What is the relationship between probability densities and mass densities?












0












$begingroup$


In statistics we have probability distribution functions which give us likelihood that some random variable ($X$) will equal a particular value. Assuming this variable is continuous, the distribution satisfies:
$$
int f_{X}(x) dx = 1
$$



and can be used to obtain the moments of the variable
begin{align}
mu'_i = int X^i f_x(x) dx
end{align}



In physics we often work with the mass distribution function which describes the distribution of mass. For example the total mass across a system is given by:
$$
M_{tot} = int g_M(m) dm
$$



and like the statistical PDF we can also derive moments of this mass distribution function by integrating across the distribution function:
$$
mu'_i = int m g_M(m) dm
$$



I am wondering what the connection between these two concepts is and if there is any way to move between them?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    In statistics we have probability distribution functions which give us likelihood that some random variable ($X$) will equal a particular value. Assuming this variable is continuous, the distribution satisfies:
    $$
    int f_{X}(x) dx = 1
    $$



    and can be used to obtain the moments of the variable
    begin{align}
    mu'_i = int X^i f_x(x) dx
    end{align}



    In physics we often work with the mass distribution function which describes the distribution of mass. For example the total mass across a system is given by:
    $$
    M_{tot} = int g_M(m) dm
    $$



    and like the statistical PDF we can also derive moments of this mass distribution function by integrating across the distribution function:
    $$
    mu'_i = int m g_M(m) dm
    $$



    I am wondering what the connection between these two concepts is and if there is any way to move between them?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      In statistics we have probability distribution functions which give us likelihood that some random variable ($X$) will equal a particular value. Assuming this variable is continuous, the distribution satisfies:
      $$
      int f_{X}(x) dx = 1
      $$



      and can be used to obtain the moments of the variable
      begin{align}
      mu'_i = int X^i f_x(x) dx
      end{align}



      In physics we often work with the mass distribution function which describes the distribution of mass. For example the total mass across a system is given by:
      $$
      M_{tot} = int g_M(m) dm
      $$



      and like the statistical PDF we can also derive moments of this mass distribution function by integrating across the distribution function:
      $$
      mu'_i = int m g_M(m) dm
      $$



      I am wondering what the connection between these two concepts is and if there is any way to move between them?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      In statistics we have probability distribution functions which give us likelihood that some random variable ($X$) will equal a particular value. Assuming this variable is continuous, the distribution satisfies:
      $$
      int f_{X}(x) dx = 1
      $$



      and can be used to obtain the moments of the variable
      begin{align}
      mu'_i = int X^i f_x(x) dx
      end{align}



      In physics we often work with the mass distribution function which describes the distribution of mass. For example the total mass across a system is given by:
      $$
      M_{tot} = int g_M(m) dm
      $$



      and like the statistical PDF we can also derive moments of this mass distribution function by integrating across the distribution function:
      $$
      mu'_i = int m g_M(m) dm
      $$



      I am wondering what the connection between these two concepts is and if there is any way to move between them?







      statistics probability-distributions physics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 9 at 17:57









      TomTom

      436




      436






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          As a very general concept density is the ratio of "stuff" to the "space" in which that "stuff" exists. Mass density is the ratio between mass and volume, population density is the ratio between a population and the area it inhabits, and probability density is the ratio between the probability of an event and the space in which that event occurs.



          In the most elementary case, density is uniform, and equal to the total amount of "stuff" divided by the total amount of "space". If the density is not uniform, then you have to use calculus (which gives the same ratio, only in terms of variable quantities). When you integrate the density function, you are finding the total amount of "stuff" (this is equivalent to cancelling out the denominator of the ratio in the elementary case).



          You can do this with anything that can be described as "rate-like"; velocity is like the "displacement density" in time, concentration is the "molecular density" in some volume of a substance, etc.



          Besides that, there isn't really much of a direct connection. You could make mass density and probability density equivalent by assigning a mass to every event, or by creating a function which gives the probability that the mass at a given point will be equal to some quantity... but I don't see any reason to do that.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067765%2fwhat-is-the-relationship-between-probability-densities-and-mass-densities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            As a very general concept density is the ratio of "stuff" to the "space" in which that "stuff" exists. Mass density is the ratio between mass and volume, population density is the ratio between a population and the area it inhabits, and probability density is the ratio between the probability of an event and the space in which that event occurs.



            In the most elementary case, density is uniform, and equal to the total amount of "stuff" divided by the total amount of "space". If the density is not uniform, then you have to use calculus (which gives the same ratio, only in terms of variable quantities). When you integrate the density function, you are finding the total amount of "stuff" (this is equivalent to cancelling out the denominator of the ratio in the elementary case).



            You can do this with anything that can be described as "rate-like"; velocity is like the "displacement density" in time, concentration is the "molecular density" in some volume of a substance, etc.



            Besides that, there isn't really much of a direct connection. You could make mass density and probability density equivalent by assigning a mass to every event, or by creating a function which gives the probability that the mass at a given point will be equal to some quantity... but I don't see any reason to do that.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              As a very general concept density is the ratio of "stuff" to the "space" in which that "stuff" exists. Mass density is the ratio between mass and volume, population density is the ratio between a population and the area it inhabits, and probability density is the ratio between the probability of an event and the space in which that event occurs.



              In the most elementary case, density is uniform, and equal to the total amount of "stuff" divided by the total amount of "space". If the density is not uniform, then you have to use calculus (which gives the same ratio, only in terms of variable quantities). When you integrate the density function, you are finding the total amount of "stuff" (this is equivalent to cancelling out the denominator of the ratio in the elementary case).



              You can do this with anything that can be described as "rate-like"; velocity is like the "displacement density" in time, concentration is the "molecular density" in some volume of a substance, etc.



              Besides that, there isn't really much of a direct connection. You could make mass density and probability density equivalent by assigning a mass to every event, or by creating a function which gives the probability that the mass at a given point will be equal to some quantity... but I don't see any reason to do that.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                As a very general concept density is the ratio of "stuff" to the "space" in which that "stuff" exists. Mass density is the ratio between mass and volume, population density is the ratio between a population and the area it inhabits, and probability density is the ratio between the probability of an event and the space in which that event occurs.



                In the most elementary case, density is uniform, and equal to the total amount of "stuff" divided by the total amount of "space". If the density is not uniform, then you have to use calculus (which gives the same ratio, only in terms of variable quantities). When you integrate the density function, you are finding the total amount of "stuff" (this is equivalent to cancelling out the denominator of the ratio in the elementary case).



                You can do this with anything that can be described as "rate-like"; velocity is like the "displacement density" in time, concentration is the "molecular density" in some volume of a substance, etc.



                Besides that, there isn't really much of a direct connection. You could make mass density and probability density equivalent by assigning a mass to every event, or by creating a function which gives the probability that the mass at a given point will be equal to some quantity... but I don't see any reason to do that.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                As a very general concept density is the ratio of "stuff" to the "space" in which that "stuff" exists. Mass density is the ratio between mass and volume, population density is the ratio between a population and the area it inhabits, and probability density is the ratio between the probability of an event and the space in which that event occurs.



                In the most elementary case, density is uniform, and equal to the total amount of "stuff" divided by the total amount of "space". If the density is not uniform, then you have to use calculus (which gives the same ratio, only in terms of variable quantities). When you integrate the density function, you are finding the total amount of "stuff" (this is equivalent to cancelling out the denominator of the ratio in the elementary case).



                You can do this with anything that can be described as "rate-like"; velocity is like the "displacement density" in time, concentration is the "molecular density" in some volume of a substance, etc.



                Besides that, there isn't really much of a direct connection. You could make mass density and probability density equivalent by assigning a mass to every event, or by creating a function which gives the probability that the mass at a given point will be equal to some quantity... but I don't see any reason to do that.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 9 at 18:32









                R. BurtonR. Burton

                732110




                732110






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067765%2fwhat-is-the-relationship-between-probability-densities-and-mass-densities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Måne

                    Storängen

                    VLT Carioca