Existence of a “scaling factor” in a inequality












0












$begingroup$


We're given the real numbers $a,b,c$ that satisfy the condition $ale b le c$.



Consider the case where $ble frac{a+b+c}{3}$, then we have $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{a+c}{2} le c$ and similarly $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{b+c}{2} le c$, Then there exist $lambda ,mu in [0,1]$ such that: $$frac{c+a}{2}=lambda c+(1-lambda)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
and $$frac{b+c}{2}=mu c+(1-mu)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
I can "intuitively" see why this should be true, but why do such $lambda$ and $mu$ must exist?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    We're given the real numbers $a,b,c$ that satisfy the condition $ale b le c$.



    Consider the case where $ble frac{a+b+c}{3}$, then we have $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{a+c}{2} le c$ and similarly $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{b+c}{2} le c$, Then there exist $lambda ,mu in [0,1]$ such that: $$frac{c+a}{2}=lambda c+(1-lambda)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
    and $$frac{b+c}{2}=mu c+(1-mu)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
    I can "intuitively" see why this should be true, but why do such $lambda$ and $mu$ must exist?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      We're given the real numbers $a,b,c$ that satisfy the condition $ale b le c$.



      Consider the case where $ble frac{a+b+c}{3}$, then we have $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{a+c}{2} le c$ and similarly $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{b+c}{2} le c$, Then there exist $lambda ,mu in [0,1]$ such that: $$frac{c+a}{2}=lambda c+(1-lambda)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
      and $$frac{b+c}{2}=mu c+(1-mu)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
      I can "intuitively" see why this should be true, but why do such $lambda$ and $mu$ must exist?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      We're given the real numbers $a,b,c$ that satisfy the condition $ale b le c$.



      Consider the case where $ble frac{a+b+c}{3}$, then we have $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{a+c}{2} le c$ and similarly $frac{a+b+c}{3} le frac{b+c}{2} le c$, Then there exist $lambda ,mu in [0,1]$ such that: $$frac{c+a}{2}=lambda c+(1-lambda)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
      and $$frac{b+c}{2}=mu c+(1-mu)left(frac{a+b+c}{3}right)$$
      I can "intuitively" see why this should be true, but why do such $lambda$ and $mu$ must exist?







      elementary-number-theory inequality






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 3 at 13:13









      Spasoje DurovicSpasoje Durovic

      38210




      38210






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          With $x = frac{a+b+c}{3}, y= frac{a+c}{2}, z= c$ your question becomes:




          If $x le y le z$ then there is a $lambda in [0, 1]$ such that
          $$ tag{*}
          y = lambda x + (1 - lambda) z , .
          $$




          If $x = z$ then any $lambda in [0, 1]$ will do, otherwise $(*)$ is equivalent
          to
          $$
          lambda = frac{z-y}{z-x} , ,
          $$

          which satisfies $0 le lambda le 1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060544%2fexistence-of-a-scaling-factor-in-a-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            With $x = frac{a+b+c}{3}, y= frac{a+c}{2}, z= c$ your question becomes:




            If $x le y le z$ then there is a $lambda in [0, 1]$ such that
            $$ tag{*}
            y = lambda x + (1 - lambda) z , .
            $$




            If $x = z$ then any $lambda in [0, 1]$ will do, otherwise $(*)$ is equivalent
            to
            $$
            lambda = frac{z-y}{z-x} , ,
            $$

            which satisfies $0 le lambda le 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              With $x = frac{a+b+c}{3}, y= frac{a+c}{2}, z= c$ your question becomes:




              If $x le y le z$ then there is a $lambda in [0, 1]$ such that
              $$ tag{*}
              y = lambda x + (1 - lambda) z , .
              $$




              If $x = z$ then any $lambda in [0, 1]$ will do, otherwise $(*)$ is equivalent
              to
              $$
              lambda = frac{z-y}{z-x} , ,
              $$

              which satisfies $0 le lambda le 1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                With $x = frac{a+b+c}{3}, y= frac{a+c}{2}, z= c$ your question becomes:




                If $x le y le z$ then there is a $lambda in [0, 1]$ such that
                $$ tag{*}
                y = lambda x + (1 - lambda) z , .
                $$




                If $x = z$ then any $lambda in [0, 1]$ will do, otherwise $(*)$ is equivalent
                to
                $$
                lambda = frac{z-y}{z-x} , ,
                $$

                which satisfies $0 le lambda le 1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                With $x = frac{a+b+c}{3}, y= frac{a+c}{2}, z= c$ your question becomes:




                If $x le y le z$ then there is a $lambda in [0, 1]$ such that
                $$ tag{*}
                y = lambda x + (1 - lambda) z , .
                $$




                If $x = z$ then any $lambda in [0, 1]$ will do, otherwise $(*)$ is equivalent
                to
                $$
                lambda = frac{z-y}{z-x} , ,
                $$

                which satisfies $0 le lambda le 1$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 3 at 13:23









                Martin RMartin R

                29.7k33558




                29.7k33558






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060544%2fexistence-of-a-scaling-factor-in-a-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna