Find subsequences with specific properties
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$
I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.
Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?
sequences-and-series analysis supremum-and-infimum
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$
I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.
Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?
sequences-and-series analysis supremum-and-infimum
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$
I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.
Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?
sequences-and-series analysis supremum-and-infimum
Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence such that $inf_{ell} a_{ell}<a_n< sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ for each $n=1,2, dots$
I want to show that there are subsequences $(a_{k_n})$ increasing and $(a_{m_n})$ decreasing such that $a_{k_n} to sup_{ell} a_{ell}$ and $a_{m_n} to inf_{ell} a_{ell}$.
Could you give me a hint how we could find the desired subsequences?
sequences-and-series analysis supremum-and-infimum
sequences-and-series analysis supremum-and-infimum
asked Dec 1 at 20:58
Evinda
670413
670413
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)
EDIT
In response to the OP's comment.
First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.
I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
– Evinda
Dec 2 at 9:26
@Evinda I added some details.
– saulspatz
Dec 2 at 13:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)
EDIT
In response to the OP's comment.
First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.
I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
– Evinda
Dec 2 at 9:26
@Evinda I added some details.
– saulspatz
Dec 2 at 13:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)
EDIT
In response to the OP's comment.
First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.
I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
– Evinda
Dec 2 at 9:26
@Evinda I added some details.
– saulspatz
Dec 2 at 13:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Hint
Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)
EDIT
In response to the OP's comment.
First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.
Hint
Suppose the infimum is $0$ and the supremum is $1$. Choose $a_{k_1}=a_1$ as the fist member of the decreasing sequence. Then since $a_1>0$ by hypothesis, there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2>k_1$ and $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$ and a $k_3>k_2$ and $0<a_{k_3}<a_{k_2}/2$ and so on. (Make sure you see why we can choose $k_{m+1}>k_m.$)
EDIT
In response to the OP's comment.
First of all, since $0 = inf{a_n}$ there are $a_k$ arbitrarily close to $0$ so we can certainly find $k_2$ such that $0<a_{k_2}<a_{k_1}/2$. The only question is whether we can find such a $k_2>k_1$. Suppose not. Then $K={k|a_k<a_{k_1}}$ is finite, and then $inf{a_k}=min_{kin K}a_k>0,$ contradiction.
edited Dec 2 at 13:26
answered Dec 1 at 21:16
saulspatz
13.4k21327
13.4k21327
I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
– Evinda
Dec 2 at 9:26
@Evinda I added some details.
– saulspatz
Dec 2 at 13:26
add a comment |
I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
– Evinda
Dec 2 at 9:26
@Evinda I added some details.
– saulspatz
Dec 2 at 13:26
I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
– Evinda
Dec 2 at 9:26
I haven't understood why there is an element $a_{k_2}$ with $k_2> k_1$ and $0< a_{k_2}< frac{a_{k_1}}{2}$ and so on. Could you explain it further to me?
– Evinda
Dec 2 at 9:26
@Evinda I added some details.
– saulspatz
Dec 2 at 13:26
@Evinda I added some details.
– saulspatz
Dec 2 at 13:26
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021823%2ffind-subsequences-with-specific-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown