Number of products of powers of primes less than n
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there a bound for the number of products of powers of a set of prime numbers less than a given number n? For instance, if I am given the set of prime numbers {2,7,11,13} and I am only interested in products of powers of primes less than 32, then there are twelve products of powers of these primes numbers: $2=2^1$, $4=2^2$, $7=7^1$, $8=2^3$, $11=11^1$, $13=13^1$, $14=2^1cdot 7^1$, $16=2^4$, $22=2^1cdot 11^1$, $26=2^1cdot 13^1$, $28=2^2cdot 7^1$, and $32=2^5$.
I know people have asked about estimating the number of products of primes less than n and estimating the number of prime powers less than n. I am looking for a combination of these two questions.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there a bound for the number of products of powers of a set of prime numbers less than a given number n? For instance, if I am given the set of prime numbers {2,7,11,13} and I am only interested in products of powers of primes less than 32, then there are twelve products of powers of these primes numbers: $2=2^1$, $4=2^2$, $7=7^1$, $8=2^3$, $11=11^1$, $13=13^1$, $14=2^1cdot 7^1$, $16=2^4$, $22=2^1cdot 11^1$, $26=2^1cdot 13^1$, $28=2^2cdot 7^1$, and $32=2^5$.
I know people have asked about estimating the number of products of primes less than n and estimating the number of prime powers less than n. I am looking for a combination of these two questions.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
N is given, are the primes given as well?Or you mean ANY set of primes under n?
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:07
If the primes aren't given, then you would end up knowing quantity of primes under every natural!
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:09
I guess I was not clear enough. If I am given a set of prime numbers as I did above {2,7,11,13}, how many numbers are a product of powers of those prime numbers? In the example above, there are twelve. I will edit the problem to reflect my original intention.
– John Asplund
Dec 5 at 17:31
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there a bound for the number of products of powers of a set of prime numbers less than a given number n? For instance, if I am given the set of prime numbers {2,7,11,13} and I am only interested in products of powers of primes less than 32, then there are twelve products of powers of these primes numbers: $2=2^1$, $4=2^2$, $7=7^1$, $8=2^3$, $11=11^1$, $13=13^1$, $14=2^1cdot 7^1$, $16=2^4$, $22=2^1cdot 11^1$, $26=2^1cdot 13^1$, $28=2^2cdot 7^1$, and $32=2^5$.
I know people have asked about estimating the number of products of primes less than n and estimating the number of prime powers less than n. I am looking for a combination of these two questions.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
Is there a bound for the number of products of powers of a set of prime numbers less than a given number n? For instance, if I am given the set of prime numbers {2,7,11,13} and I am only interested in products of powers of primes less than 32, then there are twelve products of powers of these primes numbers: $2=2^1$, $4=2^2$, $7=7^1$, $8=2^3$, $11=11^1$, $13=13^1$, $14=2^1cdot 7^1$, $16=2^4$, $22=2^1cdot 11^1$, $26=2^1cdot 13^1$, $28=2^2cdot 7^1$, and $32=2^5$.
I know people have asked about estimating the number of products of primes less than n and estimating the number of prime powers less than n. I am looking for a combination of these two questions.
number-theory elementary-number-theory
number-theory elementary-number-theory
edited Dec 5 at 17:35
asked Dec 5 at 12:11
John Asplund
386
386
N is given, are the primes given as well?Or you mean ANY set of primes under n?
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:07
If the primes aren't given, then you would end up knowing quantity of primes under every natural!
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:09
I guess I was not clear enough. If I am given a set of prime numbers as I did above {2,7,11,13}, how many numbers are a product of powers of those prime numbers? In the example above, there are twelve. I will edit the problem to reflect my original intention.
– John Asplund
Dec 5 at 17:31
add a comment |
N is given, are the primes given as well?Or you mean ANY set of primes under n?
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:07
If the primes aren't given, then you would end up knowing quantity of primes under every natural!
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:09
I guess I was not clear enough. If I am given a set of prime numbers as I did above {2,7,11,13}, how many numbers are a product of powers of those prime numbers? In the example above, there are twelve. I will edit the problem to reflect my original intention.
– John Asplund
Dec 5 at 17:31
N is given, are the primes given as well?Or you mean ANY set of primes under n?
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:07
N is given, are the primes given as well?Or you mean ANY set of primes under n?
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:07
If the primes aren't given, then you would end up knowing quantity of primes under every natural!
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:09
If the primes aren't given, then you would end up knowing quantity of primes under every natural!
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:09
I guess I was not clear enough. If I am given a set of prime numbers as I did above {2,7,11,13}, how many numbers are a product of powers of those prime numbers? In the example above, there are twelve. I will edit the problem to reflect my original intention.
– John Asplund
Dec 5 at 17:31
I guess I was not clear enough. If I am given a set of prime numbers as I did above {2,7,11,13}, how many numbers are a product of powers of those prime numbers? In the example above, there are twelve. I will edit the problem to reflect my original intention.
– John Asplund
Dec 5 at 17:31
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I thougth of this : you want to maximize the function Z = 2$^a$ + 7$^b$ + 11$^c$ + 13$^d$ , whenever z $leq$ n. You may "linearize" this function by taking natural logarithm.
By means of linear simplex method, you may find the máxima...
Then you may try and analize which 4 - tuples (a,b,c,d) with integer coordinates are nearest the máxima found . Since exponentiating and taking logarithm are continous, taking "nearby" tuples should work.
I will try to find a more combinatorial answer, though. It is a very interesting question.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026992%2fnumber-of-products-of-powers-of-primes-less-than-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I thougth of this : you want to maximize the function Z = 2$^a$ + 7$^b$ + 11$^c$ + 13$^d$ , whenever z $leq$ n. You may "linearize" this function by taking natural logarithm.
By means of linear simplex method, you may find the máxima...
Then you may try and analize which 4 - tuples (a,b,c,d) with integer coordinates are nearest the máxima found . Since exponentiating and taking logarithm are continous, taking "nearby" tuples should work.
I will try to find a more combinatorial answer, though. It is a very interesting question.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I thougth of this : you want to maximize the function Z = 2$^a$ + 7$^b$ + 11$^c$ + 13$^d$ , whenever z $leq$ n. You may "linearize" this function by taking natural logarithm.
By means of linear simplex method, you may find the máxima...
Then you may try and analize which 4 - tuples (a,b,c,d) with integer coordinates are nearest the máxima found . Since exponentiating and taking logarithm are continous, taking "nearby" tuples should work.
I will try to find a more combinatorial answer, though. It is a very interesting question.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I thougth of this : you want to maximize the function Z = 2$^a$ + 7$^b$ + 11$^c$ + 13$^d$ , whenever z $leq$ n. You may "linearize" this function by taking natural logarithm.
By means of linear simplex method, you may find the máxima...
Then you may try and analize which 4 - tuples (a,b,c,d) with integer coordinates are nearest the máxima found . Since exponentiating and taking logarithm are continous, taking "nearby" tuples should work.
I will try to find a more combinatorial answer, though. It is a very interesting question.
I thougth of this : you want to maximize the function Z = 2$^a$ + 7$^b$ + 11$^c$ + 13$^d$ , whenever z $leq$ n. You may "linearize" this function by taking natural logarithm.
By means of linear simplex method, you may find the máxima...
Then you may try and analize which 4 - tuples (a,b,c,d) with integer coordinates are nearest the máxima found . Since exponentiating and taking logarithm are continous, taking "nearby" tuples should work.
I will try to find a more combinatorial answer, though. It is a very interesting question.
answered Dec 5 at 18:14
vanmeri
658
658
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026992%2fnumber-of-products-of-powers-of-primes-less-than-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
N is given, are the primes given as well?Or you mean ANY set of primes under n?
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:07
If the primes aren't given, then you would end up knowing quantity of primes under every natural!
– vanmeri
Dec 5 at 13:09
I guess I was not clear enough. If I am given a set of prime numbers as I did above {2,7,11,13}, how many numbers are a product of powers of those prime numbers? In the example above, there are twelve. I will edit the problem to reflect my original intention.
– John Asplund
Dec 5 at 17:31