$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}$ true for all $x$?












0















$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}dfrac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}$ true for all $x$ ?




This expression is found without mentioning the domain of $x,y,z$, but I don't think its true for all $x,y,z$ as the case with the expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y$, but I have trouble proving it.



So what is the complete expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z$ ?



begin{align}
tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z&=
begin{cases}tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy < 1 \[1.5ex]
pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y>0 \[1.5ex]
-pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y<0 end{cases}\
&=
end{align}










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Well ... apart from restrictions of a similar nature that apply to the arguments of the formula for two variables ie in that case xy<1 . I seem to remember, when I once checked this out for the general case of n variables, that you get the odd symmetric polynomials of degree ≤ n in the numerator & the even symmetric [ ditto ] in the denominator ... something like that, anyway.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 5 at 18:56












  • I'm beginning to get the gist of your question now I think - I glossed over it a bit at first ... are you saying that when you go beyond two variables you lose the property of it being valid ∀ possible values of whatever variables it imports (provided the other branches of atn be admitted) ... that even if you do admit these other branches that property ceases by reason of going from two to three variables? That would be strange if it were so, and I would not have thought it were so ... but I can see how it might actually be something we can't safely assume by default.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 6 at 7:49


















0















$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}dfrac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}$ true for all $x$ ?




This expression is found without mentioning the domain of $x,y,z$, but I don't think its true for all $x,y,z$ as the case with the expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y$, but I have trouble proving it.



So what is the complete expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z$ ?



begin{align}
tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z&=
begin{cases}tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy < 1 \[1.5ex]
pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y>0 \[1.5ex]
-pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y<0 end{cases}\
&=
end{align}










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Well ... apart from restrictions of a similar nature that apply to the arguments of the formula for two variables ie in that case xy<1 . I seem to remember, when I once checked this out for the general case of n variables, that you get the odd symmetric polynomials of degree ≤ n in the numerator & the even symmetric [ ditto ] in the denominator ... something like that, anyway.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 5 at 18:56












  • I'm beginning to get the gist of your question now I think - I glossed over it a bit at first ... are you saying that when you go beyond two variables you lose the property of it being valid ∀ possible values of whatever variables it imports (provided the other branches of atn be admitted) ... that even if you do admit these other branches that property ceases by reason of going from two to three variables? That would be strange if it were so, and I would not have thought it were so ... but I can see how it might actually be something we can't safely assume by default.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 6 at 7:49
















0












0








0








$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}dfrac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}$ true for all $x$ ?




This expression is found without mentioning the domain of $x,y,z$, but I don't think its true for all $x,y,z$ as the case with the expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y$, but I have trouble proving it.



So what is the complete expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z$ ?



begin{align}
tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z&=
begin{cases}tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy < 1 \[1.5ex]
pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y>0 \[1.5ex]
-pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y<0 end{cases}\
&=
end{align}










share|cite|improve this question
















$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}dfrac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}$ true for all $x$ ?




This expression is found without mentioning the domain of $x,y,z$, but I don't think its true for all $x,y,z$ as the case with the expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y$, but I have trouble proving it.



So what is the complete expression for $tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z$ ?



begin{align}
tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y+tan^{-1}z&=
begin{cases}tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy < 1 \[1.5ex]
pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y>0 \[1.5ex]
-pi + tan^{-1}left(dfrac{x+y}{1-xy}right)+tan^{-1}z, &xy>1,::x,y<0 end{cases}\
&=
end{align}







trigonometry inverse-function






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 9 at 14:43









Martin Sleziak

44.7k7115270




44.7k7115270










asked Dec 5 at 18:47









ss1729

1,806723




1,806723












  • Well ... apart from restrictions of a similar nature that apply to the arguments of the formula for two variables ie in that case xy<1 . I seem to remember, when I once checked this out for the general case of n variables, that you get the odd symmetric polynomials of degree ≤ n in the numerator & the even symmetric [ ditto ] in the denominator ... something like that, anyway.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 5 at 18:56












  • I'm beginning to get the gist of your question now I think - I glossed over it a bit at first ... are you saying that when you go beyond two variables you lose the property of it being valid ∀ possible values of whatever variables it imports (provided the other branches of atn be admitted) ... that even if you do admit these other branches that property ceases by reason of going from two to three variables? That would be strange if it were so, and I would not have thought it were so ... but I can see how it might actually be something we can't safely assume by default.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 6 at 7:49




















  • Well ... apart from restrictions of a similar nature that apply to the arguments of the formula for two variables ie in that case xy<1 . I seem to remember, when I once checked this out for the general case of n variables, that you get the odd symmetric polynomials of degree ≤ n in the numerator & the even symmetric [ ditto ] in the denominator ... something like that, anyway.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 5 at 18:56












  • I'm beginning to get the gist of your question now I think - I glossed over it a bit at first ... are you saying that when you go beyond two variables you lose the property of it being valid ∀ possible values of whatever variables it imports (provided the other branches of atn be admitted) ... that even if you do admit these other branches that property ceases by reason of going from two to three variables? That would be strange if it were so, and I would not have thought it were so ... but I can see how it might actually be something we can't safely assume by default.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 6 at 7:49


















Well ... apart from restrictions of a similar nature that apply to the arguments of the formula for two variables ie in that case xy<1 . I seem to remember, when I once checked this out for the general case of n variables, that you get the odd symmetric polynomials of degree ≤ n in the numerator & the even symmetric [ ditto ] in the denominator ... something like that, anyway.
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 5 at 18:56






Well ... apart from restrictions of a similar nature that apply to the arguments of the formula for two variables ie in that case xy<1 . I seem to remember, when I once checked this out for the general case of n variables, that you get the odd symmetric polynomials of degree ≤ n in the numerator & the even symmetric [ ditto ] in the denominator ... something like that, anyway.
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 5 at 18:56














I'm beginning to get the gist of your question now I think - I glossed over it a bit at first ... are you saying that when you go beyond two variables you lose the property of it being valid ∀ possible values of whatever variables it imports (provided the other branches of atn be admitted) ... that even if you do admit these other branches that property ceases by reason of going from two to three variables? That would be strange if it were so, and I would not have thought it were so ... but I can see how it might actually be something we can't safely assume by default.
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 6 at 7:49






I'm beginning to get the gist of your question now I think - I glossed over it a bit at first ... are you saying that when you go beyond two variables you lose the property of it being valid ∀ possible values of whatever variables it imports (provided the other branches of atn be admitted) ... that even if you do admit these other branches that property ceases by reason of going from two to three variables? That would be strange if it were so, and I would not have thought it were so ... but I can see how it might actually be something we can't safely assume by default.
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 6 at 7:49












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1














Let




  • $L(x,y,z) = tan^{-1} x + tan^{-1} y + tan^{-1} z$

  • $R(x,y,z) = tan^{-1}left(frac{x+y+z - xyz}{1- xy - yz - zx}right)$


By addition formula of tangent function, we have
$$tan L(x,y,z) = tan R(x,y,z)$$
Since $tan theta$ is a periodic function with period $pi$, there is an integer valued function $N(x,y,z)$ such that $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + N(x,y,z)pi$$



Since $tan^{-1}theta$ maps $mathbb{R}$ into $(-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$, we have
$$|L(x,y,z)| < frac{3pi}{2} land |R(x,y,z)| < frac{pi}{2}quadimpliesquad N(x,y,z) in { 0, pm 1 }$$



Since $tan^{-1} theta$ is a continuous function for all $theta$,
$N(x,y,z)$ will be constant over those domain where $xy+yz+zx ne 1$.
Notice
$$xy+yz+zx = 1 iff 3left(frac{x+y+z}{sqrt{3}}right)^2 - ( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 ) = 2$$
is the equation of a two sheet hyperboloid centered at origin with symmetric axis pointing along the direction $(1,1,1)$. The complement of this hyperboloid consists of $3$ connected components. One can pick a point from each of these component and figure out the value of $N(x,y,z)$ over the whole component.



The end result is



$$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + begin{cases}
pi, & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z > 0\
0, & 1 > xy+yz+zx\
-pi & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z < 0
end{cases}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • thanx, i have difficulty in understanding the derivation, though i am working on it. Mean time I have checked for the case where $x=sqrt{3},y=1,z=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}$. We have $xy+yz+zx=3.30>1$ and $x+y+z>0$. LHS=$frac{pi}{3}+frac{pi}{4}+frac{pi}{6}=frac{3pi}{4}$. RHS=$pi+tan^{-1}(-1)=pi-frac{pi}{4}=frac{3pi}{4}$=LHS. THus, verified !
    – ss1729
    Dec 5 at 21:09












  • I think I see. Obviously if x>0, y>0, & xy >1, in the expression with the single arctan & rational function as argument, the arctan is going to need to be taken to be the next 'occurence' of it - the 'branch' (if I've used that term strictly correctly) that goes from π/2 to 3π/2. If you allow that, the values of x & y are unrestricted ... is that so - have I understood it aright? I've tended to neglect this kind of thing a bit, as I've found that in situations where this addition formula arises, the values of x & y tend to be such as to obviate the need to bring 'other branches' into it.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 6 at 6:57












  • Are you saying that you can have any value of x y & z, ie any point in xyz space? That the sheets of the hyperboloid are the surfaces that when (x,y,z) crosses it changes value, being -1 inside the negative 'lobe', +1 inside the positive lobe, & 0 between the two lobes; but that no restriction is imposed on what (x,y,z) might actually be? That for three variables three branches of atn are sufficient to take care of all (x,y,z)? If (x,y,z)→(∞,∞,∞) then the extreme upper edge of the top branch; & if (-∞,-∞,-∞) the the extreme lower edge of the bottom branch?
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 6 at 8:16










  • @AmbretteOrrisey Yes, aside from the restriction that $xy+yz+zx ne 1$, there is no other restriction on $(x,y,z)$. If you look at the function $tan^{-1}theta$, it is well behaved for all finite $theta$. The only place the $N(x,y,z)$ can change value is when $(x,y,z)$ cross the hyperboloid.
    – achille hui
    Dec 6 at 8:23










  • I can see something else: every time you introduce a new variable, the numerator & the denominator alternate between having the higher degree polynomial - so as all the variables go of to ∞ the atn alternates between going to 0 & π/2, and likewise for -∞; so the range of atn increases by half the range of a branch above & below each time.
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 6 at 8:27





















0














Write $a:=arctan x$ etc. so $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan a+tan b + (1-tan atan b)tan c}{1-tan atan b - (tan a+tan b)tan c}.$$If $xyne 1$, we can cancel $1-tan atan b$ to get $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan (a+b)+tan c}{1-tan (a+b)tan c}.$$If $tan (a+b)tan cne 1$ i.e. $(x+y)zne 1-xy$ i.e. $xy+yz+zx=1$, we have $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=tan (a+b+c).$$We want to get $a+b+c$ from that, which isn't as simple as taking arctangents; it has the subtleties claimed in your question (albeit not the title).






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    We have that by addition formula



    $$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y=tan^{-1}frac{x+y}{1-xy}$$



    then



    $$(tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y)+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}frac{frac{x+y}{1-xy}+z}{1-frac{(x+y)z}{1-xy}}$$



    the simplify to the given identity, which could be not well defined for (to check)




    • $1-xy=0$


    and is certainly not well defined for




    • $1-xy-yz-zx=0$






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • so u saying the above expression is true for all $x,y,z$ except $xy=1,yz=1,zx=1$ and $xy+yz+zx=1$.
      – ss1729
      Dec 5 at 20:03










    • @ss1729 Maybe I could be more precise, what I'm claiming is that how we have obtained the equality those point could be problematic and then we need to check those cases directly. For exmaple the last one always is requested. I didn't chek the others.
      – gimusi
      Dec 5 at 20:05










    • @ss1729 I see know the the secon one was equivalent to the first + third! I've updated that.
      – gimusi
      Dec 5 at 20:07



















    0















    This follows from the fact the the argument of a product of complex numbers is the sum of the arguments of the factors.




    Let $alpha=arctan x$, $beta=arctan y$ and $gamma=arctan z$. These are the arguments of the complex numbers $z_1=1+ix$, $z_2=1+iy$ and $z_3=1+iz$ respectively.



    In light of the above fact we see that $alpha+beta+gamma$ is the argument
    (up to an integer multiple of $2pi$) of the product
    $$
    z_1z_2z_3=(1+ix)(1+iy)(1+iz)=(1-xy-yz-zx)+i(x+y+z-xyz).
    $$

    But the argument $phi$ of a complex number $a+ib$ satisfies $tanphi=b/a$.



    The claim follows from this.




    Just be mindful of the lingering uncertainty in the value of the inverse tangent up to an integer multiple of $pi$. For example, if $x=y=z=1$ we have $arctan x=arctan y=arctan z=pi/4$ giving $3pi/4$ on the left hand side. But, $x+y+z-xyz=2$, $1-xy-yz-zx=-2$, so we have $arctan(-1)=-pi/4$ on the right hand side.







    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027479%2ftan-1x-tan-1y-tan-1z-tan-1-fracxyz-xyz1-xy-yz-zx-true-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      Let




      • $L(x,y,z) = tan^{-1} x + tan^{-1} y + tan^{-1} z$

      • $R(x,y,z) = tan^{-1}left(frac{x+y+z - xyz}{1- xy - yz - zx}right)$


      By addition formula of tangent function, we have
      $$tan L(x,y,z) = tan R(x,y,z)$$
      Since $tan theta$ is a periodic function with period $pi$, there is an integer valued function $N(x,y,z)$ such that $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + N(x,y,z)pi$$



      Since $tan^{-1}theta$ maps $mathbb{R}$ into $(-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$, we have
      $$|L(x,y,z)| < frac{3pi}{2} land |R(x,y,z)| < frac{pi}{2}quadimpliesquad N(x,y,z) in { 0, pm 1 }$$



      Since $tan^{-1} theta$ is a continuous function for all $theta$,
      $N(x,y,z)$ will be constant over those domain where $xy+yz+zx ne 1$.
      Notice
      $$xy+yz+zx = 1 iff 3left(frac{x+y+z}{sqrt{3}}right)^2 - ( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 ) = 2$$
      is the equation of a two sheet hyperboloid centered at origin with symmetric axis pointing along the direction $(1,1,1)$. The complement of this hyperboloid consists of $3$ connected components. One can pick a point from each of these component and figure out the value of $N(x,y,z)$ over the whole component.



      The end result is



      $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + begin{cases}
      pi, & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z > 0\
      0, & 1 > xy+yz+zx\
      -pi & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z < 0
      end{cases}
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer





















      • thanx, i have difficulty in understanding the derivation, though i am working on it. Mean time I have checked for the case where $x=sqrt{3},y=1,z=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}$. We have $xy+yz+zx=3.30>1$ and $x+y+z>0$. LHS=$frac{pi}{3}+frac{pi}{4}+frac{pi}{6}=frac{3pi}{4}$. RHS=$pi+tan^{-1}(-1)=pi-frac{pi}{4}=frac{3pi}{4}$=LHS. THus, verified !
        – ss1729
        Dec 5 at 21:09












      • I think I see. Obviously if x>0, y>0, & xy >1, in the expression with the single arctan & rational function as argument, the arctan is going to need to be taken to be the next 'occurence' of it - the 'branch' (if I've used that term strictly correctly) that goes from π/2 to 3π/2. If you allow that, the values of x & y are unrestricted ... is that so - have I understood it aright? I've tended to neglect this kind of thing a bit, as I've found that in situations where this addition formula arises, the values of x & y tend to be such as to obviate the need to bring 'other branches' into it.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 6:57












      • Are you saying that you can have any value of x y & z, ie any point in xyz space? That the sheets of the hyperboloid are the surfaces that when (x,y,z) crosses it changes value, being -1 inside the negative 'lobe', +1 inside the positive lobe, & 0 between the two lobes; but that no restriction is imposed on what (x,y,z) might actually be? That for three variables three branches of atn are sufficient to take care of all (x,y,z)? If (x,y,z)→(∞,∞,∞) then the extreme upper edge of the top branch; & if (-∞,-∞,-∞) the the extreme lower edge of the bottom branch?
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:16










      • @AmbretteOrrisey Yes, aside from the restriction that $xy+yz+zx ne 1$, there is no other restriction on $(x,y,z)$. If you look at the function $tan^{-1}theta$, it is well behaved for all finite $theta$. The only place the $N(x,y,z)$ can change value is when $(x,y,z)$ cross the hyperboloid.
        – achille hui
        Dec 6 at 8:23










      • I can see something else: every time you introduce a new variable, the numerator & the denominator alternate between having the higher degree polynomial - so as all the variables go of to ∞ the atn alternates between going to 0 & π/2, and likewise for -∞; so the range of atn increases by half the range of a branch above & below each time.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:27


















      1














      Let




      • $L(x,y,z) = tan^{-1} x + tan^{-1} y + tan^{-1} z$

      • $R(x,y,z) = tan^{-1}left(frac{x+y+z - xyz}{1- xy - yz - zx}right)$


      By addition formula of tangent function, we have
      $$tan L(x,y,z) = tan R(x,y,z)$$
      Since $tan theta$ is a periodic function with period $pi$, there is an integer valued function $N(x,y,z)$ such that $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + N(x,y,z)pi$$



      Since $tan^{-1}theta$ maps $mathbb{R}$ into $(-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$, we have
      $$|L(x,y,z)| < frac{3pi}{2} land |R(x,y,z)| < frac{pi}{2}quadimpliesquad N(x,y,z) in { 0, pm 1 }$$



      Since $tan^{-1} theta$ is a continuous function for all $theta$,
      $N(x,y,z)$ will be constant over those domain where $xy+yz+zx ne 1$.
      Notice
      $$xy+yz+zx = 1 iff 3left(frac{x+y+z}{sqrt{3}}right)^2 - ( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 ) = 2$$
      is the equation of a two sheet hyperboloid centered at origin with symmetric axis pointing along the direction $(1,1,1)$. The complement of this hyperboloid consists of $3$ connected components. One can pick a point from each of these component and figure out the value of $N(x,y,z)$ over the whole component.



      The end result is



      $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + begin{cases}
      pi, & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z > 0\
      0, & 1 > xy+yz+zx\
      -pi & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z < 0
      end{cases}
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer





















      • thanx, i have difficulty in understanding the derivation, though i am working on it. Mean time I have checked for the case where $x=sqrt{3},y=1,z=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}$. We have $xy+yz+zx=3.30>1$ and $x+y+z>0$. LHS=$frac{pi}{3}+frac{pi}{4}+frac{pi}{6}=frac{3pi}{4}$. RHS=$pi+tan^{-1}(-1)=pi-frac{pi}{4}=frac{3pi}{4}$=LHS. THus, verified !
        – ss1729
        Dec 5 at 21:09












      • I think I see. Obviously if x>0, y>0, & xy >1, in the expression with the single arctan & rational function as argument, the arctan is going to need to be taken to be the next 'occurence' of it - the 'branch' (if I've used that term strictly correctly) that goes from π/2 to 3π/2. If you allow that, the values of x & y are unrestricted ... is that so - have I understood it aright? I've tended to neglect this kind of thing a bit, as I've found that in situations where this addition formula arises, the values of x & y tend to be such as to obviate the need to bring 'other branches' into it.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 6:57












      • Are you saying that you can have any value of x y & z, ie any point in xyz space? That the sheets of the hyperboloid are the surfaces that when (x,y,z) crosses it changes value, being -1 inside the negative 'lobe', +1 inside the positive lobe, & 0 between the two lobes; but that no restriction is imposed on what (x,y,z) might actually be? That for three variables three branches of atn are sufficient to take care of all (x,y,z)? If (x,y,z)→(∞,∞,∞) then the extreme upper edge of the top branch; & if (-∞,-∞,-∞) the the extreme lower edge of the bottom branch?
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:16










      • @AmbretteOrrisey Yes, aside from the restriction that $xy+yz+zx ne 1$, there is no other restriction on $(x,y,z)$. If you look at the function $tan^{-1}theta$, it is well behaved for all finite $theta$. The only place the $N(x,y,z)$ can change value is when $(x,y,z)$ cross the hyperboloid.
        – achille hui
        Dec 6 at 8:23










      • I can see something else: every time you introduce a new variable, the numerator & the denominator alternate between having the higher degree polynomial - so as all the variables go of to ∞ the atn alternates between going to 0 & π/2, and likewise for -∞; so the range of atn increases by half the range of a branch above & below each time.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:27
















      1












      1








      1






      Let




      • $L(x,y,z) = tan^{-1} x + tan^{-1} y + tan^{-1} z$

      • $R(x,y,z) = tan^{-1}left(frac{x+y+z - xyz}{1- xy - yz - zx}right)$


      By addition formula of tangent function, we have
      $$tan L(x,y,z) = tan R(x,y,z)$$
      Since $tan theta$ is a periodic function with period $pi$, there is an integer valued function $N(x,y,z)$ such that $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + N(x,y,z)pi$$



      Since $tan^{-1}theta$ maps $mathbb{R}$ into $(-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$, we have
      $$|L(x,y,z)| < frac{3pi}{2} land |R(x,y,z)| < frac{pi}{2}quadimpliesquad N(x,y,z) in { 0, pm 1 }$$



      Since $tan^{-1} theta$ is a continuous function for all $theta$,
      $N(x,y,z)$ will be constant over those domain where $xy+yz+zx ne 1$.
      Notice
      $$xy+yz+zx = 1 iff 3left(frac{x+y+z}{sqrt{3}}right)^2 - ( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 ) = 2$$
      is the equation of a two sheet hyperboloid centered at origin with symmetric axis pointing along the direction $(1,1,1)$. The complement of this hyperboloid consists of $3$ connected components. One can pick a point from each of these component and figure out the value of $N(x,y,z)$ over the whole component.



      The end result is



      $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + begin{cases}
      pi, & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z > 0\
      0, & 1 > xy+yz+zx\
      -pi & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z < 0
      end{cases}
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer












      Let




      • $L(x,y,z) = tan^{-1} x + tan^{-1} y + tan^{-1} z$

      • $R(x,y,z) = tan^{-1}left(frac{x+y+z - xyz}{1- xy - yz - zx}right)$


      By addition formula of tangent function, we have
      $$tan L(x,y,z) = tan R(x,y,z)$$
      Since $tan theta$ is a periodic function with period $pi$, there is an integer valued function $N(x,y,z)$ such that $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + N(x,y,z)pi$$



      Since $tan^{-1}theta$ maps $mathbb{R}$ into $(-frac{pi}{2}, frac{pi}{2})$, we have
      $$|L(x,y,z)| < frac{3pi}{2} land |R(x,y,z)| < frac{pi}{2}quadimpliesquad N(x,y,z) in { 0, pm 1 }$$



      Since $tan^{-1} theta$ is a continuous function for all $theta$,
      $N(x,y,z)$ will be constant over those domain where $xy+yz+zx ne 1$.
      Notice
      $$xy+yz+zx = 1 iff 3left(frac{x+y+z}{sqrt{3}}right)^2 - ( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 ) = 2$$
      is the equation of a two sheet hyperboloid centered at origin with symmetric axis pointing along the direction $(1,1,1)$. The complement of this hyperboloid consists of $3$ connected components. One can pick a point from each of these component and figure out the value of $N(x,y,z)$ over the whole component.



      The end result is



      $$L(x,y,z) = R(x,y,z) + begin{cases}
      pi, & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z > 0\
      0, & 1 > xy+yz+zx\
      -pi & 1 < xy+yz+zx land x+y+z < 0
      end{cases}
      $$







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Dec 5 at 19:54









      achille hui

      95.4k5130256




      95.4k5130256












      • thanx, i have difficulty in understanding the derivation, though i am working on it. Mean time I have checked for the case where $x=sqrt{3},y=1,z=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}$. We have $xy+yz+zx=3.30>1$ and $x+y+z>0$. LHS=$frac{pi}{3}+frac{pi}{4}+frac{pi}{6}=frac{3pi}{4}$. RHS=$pi+tan^{-1}(-1)=pi-frac{pi}{4}=frac{3pi}{4}$=LHS. THus, verified !
        – ss1729
        Dec 5 at 21:09












      • I think I see. Obviously if x>0, y>0, & xy >1, in the expression with the single arctan & rational function as argument, the arctan is going to need to be taken to be the next 'occurence' of it - the 'branch' (if I've used that term strictly correctly) that goes from π/2 to 3π/2. If you allow that, the values of x & y are unrestricted ... is that so - have I understood it aright? I've tended to neglect this kind of thing a bit, as I've found that in situations where this addition formula arises, the values of x & y tend to be such as to obviate the need to bring 'other branches' into it.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 6:57












      • Are you saying that you can have any value of x y & z, ie any point in xyz space? That the sheets of the hyperboloid are the surfaces that when (x,y,z) crosses it changes value, being -1 inside the negative 'lobe', +1 inside the positive lobe, & 0 between the two lobes; but that no restriction is imposed on what (x,y,z) might actually be? That for three variables three branches of atn are sufficient to take care of all (x,y,z)? If (x,y,z)→(∞,∞,∞) then the extreme upper edge of the top branch; & if (-∞,-∞,-∞) the the extreme lower edge of the bottom branch?
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:16










      • @AmbretteOrrisey Yes, aside from the restriction that $xy+yz+zx ne 1$, there is no other restriction on $(x,y,z)$. If you look at the function $tan^{-1}theta$, it is well behaved for all finite $theta$. The only place the $N(x,y,z)$ can change value is when $(x,y,z)$ cross the hyperboloid.
        – achille hui
        Dec 6 at 8:23










      • I can see something else: every time you introduce a new variable, the numerator & the denominator alternate between having the higher degree polynomial - so as all the variables go of to ∞ the atn alternates between going to 0 & π/2, and likewise for -∞; so the range of atn increases by half the range of a branch above & below each time.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:27




















      • thanx, i have difficulty in understanding the derivation, though i am working on it. Mean time I have checked for the case where $x=sqrt{3},y=1,z=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}$. We have $xy+yz+zx=3.30>1$ and $x+y+z>0$. LHS=$frac{pi}{3}+frac{pi}{4}+frac{pi}{6}=frac{3pi}{4}$. RHS=$pi+tan^{-1}(-1)=pi-frac{pi}{4}=frac{3pi}{4}$=LHS. THus, verified !
        – ss1729
        Dec 5 at 21:09












      • I think I see. Obviously if x>0, y>0, & xy >1, in the expression with the single arctan & rational function as argument, the arctan is going to need to be taken to be the next 'occurence' of it - the 'branch' (if I've used that term strictly correctly) that goes from π/2 to 3π/2. If you allow that, the values of x & y are unrestricted ... is that so - have I understood it aright? I've tended to neglect this kind of thing a bit, as I've found that in situations where this addition formula arises, the values of x & y tend to be such as to obviate the need to bring 'other branches' into it.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 6:57












      • Are you saying that you can have any value of x y & z, ie any point in xyz space? That the sheets of the hyperboloid are the surfaces that when (x,y,z) crosses it changes value, being -1 inside the negative 'lobe', +1 inside the positive lobe, & 0 between the two lobes; but that no restriction is imposed on what (x,y,z) might actually be? That for three variables three branches of atn are sufficient to take care of all (x,y,z)? If (x,y,z)→(∞,∞,∞) then the extreme upper edge of the top branch; & if (-∞,-∞,-∞) the the extreme lower edge of the bottom branch?
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:16










      • @AmbretteOrrisey Yes, aside from the restriction that $xy+yz+zx ne 1$, there is no other restriction on $(x,y,z)$. If you look at the function $tan^{-1}theta$, it is well behaved for all finite $theta$. The only place the $N(x,y,z)$ can change value is when $(x,y,z)$ cross the hyperboloid.
        – achille hui
        Dec 6 at 8:23










      • I can see something else: every time you introduce a new variable, the numerator & the denominator alternate between having the higher degree polynomial - so as all the variables go of to ∞ the atn alternates between going to 0 & π/2, and likewise for -∞; so the range of atn increases by half the range of a branch above & below each time.
        – AmbretteOrrisey
        Dec 6 at 8:27


















      thanx, i have difficulty in understanding the derivation, though i am working on it. Mean time I have checked for the case where $x=sqrt{3},y=1,z=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}$. We have $xy+yz+zx=3.30>1$ and $x+y+z>0$. LHS=$frac{pi}{3}+frac{pi}{4}+frac{pi}{6}=frac{3pi}{4}$. RHS=$pi+tan^{-1}(-1)=pi-frac{pi}{4}=frac{3pi}{4}$=LHS. THus, verified !
      – ss1729
      Dec 5 at 21:09






      thanx, i have difficulty in understanding the derivation, though i am working on it. Mean time I have checked for the case where $x=sqrt{3},y=1,z=frac{1}{sqrt{3}}$. We have $xy+yz+zx=3.30>1$ and $x+y+z>0$. LHS=$frac{pi}{3}+frac{pi}{4}+frac{pi}{6}=frac{3pi}{4}$. RHS=$pi+tan^{-1}(-1)=pi-frac{pi}{4}=frac{3pi}{4}$=LHS. THus, verified !
      – ss1729
      Dec 5 at 21:09














      I think I see. Obviously if x>0, y>0, & xy >1, in the expression with the single arctan & rational function as argument, the arctan is going to need to be taken to be the next 'occurence' of it - the 'branch' (if I've used that term strictly correctly) that goes from π/2 to 3π/2. If you allow that, the values of x & y are unrestricted ... is that so - have I understood it aright? I've tended to neglect this kind of thing a bit, as I've found that in situations where this addition formula arises, the values of x & y tend to be such as to obviate the need to bring 'other branches' into it.
      – AmbretteOrrisey
      Dec 6 at 6:57






      I think I see. Obviously if x>0, y>0, & xy >1, in the expression with the single arctan & rational function as argument, the arctan is going to need to be taken to be the next 'occurence' of it - the 'branch' (if I've used that term strictly correctly) that goes from π/2 to 3π/2. If you allow that, the values of x & y are unrestricted ... is that so - have I understood it aright? I've tended to neglect this kind of thing a bit, as I've found that in situations where this addition formula arises, the values of x & y tend to be such as to obviate the need to bring 'other branches' into it.
      – AmbretteOrrisey
      Dec 6 at 6:57














      Are you saying that you can have any value of x y & z, ie any point in xyz space? That the sheets of the hyperboloid are the surfaces that when (x,y,z) crosses it changes value, being -1 inside the negative 'lobe', +1 inside the positive lobe, & 0 between the two lobes; but that no restriction is imposed on what (x,y,z) might actually be? That for three variables three branches of atn are sufficient to take care of all (x,y,z)? If (x,y,z)→(∞,∞,∞) then the extreme upper edge of the top branch; & if (-∞,-∞,-∞) the the extreme lower edge of the bottom branch?
      – AmbretteOrrisey
      Dec 6 at 8:16




      Are you saying that you can have any value of x y & z, ie any point in xyz space? That the sheets of the hyperboloid are the surfaces that when (x,y,z) crosses it changes value, being -1 inside the negative 'lobe', +1 inside the positive lobe, & 0 between the two lobes; but that no restriction is imposed on what (x,y,z) might actually be? That for three variables three branches of atn are sufficient to take care of all (x,y,z)? If (x,y,z)→(∞,∞,∞) then the extreme upper edge of the top branch; & if (-∞,-∞,-∞) the the extreme lower edge of the bottom branch?
      – AmbretteOrrisey
      Dec 6 at 8:16












      @AmbretteOrrisey Yes, aside from the restriction that $xy+yz+zx ne 1$, there is no other restriction on $(x,y,z)$. If you look at the function $tan^{-1}theta$, it is well behaved for all finite $theta$. The only place the $N(x,y,z)$ can change value is when $(x,y,z)$ cross the hyperboloid.
      – achille hui
      Dec 6 at 8:23




      @AmbretteOrrisey Yes, aside from the restriction that $xy+yz+zx ne 1$, there is no other restriction on $(x,y,z)$. If you look at the function $tan^{-1}theta$, it is well behaved for all finite $theta$. The only place the $N(x,y,z)$ can change value is when $(x,y,z)$ cross the hyperboloid.
      – achille hui
      Dec 6 at 8:23












      I can see something else: every time you introduce a new variable, the numerator & the denominator alternate between having the higher degree polynomial - so as all the variables go of to ∞ the atn alternates between going to 0 & π/2, and likewise for -∞; so the range of atn increases by half the range of a branch above & below each time.
      – AmbretteOrrisey
      Dec 6 at 8:27






      I can see something else: every time you introduce a new variable, the numerator & the denominator alternate between having the higher degree polynomial - so as all the variables go of to ∞ the atn alternates between going to 0 & π/2, and likewise for -∞; so the range of atn increases by half the range of a branch above & below each time.
      – AmbretteOrrisey
      Dec 6 at 8:27













      0














      Write $a:=arctan x$ etc. so $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan a+tan b + (1-tan atan b)tan c}{1-tan atan b - (tan a+tan b)tan c}.$$If $xyne 1$, we can cancel $1-tan atan b$ to get $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan (a+b)+tan c}{1-tan (a+b)tan c}.$$If $tan (a+b)tan cne 1$ i.e. $(x+y)zne 1-xy$ i.e. $xy+yz+zx=1$, we have $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=tan (a+b+c).$$We want to get $a+b+c$ from that, which isn't as simple as taking arctangents; it has the subtleties claimed in your question (albeit not the title).






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0














        Write $a:=arctan x$ etc. so $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan a+tan b + (1-tan atan b)tan c}{1-tan atan b - (tan a+tan b)tan c}.$$If $xyne 1$, we can cancel $1-tan atan b$ to get $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan (a+b)+tan c}{1-tan (a+b)tan c}.$$If $tan (a+b)tan cne 1$ i.e. $(x+y)zne 1-xy$ i.e. $xy+yz+zx=1$, we have $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=tan (a+b+c).$$We want to get $a+b+c$ from that, which isn't as simple as taking arctangents; it has the subtleties claimed in your question (albeit not the title).






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          0












          0








          0






          Write $a:=arctan x$ etc. so $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan a+tan b + (1-tan atan b)tan c}{1-tan atan b - (tan a+tan b)tan c}.$$If $xyne 1$, we can cancel $1-tan atan b$ to get $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan (a+b)+tan c}{1-tan (a+b)tan c}.$$If $tan (a+b)tan cne 1$ i.e. $(x+y)zne 1-xy$ i.e. $xy+yz+zx=1$, we have $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=tan (a+b+c).$$We want to get $a+b+c$ from that, which isn't as simple as taking arctangents; it has the subtleties claimed in your question (albeit not the title).






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Write $a:=arctan x$ etc. so $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan a+tan b + (1-tan atan b)tan c}{1-tan atan b - (tan a+tan b)tan c}.$$If $xyne 1$, we can cancel $1-tan atan b$ to get $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=frac{tan (a+b)+tan c}{1-tan (a+b)tan c}.$$If $tan (a+b)tan cne 1$ i.e. $(x+y)zne 1-xy$ i.e. $xy+yz+zx=1$, we have $$frac{x+y+z-xyz}{1-xy-yz-zx}=tan (a+b+c).$$We want to get $a+b+c$ from that, which isn't as simple as taking arctangents; it has the subtleties claimed in your question (albeit not the title).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 5 at 18:56









          J.G.

          22.5k22035




          22.5k22035























              0














              We have that by addition formula



              $$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y=tan^{-1}frac{x+y}{1-xy}$$



              then



              $$(tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y)+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}frac{frac{x+y}{1-xy}+z}{1-frac{(x+y)z}{1-xy}}$$



              the simplify to the given identity, which could be not well defined for (to check)




              • $1-xy=0$


              and is certainly not well defined for




              • $1-xy-yz-zx=0$






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • so u saying the above expression is true for all $x,y,z$ except $xy=1,yz=1,zx=1$ and $xy+yz+zx=1$.
                – ss1729
                Dec 5 at 20:03










              • @ss1729 Maybe I could be more precise, what I'm claiming is that how we have obtained the equality those point could be problematic and then we need to check those cases directly. For exmaple the last one always is requested. I didn't chek the others.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:05










              • @ss1729 I see know the the secon one was equivalent to the first + third! I've updated that.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:07
















              0














              We have that by addition formula



              $$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y=tan^{-1}frac{x+y}{1-xy}$$



              then



              $$(tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y)+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}frac{frac{x+y}{1-xy}+z}{1-frac{(x+y)z}{1-xy}}$$



              the simplify to the given identity, which could be not well defined for (to check)




              • $1-xy=0$


              and is certainly not well defined for




              • $1-xy-yz-zx=0$






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • so u saying the above expression is true for all $x,y,z$ except $xy=1,yz=1,zx=1$ and $xy+yz+zx=1$.
                – ss1729
                Dec 5 at 20:03










              • @ss1729 Maybe I could be more precise, what I'm claiming is that how we have obtained the equality those point could be problematic and then we need to check those cases directly. For exmaple the last one always is requested. I didn't chek the others.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:05










              • @ss1729 I see know the the secon one was equivalent to the first + third! I've updated that.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:07














              0












              0








              0






              We have that by addition formula



              $$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y=tan^{-1}frac{x+y}{1-xy}$$



              then



              $$(tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y)+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}frac{frac{x+y}{1-xy}+z}{1-frac{(x+y)z}{1-xy}}$$



              the simplify to the given identity, which could be not well defined for (to check)




              • $1-xy=0$


              and is certainly not well defined for




              • $1-xy-yz-zx=0$






              share|cite|improve this answer














              We have that by addition formula



              $$tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y=tan^{-1}frac{x+y}{1-xy}$$



              then



              $$(tan^{-1}x+tan^{-1}y)+tan^{-1}z=tan^{-1}frac{frac{x+y}{1-xy}+z}{1-frac{(x+y)z}{1-xy}}$$



              the simplify to the given identity, which could be not well defined for (to check)




              • $1-xy=0$


              and is certainly not well defined for




              • $1-xy-yz-zx=0$







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Dec 5 at 20:06

























              answered Dec 5 at 18:50









              gimusi

              1




              1












              • so u saying the above expression is true for all $x,y,z$ except $xy=1,yz=1,zx=1$ and $xy+yz+zx=1$.
                – ss1729
                Dec 5 at 20:03










              • @ss1729 Maybe I could be more precise, what I'm claiming is that how we have obtained the equality those point could be problematic and then we need to check those cases directly. For exmaple the last one always is requested. I didn't chek the others.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:05










              • @ss1729 I see know the the secon one was equivalent to the first + third! I've updated that.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:07


















              • so u saying the above expression is true for all $x,y,z$ except $xy=1,yz=1,zx=1$ and $xy+yz+zx=1$.
                – ss1729
                Dec 5 at 20:03










              • @ss1729 Maybe I could be more precise, what I'm claiming is that how we have obtained the equality those point could be problematic and then we need to check those cases directly. For exmaple the last one always is requested. I didn't chek the others.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:05










              • @ss1729 I see know the the secon one was equivalent to the first + third! I've updated that.
                – gimusi
                Dec 5 at 20:07
















              so u saying the above expression is true for all $x,y,z$ except $xy=1,yz=1,zx=1$ and $xy+yz+zx=1$.
              – ss1729
              Dec 5 at 20:03




              so u saying the above expression is true for all $x,y,z$ except $xy=1,yz=1,zx=1$ and $xy+yz+zx=1$.
              – ss1729
              Dec 5 at 20:03












              @ss1729 Maybe I could be more precise, what I'm claiming is that how we have obtained the equality those point could be problematic and then we need to check those cases directly. For exmaple the last one always is requested. I didn't chek the others.
              – gimusi
              Dec 5 at 20:05




              @ss1729 Maybe I could be more precise, what I'm claiming is that how we have obtained the equality those point could be problematic and then we need to check those cases directly. For exmaple the last one always is requested. I didn't chek the others.
              – gimusi
              Dec 5 at 20:05












              @ss1729 I see know the the secon one was equivalent to the first + third! I've updated that.
              – gimusi
              Dec 5 at 20:07




              @ss1729 I see know the the secon one was equivalent to the first + third! I've updated that.
              – gimusi
              Dec 5 at 20:07











              0















              This follows from the fact the the argument of a product of complex numbers is the sum of the arguments of the factors.




              Let $alpha=arctan x$, $beta=arctan y$ and $gamma=arctan z$. These are the arguments of the complex numbers $z_1=1+ix$, $z_2=1+iy$ and $z_3=1+iz$ respectively.



              In light of the above fact we see that $alpha+beta+gamma$ is the argument
              (up to an integer multiple of $2pi$) of the product
              $$
              z_1z_2z_3=(1+ix)(1+iy)(1+iz)=(1-xy-yz-zx)+i(x+y+z-xyz).
              $$

              But the argument $phi$ of a complex number $a+ib$ satisfies $tanphi=b/a$.



              The claim follows from this.




              Just be mindful of the lingering uncertainty in the value of the inverse tangent up to an integer multiple of $pi$. For example, if $x=y=z=1$ we have $arctan x=arctan y=arctan z=pi/4$ giving $3pi/4$ on the left hand side. But, $x+y+z-xyz=2$, $1-xy-yz-zx=-2$, so we have $arctan(-1)=-pi/4$ on the right hand side.







              share|cite|improve this answer




























                0















                This follows from the fact the the argument of a product of complex numbers is the sum of the arguments of the factors.




                Let $alpha=arctan x$, $beta=arctan y$ and $gamma=arctan z$. These are the arguments of the complex numbers $z_1=1+ix$, $z_2=1+iy$ and $z_3=1+iz$ respectively.



                In light of the above fact we see that $alpha+beta+gamma$ is the argument
                (up to an integer multiple of $2pi$) of the product
                $$
                z_1z_2z_3=(1+ix)(1+iy)(1+iz)=(1-xy-yz-zx)+i(x+y+z-xyz).
                $$

                But the argument $phi$ of a complex number $a+ib$ satisfies $tanphi=b/a$.



                The claim follows from this.




                Just be mindful of the lingering uncertainty in the value of the inverse tangent up to an integer multiple of $pi$. For example, if $x=y=z=1$ we have $arctan x=arctan y=arctan z=pi/4$ giving $3pi/4$ on the left hand side. But, $x+y+z-xyz=2$, $1-xy-yz-zx=-2$, so we have $arctan(-1)=-pi/4$ on the right hand side.







                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  This follows from the fact the the argument of a product of complex numbers is the sum of the arguments of the factors.




                  Let $alpha=arctan x$, $beta=arctan y$ and $gamma=arctan z$. These are the arguments of the complex numbers $z_1=1+ix$, $z_2=1+iy$ and $z_3=1+iz$ respectively.



                  In light of the above fact we see that $alpha+beta+gamma$ is the argument
                  (up to an integer multiple of $2pi$) of the product
                  $$
                  z_1z_2z_3=(1+ix)(1+iy)(1+iz)=(1-xy-yz-zx)+i(x+y+z-xyz).
                  $$

                  But the argument $phi$ of a complex number $a+ib$ satisfies $tanphi=b/a$.



                  The claim follows from this.




                  Just be mindful of the lingering uncertainty in the value of the inverse tangent up to an integer multiple of $pi$. For example, if $x=y=z=1$ we have $arctan x=arctan y=arctan z=pi/4$ giving $3pi/4$ on the left hand side. But, $x+y+z-xyz=2$, $1-xy-yz-zx=-2$, so we have $arctan(-1)=-pi/4$ on the right hand side.







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  This follows from the fact the the argument of a product of complex numbers is the sum of the arguments of the factors.




                  Let $alpha=arctan x$, $beta=arctan y$ and $gamma=arctan z$. These are the arguments of the complex numbers $z_1=1+ix$, $z_2=1+iy$ and $z_3=1+iz$ respectively.



                  In light of the above fact we see that $alpha+beta+gamma$ is the argument
                  (up to an integer multiple of $2pi$) of the product
                  $$
                  z_1z_2z_3=(1+ix)(1+iy)(1+iz)=(1-xy-yz-zx)+i(x+y+z-xyz).
                  $$

                  But the argument $phi$ of a complex number $a+ib$ satisfies $tanphi=b/a$.



                  The claim follows from this.




                  Just be mindful of the lingering uncertainty in the value of the inverse tangent up to an integer multiple of $pi$. For example, if $x=y=z=1$ we have $arctan x=arctan y=arctan z=pi/4$ giving $3pi/4$ on the left hand side. But, $x+y+z-xyz=2$, $1-xy-yz-zx=-2$, so we have $arctan(-1)=-pi/4$ on the right hand side.








                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 6 at 10:03

























                  answered Dec 6 at 9:56









                  Jyrki Lahtonen

                  108k12166367




                  108k12166367






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027479%2ftan-1x-tan-1y-tan-1z-tan-1-fracxyz-xyz1-xy-yz-zx-true-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna