided an answer with zero acknowledgement. Not really a cool thing to do.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. I'm so sorry about that if it makes you feel bad. At first I did leave a comment appreciating your pointing out my mistake, but after a while I deleted it only because I thought you probably already read it. Again, I apologize for such a misbehavior.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:18










  • $begingroup$
    OK, thanks for your comment here. In the future, at times, you might want to consider not deleting comments of yours even if they're mistaken. Often the resulting discussion can help readers.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw Oh, I think it's a really good point. I'll keep it in my mind. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:31


















  • $begingroup$
    You deleted your comments that I corrected, didn't answer my question there, then provided an answer with zero acknowledgement. Not really a cool thing to do.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. I'm so sorry about that if it makes you feel bad. At first I did leave a comment appreciating your pointing out my mistake, but after a while I deleted it only because I thought you probably already read it. Again, I apologize for such a misbehavior.
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:18










  • $begingroup$
    OK, thanks for your comment here. In the future, at times, you might want to consider not deleting comments of yours even if they're mistaken. Often the resulting discussion can help readers.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 13 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw Oh, I think it's a really good point. I'll keep it in my mind. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 13 at 20:31
















$begingroup$
You deleted your comments that I corrected, didn't answer my question there, then provided an answer with zero acknowledgement. Not really a cool thing to do.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 13 at 20:04




$begingroup$
You deleted your comments that I corrected, didn't answer my question there, then provided an answer with zero acknowledgement. Not really a cool thing to do.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 13 at 20:04












$begingroup$
@zhw. I'm so sorry about that if it makes you feel bad. At first I did leave a comment appreciating your pointing out my mistake, but after a while I deleted it only because I thought you probably already read it. Again, I apologize for such a misbehavior.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 13 at 20:18




$begingroup$
@zhw. I'm so sorry about that if it makes you feel bad. At first I did leave a comment appreciating your pointing out my mistake, but after a while I deleted it only because I thought you probably already read it. Again, I apologize for such a misbehavior.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 13 at 20:18












$begingroup$
OK, thanks for your comment here. In the future, at times, you might want to consider not deleting comments of yours even if they're mistaken. Often the resulting discussion can help readers.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 13 at 20:28




$begingroup$
OK, thanks for your comment here. In the future, at times, you might want to consider not deleting comments of yours even if they're mistaken. Often the resulting discussion can help readers.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 13 at 20:28












$begingroup$
@zhw Oh, I think it's a really good point. I'll keep it in my mind. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 13 at 20:31




$begingroup$
@zhw Oh, I think it's a really good point. I'll keep it in my mind. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 13 at 20:31


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071133%2fexample-of-a-subset-of-mathbbr2-which-is-not-sigma-finite-under-lebesgu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna