Suppose $R$ is a unitary ring and $S$ has no zero divisor. Prove that if $f$ is a homomorphic function from...
$begingroup$
Suppose $R$ is a unitary ring and $S$ has no zero divisor. Prove that if $f$ is a homomorphic function from $R$ to $S$ then $S$ is unitary.
My attempt:
I think if S is going to be unitary, then it's unit element should be the image of the unit element of R.
but no idea for starting...
ring-theory
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Suppose $R$ is a unitary ring and $S$ has no zero divisor. Prove that if $f$ is a homomorphic function from $R$ to $S$ then $S$ is unitary.
My attempt:
I think if S is going to be unitary, then it's unit element should be the image of the unit element of R.
but no idea for starting...
ring-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You have to assume that $f$ is non-trivial. With that in mind, you might not know yet that $f(1) = 1$, but what do you know about $f(1)$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 13:48
$begingroup$
f(1) isnt zero divisor @arthur
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:17
$begingroup$
Sure, because there are none in $S$. You're told that $f$ is a homomorphism. Does that tell you anything else about $f(1)$ than it not being a zero divisor?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@arthur if S be unitary then if we look at s in S which is not zero then, f(1).s=s so [f(1) - 1].s=0, because S has no left divisor and s in nonzero so f(1)=1
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:23
$begingroup$
You can't assume $S$ is unitary (because that's what we're asked to prove), and you can't assume $f(1)cdot s = s$ for arbitrary $s$ because, again, we don't know yet that $f(1) = 1$. What about $(f(1))^2$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:26
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Suppose $R$ is a unitary ring and $S$ has no zero divisor. Prove that if $f$ is a homomorphic function from $R$ to $S$ then $S$ is unitary.
My attempt:
I think if S is going to be unitary, then it's unit element should be the image of the unit element of R.
but no idea for starting...
ring-theory
$endgroup$
Suppose $R$ is a unitary ring and $S$ has no zero divisor. Prove that if $f$ is a homomorphic function from $R$ to $S$ then $S$ is unitary.
My attempt:
I think if S is going to be unitary, then it's unit element should be the image of the unit element of R.
but no idea for starting...
ring-theory
ring-theory
edited Jan 3 at 14:35
rschwieb
107k12102251
107k12102251
asked Jan 3 at 13:36
Arman_jrArman_jr
235
235
1
$begingroup$
You have to assume that $f$ is non-trivial. With that in mind, you might not know yet that $f(1) = 1$, but what do you know about $f(1)$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 13:48
$begingroup$
f(1) isnt zero divisor @arthur
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:17
$begingroup$
Sure, because there are none in $S$. You're told that $f$ is a homomorphism. Does that tell you anything else about $f(1)$ than it not being a zero divisor?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@arthur if S be unitary then if we look at s in S which is not zero then, f(1).s=s so [f(1) - 1].s=0, because S has no left divisor and s in nonzero so f(1)=1
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:23
$begingroup$
You can't assume $S$ is unitary (because that's what we're asked to prove), and you can't assume $f(1)cdot s = s$ for arbitrary $s$ because, again, we don't know yet that $f(1) = 1$. What about $(f(1))^2$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:26
|
show 3 more comments
1
$begingroup$
You have to assume that $f$ is non-trivial. With that in mind, you might not know yet that $f(1) = 1$, but what do you know about $f(1)$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 13:48
$begingroup$
f(1) isnt zero divisor @arthur
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:17
$begingroup$
Sure, because there are none in $S$. You're told that $f$ is a homomorphism. Does that tell you anything else about $f(1)$ than it not being a zero divisor?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@arthur if S be unitary then if we look at s in S which is not zero then, f(1).s=s so [f(1) - 1].s=0, because S has no left divisor and s in nonzero so f(1)=1
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:23
$begingroup$
You can't assume $S$ is unitary (because that's what we're asked to prove), and you can't assume $f(1)cdot s = s$ for arbitrary $s$ because, again, we don't know yet that $f(1) = 1$. What about $(f(1))^2$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:26
1
1
$begingroup$
You have to assume that $f$ is non-trivial. With that in mind, you might not know yet that $f(1) = 1$, but what do you know about $f(1)$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 13:48
$begingroup$
You have to assume that $f$ is non-trivial. With that in mind, you might not know yet that $f(1) = 1$, but what do you know about $f(1)$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 13:48
$begingroup$
f(1) isnt zero divisor @arthur
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:17
$begingroup$
f(1) isnt zero divisor @arthur
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:17
$begingroup$
Sure, because there are none in $S$. You're told that $f$ is a homomorphism. Does that tell you anything else about $f(1)$ than it not being a zero divisor?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:20
$begingroup$
Sure, because there are none in $S$. You're told that $f$ is a homomorphism. Does that tell you anything else about $f(1)$ than it not being a zero divisor?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@arthur if S be unitary then if we look at s in S which is not zero then, f(1).s=s so [f(1) - 1].s=0, because S has no left divisor and s in nonzero so f(1)=1
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:23
$begingroup$
@arthur if S be unitary then if we look at s in S which is not zero then, f(1).s=s so [f(1) - 1].s=0, because S has no left divisor and s in nonzero so f(1)=1
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:23
$begingroup$
You can't assume $S$ is unitary (because that's what we're asked to prove), and you can't assume $f(1)cdot s = s$ for arbitrary $s$ because, again, we don't know yet that $f(1) = 1$. What about $(f(1))^2$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You can't assume $S$ is unitary (because that's what we're asked to prove), and you can't assume $f(1)cdot s = s$ for arbitrary $s$ because, again, we don't know yet that $f(1) = 1$. What about $(f(1))^2$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:26
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $f$ is the zero homomorphism, this is false. Let's suppose otherwise from here on out. It turns out that you don't even need to know $S$ has an identity up front:
its unit element should be the image of the unit element of R
This is a good idea. Here is a hint to make it work: verify $f(1)$ is an idempotent of $S$. That reduces the problem to this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f(1)$ is the unit element of $im(f)$ and we assume $f$ to be non-zero, it follows that $f(1) neq 0$.
Let $a in S$. Then $f(1)^2 a = f(1) a$ and therefore $f(1) a = a$, since $f(1)$ is not a zero divisor. In the same way it follows that $a f(1) = a$, so $f(1) = 1_S$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060560%2fsuppose-r-is-a-unitary-ring-and-s-has-no-zero-divisor-prove-that-if-f-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $f$ is the zero homomorphism, this is false. Let's suppose otherwise from here on out. It turns out that you don't even need to know $S$ has an identity up front:
its unit element should be the image of the unit element of R
This is a good idea. Here is a hint to make it work: verify $f(1)$ is an idempotent of $S$. That reduces the problem to this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f$ is the zero homomorphism, this is false. Let's suppose otherwise from here on out. It turns out that you don't even need to know $S$ has an identity up front:
its unit element should be the image of the unit element of R
This is a good idea. Here is a hint to make it work: verify $f(1)$ is an idempotent of $S$. That reduces the problem to this question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f$ is the zero homomorphism, this is false. Let's suppose otherwise from here on out. It turns out that you don't even need to know $S$ has an identity up front:
its unit element should be the image of the unit element of R
This is a good idea. Here is a hint to make it work: verify $f(1)$ is an idempotent of $S$. That reduces the problem to this question.
$endgroup$
If $f$ is the zero homomorphism, this is false. Let's suppose otherwise from here on out. It turns out that you don't even need to know $S$ has an identity up front:
its unit element should be the image of the unit element of R
This is a good idea. Here is a hint to make it work: verify $f(1)$ is an idempotent of $S$. That reduces the problem to this question.
answered Jan 3 at 14:33
rschwiebrschwieb
107k12102251
107k12102251
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f(1)$ is the unit element of $im(f)$ and we assume $f$ to be non-zero, it follows that $f(1) neq 0$.
Let $a in S$. Then $f(1)^2 a = f(1) a$ and therefore $f(1) a = a$, since $f(1)$ is not a zero divisor. In the same way it follows that $a f(1) = a$, so $f(1) = 1_S$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f(1)$ is the unit element of $im(f)$ and we assume $f$ to be non-zero, it follows that $f(1) neq 0$.
Let $a in S$. Then $f(1)^2 a = f(1) a$ and therefore $f(1) a = a$, since $f(1)$ is not a zero divisor. In the same way it follows that $a f(1) = a$, so $f(1) = 1_S$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $f(1)$ is the unit element of $im(f)$ and we assume $f$ to be non-zero, it follows that $f(1) neq 0$.
Let $a in S$. Then $f(1)^2 a = f(1) a$ and therefore $f(1) a = a$, since $f(1)$ is not a zero divisor. In the same way it follows that $a f(1) = a$, so $f(1) = 1_S$.
$endgroup$
Since $f(1)$ is the unit element of $im(f)$ and we assume $f$ to be non-zero, it follows that $f(1) neq 0$.
Let $a in S$. Then $f(1)^2 a = f(1) a$ and therefore $f(1) a = a$, since $f(1)$ is not a zero divisor. In the same way it follows that $a f(1) = a$, so $f(1) = 1_S$.
answered Jan 4 at 15:42
Daniel W.Daniel W.
413
413
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060560%2fsuppose-r-is-a-unitary-ring-and-s-has-no-zero-divisor-prove-that-if-f-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You have to assume that $f$ is non-trivial. With that in mind, you might not know yet that $f(1) = 1$, but what do you know about $f(1)$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 13:48
$begingroup$
f(1) isnt zero divisor @arthur
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:17
$begingroup$
Sure, because there are none in $S$. You're told that $f$ is a homomorphism. Does that tell you anything else about $f(1)$ than it not being a zero divisor?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:20
$begingroup$
@arthur if S be unitary then if we look at s in S which is not zero then, f(1).s=s so [f(1) - 1].s=0, because S has no left divisor and s in nonzero so f(1)=1
$endgroup$
– Arman_jr
Jan 3 at 14:23
$begingroup$
You can't assume $S$ is unitary (because that's what we're asked to prove), and you can't assume $f(1)cdot s = s$ for arbitrary $s$ because, again, we don't know yet that $f(1) = 1$. What about $(f(1))^2$?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 3 at 14:26