Let $f:[0,1]to [-1,1]$ be arbitrary and define $g(x)=suplimits_{aleq tleq x}|f(t)|.$ Must $g$ be Riemann...
Let $f:[0,1]to [-1,1]$ be arbitrary and define $g(x)=suplimits_{aleq tleq x}|f(t)|.$ Must $g$ be Riemann integrable?
I'm of the feeling that $g$ is not Riemann integrable but I can't find a concrete example. Any help out there?
real-analysis integration analysis riemann-integration
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
add a comment |
Let $f:[0,1]to [-1,1]$ be arbitrary and define $g(x)=suplimits_{aleq tleq x}|f(t)|.$ Must $g$ be Riemann integrable?
I'm of the feeling that $g$ is not Riemann integrable but I can't find a concrete example. Any help out there?
real-analysis integration analysis riemann-integration
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
add a comment |
Let $f:[0,1]to [-1,1]$ be arbitrary and define $g(x)=suplimits_{aleq tleq x}|f(t)|.$ Must $g$ be Riemann integrable?
I'm of the feeling that $g$ is not Riemann integrable but I can't find a concrete example. Any help out there?
real-analysis integration analysis riemann-integration
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
Let $f:[0,1]to [-1,1]$ be arbitrary and define $g(x)=suplimits_{aleq tleq x}|f(t)|.$ Must $g$ be Riemann integrable?
I'm of the feeling that $g$ is not Riemann integrable but I can't find a concrete example. Any help out there?
real-analysis integration analysis riemann-integration
real-analysis integration analysis riemann-integration
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
asked Sep 7 at 10:19
Micheal
24810
24810
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The function $g$ is an increasing function. And a monotonic function defined on a closed and bounded interval is always Riemann-integrable. For instance, it has only countably many discontinuity points and therefore the set of discontinuity points has Lebesgue measure equal to $0$.
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
1
To the asker: Riemann integrability of monotone function can be proved directly using the criteria based on difference of upper and lower Darboux sums. This avoids the slightly more complicated route based on Lebesgue's theorem mentioned in the answer.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 7 at 15:20
@José Carlos Santos: I have not yet done Lebesgue measure. Please, can you give me an example that suits Riemann integration?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 5:43
@Micheal You will find here a proof of the fact that monotonic $implies$ Riemann-integrable.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 8 at 6:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908485%2flet-f0-1-to-1-1-be-arbitrary-and-define-gx-sup-limits-a-leq-t-leq-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The function $g$ is an increasing function. And a monotonic function defined on a closed and bounded interval is always Riemann-integrable. For instance, it has only countably many discontinuity points and therefore the set of discontinuity points has Lebesgue measure equal to $0$.
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
1
To the asker: Riemann integrability of monotone function can be proved directly using the criteria based on difference of upper and lower Darboux sums. This avoids the slightly more complicated route based on Lebesgue's theorem mentioned in the answer.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 7 at 15:20
@José Carlos Santos: I have not yet done Lebesgue measure. Please, can you give me an example that suits Riemann integration?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 5:43
@Micheal You will find here a proof of the fact that monotonic $implies$ Riemann-integrable.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 8 at 6:38
add a comment |
The function $g$ is an increasing function. And a monotonic function defined on a closed and bounded interval is always Riemann-integrable. For instance, it has only countably many discontinuity points and therefore the set of discontinuity points has Lebesgue measure equal to $0$.
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
1
To the asker: Riemann integrability of monotone function can be proved directly using the criteria based on difference of upper and lower Darboux sums. This avoids the slightly more complicated route based on Lebesgue's theorem mentioned in the answer.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 7 at 15:20
@José Carlos Santos: I have not yet done Lebesgue measure. Please, can you give me an example that suits Riemann integration?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 5:43
@Micheal You will find here a proof of the fact that monotonic $implies$ Riemann-integrable.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 8 at 6:38
add a comment |
The function $g$ is an increasing function. And a monotonic function defined on a closed and bounded interval is always Riemann-integrable. For instance, it has only countably many discontinuity points and therefore the set of discontinuity points has Lebesgue measure equal to $0$.
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
The function $g$ is an increasing function. And a monotonic function defined on a closed and bounded interval is always Riemann-integrable. For instance, it has only countably many discontinuity points and therefore the set of discontinuity points has Lebesgue measure equal to $0$.
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
edited Dec 6 at 7:09
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
answered Sep 7 at 10:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
148k22117218
1
To the asker: Riemann integrability of monotone function can be proved directly using the criteria based on difference of upper and lower Darboux sums. This avoids the slightly more complicated route based on Lebesgue's theorem mentioned in the answer.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 7 at 15:20
@José Carlos Santos: I have not yet done Lebesgue measure. Please, can you give me an example that suits Riemann integration?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 5:43
@Micheal You will find here a proof of the fact that monotonic $implies$ Riemann-integrable.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 8 at 6:38
add a comment |
1
To the asker: Riemann integrability of monotone function can be proved directly using the criteria based on difference of upper and lower Darboux sums. This avoids the slightly more complicated route based on Lebesgue's theorem mentioned in the answer.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 7 at 15:20
@José Carlos Santos: I have not yet done Lebesgue measure. Please, can you give me an example that suits Riemann integration?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 5:43
@Micheal You will find here a proof of the fact that monotonic $implies$ Riemann-integrable.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 8 at 6:38
1
1
To the asker: Riemann integrability of monotone function can be proved directly using the criteria based on difference of upper and lower Darboux sums. This avoids the slightly more complicated route based on Lebesgue's theorem mentioned in the answer.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 7 at 15:20
To the asker: Riemann integrability of monotone function can be proved directly using the criteria based on difference of upper and lower Darboux sums. This avoids the slightly more complicated route based on Lebesgue's theorem mentioned in the answer.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 7 at 15:20
@José Carlos Santos: I have not yet done Lebesgue measure. Please, can you give me an example that suits Riemann integration?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 5:43
@José Carlos Santos: I have not yet done Lebesgue measure. Please, can you give me an example that suits Riemann integration?
– Micheal
Sep 8 at 5:43
@Micheal You will find here a proof of the fact that monotonic $implies$ Riemann-integrable.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 8 at 6:38
@Micheal You will find here a proof of the fact that monotonic $implies$ Riemann-integrable.
– José Carlos Santos
Sep 8 at 6:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2908485%2flet-f0-1-to-1-1-be-arbitrary-and-define-gx-sup-limits-a-leq-t-leq-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
