Show closure of image equals $mathbb{C}$ (I.e. is dense in $mathbb{C})$
Let $f(z)$ be a nonconstant analytic function on $mathbb{C}backslash S$, where $S$ is a finite subset of $mathbb{C}$. Show that $overline{f(mathbb{C}backslash S)}=mathbb{C}$
In preparation for a final examination, I am reviewing various questions for complex analysis. In particular, I am not too sure how to go about solving this question. I was thinking to prove it by contradiction, and suppose that the image is not dense in $mathbb{C}$, but am not too sure.
My apologies for the lack of work and would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance!
complex-analysis
add a comment |
Let $f(z)$ be a nonconstant analytic function on $mathbb{C}backslash S$, where $S$ is a finite subset of $mathbb{C}$. Show that $overline{f(mathbb{C}backslash S)}=mathbb{C}$
In preparation for a final examination, I am reviewing various questions for complex analysis. In particular, I am not too sure how to go about solving this question. I was thinking to prove it by contradiction, and suppose that the image is not dense in $mathbb{C}$, but am not too sure.
My apologies for the lack of work and would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance!
complex-analysis
add a comment |
Let $f(z)$ be a nonconstant analytic function on $mathbb{C}backslash S$, where $S$ is a finite subset of $mathbb{C}$. Show that $overline{f(mathbb{C}backslash S)}=mathbb{C}$
In preparation for a final examination, I am reviewing various questions for complex analysis. In particular, I am not too sure how to go about solving this question. I was thinking to prove it by contradiction, and suppose that the image is not dense in $mathbb{C}$, but am not too sure.
My apologies for the lack of work and would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance!
complex-analysis
Let $f(z)$ be a nonconstant analytic function on $mathbb{C}backslash S$, where $S$ is a finite subset of $mathbb{C}$. Show that $overline{f(mathbb{C}backslash S)}=mathbb{C}$
In preparation for a final examination, I am reviewing various questions for complex analysis. In particular, I am not too sure how to go about solving this question. I was thinking to prove it by contradiction, and suppose that the image is not dense in $mathbb{C}$, but am not too sure.
My apologies for the lack of work and would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance!
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
asked Dec 13 '18 at 8:35
The math godThe math god
1947
1947
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Suppose it is not dense. Then there exists an open disk $B(c,r)$ disjoint from $f(mathbb Csetminus S)$. Let $g(z)=frac 1 {f(z)-c}$ for $z in mathbb Csetminus S$ . Then $g$ is analytic on $mathbb Csetminus S$ and it is bounded there (because $|f(x)-c| geq r$). It follows that at the points of $S$ it has a removable singularity. Hence it extends to a bounded entire function. This makes $g$ constant and hence $f$ also constant.
@S Sorry, there was a typo.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
Haha, I suspected this was similar to the proof showing the closure of $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$. I just realized that each point in $S$ has a ball sufficiently small around it, not including that point in $S$. Thus we can extend each point to a bounded entire function. Thank you so much!
– The math god
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037757%2fshow-closure-of-image-equals-mathbbc-i-e-is-dense-in-mathbbc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Suppose it is not dense. Then there exists an open disk $B(c,r)$ disjoint from $f(mathbb Csetminus S)$. Let $g(z)=frac 1 {f(z)-c}$ for $z in mathbb Csetminus S$ . Then $g$ is analytic on $mathbb Csetminus S$ and it is bounded there (because $|f(x)-c| geq r$). It follows that at the points of $S$ it has a removable singularity. Hence it extends to a bounded entire function. This makes $g$ constant and hence $f$ also constant.
@S Sorry, there was a typo.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
Haha, I suspected this was similar to the proof showing the closure of $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$. I just realized that each point in $S$ has a ball sufficiently small around it, not including that point in $S$. Thus we can extend each point to a bounded entire function. Thank you so much!
– The math god
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
Suppose it is not dense. Then there exists an open disk $B(c,r)$ disjoint from $f(mathbb Csetminus S)$. Let $g(z)=frac 1 {f(z)-c}$ for $z in mathbb Csetminus S$ . Then $g$ is analytic on $mathbb Csetminus S$ and it is bounded there (because $|f(x)-c| geq r$). It follows that at the points of $S$ it has a removable singularity. Hence it extends to a bounded entire function. This makes $g$ constant and hence $f$ also constant.
@S Sorry, there was a typo.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
Haha, I suspected this was similar to the proof showing the closure of $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$. I just realized that each point in $S$ has a ball sufficiently small around it, not including that point in $S$. Thus we can extend each point to a bounded entire function. Thank you so much!
– The math god
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
Suppose it is not dense. Then there exists an open disk $B(c,r)$ disjoint from $f(mathbb Csetminus S)$. Let $g(z)=frac 1 {f(z)-c}$ for $z in mathbb Csetminus S$ . Then $g$ is analytic on $mathbb Csetminus S$ and it is bounded there (because $|f(x)-c| geq r$). It follows that at the points of $S$ it has a removable singularity. Hence it extends to a bounded entire function. This makes $g$ constant and hence $f$ also constant.
Suppose it is not dense. Then there exists an open disk $B(c,r)$ disjoint from $f(mathbb Csetminus S)$. Let $g(z)=frac 1 {f(z)-c}$ for $z in mathbb Csetminus S$ . Then $g$ is analytic on $mathbb Csetminus S$ and it is bounded there (because $|f(x)-c| geq r$). It follows that at the points of $S$ it has a removable singularity. Hence it extends to a bounded entire function. This makes $g$ constant and hence $f$ also constant.
edited Dec 13 '18 at 8:46
answered Dec 13 '18 at 8:40
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
52.4k32055
52.4k32055
@S Sorry, there was a typo.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
Haha, I suspected this was similar to the proof showing the closure of $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$. I just realized that each point in $S$ has a ball sufficiently small around it, not including that point in $S$. Thus we can extend each point to a bounded entire function. Thank you so much!
– The math god
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
@S Sorry, there was a typo.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
Haha, I suspected this was similar to the proof showing the closure of $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$. I just realized that each point in $S$ has a ball sufficiently small around it, not including that point in $S$. Thus we can extend each point to a bounded entire function. Thank you so much!
– The math god
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
@S Sorry, there was a typo.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
@S Sorry, there was a typo.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
Haha, I suspected this was similar to the proof showing the closure of $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$. I just realized that each point in $S$ has a ball sufficiently small around it, not including that point in $S$. Thus we can extend each point to a bounded entire function. Thank you so much!
– The math god
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
Haha, I suspected this was similar to the proof showing the closure of $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$. I just realized that each point in $S$ has a ball sufficiently small around it, not including that point in $S$. Thus we can extend each point to a bounded entire function. Thank you so much!
– The math god
Dec 13 '18 at 8:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037757%2fshow-closure-of-image-equals-mathbbc-i-e-is-dense-in-mathbbc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown