Construction of a triangle-free graph of chromatic number $1526$












4














I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"



It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.



Now my qestions:



(1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?



(2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?



My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian



I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.










share|cite|improve this question





























    4














    I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"



    It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.



    Now my qestions:



    (1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?



    (2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?



    My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
    I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian



    I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      4












      4








      4


      1





      I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"



      It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.



      Now my qestions:



      (1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?



      (2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?



      My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
      I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian



      I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I found this exercise in Bollobas: Modern Graph Theory "Construct a triangle-free graph of chromatic number 1526"



      It is added not to use results from the chapter about Ramsey Theory.



      Now my qestions:



      (1) Is there a nice way to construct such a graph?



      (2) If yes then what is so special about this specific graph?



      My ideas: Grötzsch's theorem states that every triangle-free planar graph may be 3-colored, so we know that we can exclude planar grpahs and focus on non-planar graphs.
      I read something about the Mycielskian on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycielskian



      I think this is the key to the solution but I do not see how to follow a concrete construction.







      discrete-mathematics graph-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '13 at 6:56









      bof

      49.9k457119




      49.9k457119










      asked Nov 24 '13 at 23:30









      Montaigne

      212318




      212318






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.



          For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.



          First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.



          Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
            – Montaigne
            Nov 25 '13 at 3:04












          • I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
            – Oldboy
            Dec 10 at 6:48










          • Yes, that is my question :)
            – Oldboy
            Dec 10 at 7:12










          • By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
            – bof
            Dec 10 at 7:14












          • Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
            – bof
            Dec 10 at 7:17



















          2














          I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
          and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.



          I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f579892%2fconstruction-of-a-triangle-free-graph-of-chromatic-number-1526%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6














            There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.



            For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.



            First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.



            Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
              – Montaigne
              Nov 25 '13 at 3:04












            • I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 6:48










            • Yes, that is my question :)
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 7:12










            • By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:14












            • Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:17
















            6














            There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.



            For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.



            First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.



            Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
              – Montaigne
              Nov 25 '13 at 3:04












            • I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 6:48










            • Yes, that is my question :)
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 7:12










            • By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:14












            • Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:17














            6












            6








            6






            There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.



            For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.



            First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.



            Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            There are many ways to construct triangle-free graphs with large chromatic number. One well-known construction is Jan Mycielski's, which is described in the Wikipedia article that you cited; I guess you had trouble understanding it. Instead of explaining Mycielski's construction, I will describe another one, which is even less "efficient" (meaning that it produces a bigger graph for a given chromatic number) but maybe slightly simpler.



            For a given natural number $ninmathbb N$, let $G_n$ be the following graph with $binom n2$ vertices and $binom n3$ edges: the vertices are the pairs $(x,y)$ of integers with $1le xlt yle n$; for each triple $(x,y,z)$ with $1le xlt ylt zle n$, there is an edge joining vertex $(x,y)$ to vertex $(y,z)$. It is plain to see that $G_n$ is triangle-free. I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable if and only if $nle2^k$. Therefore, if $2^{1525}lt nle2^{1526}$, then $chi(G_n)=1526$.



            First, suppose $G_n$ is $k$-colorable; I will show that $nle2^k$. Let $f:V(G_n)to[k]={1,dots,k}$ be a proper vertex-coloring of $G_n$; i.e., for $1le xlt yle n$, the vertex $(x,y)$ gets color $f(x,y)in[k]$. For each $xin[n]={1,dots,n}$, let $S_x={f(u,x):1le ult x}subseteq[k]$. Note that, since $f$ is a proper coloring, the sets $S_1,dots,S_n$ must be distinct; namely, if $1le xlt yle n$, then $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$, showing that $S_xne S_y$. Thus there are $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, i.e., $nle2^k$.



            Now, suppose $nle2^k$; I will show that $G_n$ is $k$-colorable. Let $S_1,dots,S_n$ be $n$ distinct subsets of $[k]$, indexed in order of increasing size, so that $|S_1|le|S_2|ledotsle|S_n|$; it follows that $S_ynotsubseteq S_x$ whenever $1le xlt yle n$. Finally, we get a proper coloring $f:V(G)to[k]$ by assigning to each vertex $(x,y)$ a color $f(x,y)in S_ysetminus S_x$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 6 at 8:08

























            answered Nov 25 '13 at 1:56









            bof

            49.9k457119




            49.9k457119












            • Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
              – Montaigne
              Nov 25 '13 at 3:04












            • I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 6:48










            • Yes, that is my question :)
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 7:12










            • By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:14












            • Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:17


















            • Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
              – Montaigne
              Nov 25 '13 at 3:04












            • I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 6:48










            • Yes, that is my question :)
              – Oldboy
              Dec 10 at 7:12










            • By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:14












            • Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
              – bof
              Dec 10 at 7:17
















            Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
            – Montaigne
            Nov 25 '13 at 3:04






            Thats very nice. Why do you choose exactly $G_n$ with $binom n 2$ verties and $binom n 3$ edges, is this some special graph?
            – Montaigne
            Nov 25 '13 at 3:04














            I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
            – Oldboy
            Dec 10 at 6:48




            I find this part hard to follow: “Note that, since f is a proper coloring...” Can you explain why we need different colors when we increase $x$? I know this is an old question but very interesting to me.
            – Oldboy
            Dec 10 at 6:48












            Yes, that is my question :)
            – Oldboy
            Dec 10 at 7:12




            Yes, that is my question :)
            – Oldboy
            Dec 10 at 7:12












            By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
            – bof
            Dec 10 at 7:14






            By definition, $S_y={f(u,y):1le ult y}$. Since $1le xlt y$, it follows that $f(x,y)in S_y$.
            – bof
            Dec 10 at 7:14














            Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
            – bof
            Dec 10 at 7:17




            Assume for a contradiction that $xlt y$ and $f(x,y)in S_x$. By the definition of $S_x$, this means that $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ for some $ult x$. Since $ult xlt y$, $(u,x)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent vertices in $G_n$; hence $f(x,y)=f(u,x)$ contradicts the assumption that $f$ is a proper coloring.
            – bof
            Dec 10 at 7:17











            2














            I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
            and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.



            I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              2














              I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
              and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.



              I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
                and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.



                I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                I do not think there is any single right answer to this question. For me the easiest approach is to take a Kneser graph $K_{3r-1:r}$. (Its vertices are the subsets of size $r$ from a set of size $3r-1$, where two such subsets are disjoint.) By a famous result due to Lovasz, the chromatic number of $K_{n:r}$ is $n-2r+2$,
                and so for the graphs I am using it's $r+1$, so take $r=1525$.



                I doubt this is the solution Bollobas has in mind.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 25 '13 at 0:43









                Chris Godsil

                11.5k21634




                11.5k21634






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f579892%2fconstruction-of-a-triangle-free-graph-of-chromatic-number-1526%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna