Simplify the sum $sum_{i_1+i_2+…+i_m=z}{x_{1}^{i_1}x_{2}^{i_2}cdot…cdot x_{m}^{i_m}}$
$begingroup$
I was wondering is it possible to simplify the following sum:
$$sum_{i_1+i_2+...+i_m=z}{x_{1}^{i_1}x_{2}^{i_2}cdot...cdot x_{m}^{i_m}}$$
where $0<x<1$ for all $x$.
Is it possible to lose the sum?
For $m=2$ it is simple. Just could not find it for $m>2$.
Maybe it has to do with multinomial theorem, but how?
Would appreciate your help.
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series combinatorics summation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was wondering is it possible to simplify the following sum:
$$sum_{i_1+i_2+...+i_m=z}{x_{1}^{i_1}x_{2}^{i_2}cdot...cdot x_{m}^{i_m}}$$
where $0<x<1$ for all $x$.
Is it possible to lose the sum?
For $m=2$ it is simple. Just could not find it for $m>2$.
Maybe it has to do with multinomial theorem, but how?
Would appreciate your help.
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series combinatorics summation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do you mean "for $m=2$ it is simple"? Writing as quotient per geometric series formula?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 8 at 23:33
$begingroup$
if $z=m$ then I think it is the expansion of $(x_1+x_2+x_3+cdots+x_m)^m$
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 8 at 23:53
$begingroup$
@Shrey: no its not, because in the case $m = z = 2$ it counts mixed terms like $x_1x_2$ only once.
$endgroup$
– Snake707
Jan 9 at 0:00
1
$begingroup$
Your expression is known as the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree z in m variables.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 9 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thank you so much @MikeEarnest! you've just solved my problem. Thank god for crowd wisdom :)
$endgroup$
– Y.L
Jan 9 at 2:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was wondering is it possible to simplify the following sum:
$$sum_{i_1+i_2+...+i_m=z}{x_{1}^{i_1}x_{2}^{i_2}cdot...cdot x_{m}^{i_m}}$$
where $0<x<1$ for all $x$.
Is it possible to lose the sum?
For $m=2$ it is simple. Just could not find it for $m>2$.
Maybe it has to do with multinomial theorem, but how?
Would appreciate your help.
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series combinatorics summation
$endgroup$
I was wondering is it possible to simplify the following sum:
$$sum_{i_1+i_2+...+i_m=z}{x_{1}^{i_1}x_{2}^{i_2}cdot...cdot x_{m}^{i_m}}$$
where $0<x<1$ for all $x$.
Is it possible to lose the sum?
For $m=2$ it is simple. Just could not find it for $m>2$.
Maybe it has to do with multinomial theorem, but how?
Would appreciate your help.
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series combinatorics summation
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series combinatorics summation
edited Jan 8 at 23:21
Y.L
asked Jan 8 at 23:14
Y.LY.L
767
767
$begingroup$
What do you mean "for $m=2$ it is simple"? Writing as quotient per geometric series formula?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 8 at 23:33
$begingroup$
if $z=m$ then I think it is the expansion of $(x_1+x_2+x_3+cdots+x_m)^m$
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 8 at 23:53
$begingroup$
@Shrey: no its not, because in the case $m = z = 2$ it counts mixed terms like $x_1x_2$ only once.
$endgroup$
– Snake707
Jan 9 at 0:00
1
$begingroup$
Your expression is known as the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree z in m variables.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 9 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thank you so much @MikeEarnest! you've just solved my problem. Thank god for crowd wisdom :)
$endgroup$
– Y.L
Jan 9 at 2:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What do you mean "for $m=2$ it is simple"? Writing as quotient per geometric series formula?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 8 at 23:33
$begingroup$
if $z=m$ then I think it is the expansion of $(x_1+x_2+x_3+cdots+x_m)^m$
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 8 at 23:53
$begingroup$
@Shrey: no its not, because in the case $m = z = 2$ it counts mixed terms like $x_1x_2$ only once.
$endgroup$
– Snake707
Jan 9 at 0:00
1
$begingroup$
Your expression is known as the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree z in m variables.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 9 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thank you so much @MikeEarnest! you've just solved my problem. Thank god for crowd wisdom :)
$endgroup$
– Y.L
Jan 9 at 2:13
$begingroup$
What do you mean "for $m=2$ it is simple"? Writing as quotient per geometric series formula?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 8 at 23:33
$begingroup$
What do you mean "for $m=2$ it is simple"? Writing as quotient per geometric series formula?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 8 at 23:33
$begingroup$
if $z=m$ then I think it is the expansion of $(x_1+x_2+x_3+cdots+x_m)^m$
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 8 at 23:53
$begingroup$
if $z=m$ then I think it is the expansion of $(x_1+x_2+x_3+cdots+x_m)^m$
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 8 at 23:53
$begingroup$
@Shrey: no its not, because in the case $m = z = 2$ it counts mixed terms like $x_1x_2$ only once.
$endgroup$
– Snake707
Jan 9 at 0:00
$begingroup$
@Shrey: no its not, because in the case $m = z = 2$ it counts mixed terms like $x_1x_2$ only once.
$endgroup$
– Snake707
Jan 9 at 0:00
1
1
$begingroup$
Your expression is known as the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree z in m variables.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 9 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Your expression is known as the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree z in m variables.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 9 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thank you so much @MikeEarnest! you've just solved my problem. Thank god for crowd wisdom :)
$endgroup$
– Y.L
Jan 9 at 2:13
$begingroup$
Thank you so much @MikeEarnest! you've just solved my problem. Thank god for crowd wisdom :)
$endgroup$
– Y.L
Jan 9 at 2:13
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$m, z, i_1, ldots, i_m in mathbb{N}, quad m > 0$$
I don't think your sum has a neat form. Let $m = z = 2$ your "simple form" is: $x_1^2 + x_1cdot x_2 + x_2^2$, which is not the binomial formula. Your formula only counts the mixed terms once. The multinomial formula has the following form:
$$left(sumlimits_{k=1}^m x_iright)^z = sumlimits_{sumlimits_{k=1}^m i_k=z}frac{z!}{prodlimits_{l=1}^m i_l!}prodlimits_{l=1}^m x_l^{i_l} = sumlimits_{i_1 + ldots + i_m = z}frac{z!}{i_1!cdot ldots cdot i_m!}x_1^{i_1}cdotldotscdot x_m^{i_m}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066850%2fsimplify-the-sum-sum-i-1i-2-i-m-zx-1i-1x-2i-2-cdot-cdot-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$m, z, i_1, ldots, i_m in mathbb{N}, quad m > 0$$
I don't think your sum has a neat form. Let $m = z = 2$ your "simple form" is: $x_1^2 + x_1cdot x_2 + x_2^2$, which is not the binomial formula. Your formula only counts the mixed terms once. The multinomial formula has the following form:
$$left(sumlimits_{k=1}^m x_iright)^z = sumlimits_{sumlimits_{k=1}^m i_k=z}frac{z!}{prodlimits_{l=1}^m i_l!}prodlimits_{l=1}^m x_l^{i_l} = sumlimits_{i_1 + ldots + i_m = z}frac{z!}{i_1!cdot ldots cdot i_m!}x_1^{i_1}cdotldotscdot x_m^{i_m}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$m, z, i_1, ldots, i_m in mathbb{N}, quad m > 0$$
I don't think your sum has a neat form. Let $m = z = 2$ your "simple form" is: $x_1^2 + x_1cdot x_2 + x_2^2$, which is not the binomial formula. Your formula only counts the mixed terms once. The multinomial formula has the following form:
$$left(sumlimits_{k=1}^m x_iright)^z = sumlimits_{sumlimits_{k=1}^m i_k=z}frac{z!}{prodlimits_{l=1}^m i_l!}prodlimits_{l=1}^m x_l^{i_l} = sumlimits_{i_1 + ldots + i_m = z}frac{z!}{i_1!cdot ldots cdot i_m!}x_1^{i_1}cdotldotscdot x_m^{i_m}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$m, z, i_1, ldots, i_m in mathbb{N}, quad m > 0$$
I don't think your sum has a neat form. Let $m = z = 2$ your "simple form" is: $x_1^2 + x_1cdot x_2 + x_2^2$, which is not the binomial formula. Your formula only counts the mixed terms once. The multinomial formula has the following form:
$$left(sumlimits_{k=1}^m x_iright)^z = sumlimits_{sumlimits_{k=1}^m i_k=z}frac{z!}{prodlimits_{l=1}^m i_l!}prodlimits_{l=1}^m x_l^{i_l} = sumlimits_{i_1 + ldots + i_m = z}frac{z!}{i_1!cdot ldots cdot i_m!}x_1^{i_1}cdotldotscdot x_m^{i_m}$$
$endgroup$
$$m, z, i_1, ldots, i_m in mathbb{N}, quad m > 0$$
I don't think your sum has a neat form. Let $m = z = 2$ your "simple form" is: $x_1^2 + x_1cdot x_2 + x_2^2$, which is not the binomial formula. Your formula only counts the mixed terms once. The multinomial formula has the following form:
$$left(sumlimits_{k=1}^m x_iright)^z = sumlimits_{sumlimits_{k=1}^m i_k=z}frac{z!}{prodlimits_{l=1}^m i_l!}prodlimits_{l=1}^m x_l^{i_l} = sumlimits_{i_1 + ldots + i_m = z}frac{z!}{i_1!cdot ldots cdot i_m!}x_1^{i_1}cdotldotscdot x_m^{i_m}$$
answered Jan 8 at 23:59
Snake707Snake707
4537
4537
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066850%2fsimplify-the-sum-sum-i-1i-2-i-m-zx-1i-1x-2i-2-cdot-cdot-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What do you mean "for $m=2$ it is simple"? Writing as quotient per geometric series formula?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 8 at 23:33
$begingroup$
if $z=m$ then I think it is the expansion of $(x_1+x_2+x_3+cdots+x_m)^m$
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 8 at 23:53
$begingroup$
@Shrey: no its not, because in the case $m = z = 2$ it counts mixed terms like $x_1x_2$ only once.
$endgroup$
– Snake707
Jan 9 at 0:00
1
$begingroup$
Your expression is known as the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial of degree z in m variables.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 9 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thank you so much @MikeEarnest! you've just solved my problem. Thank god for crowd wisdom :)
$endgroup$
– Y.L
Jan 9 at 2:13