Proving that the power series for the cosine function is greater than zero, for $x$ in $[0, pi/2)$.
I'm trying to prove the cosine power series
$$sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^k frac{x^{2k}}{(2k)!} ;>;0$$
for all $x in [0, pi/2)$. Here, $pi$ is defined as the smallest positive real such that $cosfrac{pi}{2} = 0$.
My initial thoughts for an attempt at a solution:
Showing that the series achieves an absolute maximum and minimum at its endpoints, respectfully, and that both of these are positive. Thus by the intermediate value theorem, all points between must also be greater than zero.
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to formally write this as a proof, however.
real-analysis sequences-and-series trigonometry proof-writing taylor-expansion
|
show 1 more comment
I'm trying to prove the cosine power series
$$sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^k frac{x^{2k}}{(2k)!} ;>;0$$
for all $x in [0, pi/2)$. Here, $pi$ is defined as the smallest positive real such that $cosfrac{pi}{2} = 0$.
My initial thoughts for an attempt at a solution:
Showing that the series achieves an absolute maximum and minimum at its endpoints, respectfully, and that both of these are positive. Thus by the intermediate value theorem, all points between must also be greater than zero.
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to formally write this as a proof, however.
real-analysis sequences-and-series trigonometry proof-writing taylor-expansion
To solve this question, the way you define $pi$ is important.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:14
Right. Forgot to metion that we have defined $pi$ as the smallest positive real number such that cos($pi$/2) = 0.
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:15
Did you prove that the $cos$ function is continuous?
– Botond
Dec 9 '18 at 20:21
Well since series converges by the absolute series convergence test, the series would be continuous, correct?
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:32
2
If $pi/2$ is defined as the smallest positive zero of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=f(x)$ there is nothing to prove: such function is continuous and (positive where positive).
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
I'm trying to prove the cosine power series
$$sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^k frac{x^{2k}}{(2k)!} ;>;0$$
for all $x in [0, pi/2)$. Here, $pi$ is defined as the smallest positive real such that $cosfrac{pi}{2} = 0$.
My initial thoughts for an attempt at a solution:
Showing that the series achieves an absolute maximum and minimum at its endpoints, respectfully, and that both of these are positive. Thus by the intermediate value theorem, all points between must also be greater than zero.
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to formally write this as a proof, however.
real-analysis sequences-and-series trigonometry proof-writing taylor-expansion
I'm trying to prove the cosine power series
$$sum_{k=0}^infty (-1)^k frac{x^{2k}}{(2k)!} ;>;0$$
for all $x in [0, pi/2)$. Here, $pi$ is defined as the smallest positive real such that $cosfrac{pi}{2} = 0$.
My initial thoughts for an attempt at a solution:
Showing that the series achieves an absolute maximum and minimum at its endpoints, respectfully, and that both of these are positive. Thus by the intermediate value theorem, all points between must also be greater than zero.
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to formally write this as a proof, however.
real-analysis sequences-and-series trigonometry proof-writing taylor-expansion
real-analysis sequences-and-series trigonometry proof-writing taylor-expansion
edited Dec 9 '18 at 20:24
Blue
47.6k870151
47.6k870151
asked Dec 9 '18 at 20:09
user624612
To solve this question, the way you define $pi$ is important.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:14
Right. Forgot to metion that we have defined $pi$ as the smallest positive real number such that cos($pi$/2) = 0.
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:15
Did you prove that the $cos$ function is continuous?
– Botond
Dec 9 '18 at 20:21
Well since series converges by the absolute series convergence test, the series would be continuous, correct?
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:32
2
If $pi/2$ is defined as the smallest positive zero of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=f(x)$ there is nothing to prove: such function is continuous and (positive where positive).
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
To solve this question, the way you define $pi$ is important.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:14
Right. Forgot to metion that we have defined $pi$ as the smallest positive real number such that cos($pi$/2) = 0.
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:15
Did you prove that the $cos$ function is continuous?
– Botond
Dec 9 '18 at 20:21
Well since series converges by the absolute series convergence test, the series would be continuous, correct?
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:32
2
If $pi/2$ is defined as the smallest positive zero of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=f(x)$ there is nothing to prove: such function is continuous and (positive where positive).
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:16
To solve this question, the way you define $pi$ is important.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:14
To solve this question, the way you define $pi$ is important.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:14
Right. Forgot to metion that we have defined $pi$ as the smallest positive real number such that cos($pi$/2) = 0.
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:15
Right. Forgot to metion that we have defined $pi$ as the smallest positive real number such that cos($pi$/2) = 0.
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:15
Did you prove that the $cos$ function is continuous?
– Botond
Dec 9 '18 at 20:21
Did you prove that the $cos$ function is continuous?
– Botond
Dec 9 '18 at 20:21
Well since series converges by the absolute series convergence test, the series would be continuous, correct?
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:32
Well since series converges by the absolute series convergence test, the series would be continuous, correct?
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:32
2
2
If $pi/2$ is defined as the smallest positive zero of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=f(x)$ there is nothing to prove: such function is continuous and (positive where positive).
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:16
If $pi/2$ is defined as the smallest positive zero of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=f(x)$ there is nothing to prove: such function is continuous and (positive where positive).
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Denote $f(x)= cos x$. You have $f(0)=1$. As $f$ is continuous (converging power series are continuous), $f$ is strictly positive around $0$.
You can then conclude with $pi$ definition.
Which "$pi$ definition"? The area of the unit circle is not immediately related to the first positive root of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:05
@JackD'Aurizio See the question I ask to the OP and his answer. He defines $pi$ as the smallest positive integer such that $cos pi/2 =0$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:07
Positive real and not positive integer!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:14
add a comment |
We can use geometry to show $cos(x)$ is $C^{(infty)}.$ Then we can use Lagrange Remainder Theorem to show the series equals the cosine function on all $mathbb{R}$. Then we automatically get that the series is positive whenever $cos(x)$ is positive.
If $cos x$ is defined as its Maclaurin series, there is no geometry we may invoke unless we prove it.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:06
Then call the geometric version of $cos(x)$ banana and use the same argument to show that $text{banana}(x)=cos(x).$ The statement I gave was how to show the geometric definition equals the series. That's the crux, it doesn't matter what you call them.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:08
That's the crux - I do not agree, since you do not need the geometric version of $cos x$ to relate its first positive zero with the area of the circle. Yours (properly worded) is just one way.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:12
Well, I meant the crux of my argument. Sorry if it seemed I meant every argument. Also, I do think my statement is properly worded, it's just missing details.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
add a comment |
A famous diagram-based argument shows any acute $x$ satisfies $0lesin xle x$. Alternate use of $cos x=1-int_0^xsin t dt,,sin x=int_0^xcos t dt$ allows us to prove by induction that $c_{2n+1}lecos xle c_{2n}$ with $c_n:=sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x^2)^k}{(2k)!}$, and a similar result for $sin x$. Since the ratio test implies $lim_{ntoinfty} c_n$ is finite for any acute $x$, by the squeeze theorem this limit is $cos xge 0$.
You are (more or less) starting by assuming the thesis, i.e. that $$ 0 leq sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}leq x$$ holds for any $xin[0,pi/2]$. We need to prove the geometric properties of $cos x$ or $sin x$ if they are just defined through their Maclaurin series.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:09
@JackD'Aurizio No, I'm defining the trigonometric functions from geometry, and deducing their range on acute angles from geometry, and proving what the series converges to from geometry.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:11
Then how do you relate $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$ with the geometric definition of $cos x$? I agree that if we show $$sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=cos xtext{ defined by geometry}$$ we have nothing to do more.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
@JackD'Aurizio I think I spelled it out pretty well.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
$cos x$, defined as its Maclaurin series, is an entire solution of the differential equation $f''(x)+f(x)=0$, $f(0)=1$, $f'(0)=1$. $cos x$ is even and concave where positive, and we may denote with $alpha$ the smallest positive zero of $cos x$. The problem boils down to showing that $alpha=frac{pi}{2}$. Now, by denoting through $sin x$ the opposite of the derivative of $cos x$, we have that $f''+f=0$ implies that $f^2+f'^2$ is constant, in particular equal to one (Pythagorean theorem, $sin^2+cos^2=1$). Since $cos x$ is decreasing on $(0,alpha)$ and the Pythagorean theorem plus the chain rule imply that the derivative of the inverse function of $cos x$ is $-frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$, we have
$$ alpha = int_{0}^{1}frac{dx}{sqrt{1-x^2}}.$$
Integration by parts relates $alpha$ with the area of the unit circle:
$$ alpha = 2int_{0}^{1}sqrt{1-x^2},dx = frac{pi}{2} $$
and we are done: the series defining $cos x$ is positive on $[0,alpha)=left[0,frac{pi}{2}right)$.
As a side-effect, we have the hypergeometric identities
$$ frac{pi}{2}=sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{(2n+1)4^n},qquad frac{pi}{2}=2-sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(n+1)(2n+3)}$$
provided by the Maclaurin series of $frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The latter is faster-convergent, of course.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032917%2fproving-that-the-power-series-for-the-cosine-function-is-greater-than-zero-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Denote $f(x)= cos x$. You have $f(0)=1$. As $f$ is continuous (converging power series are continuous), $f$ is strictly positive around $0$.
You can then conclude with $pi$ definition.
Which "$pi$ definition"? The area of the unit circle is not immediately related to the first positive root of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:05
@JackD'Aurizio See the question I ask to the OP and his answer. He defines $pi$ as the smallest positive integer such that $cos pi/2 =0$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:07
Positive real and not positive integer!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:14
add a comment |
Denote $f(x)= cos x$. You have $f(0)=1$. As $f$ is continuous (converging power series are continuous), $f$ is strictly positive around $0$.
You can then conclude with $pi$ definition.
Which "$pi$ definition"? The area of the unit circle is not immediately related to the first positive root of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:05
@JackD'Aurizio See the question I ask to the OP and his answer. He defines $pi$ as the smallest positive integer such that $cos pi/2 =0$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:07
Positive real and not positive integer!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:14
add a comment |
Denote $f(x)= cos x$. You have $f(0)=1$. As $f$ is continuous (converging power series are continuous), $f$ is strictly positive around $0$.
You can then conclude with $pi$ definition.
Denote $f(x)= cos x$. You have $f(0)=1$. As $f$ is continuous (converging power series are continuous), $f$ is strictly positive around $0$.
You can then conclude with $pi$ definition.
answered Dec 9 '18 at 20:24
mathcounterexamples.net
24.4k21753
24.4k21753
Which "$pi$ definition"? The area of the unit circle is not immediately related to the first positive root of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:05
@JackD'Aurizio See the question I ask to the OP and his answer. He defines $pi$ as the smallest positive integer such that $cos pi/2 =0$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:07
Positive real and not positive integer!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:14
add a comment |
Which "$pi$ definition"? The area of the unit circle is not immediately related to the first positive root of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:05
@JackD'Aurizio See the question I ask to the OP and his answer. He defines $pi$ as the smallest positive integer such that $cos pi/2 =0$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:07
Positive real and not positive integer!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:14
Which "$pi$ definition"? The area of the unit circle is not immediately related to the first positive root of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:05
Which "$pi$ definition"? The area of the unit circle is not immediately related to the first positive root of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:05
@JackD'Aurizio See the question I ask to the OP and his answer. He defines $pi$ as the smallest positive integer such that $cos pi/2 =0$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:07
@JackD'Aurizio See the question I ask to the OP and his answer. He defines $pi$ as the smallest positive integer such that $cos pi/2 =0$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:07
Positive real and not positive integer!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:14
Positive real and not positive integer!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 21:14
add a comment |
We can use geometry to show $cos(x)$ is $C^{(infty)}.$ Then we can use Lagrange Remainder Theorem to show the series equals the cosine function on all $mathbb{R}$. Then we automatically get that the series is positive whenever $cos(x)$ is positive.
If $cos x$ is defined as its Maclaurin series, there is no geometry we may invoke unless we prove it.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:06
Then call the geometric version of $cos(x)$ banana and use the same argument to show that $text{banana}(x)=cos(x).$ The statement I gave was how to show the geometric definition equals the series. That's the crux, it doesn't matter what you call them.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:08
That's the crux - I do not agree, since you do not need the geometric version of $cos x$ to relate its first positive zero with the area of the circle. Yours (properly worded) is just one way.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:12
Well, I meant the crux of my argument. Sorry if it seemed I meant every argument. Also, I do think my statement is properly worded, it's just missing details.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
add a comment |
We can use geometry to show $cos(x)$ is $C^{(infty)}.$ Then we can use Lagrange Remainder Theorem to show the series equals the cosine function on all $mathbb{R}$. Then we automatically get that the series is positive whenever $cos(x)$ is positive.
If $cos x$ is defined as its Maclaurin series, there is no geometry we may invoke unless we prove it.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:06
Then call the geometric version of $cos(x)$ banana and use the same argument to show that $text{banana}(x)=cos(x).$ The statement I gave was how to show the geometric definition equals the series. That's the crux, it doesn't matter what you call them.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:08
That's the crux - I do not agree, since you do not need the geometric version of $cos x$ to relate its first positive zero with the area of the circle. Yours (properly worded) is just one way.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:12
Well, I meant the crux of my argument. Sorry if it seemed I meant every argument. Also, I do think my statement is properly worded, it's just missing details.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
add a comment |
We can use geometry to show $cos(x)$ is $C^{(infty)}.$ Then we can use Lagrange Remainder Theorem to show the series equals the cosine function on all $mathbb{R}$. Then we automatically get that the series is positive whenever $cos(x)$ is positive.
We can use geometry to show $cos(x)$ is $C^{(infty)}.$ Then we can use Lagrange Remainder Theorem to show the series equals the cosine function on all $mathbb{R}$. Then we automatically get that the series is positive whenever $cos(x)$ is positive.
answered Dec 9 '18 at 20:18
Melody
63212
63212
If $cos x$ is defined as its Maclaurin series, there is no geometry we may invoke unless we prove it.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:06
Then call the geometric version of $cos(x)$ banana and use the same argument to show that $text{banana}(x)=cos(x).$ The statement I gave was how to show the geometric definition equals the series. That's the crux, it doesn't matter what you call them.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:08
That's the crux - I do not agree, since you do not need the geometric version of $cos x$ to relate its first positive zero with the area of the circle. Yours (properly worded) is just one way.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:12
Well, I meant the crux of my argument. Sorry if it seemed I meant every argument. Also, I do think my statement is properly worded, it's just missing details.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
add a comment |
If $cos x$ is defined as its Maclaurin series, there is no geometry we may invoke unless we prove it.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:06
Then call the geometric version of $cos(x)$ banana and use the same argument to show that $text{banana}(x)=cos(x).$ The statement I gave was how to show the geometric definition equals the series. That's the crux, it doesn't matter what you call them.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:08
That's the crux - I do not agree, since you do not need the geometric version of $cos x$ to relate its first positive zero with the area of the circle. Yours (properly worded) is just one way.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:12
Well, I meant the crux of my argument. Sorry if it seemed I meant every argument. Also, I do think my statement is properly worded, it's just missing details.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
If $cos x$ is defined as its Maclaurin series, there is no geometry we may invoke unless we prove it.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:06
If $cos x$ is defined as its Maclaurin series, there is no geometry we may invoke unless we prove it.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:06
Then call the geometric version of $cos(x)$ banana and use the same argument to show that $text{banana}(x)=cos(x).$ The statement I gave was how to show the geometric definition equals the series. That's the crux, it doesn't matter what you call them.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:08
Then call the geometric version of $cos(x)$ banana and use the same argument to show that $text{banana}(x)=cos(x).$ The statement I gave was how to show the geometric definition equals the series. That's the crux, it doesn't matter what you call them.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:08
That's the crux - I do not agree, since you do not need the geometric version of $cos x$ to relate its first positive zero with the area of the circle. Yours (properly worded) is just one way.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:12
That's the crux - I do not agree, since you do not need the geometric version of $cos x$ to relate its first positive zero with the area of the circle. Yours (properly worded) is just one way.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:12
Well, I meant the crux of my argument. Sorry if it seemed I meant every argument. Also, I do think my statement is properly worded, it's just missing details.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
Well, I meant the crux of my argument. Sorry if it seemed I meant every argument. Also, I do think my statement is properly worded, it's just missing details.
– Melody
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
add a comment |
A famous diagram-based argument shows any acute $x$ satisfies $0lesin xle x$. Alternate use of $cos x=1-int_0^xsin t dt,,sin x=int_0^xcos t dt$ allows us to prove by induction that $c_{2n+1}lecos xle c_{2n}$ with $c_n:=sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x^2)^k}{(2k)!}$, and a similar result for $sin x$. Since the ratio test implies $lim_{ntoinfty} c_n$ is finite for any acute $x$, by the squeeze theorem this limit is $cos xge 0$.
You are (more or less) starting by assuming the thesis, i.e. that $$ 0 leq sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}leq x$$ holds for any $xin[0,pi/2]$. We need to prove the geometric properties of $cos x$ or $sin x$ if they are just defined through their Maclaurin series.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:09
@JackD'Aurizio No, I'm defining the trigonometric functions from geometry, and deducing their range on acute angles from geometry, and proving what the series converges to from geometry.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:11
Then how do you relate $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$ with the geometric definition of $cos x$? I agree that if we show $$sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=cos xtext{ defined by geometry}$$ we have nothing to do more.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
@JackD'Aurizio I think I spelled it out pretty well.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
A famous diagram-based argument shows any acute $x$ satisfies $0lesin xle x$. Alternate use of $cos x=1-int_0^xsin t dt,,sin x=int_0^xcos t dt$ allows us to prove by induction that $c_{2n+1}lecos xle c_{2n}$ with $c_n:=sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x^2)^k}{(2k)!}$, and a similar result for $sin x$. Since the ratio test implies $lim_{ntoinfty} c_n$ is finite for any acute $x$, by the squeeze theorem this limit is $cos xge 0$.
You are (more or less) starting by assuming the thesis, i.e. that $$ 0 leq sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}leq x$$ holds for any $xin[0,pi/2]$. We need to prove the geometric properties of $cos x$ or $sin x$ if they are just defined through their Maclaurin series.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:09
@JackD'Aurizio No, I'm defining the trigonometric functions from geometry, and deducing their range on acute angles from geometry, and proving what the series converges to from geometry.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:11
Then how do you relate $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$ with the geometric definition of $cos x$? I agree that if we show $$sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=cos xtext{ defined by geometry}$$ we have nothing to do more.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
@JackD'Aurizio I think I spelled it out pretty well.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
A famous diagram-based argument shows any acute $x$ satisfies $0lesin xle x$. Alternate use of $cos x=1-int_0^xsin t dt,,sin x=int_0^xcos t dt$ allows us to prove by induction that $c_{2n+1}lecos xle c_{2n}$ with $c_n:=sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x^2)^k}{(2k)!}$, and a similar result for $sin x$. Since the ratio test implies $lim_{ntoinfty} c_n$ is finite for any acute $x$, by the squeeze theorem this limit is $cos xge 0$.
A famous diagram-based argument shows any acute $x$ satisfies $0lesin xle x$. Alternate use of $cos x=1-int_0^xsin t dt,,sin x=int_0^xcos t dt$ allows us to prove by induction that $c_{2n+1}lecos xle c_{2n}$ with $c_n:=sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x^2)^k}{(2k)!}$, and a similar result for $sin x$. Since the ratio test implies $lim_{ntoinfty} c_n$ is finite for any acute $x$, by the squeeze theorem this limit is $cos xge 0$.
answered Dec 9 '18 at 20:24
J.G.
22.6k22136
22.6k22136
You are (more or less) starting by assuming the thesis, i.e. that $$ 0 leq sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}leq x$$ holds for any $xin[0,pi/2]$. We need to prove the geometric properties of $cos x$ or $sin x$ if they are just defined through their Maclaurin series.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:09
@JackD'Aurizio No, I'm defining the trigonometric functions from geometry, and deducing their range on acute angles from geometry, and proving what the series converges to from geometry.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:11
Then how do you relate $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$ with the geometric definition of $cos x$? I agree that if we show $$sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=cos xtext{ defined by geometry}$$ we have nothing to do more.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
@JackD'Aurizio I think I spelled it out pretty well.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
You are (more or less) starting by assuming the thesis, i.e. that $$ 0 leq sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}leq x$$ holds for any $xin[0,pi/2]$. We need to prove the geometric properties of $cos x$ or $sin x$ if they are just defined through their Maclaurin series.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:09
@JackD'Aurizio No, I'm defining the trigonometric functions from geometry, and deducing their range on acute angles from geometry, and proving what the series converges to from geometry.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:11
Then how do you relate $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$ with the geometric definition of $cos x$? I agree that if we show $$sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=cos xtext{ defined by geometry}$$ we have nothing to do more.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
@JackD'Aurizio I think I spelled it out pretty well.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:19
You are (more or less) starting by assuming the thesis, i.e. that $$ 0 leq sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}leq x$$ holds for any $xin[0,pi/2]$. We need to prove the geometric properties of $cos x$ or $sin x$ if they are just defined through their Maclaurin series.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:09
You are (more or less) starting by assuming the thesis, i.e. that $$ 0 leq sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}leq x$$ holds for any $xin[0,pi/2]$. We need to prove the geometric properties of $cos x$ or $sin x$ if they are just defined through their Maclaurin series.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:09
@JackD'Aurizio No, I'm defining the trigonometric functions from geometry, and deducing their range on acute angles from geometry, and proving what the series converges to from geometry.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:11
@JackD'Aurizio No, I'm defining the trigonometric functions from geometry, and deducing their range on acute angles from geometry, and proving what the series converges to from geometry.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:11
Then how do you relate $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$ with the geometric definition of $cos x$? I agree that if we show $$sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=cos xtext{ defined by geometry}$$ we have nothing to do more.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
Then how do you relate $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}$ with the geometric definition of $cos x$? I agree that if we show $$sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=cos xtext{ defined by geometry}$$ we have nothing to do more.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:13
@JackD'Aurizio I think I spelled it out pretty well.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:19
@JackD'Aurizio I think I spelled it out pretty well.
– J.G.
Dec 9 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
$cos x$, defined as its Maclaurin series, is an entire solution of the differential equation $f''(x)+f(x)=0$, $f(0)=1$, $f'(0)=1$. $cos x$ is even and concave where positive, and we may denote with $alpha$ the smallest positive zero of $cos x$. The problem boils down to showing that $alpha=frac{pi}{2}$. Now, by denoting through $sin x$ the opposite of the derivative of $cos x$, we have that $f''+f=0$ implies that $f^2+f'^2$ is constant, in particular equal to one (Pythagorean theorem, $sin^2+cos^2=1$). Since $cos x$ is decreasing on $(0,alpha)$ and the Pythagorean theorem plus the chain rule imply that the derivative of the inverse function of $cos x$ is $-frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$, we have
$$ alpha = int_{0}^{1}frac{dx}{sqrt{1-x^2}}.$$
Integration by parts relates $alpha$ with the area of the unit circle:
$$ alpha = 2int_{0}^{1}sqrt{1-x^2},dx = frac{pi}{2} $$
and we are done: the series defining $cos x$ is positive on $[0,alpha)=left[0,frac{pi}{2}right)$.
As a side-effect, we have the hypergeometric identities
$$ frac{pi}{2}=sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{(2n+1)4^n},qquad frac{pi}{2}=2-sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(n+1)(2n+3)}$$
provided by the Maclaurin series of $frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The latter is faster-convergent, of course.
add a comment |
$cos x$, defined as its Maclaurin series, is an entire solution of the differential equation $f''(x)+f(x)=0$, $f(0)=1$, $f'(0)=1$. $cos x$ is even and concave where positive, and we may denote with $alpha$ the smallest positive zero of $cos x$. The problem boils down to showing that $alpha=frac{pi}{2}$. Now, by denoting through $sin x$ the opposite of the derivative of $cos x$, we have that $f''+f=0$ implies that $f^2+f'^2$ is constant, in particular equal to one (Pythagorean theorem, $sin^2+cos^2=1$). Since $cos x$ is decreasing on $(0,alpha)$ and the Pythagorean theorem plus the chain rule imply that the derivative of the inverse function of $cos x$ is $-frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$, we have
$$ alpha = int_{0}^{1}frac{dx}{sqrt{1-x^2}}.$$
Integration by parts relates $alpha$ with the area of the unit circle:
$$ alpha = 2int_{0}^{1}sqrt{1-x^2},dx = frac{pi}{2} $$
and we are done: the series defining $cos x$ is positive on $[0,alpha)=left[0,frac{pi}{2}right)$.
As a side-effect, we have the hypergeometric identities
$$ frac{pi}{2}=sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{(2n+1)4^n},qquad frac{pi}{2}=2-sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(n+1)(2n+3)}$$
provided by the Maclaurin series of $frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The latter is faster-convergent, of course.
add a comment |
$cos x$, defined as its Maclaurin series, is an entire solution of the differential equation $f''(x)+f(x)=0$, $f(0)=1$, $f'(0)=1$. $cos x$ is even and concave where positive, and we may denote with $alpha$ the smallest positive zero of $cos x$. The problem boils down to showing that $alpha=frac{pi}{2}$. Now, by denoting through $sin x$ the opposite of the derivative of $cos x$, we have that $f''+f=0$ implies that $f^2+f'^2$ is constant, in particular equal to one (Pythagorean theorem, $sin^2+cos^2=1$). Since $cos x$ is decreasing on $(0,alpha)$ and the Pythagorean theorem plus the chain rule imply that the derivative of the inverse function of $cos x$ is $-frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$, we have
$$ alpha = int_{0}^{1}frac{dx}{sqrt{1-x^2}}.$$
Integration by parts relates $alpha$ with the area of the unit circle:
$$ alpha = 2int_{0}^{1}sqrt{1-x^2},dx = frac{pi}{2} $$
and we are done: the series defining $cos x$ is positive on $[0,alpha)=left[0,frac{pi}{2}right)$.
As a side-effect, we have the hypergeometric identities
$$ frac{pi}{2}=sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{(2n+1)4^n},qquad frac{pi}{2}=2-sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(n+1)(2n+3)}$$
provided by the Maclaurin series of $frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The latter is faster-convergent, of course.
$cos x$, defined as its Maclaurin series, is an entire solution of the differential equation $f''(x)+f(x)=0$, $f(0)=1$, $f'(0)=1$. $cos x$ is even and concave where positive, and we may denote with $alpha$ the smallest positive zero of $cos x$. The problem boils down to showing that $alpha=frac{pi}{2}$. Now, by denoting through $sin x$ the opposite of the derivative of $cos x$, we have that $f''+f=0$ implies that $f^2+f'^2$ is constant, in particular equal to one (Pythagorean theorem, $sin^2+cos^2=1$). Since $cos x$ is decreasing on $(0,alpha)$ and the Pythagorean theorem plus the chain rule imply that the derivative of the inverse function of $cos x$ is $-frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$, we have
$$ alpha = int_{0}^{1}frac{dx}{sqrt{1-x^2}}.$$
Integration by parts relates $alpha$ with the area of the unit circle:
$$ alpha = 2int_{0}^{1}sqrt{1-x^2},dx = frac{pi}{2} $$
and we are done: the series defining $cos x$ is positive on $[0,alpha)=left[0,frac{pi}{2}right)$.
As a side-effect, we have the hypergeometric identities
$$ frac{pi}{2}=sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{(2n+1)4^n},qquad frac{pi}{2}=2-sum_{ngeq 0}frac{binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(n+1)(2n+3)}$$
provided by the Maclaurin series of $frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The latter is faster-convergent, of course.
edited Dec 9 '18 at 21:02
answered Dec 9 '18 at 20:46
Jack D'Aurizio
286k33279656
286k33279656
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032917%2fproving-that-the-power-series-for-the-cosine-function-is-greater-than-zero-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
To solve this question, the way you define $pi$ is important.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:14
Right. Forgot to metion that we have defined $pi$ as the smallest positive real number such that cos($pi$/2) = 0.
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:15
Did you prove that the $cos$ function is continuous?
– Botond
Dec 9 '18 at 20:21
Well since series converges by the absolute series convergence test, the series would be continuous, correct?
– user624612
Dec 9 '18 at 20:32
2
If $pi/2$ is defined as the smallest positive zero of $sum_{ngeq 0}frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{(2n)!}=f(x)$ there is nothing to prove: such function is continuous and (positive where positive).
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 9 '18 at 21:16