Why is $(f_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ with $f_n :[0,1]rightarrowmathbb{R}, f_n(x)=x^n$ not uniformly convergent?...












0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent

    2 answers




If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Jan 8 at 21:58
















0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent

    2 answers




If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Jan 8 at 21:58














0












0








0





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent

    2 answers




If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent

    2 answers




If I choose $f:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{R}$ with $f(1)=1$ and otherwise $f(x)=0$ then $||f_n-f||_{[0,1]}rightarrow0$ therefore it is uniformly convergent and because it is uniformly convergent $f$ would have to be continuous but it is not, where is the mistake?





This question already has an answer here:




  • Prove $x^n$ is not uniformly convergent

    2 answers








real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 21:48









Bernard

124k741118




124k741118










asked Jan 8 at 21:46









RM777RM777

38312




38312




marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Jan 8 at 23:19


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • $begingroup$
    Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Jan 8 at 21:58


















  • $begingroup$
    Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Jan 8 at 21:58
















$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58




$begingroup$
Since $lim_n f_n$ is not continuous, it cannot be the uniform limit of any sequence of continuous functions.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 8 at 21:58










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is not uniformly convergent. For each $ninmathbb{N}$ you can choose $x=frac{1}{sqrt[n]{2}}$ and get $|f_n(x)-f(x)|geqfrac{1}{2}$. So it doesn't matter how far you go in the sequence, the distance will never be less than $frac{1}{2}$ for all $x$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 8 at 21:52









        MarkMark

        10.4k1622




        10.4k1622















            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna