Use the definition of limit to prove that $lim_{zto z_0} (az + b) = az_0 + b$, a,b belongs to complex numbers












0














Here what i already done:



begin{align*} |az+b-(az_0+b)&+|az-az_0+b-b|\&=|a(z-z_0)|\&=|a||z-z_0|{le}|a|*{Delta}|z-z_0|
end{align*}



If ${Delta}=1$ and we know that $0{lt}|z-z_0|{lt}1$, then:



$||z|-|z_0||{le}|z-z_0|<1 \{to} |z|{lt}1+|z_o|$



Then:



$|z|<1+|z_0| {to} |z+z_0|{le}|z|+|z_0|{le}1+2|z_0|$



So:



${Delta}|a|*(1+2|z_0|)\ = {Delta}(|a|*(1+2|z_0|)={epsilon}\ {to} {Delta} = {epsilon}/(|a|(|1+2|z_0|)$



Then:



$|az+b - (az_0 + b)| {lt} |a|{Delta}|z-z_0|\ {le} {Delta}(|a|(1+2|(z_0)|\{lt}{epsilon}/(|a|(1+2|z_0|)*(|a|(1+2|z_0|) = {epsilon}$



That proves:



$lim_{zto z_0} (az + b) = az_0 + b$



Is that correct?






complex-analysis limits proof-verification complex-numbers







share|cite|improve this question
























  • For $aneq 0$, from the first three lines of your reasoning you could just select: $$0<|z-z_0|<delta=epsilon/|a| implies |az+b-(az_0+b)|<epsilon$$ And then consider the case where $a=0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:56












  • @projectilemotion You forget the case $a = 0$.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:10










  • I didn't forget it, in that case you could just take any $delta>0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:15
















0














Here what i already done:



begin{align*} |az+b-(az_0+b)&+|az-az_0+b-b|\&=|a(z-z_0)|\&=|a||z-z_0|{le}|a|*{Delta}|z-z_0|
end{align*}



If ${Delta}=1$ and we know that $0{lt}|z-z_0|{lt}1$, then:



$||z|-|z_0||{le}|z-z_0|<1 \{to} |z|{lt}1+|z_o|$



Then:



$|z|<1+|z_0| {to} |z+z_0|{le}|z|+|z_0|{le}1+2|z_0|$



So:



${Delta}|a|*(1+2|z_0|)\ = {Delta}(|a|*(1+2|z_0|)={epsilon}\ {to} {Delta} = {epsilon}/(|a|(|1+2|z_0|)$



Then:



$|az+b - (az_0 + b)| {lt} |a|{Delta}|z-z_0|\ {le} {Delta}(|a|(1+2|(z_0)|\{lt}{epsilon}/(|a|(1+2|z_0|)*(|a|(1+2|z_0|) = {epsilon}$



That proves:



$lim_{zto z_0} (az + b) = az_0 + b$



Is that correct?






complex-analysis limits proof-verification complex-numbers







share|cite|improve this question
























  • For $aneq 0$, from the first three lines of your reasoning you could just select: $$0<|z-z_0|<delta=epsilon/|a| implies |az+b-(az_0+b)|<epsilon$$ And then consider the case where $a=0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:56












  • @projectilemotion You forget the case $a = 0$.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:10










  • I didn't forget it, in that case you could just take any $delta>0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:15














0












0








0







Here what i already done:



begin{align*} |az+b-(az_0+b)&+|az-az_0+b-b|\&=|a(z-z_0)|\&=|a||z-z_0|{le}|a|*{Delta}|z-z_0|
end{align*}



If ${Delta}=1$ and we know that $0{lt}|z-z_0|{lt}1$, then:



$||z|-|z_0||{le}|z-z_0|<1 \{to} |z|{lt}1+|z_o|$



Then:



$|z|<1+|z_0| {to} |z+z_0|{le}|z|+|z_0|{le}1+2|z_0|$



So:



${Delta}|a|*(1+2|z_0|)\ = {Delta}(|a|*(1+2|z_0|)={epsilon}\ {to} {Delta} = {epsilon}/(|a|(|1+2|z_0|)$



Then:



$|az+b - (az_0 + b)| {lt} |a|{Delta}|z-z_0|\ {le} {Delta}(|a|(1+2|(z_0)|\{lt}{epsilon}/(|a|(1+2|z_0|)*(|a|(1+2|z_0|) = {epsilon}$



That proves:



$lim_{zto z_0} (az + b) = az_0 + b$



Is that correct?






complex-analysis limits proof-verification complex-numbers







share|cite|improve this question















Here what i already done:



begin{align*} |az+b-(az_0+b)&+|az-az_0+b-b|\&=|a(z-z_0)|\&=|a||z-z_0|{le}|a|*{Delta}|z-z_0|
end{align*}



If ${Delta}=1$ and we know that $0{lt}|z-z_0|{lt}1$, then:



$||z|-|z_0||{le}|z-z_0|<1 \{to} |z|{lt}1+|z_o|$



Then:



$|z|<1+|z_0| {to} |z+z_0|{le}|z|+|z_0|{le}1+2|z_0|$



So:



${Delta}|a|*(1+2|z_0|)\ = {Delta}(|a|*(1+2|z_0|)={epsilon}\ {to} {Delta} = {epsilon}/(|a|(|1+2|z_0|)$



Then:



$|az+b - (az_0 + b)| {lt} |a|{Delta}|z-z_0|\ {le} {Delta}(|a|(1+2|(z_0)|\{lt}{epsilon}/(|a|(1+2|z_0|)*(|a|(1+2|z_0|) = {epsilon}$



That proves:



$lim_{zto z_0} (az + b) = az_0 + b$



Is that correct?






complex-analysis limits proof-verification complex-numbers




complex-analysis limits proof-verification complex-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 22:48









platty

3,370320




3,370320










asked Dec 12 '18 at 22:44









RafaelRafael

12




12












  • For $aneq 0$, from the first three lines of your reasoning you could just select: $$0<|z-z_0|<delta=epsilon/|a| implies |az+b-(az_0+b)|<epsilon$$ And then consider the case where $a=0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:56












  • @projectilemotion You forget the case $a = 0$.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:10










  • I didn't forget it, in that case you could just take any $delta>0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:15


















  • For $aneq 0$, from the first three lines of your reasoning you could just select: $$0<|z-z_0|<delta=epsilon/|a| implies |az+b-(az_0+b)|<epsilon$$ And then consider the case where $a=0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 22:56












  • @projectilemotion You forget the case $a = 0$.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:10










  • I didn't forget it, in that case you could just take any $delta>0$.
    – projectilemotion
    Dec 12 '18 at 23:15
















For $aneq 0$, from the first three lines of your reasoning you could just select: $$0<|z-z_0|<delta=epsilon/|a| implies |az+b-(az_0+b)|<epsilon$$ And then consider the case where $a=0$.
– projectilemotion
Dec 12 '18 at 22:56






For $aneq 0$, from the first three lines of your reasoning you could just select: $$0<|z-z_0|<delta=epsilon/|a| implies |az+b-(az_0+b)|<epsilon$$ And then consider the case where $a=0$.
– projectilemotion
Dec 12 '18 at 22:56














@projectilemotion You forget the case $a = 0$.
– Rebellos
Dec 12 '18 at 23:10




@projectilemotion You forget the case $a = 0$.
– Rebellos
Dec 12 '18 at 23:10












I didn't forget it, in that case you could just take any $delta>0$.
– projectilemotion
Dec 12 '18 at 23:15




I didn't forget it, in that case you could just take any $delta>0$.
– projectilemotion
Dec 12 '18 at 23:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Seems okay in general (but your approach is more complex than it should), just some fixes.



First of all, you need to consider the case $a=0 in mathbb C$. Then, if that's the case, you have nothing to prove, as it's straightforward. Then you can go on by considering the case $aneq 0 in mathbb C$.



But for a more fast and elegant approach, observe that



$$|az + b - (az_0 + b)| = |a||z-z_0| < varepsilon implies |z-z_0| < frac{varepsilon}{|a|+1}$$



considering $a=0$ and $aneq 0$ at the same time, thus you're finished.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037332%2fuse-the-definition-of-limit-to-prove-that-lim-z-to-z-0-az-b-az-0-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Seems okay in general (but your approach is more complex than it should), just some fixes.



    First of all, you need to consider the case $a=0 in mathbb C$. Then, if that's the case, you have nothing to prove, as it's straightforward. Then you can go on by considering the case $aneq 0 in mathbb C$.



    But for a more fast and elegant approach, observe that



    $$|az + b - (az_0 + b)| = |a||z-z_0| < varepsilon implies |z-z_0| < frac{varepsilon}{|a|+1}$$



    considering $a=0$ and $aneq 0$ at the same time, thus you're finished.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      Seems okay in general (but your approach is more complex than it should), just some fixes.



      First of all, you need to consider the case $a=0 in mathbb C$. Then, if that's the case, you have nothing to prove, as it's straightforward. Then you can go on by considering the case $aneq 0 in mathbb C$.



      But for a more fast and elegant approach, observe that



      $$|az + b - (az_0 + b)| = |a||z-z_0| < varepsilon implies |z-z_0| < frac{varepsilon}{|a|+1}$$



      considering $a=0$ and $aneq 0$ at the same time, thus you're finished.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        Seems okay in general (but your approach is more complex than it should), just some fixes.



        First of all, you need to consider the case $a=0 in mathbb C$. Then, if that's the case, you have nothing to prove, as it's straightforward. Then you can go on by considering the case $aneq 0 in mathbb C$.



        But for a more fast and elegant approach, observe that



        $$|az + b - (az_0 + b)| = |a||z-z_0| < varepsilon implies |z-z_0| < frac{varepsilon}{|a|+1}$$



        considering $a=0$ and $aneq 0$ at the same time, thus you're finished.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Seems okay in general (but your approach is more complex than it should), just some fixes.



        First of all, you need to consider the case $a=0 in mathbb C$. Then, if that's the case, you have nothing to prove, as it's straightforward. Then you can go on by considering the case $aneq 0 in mathbb C$.



        But for a more fast and elegant approach, observe that



        $$|az + b - (az_0 + b)| = |a||z-z_0| < varepsilon implies |z-z_0| < frac{varepsilon}{|a|+1}$$



        considering $a=0$ and $aneq 0$ at the same time, thus you're finished.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 12 '18 at 22:59









        RebellosRebellos

        14.5k31246




        14.5k31246






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037332%2fuse-the-definition-of-limit-to-prove-that-lim-z-to-z-0-az-b-az-0-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
            Read more

            Cabo Verde

            Image
              Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º) ...
            Read more

            Gyllenstierna

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid ...
            Read more