How the dot product of two vectors can be zero?












0












$begingroup$


I am given,



$vec s$$=2hat i+hat j-3hat k$



and



$vec r$$=4hat i+hat j+3hat k$



Now I am asked to calculate the dot product $vec scdotvec r$
But I am getting $0$ as result.



Is this possible? And if possible, then how can the dot product simply become zero?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "When I add the component parts" Why are you adding the component parts? $langle 2,1,-3rangle$ is not the zero vector $langle 0,0,0rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:43






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "Is this possible (to do a dot product with a zero vector)? How can I calculate it?" Regardless of what the entries are, you have $langle a_1,a_2,dots,a_nrangle cdot langle b_1,b_2,dots,b_nrangle = a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + dots + a_nb_n$. Further, if a vector is actually a zero vector (i.e. every entry is zero) you should see quickly that any dot product involving it will equal zero. In your case, you are asked to calculate $langle 2,1,-3rangle cdot langle 4,1,3rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Dot product zero iff vectors orthogonal.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 1 at 17:50
















0












$begingroup$


I am given,



$vec s$$=2hat i+hat j-3hat k$



and



$vec r$$=4hat i+hat j+3hat k$



Now I am asked to calculate the dot product $vec scdotvec r$
But I am getting $0$ as result.



Is this possible? And if possible, then how can the dot product simply become zero?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "When I add the component parts" Why are you adding the component parts? $langle 2,1,-3rangle$ is not the zero vector $langle 0,0,0rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:43






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "Is this possible (to do a dot product with a zero vector)? How can I calculate it?" Regardless of what the entries are, you have $langle a_1,a_2,dots,a_nrangle cdot langle b_1,b_2,dots,b_nrangle = a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + dots + a_nb_n$. Further, if a vector is actually a zero vector (i.e. every entry is zero) you should see quickly that any dot product involving it will equal zero. In your case, you are asked to calculate $langle 2,1,-3rangle cdot langle 4,1,3rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Dot product zero iff vectors orthogonal.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 1 at 17:50














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am given,



$vec s$$=2hat i+hat j-3hat k$



and



$vec r$$=4hat i+hat j+3hat k$



Now I am asked to calculate the dot product $vec scdotvec r$
But I am getting $0$ as result.



Is this possible? And if possible, then how can the dot product simply become zero?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am given,



$vec s$$=2hat i+hat j-3hat k$



and



$vec r$$=4hat i+hat j+3hat k$



Now I am asked to calculate the dot product $vec scdotvec r$
But I am getting $0$ as result.



Is this possible? And if possible, then how can the dot product simply become zero?







vectors






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 1 at 18:23









amWhy

1




1










asked Jan 1 at 17:42









RocketKangarooRocketKangaroo

334




334








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "When I add the component parts" Why are you adding the component parts? $langle 2,1,-3rangle$ is not the zero vector $langle 0,0,0rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:43






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "Is this possible (to do a dot product with a zero vector)? How can I calculate it?" Regardless of what the entries are, you have $langle a_1,a_2,dots,a_nrangle cdot langle b_1,b_2,dots,b_nrangle = a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + dots + a_nb_n$. Further, if a vector is actually a zero vector (i.e. every entry is zero) you should see quickly that any dot product involving it will equal zero. In your case, you are asked to calculate $langle 2,1,-3rangle cdot langle 4,1,3rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Dot product zero iff vectors orthogonal.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 1 at 17:50














  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "When I add the component parts" Why are you adding the component parts? $langle 2,1,-3rangle$ is not the zero vector $langle 0,0,0rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:43






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "Is this possible (to do a dot product with a zero vector)? How can I calculate it?" Regardless of what the entries are, you have $langle a_1,a_2,dots,a_nrangle cdot langle b_1,b_2,dots,b_nrangle = a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + dots + a_nb_n$. Further, if a vector is actually a zero vector (i.e. every entry is zero) you should see quickly that any dot product involving it will equal zero. In your case, you are asked to calculate $langle 2,1,-3rangle cdot langle 4,1,3rangle$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Jan 1 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Dot product zero iff vectors orthogonal.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 1 at 17:50








5




5




$begingroup$
"When I add the component parts" Why are you adding the component parts? $langle 2,1,-3rangle$ is not the zero vector $langle 0,0,0rangle$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Jan 1 at 17:43




$begingroup$
"When I add the component parts" Why are you adding the component parts? $langle 2,1,-3rangle$ is not the zero vector $langle 0,0,0rangle$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Jan 1 at 17:43




3




3




$begingroup$
"Is this possible (to do a dot product with a zero vector)? How can I calculate it?" Regardless of what the entries are, you have $langle a_1,a_2,dots,a_nrangle cdot langle b_1,b_2,dots,b_nrangle = a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + dots + a_nb_n$. Further, if a vector is actually a zero vector (i.e. every entry is zero) you should see quickly that any dot product involving it will equal zero. In your case, you are asked to calculate $langle 2,1,-3rangle cdot langle 4,1,3rangle$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Jan 1 at 17:46






$begingroup$
"Is this possible (to do a dot product with a zero vector)? How can I calculate it?" Regardless of what the entries are, you have $langle a_1,a_2,dots,a_nrangle cdot langle b_1,b_2,dots,b_nrangle = a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + dots + a_nb_n$. Further, if a vector is actually a zero vector (i.e. every entry is zero) you should see quickly that any dot product involving it will equal zero. In your case, you are asked to calculate $langle 2,1,-3rangle cdot langle 4,1,3rangle$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Jan 1 at 17:46














$begingroup$
Dot product zero iff vectors orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 1 at 17:50




$begingroup$
Dot product zero iff vectors orthogonal.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 1 at 17:50










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$$vec s.vec r=(2hat i+hat j-3hat k)cdot(4hat i+hat j+3hat k)=8+1-9=0$$
that means $vec s$ and $vec r$ are perpendicular to each other.the intuition behind this dot product is what amount of $vec s$ is working along with $vec r$?If we would get some positive value,then that would mean that there is some component of s along r as it brings us in a conclusion that s would be inclined to r.But we have a zero here,that means no component of s is working along r.it is only possible when vectors are orthogonal.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that explains the above comments and helps a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – RocketKangaroo
    Jan 1 at 17:55











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058689%2fhow-the-dot-product-of-two-vectors-can-be-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

$$vec s.vec r=(2hat i+hat j-3hat k)cdot(4hat i+hat j+3hat k)=8+1-9=0$$
that means $vec s$ and $vec r$ are perpendicular to each other.the intuition behind this dot product is what amount of $vec s$ is working along with $vec r$?If we would get some positive value,then that would mean that there is some component of s along r as it brings us in a conclusion that s would be inclined to r.But we have a zero here,that means no component of s is working along r.it is only possible when vectors are orthogonal.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that explains the above comments and helps a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – RocketKangaroo
    Jan 1 at 17:55
















1












$begingroup$

$$vec s.vec r=(2hat i+hat j-3hat k)cdot(4hat i+hat j+3hat k)=8+1-9=0$$
that means $vec s$ and $vec r$ are perpendicular to each other.the intuition behind this dot product is what amount of $vec s$ is working along with $vec r$?If we would get some positive value,then that would mean that there is some component of s along r as it brings us in a conclusion that s would be inclined to r.But we have a zero here,that means no component of s is working along r.it is only possible when vectors are orthogonal.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that explains the above comments and helps a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – RocketKangaroo
    Jan 1 at 17:55














1












1








1





$begingroup$

$$vec s.vec r=(2hat i+hat j-3hat k)cdot(4hat i+hat j+3hat k)=8+1-9=0$$
that means $vec s$ and $vec r$ are perpendicular to each other.the intuition behind this dot product is what amount of $vec s$ is working along with $vec r$?If we would get some positive value,then that would mean that there is some component of s along r as it brings us in a conclusion that s would be inclined to r.But we have a zero here,that means no component of s is working along r.it is only possible when vectors are orthogonal.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



$$vec s.vec r=(2hat i+hat j-3hat k)cdot(4hat i+hat j+3hat k)=8+1-9=0$$
that means $vec s$ and $vec r$ are perpendicular to each other.the intuition behind this dot product is what amount of $vec s$ is working along with $vec r$?If we would get some positive value,then that would mean that there is some component of s along r as it brings us in a conclusion that s would be inclined to r.But we have a zero here,that means no component of s is working along r.it is only possible when vectors are orthogonal.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 1 at 18:38









J.G.

28.5k22845




28.5k22845










answered Jan 1 at 17:53









Rakibul Islam PrinceRakibul Islam Prince

988211




988211












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that explains the above comments and helps a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – RocketKangaroo
    Jan 1 at 17:55


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that explains the above comments and helps a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – RocketKangaroo
    Jan 1 at 17:55
















$begingroup$
Thank you, that explains the above comments and helps a lot!
$endgroup$
– RocketKangaroo
Jan 1 at 17:55




$begingroup$
Thank you, that explains the above comments and helps a lot!
$endgroup$
– RocketKangaroo
Jan 1 at 17:55


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058689%2fhow-the-dot-product-of-two-vectors-can-be-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna