Show that $L_A$ acts on by orthogonal transformation and in particular rotation.












0















Let $A$ be a $3times 3$ orthogonal matrix with determinant $=1$.
Let $v$ be an eigen vector corresponding to $1$ of $A$.Let $W=text{span}{v}$.
Show that $L_A$ preserves $W^perp$ and it acts on it by orthogonal transformation and in particular rotation.




MY TRY::



Given $Av=vimplies v=A^{-1}v$



Also $L_A:Bbb R^3to Bbb R^3$ defined by $L_A(x)=Ax$.



Let $win W^perpimplies langle w,vrangle =0$



To show $L_A(w)in W^perp$.



Now $L_A(w)=Aw$



Also $langle Aw,vrangle =langle w,A^Tvrangle= langle
w,A^{-1}vrangle=langle w,vrangle =0$



Thus $L_A(w)in W^perp$.-------------(Proved)



hence we can consider the restriction $L_A:W^perpto W^perp$



But how can I show that it is an orthogonal transformation and in aprticular a rotation?










share|cite|improve this question





























    0















    Let $A$ be a $3times 3$ orthogonal matrix with determinant $=1$.
    Let $v$ be an eigen vector corresponding to $1$ of $A$.Let $W=text{span}{v}$.
    Show that $L_A$ preserves $W^perp$ and it acts on it by orthogonal transformation and in particular rotation.




    MY TRY::



    Given $Av=vimplies v=A^{-1}v$



    Also $L_A:Bbb R^3to Bbb R^3$ defined by $L_A(x)=Ax$.



    Let $win W^perpimplies langle w,vrangle =0$



    To show $L_A(w)in W^perp$.



    Now $L_A(w)=Aw$



    Also $langle Aw,vrangle =langle w,A^Tvrangle= langle
    w,A^{-1}vrangle=langle w,vrangle =0$



    Thus $L_A(w)in W^perp$.-------------(Proved)



    hence we can consider the restriction $L_A:W^perpto W^perp$



    But how can I show that it is an orthogonal transformation and in aprticular a rotation?










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      Let $A$ be a $3times 3$ orthogonal matrix with determinant $=1$.
      Let $v$ be an eigen vector corresponding to $1$ of $A$.Let $W=text{span}{v}$.
      Show that $L_A$ preserves $W^perp$ and it acts on it by orthogonal transformation and in particular rotation.




      MY TRY::



      Given $Av=vimplies v=A^{-1}v$



      Also $L_A:Bbb R^3to Bbb R^3$ defined by $L_A(x)=Ax$.



      Let $win W^perpimplies langle w,vrangle =0$



      To show $L_A(w)in W^perp$.



      Now $L_A(w)=Aw$



      Also $langle Aw,vrangle =langle w,A^Tvrangle= langle
      w,A^{-1}vrangle=langle w,vrangle =0$



      Thus $L_A(w)in W^perp$.-------------(Proved)



      hence we can consider the restriction $L_A:W^perpto W^perp$



      But how can I show that it is an orthogonal transformation and in aprticular a rotation?










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Let $A$ be a $3times 3$ orthogonal matrix with determinant $=1$.
      Let $v$ be an eigen vector corresponding to $1$ of $A$.Let $W=text{span}{v}$.
      Show that $L_A$ preserves $W^perp$ and it acts on it by orthogonal transformation and in particular rotation.




      MY TRY::



      Given $Av=vimplies v=A^{-1}v$



      Also $L_A:Bbb R^3to Bbb R^3$ defined by $L_A(x)=Ax$.



      Let $win W^perpimplies langle w,vrangle =0$



      To show $L_A(w)in W^perp$.



      Now $L_A(w)=Aw$



      Also $langle Aw,vrangle =langle w,A^Tvrangle= langle
      w,A^{-1}vrangle=langle w,vrangle =0$



      Thus $L_A(w)in W^perp$.-------------(Proved)



      hence we can consider the restriction $L_A:W^perpto W^perp$



      But how can I show that it is an orthogonal transformation and in aprticular a rotation?







      linear-algebra matrices geometry eigenvalues-eigenvectors orthogonal-matrices






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 9 at 15:08









      José Carlos Santos

      150k22120221




      150k22120221










      asked Dec 9 at 14:56









      Join_PhD

      1968




      1968






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Since $A.W^perpsubset W^perp$ and since $A$ is orthogonal, $A$ induces an orthogonal map from $W^perp$ into itself. Suppose that it is not a rotation. Fix an orthonormal basis $B$ of $W^perp$. Then the matrix of $A|_{W^perp}$ with respect to $B$ is an orthogonal matrix with determinant $-1$. But then $det A=1times(-1)=-1$. This is impossible, since we're assuming that $det A=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • My problem is I dont understand how to show that restriction of A to $W^perp$ is orthogonal,is restriction of an orthogonal transformation an orthogonal transformation?if yes why?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19












          • How to prove it?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19










          • Since $A$ is orthogonal, then$$(forall v,winmathbb{R}^3):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle.$$In particular,$$(forall v,win W^perp):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle,$$which means that $A|_{W^perp}$ is orthogonal.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Dec 9 at 15:22












          • Are you including the vector $v$ along with the basis B to form a basis of $L_A$
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33










          • Otherwise how can you include the eigen value -1
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032461%2fshow-that-l-a-acts-on-by-orthogonal-transformation-and-in-particular-rotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Since $A.W^perpsubset W^perp$ and since $A$ is orthogonal, $A$ induces an orthogonal map from $W^perp$ into itself. Suppose that it is not a rotation. Fix an orthonormal basis $B$ of $W^perp$. Then the matrix of $A|_{W^perp}$ with respect to $B$ is an orthogonal matrix with determinant $-1$. But then $det A=1times(-1)=-1$. This is impossible, since we're assuming that $det A=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • My problem is I dont understand how to show that restriction of A to $W^perp$ is orthogonal,is restriction of an orthogonal transformation an orthogonal transformation?if yes why?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19












          • How to prove it?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19










          • Since $A$ is orthogonal, then$$(forall v,winmathbb{R}^3):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle.$$In particular,$$(forall v,win W^perp):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle,$$which means that $A|_{W^perp}$ is orthogonal.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Dec 9 at 15:22












          • Are you including the vector $v$ along with the basis B to form a basis of $L_A$
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33










          • Otherwise how can you include the eigen value -1
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33
















          1














          Since $A.W^perpsubset W^perp$ and since $A$ is orthogonal, $A$ induces an orthogonal map from $W^perp$ into itself. Suppose that it is not a rotation. Fix an orthonormal basis $B$ of $W^perp$. Then the matrix of $A|_{W^perp}$ with respect to $B$ is an orthogonal matrix with determinant $-1$. But then $det A=1times(-1)=-1$. This is impossible, since we're assuming that $det A=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • My problem is I dont understand how to show that restriction of A to $W^perp$ is orthogonal,is restriction of an orthogonal transformation an orthogonal transformation?if yes why?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19












          • How to prove it?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19










          • Since $A$ is orthogonal, then$$(forall v,winmathbb{R}^3):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle.$$In particular,$$(forall v,win W^perp):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle,$$which means that $A|_{W^perp}$ is orthogonal.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Dec 9 at 15:22












          • Are you including the vector $v$ along with the basis B to form a basis of $L_A$
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33










          • Otherwise how can you include the eigen value -1
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33














          1












          1








          1






          Since $A.W^perpsubset W^perp$ and since $A$ is orthogonal, $A$ induces an orthogonal map from $W^perp$ into itself. Suppose that it is not a rotation. Fix an orthonormal basis $B$ of $W^perp$. Then the matrix of $A|_{W^perp}$ with respect to $B$ is an orthogonal matrix with determinant $-1$. But then $det A=1times(-1)=-1$. This is impossible, since we're assuming that $det A=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Since $A.W^perpsubset W^perp$ and since $A$ is orthogonal, $A$ induces an orthogonal map from $W^perp$ into itself. Suppose that it is not a rotation. Fix an orthonormal basis $B$ of $W^perp$. Then the matrix of $A|_{W^perp}$ with respect to $B$ is an orthogonal matrix with determinant $-1$. But then $det A=1times(-1)=-1$. This is impossible, since we're assuming that $det A=1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 9 at 15:07









          José Carlos Santos

          150k22120221




          150k22120221












          • My problem is I dont understand how to show that restriction of A to $W^perp$ is orthogonal,is restriction of an orthogonal transformation an orthogonal transformation?if yes why?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19












          • How to prove it?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19










          • Since $A$ is orthogonal, then$$(forall v,winmathbb{R}^3):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle.$$In particular,$$(forall v,win W^perp):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle,$$which means that $A|_{W^perp}$ is orthogonal.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Dec 9 at 15:22












          • Are you including the vector $v$ along with the basis B to form a basis of $L_A$
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33










          • Otherwise how can you include the eigen value -1
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33


















          • My problem is I dont understand how to show that restriction of A to $W^perp$ is orthogonal,is restriction of an orthogonal transformation an orthogonal transformation?if yes why?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19












          • How to prove it?
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:19










          • Since $A$ is orthogonal, then$$(forall v,winmathbb{R}^3):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle.$$In particular,$$(forall v,win W^perp):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle,$$which means that $A|_{W^perp}$ is orthogonal.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Dec 9 at 15:22












          • Are you including the vector $v$ along with the basis B to form a basis of $L_A$
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33










          • Otherwise how can you include the eigen value -1
            – Join_PhD
            Dec 9 at 15:33
















          My problem is I dont understand how to show that restriction of A to $W^perp$ is orthogonal,is restriction of an orthogonal transformation an orthogonal transformation?if yes why?
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:19






          My problem is I dont understand how to show that restriction of A to $W^perp$ is orthogonal,is restriction of an orthogonal transformation an orthogonal transformation?if yes why?
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:19














          How to prove it?
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:19




          How to prove it?
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:19












          Since $A$ is orthogonal, then$$(forall v,winmathbb{R}^3):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle.$$In particular,$$(forall v,win W^perp):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle,$$which means that $A|_{W^perp}$ is orthogonal.
          – José Carlos Santos
          Dec 9 at 15:22






          Since $A$ is orthogonal, then$$(forall v,winmathbb{R}^3):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle.$$In particular,$$(forall v,win W^perp):langle A.v,A.wrangle=langle v,wrangle,$$which means that $A|_{W^perp}$ is orthogonal.
          – José Carlos Santos
          Dec 9 at 15:22














          Are you including the vector $v$ along with the basis B to form a basis of $L_A$
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:33




          Are you including the vector $v$ along with the basis B to form a basis of $L_A$
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:33












          Otherwise how can you include the eigen value -1
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:33




          Otherwise how can you include the eigen value -1
          – Join_PhD
          Dec 9 at 15:33


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032461%2fshow-that-l-a-acts-on-by-orthogonal-transformation-and-in-particular-rotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna