Finding $suplimits_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}$











up vote
3
down vote

favorite













c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$



d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,



$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$



Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.




This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.



I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.



UPDATE:



$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 19:15












  • @OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 27 at 19:55










  • Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 21:46















up vote
3
down vote

favorite













c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$



d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,



$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$



Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.




This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.



I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.



UPDATE:



$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 19:15












  • @OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 27 at 19:55










  • Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 21:46













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite












c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$



d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,



$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$



Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.




This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.



I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.



UPDATE:



$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?










share|cite|improve this question
















c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$



d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,



$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$



Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.




This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.



I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.



UPDATE:



$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?







real-analysis supremum-and-infimum






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 1 at 3:26









user302797

19.4k92251




19.4k92251










asked Nov 27 at 19:09









Lucas Zanella

86911330




86911330








  • 2




    c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 19:15












  • @OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 27 at 19:55










  • Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 21:46














  • 2




    c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 19:15












  • @OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 27 at 19:55










  • Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
    – Olivier Moschetta
    Nov 27 at 21:46








2




2




c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15






c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15














@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55




@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55












Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46




Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted
+50










$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}



For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$

thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}

It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$

Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
    – Lucas Zanella
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016177%2ffinding-sup-limits-lambda-ge-0-lambdake-a-lambda2-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted
+50










$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}



For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$

thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}

It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$

Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
    – Lucas Zanella
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote



accepted
+50










$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}



For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$

thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}

It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$

Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
    – Lucas Zanella
    2 days ago













up vote
1
down vote



accepted
+50







up vote
1
down vote



accepted
+50




+50




$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}



For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$

thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}

It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$

Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.






share|cite|improve this answer












$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}



For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$

thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}

It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$

Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 1 at 3:23









user302797

19.4k92251




19.4k92251












  • thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
    – Lucas Zanella
    2 days ago


















  • thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
    – Lucas Zanella
    2 days ago
















thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago




thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016177%2ffinding-sup-limits-lambda-ge-0-lambdake-a-lambda2-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna