joint distribution of number of visits of a Markov chain
Let ${X_{n}}_{n geq 0}$ be a Markov chain on the state space $S = {1,dots,r}$, $r geq 2$. Let $alpha = (alpha_{1},dots,alpha_{r})$ be the initial distribution and $P$ the transition matrix. For $i = 1,dots,r$ define the following random variables
$$
L_{i,K} = sum_{j=0}^{K-1}mathbb{1}_{{X_{j} = i}}
$$
i.e. $L_{i,K}$ is the number of visits to state $i$ up to time $K-1$. I want to determine the joint distribution
$$
mathbb{P}(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})
$$
where $n_{1} + dots + n_{r} = K$. My attempt is the following. First I have determined the generating function of $(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})$. The result is given by
$$
F_{n}(x_{1},dots,x_{r}) := sum_{n_{1} + cdots + n_{r} = n}mathbb{P}left( L_{1,n} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,n} = n_{r} right)x_{1}^{n_{1}} cdots x_{r}^{n_{r}} = [alpha_{1}x_{1},dots,alpha_{r}x_{r}] left( PDright)^{n-1} e,
$$
where
$$
D =
begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} && \
& ddots &\
& & x_{r}
end{bmatrix}.
$$
and $e = (1,dots,1) in mathbb{R}^{r}$. Is there a way to extract the probabilities?
probability markov-chains
add a comment |
Let ${X_{n}}_{n geq 0}$ be a Markov chain on the state space $S = {1,dots,r}$, $r geq 2$. Let $alpha = (alpha_{1},dots,alpha_{r})$ be the initial distribution and $P$ the transition matrix. For $i = 1,dots,r$ define the following random variables
$$
L_{i,K} = sum_{j=0}^{K-1}mathbb{1}_{{X_{j} = i}}
$$
i.e. $L_{i,K}$ is the number of visits to state $i$ up to time $K-1$. I want to determine the joint distribution
$$
mathbb{P}(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})
$$
where $n_{1} + dots + n_{r} = K$. My attempt is the following. First I have determined the generating function of $(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})$. The result is given by
$$
F_{n}(x_{1},dots,x_{r}) := sum_{n_{1} + cdots + n_{r} = n}mathbb{P}left( L_{1,n} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,n} = n_{r} right)x_{1}^{n_{1}} cdots x_{r}^{n_{r}} = [alpha_{1}x_{1},dots,alpha_{r}x_{r}] left( PDright)^{n-1} e,
$$
where
$$
D =
begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} && \
& ddots &\
& & x_{r}
end{bmatrix}.
$$
and $e = (1,dots,1) in mathbb{R}^{r}$. Is there a way to extract the probabilities?
probability markov-chains
1
There is no known (simple) way to do this: If you take a general graph with $r$ nodes and define the Markov chain by a random walk over the graph (starting in state 1) then $P[L_{1,r}=1, L_{2,r}=1, ..., L_{r,r}=1]>0$ iff there is a Hamiltonian path starting at state 1.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 8:43
I have edit my question. I hope the answer is now more accessible
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 12:16
1
In general you can extract the $(n_1, ..., n_r)=(1,1,...,1)$ term from a transform by taking $(partial/partial x_1)(partial/partial x_2)...(partial/partial x_n)$ and setting $x_i=0$ for all $i$. But I don't think your edits are going to solve an NP-hard problem.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 15:21
so you mean that this is the best expression to compute the probabilities? There is no easy way to extract the probabilities?
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 18:15
add a comment |
Let ${X_{n}}_{n geq 0}$ be a Markov chain on the state space $S = {1,dots,r}$, $r geq 2$. Let $alpha = (alpha_{1},dots,alpha_{r})$ be the initial distribution and $P$ the transition matrix. For $i = 1,dots,r$ define the following random variables
$$
L_{i,K} = sum_{j=0}^{K-1}mathbb{1}_{{X_{j} = i}}
$$
i.e. $L_{i,K}$ is the number of visits to state $i$ up to time $K-1$. I want to determine the joint distribution
$$
mathbb{P}(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})
$$
where $n_{1} + dots + n_{r} = K$. My attempt is the following. First I have determined the generating function of $(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})$. The result is given by
$$
F_{n}(x_{1},dots,x_{r}) := sum_{n_{1} + cdots + n_{r} = n}mathbb{P}left( L_{1,n} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,n} = n_{r} right)x_{1}^{n_{1}} cdots x_{r}^{n_{r}} = [alpha_{1}x_{1},dots,alpha_{r}x_{r}] left( PDright)^{n-1} e,
$$
where
$$
D =
begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} && \
& ddots &\
& & x_{r}
end{bmatrix}.
$$
and $e = (1,dots,1) in mathbb{R}^{r}$. Is there a way to extract the probabilities?
probability markov-chains
Let ${X_{n}}_{n geq 0}$ be a Markov chain on the state space $S = {1,dots,r}$, $r geq 2$. Let $alpha = (alpha_{1},dots,alpha_{r})$ be the initial distribution and $P$ the transition matrix. For $i = 1,dots,r$ define the following random variables
$$
L_{i,K} = sum_{j=0}^{K-1}mathbb{1}_{{X_{j} = i}}
$$
i.e. $L_{i,K}$ is the number of visits to state $i$ up to time $K-1$. I want to determine the joint distribution
$$
mathbb{P}(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})
$$
where $n_{1} + dots + n_{r} = K$. My attempt is the following. First I have determined the generating function of $(L_{1,K} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,K}=n_{r})$. The result is given by
$$
F_{n}(x_{1},dots,x_{r}) := sum_{n_{1} + cdots + n_{r} = n}mathbb{P}left( L_{1,n} = n_{1},dots,L_{r,n} = n_{r} right)x_{1}^{n_{1}} cdots x_{r}^{n_{r}} = [alpha_{1}x_{1},dots,alpha_{r}x_{r}] left( PDright)^{n-1} e,
$$
where
$$
D =
begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} && \
& ddots &\
& & x_{r}
end{bmatrix}.
$$
and $e = (1,dots,1) in mathbb{R}^{r}$. Is there a way to extract the probabilities?
probability markov-chains
probability markov-chains
edited Dec 10 '18 at 12:13
asked Dec 9 '18 at 20:58
wayne
492112
492112
1
There is no known (simple) way to do this: If you take a general graph with $r$ nodes and define the Markov chain by a random walk over the graph (starting in state 1) then $P[L_{1,r}=1, L_{2,r}=1, ..., L_{r,r}=1]>0$ iff there is a Hamiltonian path starting at state 1.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 8:43
I have edit my question. I hope the answer is now more accessible
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 12:16
1
In general you can extract the $(n_1, ..., n_r)=(1,1,...,1)$ term from a transform by taking $(partial/partial x_1)(partial/partial x_2)...(partial/partial x_n)$ and setting $x_i=0$ for all $i$. But I don't think your edits are going to solve an NP-hard problem.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 15:21
so you mean that this is the best expression to compute the probabilities? There is no easy way to extract the probabilities?
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 18:15
add a comment |
1
There is no known (simple) way to do this: If you take a general graph with $r$ nodes and define the Markov chain by a random walk over the graph (starting in state 1) then $P[L_{1,r}=1, L_{2,r}=1, ..., L_{r,r}=1]>0$ iff there is a Hamiltonian path starting at state 1.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 8:43
I have edit my question. I hope the answer is now more accessible
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 12:16
1
In general you can extract the $(n_1, ..., n_r)=(1,1,...,1)$ term from a transform by taking $(partial/partial x_1)(partial/partial x_2)...(partial/partial x_n)$ and setting $x_i=0$ for all $i$. But I don't think your edits are going to solve an NP-hard problem.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 15:21
so you mean that this is the best expression to compute the probabilities? There is no easy way to extract the probabilities?
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 18:15
1
1
There is no known (simple) way to do this: If you take a general graph with $r$ nodes and define the Markov chain by a random walk over the graph (starting in state 1) then $P[L_{1,r}=1, L_{2,r}=1, ..., L_{r,r}=1]>0$ iff there is a Hamiltonian path starting at state 1.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 8:43
There is no known (simple) way to do this: If you take a general graph with $r$ nodes and define the Markov chain by a random walk over the graph (starting in state 1) then $P[L_{1,r}=1, L_{2,r}=1, ..., L_{r,r}=1]>0$ iff there is a Hamiltonian path starting at state 1.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 8:43
I have edit my question. I hope the answer is now more accessible
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 12:16
I have edit my question. I hope the answer is now more accessible
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 12:16
1
1
In general you can extract the $(n_1, ..., n_r)=(1,1,...,1)$ term from a transform by taking $(partial/partial x_1)(partial/partial x_2)...(partial/partial x_n)$ and setting $x_i=0$ for all $i$. But I don't think your edits are going to solve an NP-hard problem.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 15:21
In general you can extract the $(n_1, ..., n_r)=(1,1,...,1)$ term from a transform by taking $(partial/partial x_1)(partial/partial x_2)...(partial/partial x_n)$ and setting $x_i=0$ for all $i$. But I don't think your edits are going to solve an NP-hard problem.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 15:21
so you mean that this is the best expression to compute the probabilities? There is no easy way to extract the probabilities?
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 18:15
so you mean that this is the best expression to compute the probabilities? There is no easy way to extract the probabilities?
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 18:15
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033001%2fjoint-distribution-of-number-of-visits-of-a-markov-chain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033001%2fjoint-distribution-of-number-of-visits-of-a-markov-chain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
There is no known (simple) way to do this: If you take a general graph with $r$ nodes and define the Markov chain by a random walk over the graph (starting in state 1) then $P[L_{1,r}=1, L_{2,r}=1, ..., L_{r,r}=1]>0$ iff there is a Hamiltonian path starting at state 1.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 8:43
I have edit my question. I hope the answer is now more accessible
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 12:16
1
In general you can extract the $(n_1, ..., n_r)=(1,1,...,1)$ term from a transform by taking $(partial/partial x_1)(partial/partial x_2)...(partial/partial x_n)$ and setting $x_i=0$ for all $i$. But I don't think your edits are going to solve an NP-hard problem.
– Michael
Dec 10 '18 at 15:21
so you mean that this is the best expression to compute the probabilities? There is no easy way to extract the probabilities?
– wayne
Dec 10 '18 at 18:15