A Bound on the Dimensions of Certain Types of Subspaces
Let $V$ be a $4$-dimensional vector space over the complex numbers, and let $S$ be a subspace of the endomorphisms of $V$ such that the elements of $S$ commute.
If there exists an element in $S$ that has at least two distinct eigenvalues, is the dimension of $S$ at most $4$? If so (or if not), why?
An example of such a subspace of dimension $5$ that does not have an element with at least two distinct eigenvalues is the set of matrices of the form
$$left(begin{matrix}
a & 0 & c & d \
0 & a & e & f \
0 & 0 & a & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & a
end{matrix}right) .$$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
add a comment |
Let $V$ be a $4$-dimensional vector space over the complex numbers, and let $S$ be a subspace of the endomorphisms of $V$ such that the elements of $S$ commute.
If there exists an element in $S$ that has at least two distinct eigenvalues, is the dimension of $S$ at most $4$? If so (or if not), why?
An example of such a subspace of dimension $5$ that does not have an element with at least two distinct eigenvalues is the set of matrices of the form
$$left(begin{matrix}
a & 0 & c & d \
0 & a & e & f \
0 & 0 & a & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & a
end{matrix}right) .$$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
2
I see where this is coming from, but I would guess not. Can't find a counterexample at the moment though.
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 at 1:55
add a comment |
Let $V$ be a $4$-dimensional vector space over the complex numbers, and let $S$ be a subspace of the endomorphisms of $V$ such that the elements of $S$ commute.
If there exists an element in $S$ that has at least two distinct eigenvalues, is the dimension of $S$ at most $4$? If so (or if not), why?
An example of such a subspace of dimension $5$ that does not have an element with at least two distinct eigenvalues is the set of matrices of the form
$$left(begin{matrix}
a & 0 & c & d \
0 & a & e & f \
0 & 0 & a & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & a
end{matrix}right) .$$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
Let $V$ be a $4$-dimensional vector space over the complex numbers, and let $S$ be a subspace of the endomorphisms of $V$ such that the elements of $S$ commute.
If there exists an element in $S$ that has at least two distinct eigenvalues, is the dimension of $S$ at most $4$? If so (or if not), why?
An example of such a subspace of dimension $5$ that does not have an element with at least two distinct eigenvalues is the set of matrices of the form
$$left(begin{matrix}
a & 0 & c & d \
0 & a & e & f \
0 & 0 & a & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & a
end{matrix}right) .$$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
asked Dec 9 at 19:22
LinearGuy
1437
1437
2
I see where this is coming from, but I would guess not. Can't find a counterexample at the moment though.
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 at 1:55
add a comment |
2
I see where this is coming from, but I would guess not. Can't find a counterexample at the moment though.
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 at 1:55
2
2
I see where this is coming from, but I would guess not. Can't find a counterexample at the moment though.
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 at 1:55
I see where this is coming from, but I would guess not. Can't find a counterexample at the moment though.
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 at 1:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
By an old theorem of Schur (see this simple proof in an early paper by the late great Maryam Mirzakhani), the maximal number of linearly independent linear endomorphisms of $mathbb{C}^n$ is $N(n) = lfloor n^2/4 rfloor + 1$. Your example gives the maximum dimension $N(4)=5$. However, if some matrix $A in S$ has two different eigenvalues, then $S$ will be reducible since every matrix in $S$ has these different eigenspaces of $A$ as invariant subspaces. For $n<4$, one always has $N(n) = n$, so the maximum dimension in that case is $4$.
+1 Thanks for the theorem and for this nice application.
– Tengu
Dec 12 at 12:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032832%2fa-bound-on-the-dimensions-of-certain-types-of-subspaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
By an old theorem of Schur (see this simple proof in an early paper by the late great Maryam Mirzakhani), the maximal number of linearly independent linear endomorphisms of $mathbb{C}^n$ is $N(n) = lfloor n^2/4 rfloor + 1$. Your example gives the maximum dimension $N(4)=5$. However, if some matrix $A in S$ has two different eigenvalues, then $S$ will be reducible since every matrix in $S$ has these different eigenspaces of $A$ as invariant subspaces. For $n<4$, one always has $N(n) = n$, so the maximum dimension in that case is $4$.
+1 Thanks for the theorem and for this nice application.
– Tengu
Dec 12 at 12:30
add a comment |
By an old theorem of Schur (see this simple proof in an early paper by the late great Maryam Mirzakhani), the maximal number of linearly independent linear endomorphisms of $mathbb{C}^n$ is $N(n) = lfloor n^2/4 rfloor + 1$. Your example gives the maximum dimension $N(4)=5$. However, if some matrix $A in S$ has two different eigenvalues, then $S$ will be reducible since every matrix in $S$ has these different eigenspaces of $A$ as invariant subspaces. For $n<4$, one always has $N(n) = n$, so the maximum dimension in that case is $4$.
+1 Thanks for the theorem and for this nice application.
– Tengu
Dec 12 at 12:30
add a comment |
By an old theorem of Schur (see this simple proof in an early paper by the late great Maryam Mirzakhani), the maximal number of linearly independent linear endomorphisms of $mathbb{C}^n$ is $N(n) = lfloor n^2/4 rfloor + 1$. Your example gives the maximum dimension $N(4)=5$. However, if some matrix $A in S$ has two different eigenvalues, then $S$ will be reducible since every matrix in $S$ has these different eigenspaces of $A$ as invariant subspaces. For $n<4$, one always has $N(n) = n$, so the maximum dimension in that case is $4$.
By an old theorem of Schur (see this simple proof in an early paper by the late great Maryam Mirzakhani), the maximal number of linearly independent linear endomorphisms of $mathbb{C}^n$ is $N(n) = lfloor n^2/4 rfloor + 1$. Your example gives the maximum dimension $N(4)=5$. However, if some matrix $A in S$ has two different eigenvalues, then $S$ will be reducible since every matrix in $S$ has these different eigenspaces of $A$ as invariant subspaces. For $n<4$, one always has $N(n) = n$, so the maximum dimension in that case is $4$.
answered Dec 10 at 20:53
Lukas Geyer
13.3k1454
13.3k1454
+1 Thanks for the theorem and for this nice application.
– Tengu
Dec 12 at 12:30
add a comment |
+1 Thanks for the theorem and for this nice application.
– Tengu
Dec 12 at 12:30
+1 Thanks for the theorem and for this nice application.
– Tengu
Dec 12 at 12:30
+1 Thanks for the theorem and for this nice application.
– Tengu
Dec 12 at 12:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032832%2fa-bound-on-the-dimensions-of-certain-types-of-subspaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I see where this is coming from, but I would guess not. Can't find a counterexample at the moment though.
– Matt Samuel
Dec 10 at 1:55