“Almost uniformly convergent” Implies “Uniformly convergent almost everywhere” . Is there something...












1












$begingroup$


I find a tricky proof shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "uniformly convergent almost everywhere". I know it is wrong, for there is a counterexample. Can anyone help me why this proof is wrong?



I got the inspiration from the proof that shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "convergent almost everywhere":



It says $forall epsilon, exists B_epsilon, mu(B_epsilon)<epsilon$ outside of which $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and prove $Bequivbigcap_{ninmathbb{N}}B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is zero-measure. I think in this case, outside $B$, $f_n to f$ no only converges pointwise (as the proof says) but also converges uniformly (for it is true outside any $B_frac{1}{n}$). Since $mu(B)=0$, it implies $f_n to f$ converges uniformly almost everywhere.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I find a tricky proof shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "uniformly convergent almost everywhere". I know it is wrong, for there is a counterexample. Can anyone help me why this proof is wrong?



    I got the inspiration from the proof that shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "convergent almost everywhere":



    It says $forall epsilon, exists B_epsilon, mu(B_epsilon)<epsilon$ outside of which $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and prove $Bequivbigcap_{ninmathbb{N}}B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is zero-measure. I think in this case, outside $B$, $f_n to f$ no only converges pointwise (as the proof says) but also converges uniformly (for it is true outside any $B_frac{1}{n}$). Since $mu(B)=0$, it implies $f_n to f$ converges uniformly almost everywhere.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I find a tricky proof shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "uniformly convergent almost everywhere". I know it is wrong, for there is a counterexample. Can anyone help me why this proof is wrong?



      I got the inspiration from the proof that shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "convergent almost everywhere":



      It says $forall epsilon, exists B_epsilon, mu(B_epsilon)<epsilon$ outside of which $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and prove $Bequivbigcap_{ninmathbb{N}}B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is zero-measure. I think in this case, outside $B$, $f_n to f$ no only converges pointwise (as the proof says) but also converges uniformly (for it is true outside any $B_frac{1}{n}$). Since $mu(B)=0$, it implies $f_n to f$ converges uniformly almost everywhere.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I find a tricky proof shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "uniformly convergent almost everywhere". I know it is wrong, for there is a counterexample. Can anyone help me why this proof is wrong?



      I got the inspiration from the proof that shows "almost uniformly convergent" implies "convergent almost everywhere":



      It says $forall epsilon, exists B_epsilon, mu(B_epsilon)<epsilon$ outside of which $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and prove $Bequivbigcap_{ninmathbb{N}}B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is zero-measure. I think in this case, outside $B$, $f_n to f$ no only converges pointwise (as the proof says) but also converges uniformly (for it is true outside any $B_frac{1}{n}$). Since $mu(B)=0$, it implies $f_n to f$ converges uniformly almost everywhere.







      real-analysis measure-theory almost-everywhere






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 28 '18 at 13:59









      XuchuangXuchuang

      82




      82






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider a simple example:



          $x^n to 0$ almost uniformly on $[0,1]$. Indeed, for every $varepsilon > 0$ we have $x^n to 0$ uniformly on $B_varepsilon^c = [0,1-varepsilon]$ where $B_varepsilon = [1-varepsilon, 1]$ has measure $varepsilon$.



          However on $$B^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{frac1n}right)^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[1-frac1n,1right]right)^c = {1}^c = [0,1rangle$$ the convergence $x^n to 0$ is not uniform. It is only uniform on segments $B_{frac1n}^c=left[0,1-frac1nright]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:41












          • $begingroup$
            @Xuchuang On $B_{frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x in B^c$, we have $x in B_{frac1n}^c$ for some $n in mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n to f$ uniformly as the example shows.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:12












          • $begingroup$
            It's sort of like how the function $x mapsto frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] subseteq langle 0, inftyrangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $langle 0,inftyrangle$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:14












          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. $x$ and $epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:02



















          0












          $begingroup$

          You have that ${f_n}$ converges uniformly on each set $B_{frac 1n}^c$. There is no reason why it should converge uniformly on $displaystyle bigcup_n B_{frac 1n}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $bigcup_n B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:16










          • $begingroup$
            That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $bigcup_n B^c_{frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x in B_{frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) to f(x)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Umberto P.
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:18












          • $begingroup$
            But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:27










          • $begingroup$
            You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054911%2falmost-uniformly-convergent-implies-uniformly-convergent-almost-everywhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider a simple example:



          $x^n to 0$ almost uniformly on $[0,1]$. Indeed, for every $varepsilon > 0$ we have $x^n to 0$ uniformly on $B_varepsilon^c = [0,1-varepsilon]$ where $B_varepsilon = [1-varepsilon, 1]$ has measure $varepsilon$.



          However on $$B^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{frac1n}right)^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[1-frac1n,1right]right)^c = {1}^c = [0,1rangle$$ the convergence $x^n to 0$ is not uniform. It is only uniform on segments $B_{frac1n}^c=left[0,1-frac1nright]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:41












          • $begingroup$
            @Xuchuang On $B_{frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x in B^c$, we have $x in B_{frac1n}^c$ for some $n in mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n to f$ uniformly as the example shows.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:12












          • $begingroup$
            It's sort of like how the function $x mapsto frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] subseteq langle 0, inftyrangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $langle 0,inftyrangle$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:14












          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. $x$ and $epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:02
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Consider a simple example:



          $x^n to 0$ almost uniformly on $[0,1]$. Indeed, for every $varepsilon > 0$ we have $x^n to 0$ uniformly on $B_varepsilon^c = [0,1-varepsilon]$ where $B_varepsilon = [1-varepsilon, 1]$ has measure $varepsilon$.



          However on $$B^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{frac1n}right)^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[1-frac1n,1right]right)^c = {1}^c = [0,1rangle$$ the convergence $x^n to 0$ is not uniform. It is only uniform on segments $B_{frac1n}^c=left[0,1-frac1nright]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:41












          • $begingroup$
            @Xuchuang On $B_{frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x in B^c$, we have $x in B_{frac1n}^c$ for some $n in mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n to f$ uniformly as the example shows.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:12












          • $begingroup$
            It's sort of like how the function $x mapsto frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] subseteq langle 0, inftyrangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $langle 0,inftyrangle$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:14












          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. $x$ and $epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:02














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Consider a simple example:



          $x^n to 0$ almost uniformly on $[0,1]$. Indeed, for every $varepsilon > 0$ we have $x^n to 0$ uniformly on $B_varepsilon^c = [0,1-varepsilon]$ where $B_varepsilon = [1-varepsilon, 1]$ has measure $varepsilon$.



          However on $$B^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{frac1n}right)^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[1-frac1n,1right]right)^c = {1}^c = [0,1rangle$$ the convergence $x^n to 0$ is not uniform. It is only uniform on segments $B_{frac1n}^c=left[0,1-frac1nright]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Consider a simple example:



          $x^n to 0$ almost uniformly on $[0,1]$. Indeed, for every $varepsilon > 0$ we have $x^n to 0$ uniformly on $B_varepsilon^c = [0,1-varepsilon]$ where $B_varepsilon = [1-varepsilon, 1]$ has measure $varepsilon$.



          However on $$B^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{frac1n}right)^c = left(bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[1-frac1n,1right]right)^c = {1}^c = [0,1rangle$$ the convergence $x^n to 0$ is not uniform. It is only uniform on segments $B_{frac1n}^c=left[0,1-frac1nright]$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:13









          mechanodroidmechanodroid

          27.8k62447




          27.8k62447












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:41












          • $begingroup$
            @Xuchuang On $B_{frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x in B^c$, we have $x in B_{frac1n}^c$ for some $n in mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n to f$ uniformly as the example shows.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:12












          • $begingroup$
            It's sort of like how the function $x mapsto frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] subseteq langle 0, inftyrangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $langle 0,inftyrangle$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:14












          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. $x$ and $epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:02


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:41












          • $begingroup$
            @Xuchuang On $B_{frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x in B^c$, we have $x in B_{frac1n}^c$ for some $n in mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n to f$ uniformly as the example shows.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:12












          • $begingroup$
            It's sort of like how the function $x mapsto frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] subseteq langle 0, inftyrangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $langle 0,inftyrangle$.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Dec 28 '18 at 15:14












          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. $x$ and $epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:02
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference?
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:41






          $begingroup$
          Thanks for the clear example. It helps. As Umberto says in another answer, that is the wrong place. But I am a little confused about why combining all $B_{frac{1}{n}}$ is right for pointwise convergence but not for uniformly convergence. Can you tell me their difference?
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:41














          $begingroup$
          @Xuchuang On $B_{frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x in B^c$, we have $x in B_{frac1n}^c$ for some $n in mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n to f$ uniformly as the example shows.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Dec 28 '18 at 15:12






          $begingroup$
          @Xuchuang On $B_{frac1n}^c$ we have $f_n to f$ uniformly, and in particular pointwise. Then for every $x in B^c$, we have $x in B_{frac1n}^c$ for some $n in mathbb{N}$ so $f_n(x) to f(x)$. Since $x$ was arbitrary, we conclude $f_n to f$ pointwise on $B^c$. We cannot conclude $f_n to f$ uniformly as the example shows.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Dec 28 '18 at 15:12














          $begingroup$
          It's sort of like how the function $x mapsto frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] subseteq langle 0, inftyrangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $langle 0,inftyrangle$.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Dec 28 '18 at 15:14






          $begingroup$
          It's sort of like how the function $x mapsto frac1x$ is uniformly continuous on all segments $[a,b] subseteq langle 0, inftyrangle$ but it is not uniformly continuous on entire $langle 0,inftyrangle$.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Dec 28 '18 at 15:14














          $begingroup$
          It makes sense. $x$ and $epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much.
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 29 '18 at 3:02




          $begingroup$
          It makes sense. $x$ and $epsilon$ are both arbitrary in uniformly convergence. Thank you very much.
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 29 '18 at 3:02











          0












          $begingroup$

          You have that ${f_n}$ converges uniformly on each set $B_{frac 1n}^c$. There is no reason why it should converge uniformly on $displaystyle bigcup_n B_{frac 1n}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $bigcup_n B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:16










          • $begingroup$
            That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $bigcup_n B^c_{frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x in B_{frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) to f(x)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Umberto P.
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:18












          • $begingroup$
            But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:27










          • $begingroup$
            You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You have that ${f_n}$ converges uniformly on each set $B_{frac 1n}^c$. There is no reason why it should converge uniformly on $displaystyle bigcup_n B_{frac 1n}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $bigcup_n B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:16










          • $begingroup$
            That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $bigcup_n B^c_{frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x in B_{frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) to f(x)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Umberto P.
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:18












          • $begingroup$
            But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:27










          • $begingroup$
            You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          You have that ${f_n}$ converges uniformly on each set $B_{frac 1n}^c$. There is no reason why it should converge uniformly on $displaystyle bigcup_n B_{frac 1n}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You have that ${f_n}$ converges uniformly on each set $B_{frac 1n}^c$. There is no reason why it should converge uniformly on $displaystyle bigcup_n B_{frac 1n}^c$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:07









          Umberto P.Umberto P.

          39.4k13166




          39.4k13166












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $bigcup_n B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:16










          • $begingroup$
            That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $bigcup_n B^c_{frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x in B_{frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) to f(x)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Umberto P.
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:18












          • $begingroup$
            But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:27










          • $begingroup$
            You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08




















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $bigcup_n B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them.
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:16










          • $begingroup$
            That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $bigcup_n B^c_{frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x in B_{frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) to f(x)$.
            $endgroup$
            – Umberto P.
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:18












          • $begingroup$
            But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right?
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 28 '18 at 14:27










          • $begingroup$
            You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Xuchuang
            Dec 29 '18 at 3:08


















          $begingroup$
          Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $bigcup_n B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them.
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:16




          $begingroup$
          Thanks, I also think that may be the wrong place. But the original proof also don't show why it should converge pointwise on $bigcup_n B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$. Is there a difference between them.
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:16












          $begingroup$
          That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $bigcup_n B^c_{frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x in B_{frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) to f(x)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Umberto P.
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:18






          $begingroup$
          That isn't to hard to see. If a point $x$ belongs to $bigcup_n B^c_{frac 1n}$, then there exists (at least one) index $n$ with $x in B_{frac 1n}^c$. This means that $f_n(x) to f(x)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Umberto P.
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:18














          $begingroup$
          But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right?
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:27




          $begingroup$
          But the converges pointwise is derived from converges uniformly in the proof. If there exists a single index $n$ for pointwise, it must already have an index $n$ for uniformly to support the derivation. Am I right?
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 28 '18 at 14:27












          $begingroup$
          You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 29 '18 at 3:08






          $begingroup$
          You are right. The wrong place is when unionizing those $B_{frac{1}{n}}^c$, it may change interval's bound (like close to open). Pointwise convergence is OK with that but uniformly convergence is not. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – Xuchuang
          Dec 29 '18 at 3:08




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054911%2falmost-uniformly-convergent-implies-uniformly-convergent-almost-everywhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna