Suppose that $N$ is a normal and cyclic subgroup of $G$, and $H$ is a subgroup of $N$. Show that $H$ is...
Suppose that $N$ is a normal and cyclic subgroup of $G$, and $H$ is a subgroup of $N$. Show that $H$ is normal in $G$.
What should I do when $N$ is finite?
I have tried to show that it is right for infinite $N$.
abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups normal-subgroups
closed as off-topic by Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy Dec 13 '18 at 15:50
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Suppose that $N$ is a normal and cyclic subgroup of $G$, and $H$ is a subgroup of $N$. Show that $H$ is normal in $G$.
What should I do when $N$ is finite?
I have tried to show that it is right for infinite $N$.
abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups normal-subgroups
closed as off-topic by Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy Dec 13 '18 at 15:50
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$N$ is normal $gN=Ng:forall:gin G$. Restrict $N$ to $H$.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:43
what do you mean of restrict? please clarify more
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:45
Since $N$ is normal in $G$, $gHg^{-1}subset N$ and use the fact $N$ is cyclic.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:53
add a comment |
Suppose that $N$ is a normal and cyclic subgroup of $G$, and $H$ is a subgroup of $N$. Show that $H$ is normal in $G$.
What should I do when $N$ is finite?
I have tried to show that it is right for infinite $N$.
abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups normal-subgroups
Suppose that $N$ is a normal and cyclic subgroup of $G$, and $H$ is a subgroup of $N$. Show that $H$ is normal in $G$.
What should I do when $N$ is finite?
I have tried to show that it is right for infinite $N$.
abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups normal-subgroups
abstract-algebra group-theory cyclic-groups normal-subgroups
edited Dec 12 '18 at 23:58
Batominovski
1
1
asked Dec 12 '18 at 22:39
Arman_jrArman_jr
284
284
closed as off-topic by Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy Dec 13 '18 at 15:50
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy Dec 13 '18 at 15:50
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Shailesh, platty, Saad, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$N$ is normal $gN=Ng:forall:gin G$. Restrict $N$ to $H$.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:43
what do you mean of restrict? please clarify more
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:45
Since $N$ is normal in $G$, $gHg^{-1}subset N$ and use the fact $N$ is cyclic.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:53
add a comment |
$N$ is normal $gN=Ng:forall:gin G$. Restrict $N$ to $H$.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:43
what do you mean of restrict? please clarify more
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:45
Since $N$ is normal in $G$, $gHg^{-1}subset N$ and use the fact $N$ is cyclic.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:53
$N$ is normal $gN=Ng:forall:gin G$. Restrict $N$ to $H$.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:43
$N$ is normal $gN=Ng:forall:gin G$. Restrict $N$ to $H$.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:43
what do you mean of restrict? please clarify more
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:45
what do you mean of restrict? please clarify more
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:45
Since $N$ is normal in $G$, $gHg^{-1}subset N$ and use the fact $N$ is cyclic.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:53
Since $N$ is normal in $G$, $gHg^{-1}subset N$ and use the fact $N$ is cyclic.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:53
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Let $N=langle nrangle$ and $H=langle n^arangle$. To show that $H$ is normal in $G$, it is enough to show that for all $gin G$ we have $gn^ag^{-1}in H$.
First since $nin N$ and $N$ is normal in $G$, then $gng^{-1}in N$. Write $gng^{-1}=n^b$ for some $b$. Now
$$gn^ag^{-1}=(gng^{-1})^a=(n^b)^a=(n^a)^bin H$$
since $n^ain H$ and we are done.
add a comment |
An abelian subgroup is not necessarily normal.
Hence, the assumption that $N$ is cyclic matters.
Indeed, let $g in G$, $h in H$. Then $ghg^{-1} in N$ because $N$ is normal, and $(ghg^{-1})^{|H|} = gh^{|H|}g^{-1}=e$, thus (this is a standard fact for cyclic groups) $ghg^{-1} in H$.
Edit: if I understood the comment correctly, I need to prove that if $N$ is a cyclic group and $H$ is a cyclic subgroup of $N$, then $H={h in N,,h^{|H|}=e}:=H_0$.
First, $H subset H_0$ (Clearly $H_0$ is a subgroup of a $N$, containing a generator of $H$).
Conversely, let $n$ be a generator of $N$. Let $|N| > k geq 1$ be such that $n^k$ is a generator of $|H|$. Then the set of all $n^{kl}$ for integers $l$ is exactly $H$ and has cardinality $|H|$. Besides, the value of $n^{kl}$ is uniquely deterlined by that of $kl$ mod $|N|$. So $|H|=|N|/gcd(|N|,k)$, and, for every integer $l$, $n^l in H_0$ iff $n^{|H|l}=e$ iff $|N| | |H|l$ iff $gcd(|N|,k)|l$, iff $l=a|N|+bk$ for some $a,b$, iff $n^l=(n^k)^b$ for some $b$ iff $n^l in H$.
How does it imply the last part?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:31
i mean why (ghg−1)|H|=gh|H|g−1=e implies ghg-1 is in H
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:34
Because if $N$ is cyclic and $k$ divides $|N|$ there is a unique subgroup of $N$ of cardinality $k$. Since $(gng^{-1})^{|H|}=e$ it tells us that $gng^{-1}$ is in the unique subgroup of order $|H|$, namely $H$ itself.
– user9077
Dec 13 '18 at 0:44
you used the formulas of orders in the proof, what if |H| is not finite? ie. |N| is not finite?
– Arman_jr
Dec 13 '18 at 9:21
My mistake. I am no native English speaker and in my native language cyclic groups are finite.
– Mindlack
Dec 13 '18 at 9:23
|
show 1 more comment
Let's start you off,
we know
G > N > H
N is normal
wts
H is normal in G.
that is, wts hG=Gh for all h in H
We know,
for all n in N, nG=Gn...
what next?
since H is subgroup of N and N is cyclic, so H is cyclic
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:55
N is cyclic so H must be cyclic. Since H is cyclic, it must be abelian. Since H is abelian, it must be normal.
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 22:59
yes (it's making me type more)
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 23:00
can we brake the problem in two parts?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:03
1
-1 This is riddled with falsehoods and irrelevant statements.
– Servaes
Dec 13 '18 at 0:08
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $N=langle nrangle$ and $H=langle n^arangle$. To show that $H$ is normal in $G$, it is enough to show that for all $gin G$ we have $gn^ag^{-1}in H$.
First since $nin N$ and $N$ is normal in $G$, then $gng^{-1}in N$. Write $gng^{-1}=n^b$ for some $b$. Now
$$gn^ag^{-1}=(gng^{-1})^a=(n^b)^a=(n^a)^bin H$$
since $n^ain H$ and we are done.
add a comment |
Let $N=langle nrangle$ and $H=langle n^arangle$. To show that $H$ is normal in $G$, it is enough to show that for all $gin G$ we have $gn^ag^{-1}in H$.
First since $nin N$ and $N$ is normal in $G$, then $gng^{-1}in N$. Write $gng^{-1}=n^b$ for some $b$. Now
$$gn^ag^{-1}=(gng^{-1})^a=(n^b)^a=(n^a)^bin H$$
since $n^ain H$ and we are done.
add a comment |
Let $N=langle nrangle$ and $H=langle n^arangle$. To show that $H$ is normal in $G$, it is enough to show that for all $gin G$ we have $gn^ag^{-1}in H$.
First since $nin N$ and $N$ is normal in $G$, then $gng^{-1}in N$. Write $gng^{-1}=n^b$ for some $b$. Now
$$gn^ag^{-1}=(gng^{-1})^a=(n^b)^a=(n^a)^bin H$$
since $n^ain H$ and we are done.
Let $N=langle nrangle$ and $H=langle n^arangle$. To show that $H$ is normal in $G$, it is enough to show that for all $gin G$ we have $gn^ag^{-1}in H$.
First since $nin N$ and $N$ is normal in $G$, then $gng^{-1}in N$. Write $gng^{-1}=n^b$ for some $b$. Now
$$gn^ag^{-1}=(gng^{-1})^a=(n^b)^a=(n^a)^bin H$$
since $n^ain H$ and we are done.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 23:57
user9077user9077
1,269612
1,269612
add a comment |
add a comment |
An abelian subgroup is not necessarily normal.
Hence, the assumption that $N$ is cyclic matters.
Indeed, let $g in G$, $h in H$. Then $ghg^{-1} in N$ because $N$ is normal, and $(ghg^{-1})^{|H|} = gh^{|H|}g^{-1}=e$, thus (this is a standard fact for cyclic groups) $ghg^{-1} in H$.
Edit: if I understood the comment correctly, I need to prove that if $N$ is a cyclic group and $H$ is a cyclic subgroup of $N$, then $H={h in N,,h^{|H|}=e}:=H_0$.
First, $H subset H_0$ (Clearly $H_0$ is a subgroup of a $N$, containing a generator of $H$).
Conversely, let $n$ be a generator of $N$. Let $|N| > k geq 1$ be such that $n^k$ is a generator of $|H|$. Then the set of all $n^{kl}$ for integers $l$ is exactly $H$ and has cardinality $|H|$. Besides, the value of $n^{kl}$ is uniquely deterlined by that of $kl$ mod $|N|$. So $|H|=|N|/gcd(|N|,k)$, and, for every integer $l$, $n^l in H_0$ iff $n^{|H|l}=e$ iff $|N| | |H|l$ iff $gcd(|N|,k)|l$, iff $l=a|N|+bk$ for some $a,b$, iff $n^l=(n^k)^b$ for some $b$ iff $n^l in H$.
How does it imply the last part?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:31
i mean why (ghg−1)|H|=gh|H|g−1=e implies ghg-1 is in H
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:34
Because if $N$ is cyclic and $k$ divides $|N|$ there is a unique subgroup of $N$ of cardinality $k$. Since $(gng^{-1})^{|H|}=e$ it tells us that $gng^{-1}$ is in the unique subgroup of order $|H|$, namely $H$ itself.
– user9077
Dec 13 '18 at 0:44
you used the formulas of orders in the proof, what if |H| is not finite? ie. |N| is not finite?
– Arman_jr
Dec 13 '18 at 9:21
My mistake. I am no native English speaker and in my native language cyclic groups are finite.
– Mindlack
Dec 13 '18 at 9:23
|
show 1 more comment
An abelian subgroup is not necessarily normal.
Hence, the assumption that $N$ is cyclic matters.
Indeed, let $g in G$, $h in H$. Then $ghg^{-1} in N$ because $N$ is normal, and $(ghg^{-1})^{|H|} = gh^{|H|}g^{-1}=e$, thus (this is a standard fact for cyclic groups) $ghg^{-1} in H$.
Edit: if I understood the comment correctly, I need to prove that if $N$ is a cyclic group and $H$ is a cyclic subgroup of $N$, then $H={h in N,,h^{|H|}=e}:=H_0$.
First, $H subset H_0$ (Clearly $H_0$ is a subgroup of a $N$, containing a generator of $H$).
Conversely, let $n$ be a generator of $N$. Let $|N| > k geq 1$ be such that $n^k$ is a generator of $|H|$. Then the set of all $n^{kl}$ for integers $l$ is exactly $H$ and has cardinality $|H|$. Besides, the value of $n^{kl}$ is uniquely deterlined by that of $kl$ mod $|N|$. So $|H|=|N|/gcd(|N|,k)$, and, for every integer $l$, $n^l in H_0$ iff $n^{|H|l}=e$ iff $|N| | |H|l$ iff $gcd(|N|,k)|l$, iff $l=a|N|+bk$ for some $a,b$, iff $n^l=(n^k)^b$ for some $b$ iff $n^l in H$.
How does it imply the last part?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:31
i mean why (ghg−1)|H|=gh|H|g−1=e implies ghg-1 is in H
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:34
Because if $N$ is cyclic and $k$ divides $|N|$ there is a unique subgroup of $N$ of cardinality $k$. Since $(gng^{-1})^{|H|}=e$ it tells us that $gng^{-1}$ is in the unique subgroup of order $|H|$, namely $H$ itself.
– user9077
Dec 13 '18 at 0:44
you used the formulas of orders in the proof, what if |H| is not finite? ie. |N| is not finite?
– Arman_jr
Dec 13 '18 at 9:21
My mistake. I am no native English speaker and in my native language cyclic groups are finite.
– Mindlack
Dec 13 '18 at 9:23
|
show 1 more comment
An abelian subgroup is not necessarily normal.
Hence, the assumption that $N$ is cyclic matters.
Indeed, let $g in G$, $h in H$. Then $ghg^{-1} in N$ because $N$ is normal, and $(ghg^{-1})^{|H|} = gh^{|H|}g^{-1}=e$, thus (this is a standard fact for cyclic groups) $ghg^{-1} in H$.
Edit: if I understood the comment correctly, I need to prove that if $N$ is a cyclic group and $H$ is a cyclic subgroup of $N$, then $H={h in N,,h^{|H|}=e}:=H_0$.
First, $H subset H_0$ (Clearly $H_0$ is a subgroup of a $N$, containing a generator of $H$).
Conversely, let $n$ be a generator of $N$. Let $|N| > k geq 1$ be such that $n^k$ is a generator of $|H|$. Then the set of all $n^{kl}$ for integers $l$ is exactly $H$ and has cardinality $|H|$. Besides, the value of $n^{kl}$ is uniquely deterlined by that of $kl$ mod $|N|$. So $|H|=|N|/gcd(|N|,k)$, and, for every integer $l$, $n^l in H_0$ iff $n^{|H|l}=e$ iff $|N| | |H|l$ iff $gcd(|N|,k)|l$, iff $l=a|N|+bk$ for some $a,b$, iff $n^l=(n^k)^b$ for some $b$ iff $n^l in H$.
An abelian subgroup is not necessarily normal.
Hence, the assumption that $N$ is cyclic matters.
Indeed, let $g in G$, $h in H$. Then $ghg^{-1} in N$ because $N$ is normal, and $(ghg^{-1})^{|H|} = gh^{|H|}g^{-1}=e$, thus (this is a standard fact for cyclic groups) $ghg^{-1} in H$.
Edit: if I understood the comment correctly, I need to prove that if $N$ is a cyclic group and $H$ is a cyclic subgroup of $N$, then $H={h in N,,h^{|H|}=e}:=H_0$.
First, $H subset H_0$ (Clearly $H_0$ is a subgroup of a $N$, containing a generator of $H$).
Conversely, let $n$ be a generator of $N$. Let $|N| > k geq 1$ be such that $n^k$ is a generator of $|H|$. Then the set of all $n^{kl}$ for integers $l$ is exactly $H$ and has cardinality $|H|$. Besides, the value of $n^{kl}$ is uniquely deterlined by that of $kl$ mod $|N|$. So $|H|=|N|/gcd(|N|,k)$, and, for every integer $l$, $n^l in H_0$ iff $n^{|H|l}=e$ iff $|N| | |H|l$ iff $gcd(|N|,k)|l$, iff $l=a|N|+bk$ for some $a,b$, iff $n^l=(n^k)^b$ for some $b$ iff $n^l in H$.
edited Dec 12 '18 at 23:45
answered Dec 12 '18 at 23:26
MindlackMindlack
2,33217
2,33217
How does it imply the last part?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:31
i mean why (ghg−1)|H|=gh|H|g−1=e implies ghg-1 is in H
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:34
Because if $N$ is cyclic and $k$ divides $|N|$ there is a unique subgroup of $N$ of cardinality $k$. Since $(gng^{-1})^{|H|}=e$ it tells us that $gng^{-1}$ is in the unique subgroup of order $|H|$, namely $H$ itself.
– user9077
Dec 13 '18 at 0:44
you used the formulas of orders in the proof, what if |H| is not finite? ie. |N| is not finite?
– Arman_jr
Dec 13 '18 at 9:21
My mistake. I am no native English speaker and in my native language cyclic groups are finite.
– Mindlack
Dec 13 '18 at 9:23
|
show 1 more comment
How does it imply the last part?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:31
i mean why (ghg−1)|H|=gh|H|g−1=e implies ghg-1 is in H
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:34
Because if $N$ is cyclic and $k$ divides $|N|$ there is a unique subgroup of $N$ of cardinality $k$. Since $(gng^{-1})^{|H|}=e$ it tells us that $gng^{-1}$ is in the unique subgroup of order $|H|$, namely $H$ itself.
– user9077
Dec 13 '18 at 0:44
you used the formulas of orders in the proof, what if |H| is not finite? ie. |N| is not finite?
– Arman_jr
Dec 13 '18 at 9:21
My mistake. I am no native English speaker and in my native language cyclic groups are finite.
– Mindlack
Dec 13 '18 at 9:23
How does it imply the last part?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:31
How does it imply the last part?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:31
i mean why (ghg−1)|H|=gh|H|g−1=e implies ghg-1 is in H
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:34
i mean why (ghg−1)|H|=gh|H|g−1=e implies ghg-1 is in H
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:34
Because if $N$ is cyclic and $k$ divides $|N|$ there is a unique subgroup of $N$ of cardinality $k$. Since $(gng^{-1})^{|H|}=e$ it tells us that $gng^{-1}$ is in the unique subgroup of order $|H|$, namely $H$ itself.
– user9077
Dec 13 '18 at 0:44
Because if $N$ is cyclic and $k$ divides $|N|$ there is a unique subgroup of $N$ of cardinality $k$. Since $(gng^{-1})^{|H|}=e$ it tells us that $gng^{-1}$ is in the unique subgroup of order $|H|$, namely $H$ itself.
– user9077
Dec 13 '18 at 0:44
you used the formulas of orders in the proof, what if |H| is not finite? ie. |N| is not finite?
– Arman_jr
Dec 13 '18 at 9:21
you used the formulas of orders in the proof, what if |H| is not finite? ie. |N| is not finite?
– Arman_jr
Dec 13 '18 at 9:21
My mistake. I am no native English speaker and in my native language cyclic groups are finite.
– Mindlack
Dec 13 '18 at 9:23
My mistake. I am no native English speaker and in my native language cyclic groups are finite.
– Mindlack
Dec 13 '18 at 9:23
|
show 1 more comment
Let's start you off,
we know
G > N > H
N is normal
wts
H is normal in G.
that is, wts hG=Gh for all h in H
We know,
for all n in N, nG=Gn...
what next?
since H is subgroup of N and N is cyclic, so H is cyclic
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:55
N is cyclic so H must be cyclic. Since H is cyclic, it must be abelian. Since H is abelian, it must be normal.
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 22:59
yes (it's making me type more)
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 23:00
can we brake the problem in two parts?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:03
1
-1 This is riddled with falsehoods and irrelevant statements.
– Servaes
Dec 13 '18 at 0:08
|
show 1 more comment
Let's start you off,
we know
G > N > H
N is normal
wts
H is normal in G.
that is, wts hG=Gh for all h in H
We know,
for all n in N, nG=Gn...
what next?
since H is subgroup of N and N is cyclic, so H is cyclic
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:55
N is cyclic so H must be cyclic. Since H is cyclic, it must be abelian. Since H is abelian, it must be normal.
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 22:59
yes (it's making me type more)
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 23:00
can we brake the problem in two parts?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:03
1
-1 This is riddled with falsehoods and irrelevant statements.
– Servaes
Dec 13 '18 at 0:08
|
show 1 more comment
Let's start you off,
we know
G > N > H
N is normal
wts
H is normal in G.
that is, wts hG=Gh for all h in H
We know,
for all n in N, nG=Gn...
what next?
Let's start you off,
we know
G > N > H
N is normal
wts
H is normal in G.
that is, wts hG=Gh for all h in H
We know,
for all n in N, nG=Gn...
what next?
answered Dec 12 '18 at 22:50
nessness
375
375
since H is subgroup of N and N is cyclic, so H is cyclic
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:55
N is cyclic so H must be cyclic. Since H is cyclic, it must be abelian. Since H is abelian, it must be normal.
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 22:59
yes (it's making me type more)
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 23:00
can we brake the problem in two parts?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:03
1
-1 This is riddled with falsehoods and irrelevant statements.
– Servaes
Dec 13 '18 at 0:08
|
show 1 more comment
since H is subgroup of N and N is cyclic, so H is cyclic
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:55
N is cyclic so H must be cyclic. Since H is cyclic, it must be abelian. Since H is abelian, it must be normal.
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 22:59
yes (it's making me type more)
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 23:00
can we brake the problem in two parts?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:03
1
-1 This is riddled with falsehoods and irrelevant statements.
– Servaes
Dec 13 '18 at 0:08
since H is subgroup of N and N is cyclic, so H is cyclic
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:55
since H is subgroup of N and N is cyclic, so H is cyclic
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:55
N is cyclic so H must be cyclic. Since H is cyclic, it must be abelian. Since H is abelian, it must be normal.
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 22:59
N is cyclic so H must be cyclic. Since H is cyclic, it must be abelian. Since H is abelian, it must be normal.
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 22:59
yes (it's making me type more)
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 23:00
yes (it's making me type more)
– ness
Dec 12 '18 at 23:00
can we brake the problem in two parts?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:03
can we brake the problem in two parts?
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 23:03
1
1
-1 This is riddled with falsehoods and irrelevant statements.
– Servaes
Dec 13 '18 at 0:08
-1 This is riddled with falsehoods and irrelevant statements.
– Servaes
Dec 13 '18 at 0:08
|
show 1 more comment
$N$ is normal $gN=Ng:forall:gin G$. Restrict $N$ to $H$.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:43
what do you mean of restrict? please clarify more
– Arman_jr
Dec 12 '18 at 22:45
Since $N$ is normal in $G$, $gHg^{-1}subset N$ and use the fact $N$ is cyclic.
– Yadati Kiran
Dec 12 '18 at 22:53