List of proofs of Weierstrass Approximation Theorem
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :
If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that
$|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
for all $x in [a,b]$.
analysis
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :
If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that
$|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
for all $x in [a,b]$.
analysis
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :
If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that
$|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
for all $x in [a,b]$.
analysis
I am looking for different proofs of the theorem :
If $f$ is a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and if any $epsilon>0$ is given, then there exists a polynomial $p$ on $[a,b]$ such that
$|f(x)-P(x)|< epsilon $
for all $x in [a,b]$.
analysis
analysis
asked Dec 1 at 20:02
mike moke
306
306
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.
Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
$$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$
A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.
Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
$$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.
A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.
I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
– mike moke
Dec 2 at 6:22
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.
Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
$$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$
A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.
Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
$$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.
A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.
I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
– mike moke
Dec 2 at 6:22
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.
Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
$$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$
A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.
Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
$$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.
A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.
I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
– mike moke
Dec 2 at 6:22
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.
Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
$$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$
A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.
Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
$$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.
A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.
My favorite proof uses probability! Here are two exercises that will help you prove it.
Step 1: Let $Z_n$ be a sequence of random variables and $c$ a constant such that for each $epsilon > 0$ it holds
that $$mathbb{P}[|Z_n −c| > epsilon] rightarrow 0, text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$ Show that for any bounded continuous function $g,$
$$mathbb{E}[g(Z_n)] rightarrow g(c) text{as } n rightarrow 0.$$
A hint for Step $1$ is to use the fact that $g$ is bounded and the definition of continuity.
Step 2: Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function in $[0,1]$. Consider the $textit{Bernstein Polynomials,}$ defined by
$$ B_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^n f left( frac{k}n right) dbinom{n}k x^k (1-x)^{n-k}. $$
Show that $B_n rightarrow f$ uniformly.
A hint for Step $2$ is to use the weak law of large numbers.
answered Dec 1 at 20:38
Sandeep Silwal
5,52011236
5,52011236
I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
– mike moke
Dec 2 at 6:22
add a comment |
I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
– mike moke
Dec 2 at 6:22
I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
– mike moke
Dec 2 at 6:22
I have seen the proof which uses only Bernstein Polynomials . I am looking for a proof that uses Lagrange Interpolating Polynomial . Thanks for your post , I will try to prove it.
– mike moke
Dec 2 at 6:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021760%2flist-of-proofs-of-weierstrass-approximation-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown