Finding $suplimits_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}$
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$
d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,
$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$
Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.
This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.
I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.
UPDATE:
$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?
real-analysis supremum-and-infimum
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$
d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,
$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$
Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.
This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.
I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.
UPDATE:
$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?
real-analysis supremum-and-infimum
2
c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15
@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55
Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$
d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,
$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$
Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.
This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.
I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.
UPDATE:
$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?
real-analysis supremum-and-infimum
c) Let $a>0$. Find, for each $k=0,1,cdots$,
$$sup_{lambdage 0}{lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}}.$$
d) Define, for $xinmathbb{R}$,
$$v(x) = int_{mathbb{R}}e^{ixlambda-alambda^2} dλ.$$
Show that $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $1/2$ on $mathbb{R}$.
This question arises in context with $sup_K |partial^{alpha}u|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ then $u$ is analytic for $sle 1$ where the Gevrey class is defined.
I believe they are closely reated. I know that for d) I have to show that $suplimits_K |partial^{alpha}v|le C^{|alpha|+1}alpha!^s$ and I believe that the $1/2$ from c) will appear in the $s$ of the Gevrey class.
UPDATE:
$$frac{d}{dx}lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2} =e^{-(a lambda^2)/2} lambda^{-1 + k} (k - a lambda^2)=0implies k = alambda^2implies lambda = pmfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}},$$
so the sup is the value of $lambda^ke^{-alambda^2/2}$ at $-dfrac{sqrt{k}}{sqrt{a}}$? I think I need a stronger argument. How to show it is actually the sup?
real-analysis supremum-and-infimum
real-analysis supremum-and-infimum
edited Dec 1 at 3:26
user302797
19.4k92251
19.4k92251
asked Nov 27 at 19:09
Lucas Zanella
86911330
86911330
2
c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15
@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55
Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46
add a comment |
2
c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15
@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55
Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46
2
2
c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15
c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15
@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55
@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55
Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46
Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}
For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$
thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}
It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$
Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.
thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}
For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$
thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}
It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$
Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.
thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}
For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$
thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}
It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$
Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.
thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}
For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$
thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}
It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$
Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.
$defd{mathrm{d}}defe{mathrm{e}}defi{mathrm{i}}defR{mathbb{R}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$For (c), if denoting $f(λ) = kln λ - dfrac{1}{2}aλ^2$ ($λ > 0$), then $f'(λ) = dfrac{k}{λ} - aλ$ implies that $f$ is increasing on $left( 0, sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}} right]$ and decreasing on $left[ sqrt{dfrac{k}{a}}, +∞ right)$. Thus,begin{align*}
&peq sup_{λ geqslant 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) = sup_{λ > 0} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right)\
&= sup_{λ > 0} exp(f(λ)) = expleft( fleft( sqrt{frac{k}{a}} right) right) = left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}}.
end{align*}
For (d), the dominated convergence theorem and induction imply that for $k geqslant 0$,$$
v^{(k)}(x) = i^k int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ, quad forall x in R
$$
thus for $x in R$,begin{align*}
|v^{(k)}(x)| &= left| int_{R} λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right) ,d λ right| leqslant int_{R} |λ^k expleft( i xλ - aλ^2 right)| ,d λ\
&= int_{R} |λ|^k e^{-aλ^2} ,d λ = 2 int_0^{+∞} λ^k expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) · expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ\
&leqslant 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} int_0^{+∞} expleft( -frac{1}{2} aλ^2 right) ,d λ = 2 left( frac{k}{e a} right)^{frac{k}{2}} sqrt{frac{a}{2π}}. tag{1}
end{align*}
It is easy to prove by induction that $left( dfrac{k}{e} right)^k leqslant k!$ for $k geqslant 0$, thus (1) implies that$$
|v^{(k)}(x)| leqslant sqrt{frac{2a}{π}} · (a^{-frac{1}{2}})^k · sqrt{k!}. quad forall x in R
$$
Therefore, $v$ belongs to the Gevrey class of order $dfrac{1}{2}$ on $R$.
answered Dec 1 at 3:23
user302797
19.4k92251
19.4k92251
thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago
add a comment |
thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago
thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago
thank you. I just opened two more bounties on thigns related to this question, would be nice if you could take a look math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018750/… math.stackexchange.com/questions/3018740/…
– Lucas Zanella
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016177%2ffinding-sup-limits-lambda-ge-0-lambdake-a-lambda2-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
c) looks fairly easy by differentiating this function of $lambda$.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 19:15
@OlivierMoschetta please take a look at my update
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 27 at 19:55
Well $lambdageq 0$ by assumption so only the root $+sqrt{k/a}$ is of interest. You can show by examining the derivative that $f$ is increasing on $[0,sqrt{k/a}]$, then decreases so that the maximum is taken there.
– Olivier Moschetta
Nov 27 at 21:46