List of proofs of Weierstrass Approximation Theorem











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :



If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that



$|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
for all $x in [a,b]$.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :



    If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that



    $|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
    for all $x in [a,b]$.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :



      If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that



      $|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
      for all $x in [a,b]$.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :



      If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that



      $|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
      for all $x in [a,b]$.







      analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 1 at 20:02









      mike moke

      306




      306






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.




          Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
          that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
          $$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$




          A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.




          Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
          $$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
          Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.




          A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
            – mike moke
            Dec 2 at 6:22











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021760%2flist-of-proofs-of-weierstrass-approximation-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.




          Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
          that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
          $$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$




          A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.




          Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
          $$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
          Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.




          A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
            – mike moke
            Dec 2 at 6:22















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.




          Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
          that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
          $$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$




          A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.




          Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
          $$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
          Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.




          A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
            – mike moke
            Dec 2 at 6:22













          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.




          Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
          that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
          $$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$




          A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.




          Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
          $$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
          Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.




          A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.




          Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
          that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
          $$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$




          A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.




          Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
          $$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
          Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.




          A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 1 at 20:38









          Sandeep Silwal

          5,52011236




          5,52011236












          • I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
            – mike moke
            Dec 2 at 6:22


















          • I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
            – mike moke
            Dec 2 at 6:22
















          I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
          – mike moke
          Dec 2 at 6:22




          I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
          – mike moke
          Dec 2 at 6:22


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021760%2flist-of-proofs-of-weierstrass-approximation-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna