Geometrical Applications of Complex Numbers
The complex numbers $z_1,z_2,z_3$ satisfying $$dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}=dfrac{1-isqrt{3}}{2}$$ are the vertices of a triangle which is:
a) of area $0$
b) equilateral
c) right angled and isosceles
d) obtuse angled
$$$$
All I got was that from the Rotation Theorem, $$argleft(dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}right)=-pi/3$$ and that $$|z_1+z_3|=|z_2-z_3|$$
$$$$
Could somebody please show me how to solve this problem? Many thanks!
calculus complex-analysis algebra-precalculus geometry complex-numbers
add a comment |
The complex numbers $z_1,z_2,z_3$ satisfying $$dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}=dfrac{1-isqrt{3}}{2}$$ are the vertices of a triangle which is:
a) of area $0$
b) equilateral
c) right angled and isosceles
d) obtuse angled
$$$$
All I got was that from the Rotation Theorem, $$argleft(dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}right)=-pi/3$$ and that $$|z_1+z_3|=|z_2-z_3|$$
$$$$
Could somebody please show me how to solve this problem? Many thanks!
calculus complex-analysis algebra-precalculus geometry complex-numbers
1
If the numerator were $z_1-z_3$ instead of $z_1+z_3$, then the answer would be (b), because the information you're given would imply that two of the sides have equal length and the angle between those two sides is $60^circ$.
– grand_chat
Mar 25 '16 at 7:04
Hint: Shift the origin to any of $z_1, z_2, z_3$ to see the properties of triangle, as angles and sides are invariant under translation of origin.
– mea43
Mar 25 '16 at 7:10
You should edit your post: in fact it's $frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}=e^{-ifrac{pi }{3}}$ and $arg left(frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}right)=-frac{pi }{3}$. As @user21820, I don't think you can know much more about $z1,z2,z3$...
– Eddy Khemiri
Mar 25 '16 at 10:36
@mea43 Sir I tried for very long, but couldn't reach anywhere. Could you please help me?
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:01
@EddyKhemiri Edited, thanks for informing me.
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:03
add a comment |
The complex numbers $z_1,z_2,z_3$ satisfying $$dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}=dfrac{1-isqrt{3}}{2}$$ are the vertices of a triangle which is:
a) of area $0$
b) equilateral
c) right angled and isosceles
d) obtuse angled
$$$$
All I got was that from the Rotation Theorem, $$argleft(dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}right)=-pi/3$$ and that $$|z_1+z_3|=|z_2-z_3|$$
$$$$
Could somebody please show me how to solve this problem? Many thanks!
calculus complex-analysis algebra-precalculus geometry complex-numbers
The complex numbers $z_1,z_2,z_3$ satisfying $$dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}=dfrac{1-isqrt{3}}{2}$$ are the vertices of a triangle which is:
a) of area $0$
b) equilateral
c) right angled and isosceles
d) obtuse angled
$$$$
All I got was that from the Rotation Theorem, $$argleft(dfrac{z_1+z_3}{z_2-z_3}right)=-pi/3$$ and that $$|z_1+z_3|=|z_2-z_3|$$
$$$$
Could somebody please show me how to solve this problem? Many thanks!
calculus complex-analysis algebra-precalculus geometry complex-numbers
calculus complex-analysis algebra-precalculus geometry complex-numbers
edited Dec 6 at 11:13
user376343
2,7782822
2,7782822
asked Mar 25 '16 at 6:17
Better World
10018
10018
1
If the numerator were $z_1-z_3$ instead of $z_1+z_3$, then the answer would be (b), because the information you're given would imply that two of the sides have equal length and the angle between those two sides is $60^circ$.
– grand_chat
Mar 25 '16 at 7:04
Hint: Shift the origin to any of $z_1, z_2, z_3$ to see the properties of triangle, as angles and sides are invariant under translation of origin.
– mea43
Mar 25 '16 at 7:10
You should edit your post: in fact it's $frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}=e^{-ifrac{pi }{3}}$ and $arg left(frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}right)=-frac{pi }{3}$. As @user21820, I don't think you can know much more about $z1,z2,z3$...
– Eddy Khemiri
Mar 25 '16 at 10:36
@mea43 Sir I tried for very long, but couldn't reach anywhere. Could you please help me?
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:01
@EddyKhemiri Edited, thanks for informing me.
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:03
add a comment |
1
If the numerator were $z_1-z_3$ instead of $z_1+z_3$, then the answer would be (b), because the information you're given would imply that two of the sides have equal length and the angle between those two sides is $60^circ$.
– grand_chat
Mar 25 '16 at 7:04
Hint: Shift the origin to any of $z_1, z_2, z_3$ to see the properties of triangle, as angles and sides are invariant under translation of origin.
– mea43
Mar 25 '16 at 7:10
You should edit your post: in fact it's $frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}=e^{-ifrac{pi }{3}}$ and $arg left(frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}right)=-frac{pi }{3}$. As @user21820, I don't think you can know much more about $z1,z2,z3$...
– Eddy Khemiri
Mar 25 '16 at 10:36
@mea43 Sir I tried for very long, but couldn't reach anywhere. Could you please help me?
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:01
@EddyKhemiri Edited, thanks for informing me.
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:03
1
1
If the numerator were $z_1-z_3$ instead of $z_1+z_3$, then the answer would be (b), because the information you're given would imply that two of the sides have equal length and the angle between those two sides is $60^circ$.
– grand_chat
Mar 25 '16 at 7:04
If the numerator were $z_1-z_3$ instead of $z_1+z_3$, then the answer would be (b), because the information you're given would imply that two of the sides have equal length and the angle between those two sides is $60^circ$.
– grand_chat
Mar 25 '16 at 7:04
Hint: Shift the origin to any of $z_1, z_2, z_3$ to see the properties of triangle, as angles and sides are invariant under translation of origin.
– mea43
Mar 25 '16 at 7:10
Hint: Shift the origin to any of $z_1, z_2, z_3$ to see the properties of triangle, as angles and sides are invariant under translation of origin.
– mea43
Mar 25 '16 at 7:10
You should edit your post: in fact it's $frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}=e^{-ifrac{pi }{3}}$ and $arg left(frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}right)=-frac{pi }{3}$. As @user21820, I don't think you can know much more about $z1,z2,z3$...
– Eddy Khemiri
Mar 25 '16 at 10:36
You should edit your post: in fact it's $frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}=e^{-ifrac{pi }{3}}$ and $arg left(frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}right)=-frac{pi }{3}$. As @user21820, I don't think you can know much more about $z1,z2,z3$...
– Eddy Khemiri
Mar 25 '16 at 10:36
@mea43 Sir I tried for very long, but couldn't reach anywhere. Could you please help me?
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:01
@mea43 Sir I tried for very long, but couldn't reach anywhere. Could you please help me?
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:01
@EddyKhemiri Edited, thanks for informing me.
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:03
@EddyKhemiri Edited, thanks for informing me.
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is a problem with the problem. By what you have stated, we know that $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ are the vertices of an isosceles triangle with equal sides meeting at $120^circ$. But then we don't know anything much about $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$, because as you can see translating $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ around makes $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$ change shape.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1712635%2fgeometrical-applications-of-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is a problem with the problem. By what you have stated, we know that $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ are the vertices of an isosceles triangle with equal sides meeting at $120^circ$. But then we don't know anything much about $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$, because as you can see translating $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ around makes $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$ change shape.
add a comment |
There is a problem with the problem. By what you have stated, we know that $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ are the vertices of an isosceles triangle with equal sides meeting at $120^circ$. But then we don't know anything much about $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$, because as you can see translating $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ around makes $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$ change shape.
add a comment |
There is a problem with the problem. By what you have stated, we know that $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ are the vertices of an isosceles triangle with equal sides meeting at $120^circ$. But then we don't know anything much about $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$, because as you can see translating $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ around makes $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$ change shape.
There is a problem with the problem. By what you have stated, we know that $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ are the vertices of an isosceles triangle with equal sides meeting at $120^circ$. But then we don't know anything much about $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$, because as you can see translating $(-z_1,z_2,z_3)$ around makes $(z_1,z_2,z_3)$ change shape.
answered Mar 25 '16 at 9:09
user21820
38.6k542153
38.6k542153
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1712635%2fgeometrical-applications-of-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
If the numerator were $z_1-z_3$ instead of $z_1+z_3$, then the answer would be (b), because the information you're given would imply that two of the sides have equal length and the angle between those two sides is $60^circ$.
– grand_chat
Mar 25 '16 at 7:04
Hint: Shift the origin to any of $z_1, z_2, z_3$ to see the properties of triangle, as angles and sides are invariant under translation of origin.
– mea43
Mar 25 '16 at 7:10
You should edit your post: in fact it's $frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}=e^{-ifrac{pi }{3}}$ and $arg left(frac{text{z1}+text{z3}}{text{z2}-text{z3}}right)=-frac{pi }{3}$. As @user21820, I don't think you can know much more about $z1,z2,z3$...
– Eddy Khemiri
Mar 25 '16 at 10:36
@mea43 Sir I tried for very long, but couldn't reach anywhere. Could you please help me?
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:01
@EddyKhemiri Edited, thanks for informing me.
– Better World
Mar 25 '16 at 11:03