Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3












Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$



MY WORK



Consider the Riemann sum



begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 5




    The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 6:40










  • Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Sep 11 at 9:11

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3












Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$



MY WORK



Consider the Riemann sum



begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 5




    The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 6:40










  • Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Sep 11 at 9:11















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3






3





Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$



MY WORK



Consider the Riemann sum



begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question















Prove that $f(x)=sqrt{x}$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$



MY WORK



Consider the Riemann sum



begin{align}int^{1}_{0}f(x)dx&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}fleft(frac{k}{n}right)\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{frac{k}{n}}\&=limlimits_{ntoinfty}frac{1}{n^{3/2}}sum^{n-1}_{k=0}sqrt{k}end{align}
I'm stuck here, what should I do? Thanks!







calculus real-analysis limits analysis riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 at 3:02









RRL

47.6k42369




47.6k42369










asked Sep 11 at 6:34









Mike

1,006116




1,006116








  • 5




    The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 6:40










  • Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Sep 11 at 9:11
















  • 5




    The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 6:40










  • Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Sep 11 at 9:11










5




5




The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40




The function is continuous on a compact interval hence...
– Did
Sep 11 at 6:40












Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11






Another reason: the given function is monotone and hence Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$. The answer by RRL can be used to show that any monotone function is Riemann integrable.
– Paramanand Singh
Sep 11 at 9:11












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










There are a number of possible approaches.



If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are



$$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$



Hence,



$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$



Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,



$$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$



Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks very much, I am grateful!
    – Mike
    Sep 11 at 7:22










  • @Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
    – RRL
    Sep 11 at 7:40


















up vote
1
down vote













Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912812%2fprove-that-fx-sqrtx-is-riemann-integrable-over-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    There are a number of possible approaches.



    If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are



    $$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$



    Hence,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$



    Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$



    Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thanks very much, I am grateful!
      – Mike
      Sep 11 at 7:22










    • @Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
      – RRL
      Sep 11 at 7:40















    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    There are a number of possible approaches.



    If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are



    $$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$



    Hence,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$



    Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$



    Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thanks very much, I am grateful!
      – Mike
      Sep 11 at 7:22










    • @Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
      – RRL
      Sep 11 at 7:40













    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted






    There are a number of possible approaches.



    If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are



    $$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$



    Hence,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$



    Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$



    Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    There are a number of possible approaches.



    If you are trying to show that the integral exists with Riemann (Darboux) sums, then since $f(x) = sqrt{x}$ is increasing, the upper and lower sums for a uniform partition $P = (0, 1/n, 2/n, ldots, 1)$ are



    $$U(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k},\L(P,f) = frac1{n}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{(k-1)/n}= frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nsqrt{k-1}$$



    Hence,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac1{n^{3/2}}sum_{k=1}^nleft(sqrt{k}-sqrt{k-1}right)$$



    Since the sum is telescoping, we have for $n > 1/epsilon$,



    $$U(P,f)-L(P,f) = frac{sqrt{n}}{n^{3/2}}= frac1{n}< epsilon$$



    Therefore, $f$ is integrable by the Riemann criterion -- since for any $epsilon >0$ there exists a partition for which the difference between upper and lower sums is less than $epsilon$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Sep 11 at 7:01

























    answered Sep 11 at 6:48









    RRL

    47.6k42369




    47.6k42369












    • Thanks very much, I am grateful!
      – Mike
      Sep 11 at 7:22










    • @Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
      – RRL
      Sep 11 at 7:40


















    • Thanks very much, I am grateful!
      – Mike
      Sep 11 at 7:22










    • @Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
      – RRL
      Sep 11 at 7:40
















    Thanks very much, I am grateful!
    – Mike
    Sep 11 at 7:22




    Thanks very much, I am grateful!
    – Mike
    Sep 11 at 7:22












    @Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
    – RRL
    Sep 11 at 7:40




    @Mike: You're welcome. Glad this helped.
    – RRL
    Sep 11 at 7:40










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Recall that a continuous function $f:[a,b] to mathbb{R}$ is integrable on the interval $[a,b]$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 11 at 6:49









        gimusi

        90.3k74495




        90.3k74495






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912812%2fprove-that-fx-sqrtx-is-riemann-integrable-over-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna