Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$
MY WORK
Consider the Riemann sum
begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!
calculus real-analysis limits analysis riemann-integration
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$
MY WORK
Consider the Riemann sum
begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!
calculus real-analysis limits analysis riemann-integration
5
The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40
Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$
MY WORK
Consider the Riemann sum
begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!
calculus real-analysis limits analysis riemann-integration
Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$
MY WORK
Consider the Riemann sum
begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!
calculus real-analysis limits analysis riemann-integration
calculus real-analysis limits analysis riemann-integration
edited Dec 2 at 3:02
RRL
47.6k42369
47.6k42369
asked Sep 11 at 6:34
Mike
1,006116
1,006116
5
The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40
Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11
add a comment |
5
The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40
Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11
5
5
The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40
The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40
Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11
Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are a number of possible approaches.
If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are
$$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$
Hence,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$
Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$
Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.
Thanks very much, I am grateful!
– Mike
Sep 11 at 7:22
@Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
– RRL
Sep 11 at 7:40
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are a number of possible approaches.
If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are
$$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$
Hence,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$
Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$
Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.
Thanks very much, I am grateful!
– Mike
Sep 11 at 7:22
@Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
– RRL
Sep 11 at 7:40
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are a number of possible approaches.
If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are
$$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$
Hence,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$
Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$
Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.
Thanks very much, I am grateful!
– Mike
Sep 11 at 7:22
@Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
– RRL
Sep 11 at 7:40
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
There are a number of possible approaches.
If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are
$$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$
Hence,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$
Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$
Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.
There are a number of possible approaches.
If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are
$$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$
Hence,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$
Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,
$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$
Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.
edited Sep 11 at 7:01
answered Sep 11 at 6:48
RRL
47.6k42369
47.6k42369
Thanks very much, I am grateful!
– Mike
Sep 11 at 7:22
@Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
– RRL
Sep 11 at 7:40
add a comment |
Thanks very much, I am grateful!
– Mike
Sep 11 at 7:22
@Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
– RRL
Sep 11 at 7:40
Thanks very much, I am grateful!
– Mike
Sep 11 at 7:22
Thanks very much, I am grateful!
– Mike
Sep 11 at 7:22
@Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
– RRL
Sep 11 at 7:40
@Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
– RRL
Sep 11 at 7:40
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.
Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.
answered Sep 11 at 6:49
gimusi
90.3k74495
90.3k74495
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912812%2fprove-that-fx-sqrtx-is-riemann-integrable-over-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40
Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11