Logistic map (discrete dynamical system) vs logistic differential equation
I have to roughly illustrate the logistic discrete dynamical system (as a model for population growth) to some non mathematics students. I'm not an analyst or an expert of dynamical systems.
Looking things up in the internet, I find the logistic map
$$x_{n+1}=rx_n(1-x_n)$$
with initial condition $x_0in [0,1]$, and where $rin[0,4]$ is a parameter (the condition $0leq r leq 4$ guarantees that $x_n$ doesn't escape the unit interval $[0,1]$ throughout the evolution of the system). Here $x_n$ represents the ratio between the population at time $n$ and the total population the environment is able to support.
I find also different behaviors according to the value of the parameter $rin[0,4]$. For example,
- For $0<rleq 1$ there's extinction of the population.
- For $1<rleq 3$ the sequence tends to a stable equilibrium $x_infty:=1-1/r$.
- For $3<rleq 1+sqrt{6}$ there's convergence to a period-$2$ cycle.
- For $1+sqrt{6}<rleq r^*$ (where $r^*$ is a certain constant) several bifurcations occur with limit a cycle of period that doubles as $r$ traverses that range.
- For $r>r^*$ there's chaotic behavior.
I would expect that a similar span of different behaviors also happens for the logistic differential equation
$$dot{x}(t)=rx(t)(1-x(t))$$
upon varying the parameter $r$. But on the internet I found no reference to anything like this. On the contrary, many pages care to solve the differential equation explicitely and illustrate the solution, which is the famous logistic function: the S-shaped increasing curve (depending on $r$) with a horizontal asymptote and an inflection point. It seems this solution is obtainable no matter what $r$ is. This looks only like case number 2. of the discrete dynamical system above.
So where are the analogous to cases 1.,3.,4. and 5. where the time is continuous??
Or am I misunderstanding some aspects of how a continuous-time dynamical system gets discretized?
Also,
Which correspondence is there between the $r$ of the discrete version and the $r$ of the continuous version?
differential-equations recurrence-relations dynamical-systems nonlinear-system
add a comment |
I have to roughly illustrate the logistic discrete dynamical system (as a model for population growth) to some non mathematics students. I'm not an analyst or an expert of dynamical systems.
Looking things up in the internet, I find the logistic map
$$x_{n+1}=rx_n(1-x_n)$$
with initial condition $x_0in [0,1]$, and where $rin[0,4]$ is a parameter (the condition $0leq r leq 4$ guarantees that $x_n$ doesn't escape the unit interval $[0,1]$ throughout the evolution of the system). Here $x_n$ represents the ratio between the population at time $n$ and the total population the environment is able to support.
I find also different behaviors according to the value of the parameter $rin[0,4]$. For example,
- For $0<rleq 1$ there's extinction of the population.
- For $1<rleq 3$ the sequence tends to a stable equilibrium $x_infty:=1-1/r$.
- For $3<rleq 1+sqrt{6}$ there's convergence to a period-$2$ cycle.
- For $1+sqrt{6}<rleq r^*$ (where $r^*$ is a certain constant) several bifurcations occur with limit a cycle of period that doubles as $r$ traverses that range.
- For $r>r^*$ there's chaotic behavior.
I would expect that a similar span of different behaviors also happens for the logistic differential equation
$$dot{x}(t)=rx(t)(1-x(t))$$
upon varying the parameter $r$. But on the internet I found no reference to anything like this. On the contrary, many pages care to solve the differential equation explicitely and illustrate the solution, which is the famous logistic function: the S-shaped increasing curve (depending on $r$) with a horizontal asymptote and an inflection point. It seems this solution is obtainable no matter what $r$ is. This looks only like case number 2. of the discrete dynamical system above.
So where are the analogous to cases 1.,3.,4. and 5. where the time is continuous??
Or am I misunderstanding some aspects of how a continuous-time dynamical system gets discretized?
Also,
Which correspondence is there between the $r$ of the discrete version and the $r$ of the continuous version?
differential-equations recurrence-relations dynamical-systems nonlinear-system
add a comment |
I have to roughly illustrate the logistic discrete dynamical system (as a model for population growth) to some non mathematics students. I'm not an analyst or an expert of dynamical systems.
Looking things up in the internet, I find the logistic map
$$x_{n+1}=rx_n(1-x_n)$$
with initial condition $x_0in [0,1]$, and where $rin[0,4]$ is a parameter (the condition $0leq r leq 4$ guarantees that $x_n$ doesn't escape the unit interval $[0,1]$ throughout the evolution of the system). Here $x_n$ represents the ratio between the population at time $n$ and the total population the environment is able to support.
I find also different behaviors according to the value of the parameter $rin[0,4]$. For example,
- For $0<rleq 1$ there's extinction of the population.
- For $1<rleq 3$ the sequence tends to a stable equilibrium $x_infty:=1-1/r$.
- For $3<rleq 1+sqrt{6}$ there's convergence to a period-$2$ cycle.
- For $1+sqrt{6}<rleq r^*$ (where $r^*$ is a certain constant) several bifurcations occur with limit a cycle of period that doubles as $r$ traverses that range.
- For $r>r^*$ there's chaotic behavior.
I would expect that a similar span of different behaviors also happens for the logistic differential equation
$$dot{x}(t)=rx(t)(1-x(t))$$
upon varying the parameter $r$. But on the internet I found no reference to anything like this. On the contrary, many pages care to solve the differential equation explicitely and illustrate the solution, which is the famous logistic function: the S-shaped increasing curve (depending on $r$) with a horizontal asymptote and an inflection point. It seems this solution is obtainable no matter what $r$ is. This looks only like case number 2. of the discrete dynamical system above.
So where are the analogous to cases 1.,3.,4. and 5. where the time is continuous??
Or am I misunderstanding some aspects of how a continuous-time dynamical system gets discretized?
Also,
Which correspondence is there between the $r$ of the discrete version and the $r$ of the continuous version?
differential-equations recurrence-relations dynamical-systems nonlinear-system
I have to roughly illustrate the logistic discrete dynamical system (as a model for population growth) to some non mathematics students. I'm not an analyst or an expert of dynamical systems.
Looking things up in the internet, I find the logistic map
$$x_{n+1}=rx_n(1-x_n)$$
with initial condition $x_0in [0,1]$, and where $rin[0,4]$ is a parameter (the condition $0leq r leq 4$ guarantees that $x_n$ doesn't escape the unit interval $[0,1]$ throughout the evolution of the system). Here $x_n$ represents the ratio between the population at time $n$ and the total population the environment is able to support.
I find also different behaviors according to the value of the parameter $rin[0,4]$. For example,
- For $0<rleq 1$ there's extinction of the population.
- For $1<rleq 3$ the sequence tends to a stable equilibrium $x_infty:=1-1/r$.
- For $3<rleq 1+sqrt{6}$ there's convergence to a period-$2$ cycle.
- For $1+sqrt{6}<rleq r^*$ (where $r^*$ is a certain constant) several bifurcations occur with limit a cycle of period that doubles as $r$ traverses that range.
- For $r>r^*$ there's chaotic behavior.
I would expect that a similar span of different behaviors also happens for the logistic differential equation
$$dot{x}(t)=rx(t)(1-x(t))$$
upon varying the parameter $r$. But on the internet I found no reference to anything like this. On the contrary, many pages care to solve the differential equation explicitely and illustrate the solution, which is the famous logistic function: the S-shaped increasing curve (depending on $r$) with a horizontal asymptote and an inflection point. It seems this solution is obtainable no matter what $r$ is. This looks only like case number 2. of the discrete dynamical system above.
So where are the analogous to cases 1.,3.,4. and 5. where the time is continuous??
Or am I misunderstanding some aspects of how a continuous-time dynamical system gets discretized?
Also,
Which correspondence is there between the $r$ of the discrete version and the $r$ of the continuous version?
differential-equations recurrence-relations dynamical-systems nonlinear-system
differential-equations recurrence-relations dynamical-systems nonlinear-system
edited Dec 9 '18 at 19:59
asked Dec 9 '18 at 19:52
Qfwfq
315111
315111
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Only some elements
A differential equation and it associated discretized problem may have different stability behaviors depending on the way you perform the discretization. See for example Wikipedia - discretization, paragraph Approximations.
Nevertheless, approximating $dot{x}(t) = rx(t)(1-x(t))$ by $x_{n+1}=r x_n(1-x_n)$ is rather strange. It should be better discretized by $x_{n+1} -x_n =r x_n(1-x_n)$. Because usually
$$dot{x}(t) = frac{x_{n+1}-x_n}{t_{n+1}-t_n} =x_{n+1}-x_n$$ if you consider equal discretization of the time.
I exactly thought the same thing: the ODE should be discretized by $x_{n+1}-x_n=rx_n(1-x_n)$ because the finite difference ratio $(x_{n+1}-x_n)/1$ plays the role of $dx/dt$. But I don't know...
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:22
In the paragraph you cite (of the wikipedia link) it seems they're considering linear ODEs, while the logistic is nonlinear - not sure how this affects the continuous/discrete relationship.
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:25
It is even worse... if You already have issue with linear problems!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:26
add a comment |
In the logistic equation you get transforming it as Bernoulli equation
$$
frac{d}{dt}x(t)^{-1}=r(1-x(t)^{-1})implies x(t)^{-1}=1+ce^{-rt}.
$$
Now compare the values for $t$ and $t+h$,
$$
x(t+h)^{-1}-1 = ce^{-rt-rh}=e^{-rh}(x(t)^{-1}-1).
$$
For the sequence $x_k=x(kh)$ you get thus the recursion formula
$$
x_{k+1}=frac{x_k}{1-e^{-rh}+e^{-rh}x_k}
$$
which looks rather different than the logistic map.
Any sane discretization using the Euler method or similar would use a sufficiently small $h$, so that in the Euler forward discretization $$x_{k+1}=x_k(1+hr)-hrx_k^2.$$ To get to the normal form one would have to rescale $y_k=ax_k$, so that then $$y_{k+1}=y_k(1+hr)-frac{hr}ay_k^2=(1+hr)y_kleft(1-frac{hr}{a(1+hr)}y_kright)$$ giving $a=frac{hr}{1+hr}$. This is indeed case $2$ in the list, with equilibrium at $y_infty=1-frac1{1+hr}=frac{hr}{1+hr}=a$ or translated back at $x_infty=1$.
Ok, this is to say the recursion you get depends heavily on how you choose to discretize, I assume? But is it relevant to the question? Which is the discretization method in the OP case, and does it lead to different phenomena (differences between the continuum and the discrete)?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 21:32
1
Too long for a comment, added remark on discretization to the answer. One can conclude that the interesting phenomena happen when $h$ is so large that the discretization error can no longer be classified as $O(h^2)$ as the higher order terms are equally large or even dominate.
– LutzL
Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
So it's true that chaotic features are not present in the continuous model but appear only once I discretize in that specific way?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032887%2flogistic-map-discrete-dynamical-system-vs-logistic-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Only some elements
A differential equation and it associated discretized problem may have different stability behaviors depending on the way you perform the discretization. See for example Wikipedia - discretization, paragraph Approximations.
Nevertheless, approximating $dot{x}(t) = rx(t)(1-x(t))$ by $x_{n+1}=r x_n(1-x_n)$ is rather strange. It should be better discretized by $x_{n+1} -x_n =r x_n(1-x_n)$. Because usually
$$dot{x}(t) = frac{x_{n+1}-x_n}{t_{n+1}-t_n} =x_{n+1}-x_n$$ if you consider equal discretization of the time.
I exactly thought the same thing: the ODE should be discretized by $x_{n+1}-x_n=rx_n(1-x_n)$ because the finite difference ratio $(x_{n+1}-x_n)/1$ plays the role of $dx/dt$. But I don't know...
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:22
In the paragraph you cite (of the wikipedia link) it seems they're considering linear ODEs, while the logistic is nonlinear - not sure how this affects the continuous/discrete relationship.
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:25
It is even worse... if You already have issue with linear problems!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:26
add a comment |
Only some elements
A differential equation and it associated discretized problem may have different stability behaviors depending on the way you perform the discretization. See for example Wikipedia - discretization, paragraph Approximations.
Nevertheless, approximating $dot{x}(t) = rx(t)(1-x(t))$ by $x_{n+1}=r x_n(1-x_n)$ is rather strange. It should be better discretized by $x_{n+1} -x_n =r x_n(1-x_n)$. Because usually
$$dot{x}(t) = frac{x_{n+1}-x_n}{t_{n+1}-t_n} =x_{n+1}-x_n$$ if you consider equal discretization of the time.
I exactly thought the same thing: the ODE should be discretized by $x_{n+1}-x_n=rx_n(1-x_n)$ because the finite difference ratio $(x_{n+1}-x_n)/1$ plays the role of $dx/dt$. But I don't know...
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:22
In the paragraph you cite (of the wikipedia link) it seems they're considering linear ODEs, while the logistic is nonlinear - not sure how this affects the continuous/discrete relationship.
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:25
It is even worse... if You already have issue with linear problems!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:26
add a comment |
Only some elements
A differential equation and it associated discretized problem may have different stability behaviors depending on the way you perform the discretization. See for example Wikipedia - discretization, paragraph Approximations.
Nevertheless, approximating $dot{x}(t) = rx(t)(1-x(t))$ by $x_{n+1}=r x_n(1-x_n)$ is rather strange. It should be better discretized by $x_{n+1} -x_n =r x_n(1-x_n)$. Because usually
$$dot{x}(t) = frac{x_{n+1}-x_n}{t_{n+1}-t_n} =x_{n+1}-x_n$$ if you consider equal discretization of the time.
Only some elements
A differential equation and it associated discretized problem may have different stability behaviors depending on the way you perform the discretization. See for example Wikipedia - discretization, paragraph Approximations.
Nevertheless, approximating $dot{x}(t) = rx(t)(1-x(t))$ by $x_{n+1}=r x_n(1-x_n)$ is rather strange. It should be better discretized by $x_{n+1} -x_n =r x_n(1-x_n)$. Because usually
$$dot{x}(t) = frac{x_{n+1}-x_n}{t_{n+1}-t_n} =x_{n+1}-x_n$$ if you consider equal discretization of the time.
answered Dec 9 '18 at 20:08
mathcounterexamples.net
24.4k21753
24.4k21753
I exactly thought the same thing: the ODE should be discretized by $x_{n+1}-x_n=rx_n(1-x_n)$ because the finite difference ratio $(x_{n+1}-x_n)/1$ plays the role of $dx/dt$. But I don't know...
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:22
In the paragraph you cite (of the wikipedia link) it seems they're considering linear ODEs, while the logistic is nonlinear - not sure how this affects the continuous/discrete relationship.
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:25
It is even worse... if You already have issue with linear problems!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:26
add a comment |
I exactly thought the same thing: the ODE should be discretized by $x_{n+1}-x_n=rx_n(1-x_n)$ because the finite difference ratio $(x_{n+1}-x_n)/1$ plays the role of $dx/dt$. But I don't know...
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:22
In the paragraph you cite (of the wikipedia link) it seems they're considering linear ODEs, while the logistic is nonlinear - not sure how this affects the continuous/discrete relationship.
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:25
It is even worse... if You already have issue with linear problems!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:26
I exactly thought the same thing: the ODE should be discretized by $x_{n+1}-x_n=rx_n(1-x_n)$ because the finite difference ratio $(x_{n+1}-x_n)/1$ plays the role of $dx/dt$. But I don't know...
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:22
I exactly thought the same thing: the ODE should be discretized by $x_{n+1}-x_n=rx_n(1-x_n)$ because the finite difference ratio $(x_{n+1}-x_n)/1$ plays the role of $dx/dt$. But I don't know...
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:22
In the paragraph you cite (of the wikipedia link) it seems they're considering linear ODEs, while the logistic is nonlinear - not sure how this affects the continuous/discrete relationship.
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:25
In the paragraph you cite (of the wikipedia link) it seems they're considering linear ODEs, while the logistic is nonlinear - not sure how this affects the continuous/discrete relationship.
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 20:25
It is even worse... if You already have issue with linear problems!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:26
It is even worse... if You already have issue with linear problems!
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 9 '18 at 20:26
add a comment |
In the logistic equation you get transforming it as Bernoulli equation
$$
frac{d}{dt}x(t)^{-1}=r(1-x(t)^{-1})implies x(t)^{-1}=1+ce^{-rt}.
$$
Now compare the values for $t$ and $t+h$,
$$
x(t+h)^{-1}-1 = ce^{-rt-rh}=e^{-rh}(x(t)^{-1}-1).
$$
For the sequence $x_k=x(kh)$ you get thus the recursion formula
$$
x_{k+1}=frac{x_k}{1-e^{-rh}+e^{-rh}x_k}
$$
which looks rather different than the logistic map.
Any sane discretization using the Euler method or similar would use a sufficiently small $h$, so that in the Euler forward discretization $$x_{k+1}=x_k(1+hr)-hrx_k^2.$$ To get to the normal form one would have to rescale $y_k=ax_k$, so that then $$y_{k+1}=y_k(1+hr)-frac{hr}ay_k^2=(1+hr)y_kleft(1-frac{hr}{a(1+hr)}y_kright)$$ giving $a=frac{hr}{1+hr}$. This is indeed case $2$ in the list, with equilibrium at $y_infty=1-frac1{1+hr}=frac{hr}{1+hr}=a$ or translated back at $x_infty=1$.
Ok, this is to say the recursion you get depends heavily on how you choose to discretize, I assume? But is it relevant to the question? Which is the discretization method in the OP case, and does it lead to different phenomena (differences between the continuum and the discrete)?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 21:32
1
Too long for a comment, added remark on discretization to the answer. One can conclude that the interesting phenomena happen when $h$ is so large that the discretization error can no longer be classified as $O(h^2)$ as the higher order terms are equally large or even dominate.
– LutzL
Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
So it's true that chaotic features are not present in the continuous model but appear only once I discretize in that specific way?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
In the logistic equation you get transforming it as Bernoulli equation
$$
frac{d}{dt}x(t)^{-1}=r(1-x(t)^{-1})implies x(t)^{-1}=1+ce^{-rt}.
$$
Now compare the values for $t$ and $t+h$,
$$
x(t+h)^{-1}-1 = ce^{-rt-rh}=e^{-rh}(x(t)^{-1}-1).
$$
For the sequence $x_k=x(kh)$ you get thus the recursion formula
$$
x_{k+1}=frac{x_k}{1-e^{-rh}+e^{-rh}x_k}
$$
which looks rather different than the logistic map.
Any sane discretization using the Euler method or similar would use a sufficiently small $h$, so that in the Euler forward discretization $$x_{k+1}=x_k(1+hr)-hrx_k^2.$$ To get to the normal form one would have to rescale $y_k=ax_k$, so that then $$y_{k+1}=y_k(1+hr)-frac{hr}ay_k^2=(1+hr)y_kleft(1-frac{hr}{a(1+hr)}y_kright)$$ giving $a=frac{hr}{1+hr}$. This is indeed case $2$ in the list, with equilibrium at $y_infty=1-frac1{1+hr}=frac{hr}{1+hr}=a$ or translated back at $x_infty=1$.
Ok, this is to say the recursion you get depends heavily on how you choose to discretize, I assume? But is it relevant to the question? Which is the discretization method in the OP case, and does it lead to different phenomena (differences between the continuum and the discrete)?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 21:32
1
Too long for a comment, added remark on discretization to the answer. One can conclude that the interesting phenomena happen when $h$ is so large that the discretization error can no longer be classified as $O(h^2)$ as the higher order terms are equally large or even dominate.
– LutzL
Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
So it's true that chaotic features are not present in the continuous model but appear only once I discretize in that specific way?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
In the logistic equation you get transforming it as Bernoulli equation
$$
frac{d}{dt}x(t)^{-1}=r(1-x(t)^{-1})implies x(t)^{-1}=1+ce^{-rt}.
$$
Now compare the values for $t$ and $t+h$,
$$
x(t+h)^{-1}-1 = ce^{-rt-rh}=e^{-rh}(x(t)^{-1}-1).
$$
For the sequence $x_k=x(kh)$ you get thus the recursion formula
$$
x_{k+1}=frac{x_k}{1-e^{-rh}+e^{-rh}x_k}
$$
which looks rather different than the logistic map.
Any sane discretization using the Euler method or similar would use a sufficiently small $h$, so that in the Euler forward discretization $$x_{k+1}=x_k(1+hr)-hrx_k^2.$$ To get to the normal form one would have to rescale $y_k=ax_k$, so that then $$y_{k+1}=y_k(1+hr)-frac{hr}ay_k^2=(1+hr)y_kleft(1-frac{hr}{a(1+hr)}y_kright)$$ giving $a=frac{hr}{1+hr}$. This is indeed case $2$ in the list, with equilibrium at $y_infty=1-frac1{1+hr}=frac{hr}{1+hr}=a$ or translated back at $x_infty=1$.
In the logistic equation you get transforming it as Bernoulli equation
$$
frac{d}{dt}x(t)^{-1}=r(1-x(t)^{-1})implies x(t)^{-1}=1+ce^{-rt}.
$$
Now compare the values for $t$ and $t+h$,
$$
x(t+h)^{-1}-1 = ce^{-rt-rh}=e^{-rh}(x(t)^{-1}-1).
$$
For the sequence $x_k=x(kh)$ you get thus the recursion formula
$$
x_{k+1}=frac{x_k}{1-e^{-rh}+e^{-rh}x_k}
$$
which looks rather different than the logistic map.
Any sane discretization using the Euler method or similar would use a sufficiently small $h$, so that in the Euler forward discretization $$x_{k+1}=x_k(1+hr)-hrx_k^2.$$ To get to the normal form one would have to rescale $y_k=ax_k$, so that then $$y_{k+1}=y_k(1+hr)-frac{hr}ay_k^2=(1+hr)y_kleft(1-frac{hr}{a(1+hr)}y_kright)$$ giving $a=frac{hr}{1+hr}$. This is indeed case $2$ in the list, with equilibrium at $y_infty=1-frac1{1+hr}=frac{hr}{1+hr}=a$ or translated back at $x_infty=1$.
edited Dec 9 '18 at 21:47
answered Dec 9 '18 at 21:01
LutzL
56k42054
56k42054
Ok, this is to say the recursion you get depends heavily on how you choose to discretize, I assume? But is it relevant to the question? Which is the discretization method in the OP case, and does it lead to different phenomena (differences between the continuum and the discrete)?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 21:32
1
Too long for a comment, added remark on discretization to the answer. One can conclude that the interesting phenomena happen when $h$ is so large that the discretization error can no longer be classified as $O(h^2)$ as the higher order terms are equally large or even dominate.
– LutzL
Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
So it's true that chaotic features are not present in the continuous model but appear only once I discretize in that specific way?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
Ok, this is to say the recursion you get depends heavily on how you choose to discretize, I assume? But is it relevant to the question? Which is the discretization method in the OP case, and does it lead to different phenomena (differences between the continuum and the discrete)?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 21:32
1
Too long for a comment, added remark on discretization to the answer. One can conclude that the interesting phenomena happen when $h$ is so large that the discretization error can no longer be classified as $O(h^2)$ as the higher order terms are equally large or even dominate.
– LutzL
Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
So it's true that chaotic features are not present in the continuous model but appear only once I discretize in that specific way?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 22:19
Ok, this is to say the recursion you get depends heavily on how you choose to discretize, I assume? But is it relevant to the question? Which is the discretization method in the OP case, and does it lead to different phenomena (differences between the continuum and the discrete)?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 21:32
Ok, this is to say the recursion you get depends heavily on how you choose to discretize, I assume? But is it relevant to the question? Which is the discretization method in the OP case, and does it lead to different phenomena (differences between the continuum and the discrete)?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 21:32
1
1
Too long for a comment, added remark on discretization to the answer. One can conclude that the interesting phenomena happen when $h$ is so large that the discretization error can no longer be classified as $O(h^2)$ as the higher order terms are equally large or even dominate.
– LutzL
Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
Too long for a comment, added remark on discretization to the answer. One can conclude that the interesting phenomena happen when $h$ is so large that the discretization error can no longer be classified as $O(h^2)$ as the higher order terms are equally large or even dominate.
– LutzL
Dec 9 '18 at 21:50
So it's true that chaotic features are not present in the continuous model but appear only once I discretize in that specific way?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 22:19
So it's true that chaotic features are not present in the continuous model but appear only once I discretize in that specific way?
– Qfwfq
Dec 9 '18 at 22:19
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032887%2flogistic-map-discrete-dynamical-system-vs-logistic-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown