Why is $(f_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ with $f_n :[0,1]rightarrowmathbb{R}, f_n(x)=x^n$ not uniformly convergent?...
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent
2 answers
If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by RRL
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent
2 answers
If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by RRL
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent
2 answers
If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent
2 answers
If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?
This question already has an answer here:
Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent
2 answers
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Jan 8 at 21:48
Bernard
124k741118
124k741118
asked Jan 8 at 21:46
RM777RM777
38312
38312
marked as duplicate by RRL
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by RRL
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58
$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58
$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.
answered Jan 8 at 21:52
MarkMark
10.4k1622
10.4k1622
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58