positive linear combination of quasi-concave functions
I have a question that I cannot manage to get around. I need to answer the following:
Give an example to 2 quasi-concave functions on an interval such that
any positive linear combination of these two functions is not
quasi-concave.
Now, I understand the property that states that concavity is preserved by negative linear combinations. So my first question is, is the contrary always true? That is, that concavity is not respected by positive linear combinations?
If this is not the case always, my main issue here is how to get an example that clearly shows the above for ANY positive linear combination. I imagine this would require an example and a proof but I cannot work around this and to the best of my knowledge this is not covered by another thread.
Thanks in advance, any help would be useful
convex-analysis
add a comment |
I have a question that I cannot manage to get around. I need to answer the following:
Give an example to 2 quasi-concave functions on an interval such that
any positive linear combination of these two functions is not
quasi-concave.
Now, I understand the property that states that concavity is preserved by negative linear combinations. So my first question is, is the contrary always true? That is, that concavity is not respected by positive linear combinations?
If this is not the case always, my main issue here is how to get an example that clearly shows the above for ANY positive linear combination. I imagine this would require an example and a proof but I cannot work around this and to the best of my knowledge this is not covered by another thread.
Thanks in advance, any help would be useful
convex-analysis
add a comment |
I have a question that I cannot manage to get around. I need to answer the following:
Give an example to 2 quasi-concave functions on an interval such that
any positive linear combination of these two functions is not
quasi-concave.
Now, I understand the property that states that concavity is preserved by negative linear combinations. So my first question is, is the contrary always true? That is, that concavity is not respected by positive linear combinations?
If this is not the case always, my main issue here is how to get an example that clearly shows the above for ANY positive linear combination. I imagine this would require an example and a proof but I cannot work around this and to the best of my knowledge this is not covered by another thread.
Thanks in advance, any help would be useful
convex-analysis
I have a question that I cannot manage to get around. I need to answer the following:
Give an example to 2 quasi-concave functions on an interval such that
any positive linear combination of these two functions is not
quasi-concave.
Now, I understand the property that states that concavity is preserved by negative linear combinations. So my first question is, is the contrary always true? That is, that concavity is not respected by positive linear combinations?
If this is not the case always, my main issue here is how to get an example that clearly shows the above for ANY positive linear combination. I imagine this would require an example and a proof but I cannot work around this and to the best of my knowledge this is not covered by another thread.
Thanks in advance, any help would be useful
convex-analysis
convex-analysis
asked Dec 9 at 15:29
user20105
82
82
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The function $xmapsto sqrt |x|$ is quasi-convex. Let me show that the function
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{|x-1|} + b sqrt{|x+1|}
$$
is not quasi-convex for all $a,b>0$.
The points $x=-1$ and $x=1$ are local minima of $f$.
On the interval $(-1,1)$ the function $f$ reduces to
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{1-x} + b sqrt{x+1},
$$
which is a strictly concave function. Hence, $f$ has a local maximum $x^*in (-1,1)$ with $f(x^*) > max (f(-1),f(1))$.
Now let me choose a sub-level set that contains $1$ and $-1$ but not $x^*$.
Then the sub-level set
$$
left{x : f(x) le frac{f(x^*)+max (f(-1),f(1))}2right}
$$
contains $-1,1$ but not $x^*$. Hence this level set is not convex, and $f$ is not quasi-convex.
Note that $-f$ is not quasi-concave, but is the sum of two quasi-concave functions. So is is the example you are looking for.
Thanks for your answer but I am failing to see how this answers the question, would you mind further explaining?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 14:56
I expanded the answer. Could you be more specific? What argument is difficult to understand?
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:06
I am looking for two quasi-concave functions on an interval such that any positive linear combination of these is not quasi-concave. Here on the interval (-1,1) the function f(x) is the sum of two concave functions, it is concave and the level set is not convex. I apologize for the confusion but how is f(x) an example of a linear combination of two quasiconcave functions with f(x) not quasi-concave?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:31
The function $-f$ on the interval $[-2,2]$ is the counterexample: it is the sum of two quasi-concave functions, but not quasi-concave. Note the minus sign. It was easier for me two write the example for quasi-convex. To get to quasi-concave, you have multiply by $-1$ everything.
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:41
I see it! Thank you for the answer and the explanation!
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032500%2fpositive-linear-combination-of-quasi-concave-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The function $xmapsto sqrt |x|$ is quasi-convex. Let me show that the function
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{|x-1|} + b sqrt{|x+1|}
$$
is not quasi-convex for all $a,b>0$.
The points $x=-1$ and $x=1$ are local minima of $f$.
On the interval $(-1,1)$ the function $f$ reduces to
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{1-x} + b sqrt{x+1},
$$
which is a strictly concave function. Hence, $f$ has a local maximum $x^*in (-1,1)$ with $f(x^*) > max (f(-1),f(1))$.
Now let me choose a sub-level set that contains $1$ and $-1$ but not $x^*$.
Then the sub-level set
$$
left{x : f(x) le frac{f(x^*)+max (f(-1),f(1))}2right}
$$
contains $-1,1$ but not $x^*$. Hence this level set is not convex, and $f$ is not quasi-convex.
Note that $-f$ is not quasi-concave, but is the sum of two quasi-concave functions. So is is the example you are looking for.
Thanks for your answer but I am failing to see how this answers the question, would you mind further explaining?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 14:56
I expanded the answer. Could you be more specific? What argument is difficult to understand?
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:06
I am looking for two quasi-concave functions on an interval such that any positive linear combination of these is not quasi-concave. Here on the interval (-1,1) the function f(x) is the sum of two concave functions, it is concave and the level set is not convex. I apologize for the confusion but how is f(x) an example of a linear combination of two quasiconcave functions with f(x) not quasi-concave?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:31
The function $-f$ on the interval $[-2,2]$ is the counterexample: it is the sum of two quasi-concave functions, but not quasi-concave. Note the minus sign. It was easier for me two write the example for quasi-convex. To get to quasi-concave, you have multiply by $-1$ everything.
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:41
I see it! Thank you for the answer and the explanation!
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:47
add a comment |
The function $xmapsto sqrt |x|$ is quasi-convex. Let me show that the function
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{|x-1|} + b sqrt{|x+1|}
$$
is not quasi-convex for all $a,b>0$.
The points $x=-1$ and $x=1$ are local minima of $f$.
On the interval $(-1,1)$ the function $f$ reduces to
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{1-x} + b sqrt{x+1},
$$
which is a strictly concave function. Hence, $f$ has a local maximum $x^*in (-1,1)$ with $f(x^*) > max (f(-1),f(1))$.
Now let me choose a sub-level set that contains $1$ and $-1$ but not $x^*$.
Then the sub-level set
$$
left{x : f(x) le frac{f(x^*)+max (f(-1),f(1))}2right}
$$
contains $-1,1$ but not $x^*$. Hence this level set is not convex, and $f$ is not quasi-convex.
Note that $-f$ is not quasi-concave, but is the sum of two quasi-concave functions. So is is the example you are looking for.
Thanks for your answer but I am failing to see how this answers the question, would you mind further explaining?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 14:56
I expanded the answer. Could you be more specific? What argument is difficult to understand?
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:06
I am looking for two quasi-concave functions on an interval such that any positive linear combination of these is not quasi-concave. Here on the interval (-1,1) the function f(x) is the sum of two concave functions, it is concave and the level set is not convex. I apologize for the confusion but how is f(x) an example of a linear combination of two quasiconcave functions with f(x) not quasi-concave?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:31
The function $-f$ on the interval $[-2,2]$ is the counterexample: it is the sum of two quasi-concave functions, but not quasi-concave. Note the minus sign. It was easier for me two write the example for quasi-convex. To get to quasi-concave, you have multiply by $-1$ everything.
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:41
I see it! Thank you for the answer and the explanation!
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:47
add a comment |
The function $xmapsto sqrt |x|$ is quasi-convex. Let me show that the function
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{|x-1|} + b sqrt{|x+1|}
$$
is not quasi-convex for all $a,b>0$.
The points $x=-1$ and $x=1$ are local minima of $f$.
On the interval $(-1,1)$ the function $f$ reduces to
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{1-x} + b sqrt{x+1},
$$
which is a strictly concave function. Hence, $f$ has a local maximum $x^*in (-1,1)$ with $f(x^*) > max (f(-1),f(1))$.
Now let me choose a sub-level set that contains $1$ and $-1$ but not $x^*$.
Then the sub-level set
$$
left{x : f(x) le frac{f(x^*)+max (f(-1),f(1))}2right}
$$
contains $-1,1$ but not $x^*$. Hence this level set is not convex, and $f$ is not quasi-convex.
Note that $-f$ is not quasi-concave, but is the sum of two quasi-concave functions. So is is the example you are looking for.
The function $xmapsto sqrt |x|$ is quasi-convex. Let me show that the function
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{|x-1|} + b sqrt{|x+1|}
$$
is not quasi-convex for all $a,b>0$.
The points $x=-1$ and $x=1$ are local minima of $f$.
On the interval $(-1,1)$ the function $f$ reduces to
$$
f(x) = a sqrt{1-x} + b sqrt{x+1},
$$
which is a strictly concave function. Hence, $f$ has a local maximum $x^*in (-1,1)$ with $f(x^*) > max (f(-1),f(1))$.
Now let me choose a sub-level set that contains $1$ and $-1$ but not $x^*$.
Then the sub-level set
$$
left{x : f(x) le frac{f(x^*)+max (f(-1),f(1))}2right}
$$
contains $-1,1$ but not $x^*$. Hence this level set is not convex, and $f$ is not quasi-convex.
Note that $-f$ is not quasi-concave, but is the sum of two quasi-concave functions. So is is the example you are looking for.
edited Dec 13 at 15:06
answered Dec 11 at 8:03
daw
24k1544
24k1544
Thanks for your answer but I am failing to see how this answers the question, would you mind further explaining?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 14:56
I expanded the answer. Could you be more specific? What argument is difficult to understand?
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:06
I am looking for two quasi-concave functions on an interval such that any positive linear combination of these is not quasi-concave. Here on the interval (-1,1) the function f(x) is the sum of two concave functions, it is concave and the level set is not convex. I apologize for the confusion but how is f(x) an example of a linear combination of two quasiconcave functions with f(x) not quasi-concave?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:31
The function $-f$ on the interval $[-2,2]$ is the counterexample: it is the sum of two quasi-concave functions, but not quasi-concave. Note the minus sign. It was easier for me two write the example for quasi-convex. To get to quasi-concave, you have multiply by $-1$ everything.
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:41
I see it! Thank you for the answer and the explanation!
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:47
add a comment |
Thanks for your answer but I am failing to see how this answers the question, would you mind further explaining?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 14:56
I expanded the answer. Could you be more specific? What argument is difficult to understand?
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:06
I am looking for two quasi-concave functions on an interval such that any positive linear combination of these is not quasi-concave. Here on the interval (-1,1) the function f(x) is the sum of two concave functions, it is concave and the level set is not convex. I apologize for the confusion but how is f(x) an example of a linear combination of two quasiconcave functions with f(x) not quasi-concave?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:31
The function $-f$ on the interval $[-2,2]$ is the counterexample: it is the sum of two quasi-concave functions, but not quasi-concave. Note the minus sign. It was easier for me two write the example for quasi-convex. To get to quasi-concave, you have multiply by $-1$ everything.
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:41
I see it! Thank you for the answer and the explanation!
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:47
Thanks for your answer but I am failing to see how this answers the question, would you mind further explaining?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 14:56
Thanks for your answer but I am failing to see how this answers the question, would you mind further explaining?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 14:56
I expanded the answer. Could you be more specific? What argument is difficult to understand?
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:06
I expanded the answer. Could you be more specific? What argument is difficult to understand?
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:06
I am looking for two quasi-concave functions on an interval such that any positive linear combination of these is not quasi-concave. Here on the interval (-1,1) the function f(x) is the sum of two concave functions, it is concave and the level set is not convex. I apologize for the confusion but how is f(x) an example of a linear combination of two quasiconcave functions with f(x) not quasi-concave?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:31
I am looking for two quasi-concave functions on an interval such that any positive linear combination of these is not quasi-concave. Here on the interval (-1,1) the function f(x) is the sum of two concave functions, it is concave and the level set is not convex. I apologize for the confusion but how is f(x) an example of a linear combination of two quasiconcave functions with f(x) not quasi-concave?
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:31
The function $-f$ on the interval $[-2,2]$ is the counterexample: it is the sum of two quasi-concave functions, but not quasi-concave. Note the minus sign. It was easier for me two write the example for quasi-convex. To get to quasi-concave, you have multiply by $-1$ everything.
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:41
The function $-f$ on the interval $[-2,2]$ is the counterexample: it is the sum of two quasi-concave functions, but not quasi-concave. Note the minus sign. It was easier for me two write the example for quasi-convex. To get to quasi-concave, you have multiply by $-1$ everything.
– daw
Dec 13 at 15:41
I see it! Thank you for the answer and the explanation!
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:47
I see it! Thank you for the answer and the explanation!
– user20105
Dec 13 at 15:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032500%2fpositive-linear-combination-of-quasi-concave-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown