Proving $alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$












0














For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is $beta_delta$?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29
















0














For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is $beta_delta$?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29














0












0








0







For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.










share|cite|improve this question















For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.







elementary-set-theory ordinals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '18 at 18:19









Andrés E. Caicedo

64.8k8158246




64.8k8158246










asked Dec 11 '18 at 5:36









FreeMind

9121133




9121133












  • What is $beta_delta$?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29


















  • What is $beta_delta$?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29
















What is $beta_delta$?
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:37






What is $beta_delta$?
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:37














What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:39






What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:39














@HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 5:52




@HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 5:52












No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 6:33




No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 6:33












@HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 16:29




@HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 16:29










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034935%2fproving-alpha-beta-sup-alpha-beta-delta-delta-gamma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034935%2fproving-alpha-beta-sup-alpha-beta-delta-delta-gamma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Karlovacs län

Cabo Verde

Fundamental Group of Connected Sum of two $3$-manifolds