Construction of a triangle-free graph of chromatic number $1526$
I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"
It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.
Now my qestions:
(1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?
(2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?
My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian
I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
add a comment |
I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"
It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.
Now my qestions:
(1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?
(2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?
My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian
I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
add a comment |
I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"
It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.
Now my qestions:
(1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?
(2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?
My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian
I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"
It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.
Now my qestions:
(1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?
(2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?
My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian
I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
discrete-mathematics graph-theory
edited Dec 3 '13 at 6:56
bof
49.9k457119
49.9k457119
asked Nov 24 '13 at 23:30
Montaigne
212318
212318
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.
For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.
First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.
Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.
Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
– Montaigne
Nov 25 '13 at 3:04
I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 6:48
Yes, that is my question :)
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 7:12
By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:14
Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:17
add a comment |
I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.
I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f579892%2fconstruction-of-a-triangle-free-graph-of-chromatic-number-1526%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.
For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.
First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.
Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.
Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
– Montaigne
Nov 25 '13 at 3:04
I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 6:48
Yes, that is my question :)
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 7:12
By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:14
Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:17
add a comment |
There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.
For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.
First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.
Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.
Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
– Montaigne
Nov 25 '13 at 3:04
I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 6:48
Yes, that is my question :)
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 7:12
By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:14
Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:17
add a comment |
There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.
For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.
First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.
Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.
There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.
For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.
First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.
Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.
edited Dec 6 at 8:08
answered Nov 25 '13 at 1:56
bof
49.9k457119
49.9k457119
Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
– Montaigne
Nov 25 '13 at 3:04
I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 6:48
Yes, that is my question :)
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 7:12
By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:14
Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:17
add a comment |
Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
– Montaigne
Nov 25 '13 at 3:04
I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 6:48
Yes, that is my question :)
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 7:12
By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:14
Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:17
Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
– Montaigne
Nov 25 '13 at 3:04
Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
– Montaigne
Nov 25 '13 at 3:04
I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 6:48
I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 6:48
Yes, that is my question :)
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 7:12
Yes, that is my question :)
– Oldboy
Dec 10 at 7:12
By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:14
By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:14
Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:17
Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
– bof
Dec 10 at 7:17
add a comment |
I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.
I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.
add a comment |
I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.
I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.
add a comment |
I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.
I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.
I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.
I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.
answered Nov 25 '13 at 0:43
Chris Godsil
11.5k21634
11.5k21634
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f579892%2fconstruction-of-a-triangle-free-graph-of-chromatic-number-1526%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown